Association between floral traits and rewards in Erysimum mediohispanicum (Brassicaceae)

Annals of Botany

Volumn 101, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1413-1420

  Gómez, José M ^a   Bosch, Jordi ^b   Perfectti, Francisco ^a   Fernandez J D ^a   Abdelaziz, Mohamed ^a   Camacho, J P M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Erysimum; Floral traits; Nectar; Pollen; Pollinator visitation rate; Reward

Indexed keywords

BEE; BUTTERFLY; FLORAL TRAIT; FLOWER VISITING; HERB; MORPHOLOGY; NECTAR; PHENOTYPE; POLLINATOR;

ARTICLE; ERYSIMUM; FLOWER; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLEN; POLLINATION;

ERYSIMUM; FLOWERS; POLLEN; POLLINATION;

APOIDEA; BRASSICACEAE; ERYSIMUM; ERYSIMUM MEDIOHISPANICUM; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 44649128528     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcn053     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Armbruster WS, Antonsen L, Pelabon C. 2005. Phenotypic selection on Delachampia blossoms: honest signaling affects pollination success. Ecology 86: 3323-3333.
2. Ashman TL, Stanton M. 1991. Seasonal variation in pollination dynamics of sexually dimorphic Sidalcea oregana spp. spicata (Malvaceae). Ecology 72: 993-1003.
3. Biernaskie JM, Cartar RV. 2004. Variation in rate of nectar production depends on floral display size: a pollinator manipulation hypothesis. Functional Ecology 18: 125-129.
4. Blarer A, Keasar T, Shmida A. 2002. Possible mechanisms for the formation of flower size preferences by foraging bumblebees. Ethology 108: 341-351.
5. Boose DL. 1997. Sources of variation in floral nectar production rate in Epilobium canum (Onagraceae): implications for natural selection. Oecologia 110: 493-500.
6. Branquart E, Hemptinne JL. 2000. Selectivity in the exploitation of floral resources by hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphinae). Ecography 23: 732-742.
7. Campbell DR. 1991. Effects of floral traits on sequential components of fitness in Ipomopsis aggregata. American Naturalist 137: 713-737.
8. Campbell DR, Waser NM, Price MV, Lynch EA, Mitchell RJ. 1991. Components of phenotypic selection: pollen export and flower corolla width in Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 45: 1458-1467.
9. Cohen D, Shmida A. 1993. The evolution of flower display and reward. Evolutionary Biology 27: 197-243.
10. Colley MR, Luna JM. 2000. Relative attractiveness of potential insectary plants to aphidophagous hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae). Environmental Entomology 29: 1054-1059.
11. Corbet SA. 2000. Butterfly nectaring flowers: butterfly morphology and flower form. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 96: 289-298.
12. Cresswell JE. 1999. The influence of nectar and pollen availability on pollen transfer by individual flowers of oil-seed rape (Brassica napus) when pollinated by bumblebees (Bombus lapidarius). Journal of Ecology 87: 670-677.
13. Cunningham JP, West SA, Wright DJ. 1998. Learning in the nectar foraging behaviour of Helicoverpa armigera. Ecological Entomology 23: 363-369.
14. Dafni A. 1991. Advertisement, flower longevity, reward and nectar production in Labiatae. Acta Horticulturae 288: 340-346.
15. Faegri K, van der Pijl L. 1979. The principles of pollination ecology, 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
16. Fenster CB, Armbruster WS, Wilson P, Dudash MR, Thomson JD. 2004. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Reviews of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics 35: 375-403.
17. Fenster CB, Cheely G, Dudash MR, Reynolds RJ. 2006. Nectar reward and advertisement in hummingbird-pollinated Silene virginica (Caryophyllaceae). American Journal of Botany 93: 1800-1807.
18. von Frisch K. 1965. Tanzsprache un orientierung der Bienen. Berlin: Springer.
19. Galen C, Plowright RC. 1985. The effects of nectar level and flower development on pollen carry-over in inflorescences of fireweed (Epilobium angustifolium). Canadian Journal of Botany 63: 488-491.
20. Galen C, Zimmer KA, Newport ME. 1987. Pollination in floral scent morphs of Polemonium viscosum: a mechanism for disruptive selection on flower size. Evolution 41: 599-606.
21. Gilbert FS. 1981. Foraging ecology of hoverflies: morphology of the mouthparts in relation to feeding on nectar and pollen in some common urban species. Ecological Entomology 6: 245-262.
22. Gómez JM. 2003. Herbivory reduces the strength of pollinator-mediated selection in the Mediterranean herb Erysimum mediohispanicum: consequences for plant specialization. American Naturalist 162: 242-256.
23. Gómez JM. 2005. Non-additivity effect of herbivores and pollinators on Erysimum mediohispanicum (Cruciferae) fitness. Oecologia 143: 412-418.
24. Gómez JM. 2008. Sequential conflicting selection due to multispecific interactions triggers evolutionary trade-offs in a monocarpic herb. Evolution 62: 668-679.
25. Gómez JM, Zamora R. 2000. Spatial variation in the selective scenarios of Hormathophylla spinosa (Cruciferae). American Naturalist 155: 657-668.
26. Gómez JM, Perfectti F, Camacho JPM. 2006. Natural selection on Erysimum mediohispanicum flower shape: insights into the evolution of zygomorphy. American Naturalist 168: 531-545.
27. Gómez JM, Bosch J, Perfectti P, Fernandez JD, Abdelaziz M. 2007. Pollinator diversity affects plant reproduction and recruitment: the tradeoffs of generalization. Oecologia 153: 597-605.
28. Goulson D. 1999. Foraging strategies of insects for gathering nectar and pollen, and implications for plant ecology and evolution. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 2: 185-209.
29. Grindeland JM, Sletwold N, Ims RA. 2005. Effects of floral display size and plant density on pollinator visitation in a natural population of Digitalis purpurea. Functional Ecology 19: 383-390.
30. Hammer M, Menzel R. 1995. Learning and memory in the honeybee. Journal of Neuroscience 15: 1617-1630.
31. Harder LD, Barrett SCH. 2006. Ecology and evolution of flowers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Harder LD, Cruzan MB. 1990. An evaluation of the physiological and evolutionary influences of inflorescence size and flower depth on nectar production. Functional Ecology 4: 559-572.
33. Heinrich B. 1979. Resource heterogeneity and patterns of movement in foraging bumblebees. Oecologia 40: 235-245.
34. Hodges SA. 1995. Influence of nectar production on hawkmoth behavior, self pollination, and seed production in Mirabilis multiflora (Nyctaginaceae). American Journal of Botany 82: 197-204.
35. Inouye DW. 1980. The effects of proboscis and corolla tube lengths on patterns and rates of flower visitation by bumblebees. Oecologia 45: 197-201.
36. Internicola AI, Page PA, Bernasconi G, Gigord LDB. 2007. Competition for pollinator visitation between deceptive and rewarding artificial inflorescences: an experimental test of the effects of floral colour similarity and spatial mingling. Functional Ecology 21: 864-872.
37. Ishii HS, Harder LD. 2006. The size of individual Delphinium flowers and the opportunity for geitonogamous pollination. Functional Ecology 20: 1115-1123.
38. Kaczorowski RL, Gardener MC, Holtsford TP. 2005. Nectar traits in Nicotiana section alatae (Solanaceae) in relation to floral traits, pollinators, and mating system. American Journal of Botany 92: 1270-1283.
39. Kadmon R, Shmida A. 1992. Departure rules used by bees foraging for nectar: a field test. Evolutionary Ecology 6: 142-151.
40. Kearns CA, Inouye DW. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.
41. Klinkhamer PGL, Van der Lugt PP. 2004. Pollinator service only depends on nectar production rates in sparse populations. Oecologia 140: 491-494.
42. Lloyd DG, Barrett SCH. 1986. Floral biology, studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. New York: Academic Press.
43. Makino TT, Sakai S. 2007. Experience changes pollinator responses to floral display size: from size-based to reward-based foraging. Functional Ecology 21: 854-863.
44. Martin NH. 2004. Flower size preferences of the honeybee (Apis mellifera) foraging on Mimulus guttatus. (Scrophulariaceae). Evolutioanry Ecology Research 6: 777-782.
45. Mitchell RJ. 1992. Adaptive significance of Ipomopsis aggregata nectar production: pollination success of single flowers. Ecology 73: 633-638.
46. Mitchell RJ. 1993. Adaptive significance of Ipomopsis aggregata nectar production: observation and experiment in the field. Evolution 47: 25-35.
47. Mitchell RJ, Waser NM. 1992. Adaptive significance of Ipomopsis aggregata nectar production: pollination success of single flowers. Ecology 73: 633-638.
48. Mitchell RJ, Karron JD, Holmquist KG, Bell JM. 2004. The influence of Mimulus ringens floral display size on pollinator visitation patterns. Functional Ecology 18: 116-124.
49. Navarro L. 1996. Bioloǵa reproductiva y conservación de dos endemismos del noroccidente Ibérico: Petrocoptis grandiflora Rothm y Petrocoptis viscosa Rothm (Caryophyllaceae). PhD Thesis, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
50. Neff JL, Simpson BB. 1990. The roles of phenology and reward structure in the pollination biology of wild sunflower (Helianthus annuus L. Asteraceae). Israel Journal of Botany 39: 197-216.
51. Ohashi K, Yahara T. 2001. Behavioral responses of pollinators to variation in floral display size and their influences on the evolution of floral traits. In: Chittka L, Thomson JD., eds. Cognitive ecology of pollination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Ornela JF, Ordano M, de Nova AJ, Quintero ME, Garland Jr, T. 2007. Phylogenetic analysis of interspecific variation in nectar of hummingbird-visited plants. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 1904-1917.
53. Pleasant JM. 1983. Nectar production patterns in Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 70: 1468-1475.
54. Pleasants JM, Zimmerman M. 1979. Patchiness in the dispersion of nectar resources: evidence for hot and cold spots. Oecologia 41: 283-288.
55. Plepys D, Ibarra F, Fracnke W, Löfstedt C. 2002. Odour-mediated nectar foraging in the silver Y moth Autographa gamma (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): behavioural and electrophysiological responses to floral volatiles. Oikos 99: 75-82.
56. Plowright RC. 1981. Nectar production in the boreal forest lily Clintonia borealis. Canadian Journal of Botany 59: 156-160.
57. Pyke GH. 1978. Optimal foraging: movement patterns of bumblebees between inflorescences. Theoretical Population Biology 13: 72-98.
58. Rawling JO, Pantula SG, Dickey DA. 1998. Applied regression analysis, a research tool. New York: Springer.
59. Real LA, Rathcke BJ 1991. Individual variation in nectar production and its effect on fitness in Kalmia latifolia. Ecology 72: 149-155.
60. Schaefer HM, Schaefer V, Levey DJ. 2004. How plant-animal interactions signal new insights in communication. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 1-8.
61. Scheiner R, Erber J, Page Jr, RE. 1999. Tactile learning and the individual evaluation of the reward in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Journal of Comparative Physiology A 185: 1-10.
62. Simpson BB, Neff JL. 1983. Evolution and diversity of floral rewards. In: Jones CE, Little RJ., eds. Handbook of experimental pollination biology, New York: Van Nostrand Reinold Co., 142-159.
63. Smithson A, Macnair MR. 1997. Negative frequency-dependent selection by pollinators on artificial flowers without rewards. Evolution 51: 715-723.
64. Stanton M, Young HJ. 1994. Selection for floral character associations in wild radish, Raphanus sativus L. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 7: 271-285.
65. Stanton ML, Preston RE. 1988. Ecological consequences and phenotypic correlates of flower size variation in wild radish, Raphanus sativus L. (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 75: 528-539.
66. Szucsich NU, Krenn HW. 2002. Flies and concealed nectar sources: morphological innovations in the proboscis of Bombyliidae (Diptera). Acta Zoologica 83: 183-192.
67. Thomson JD, Plowright RC. 1980. Pollen carryover, nectar rewards, and pollinator behavior with special reference to Diervilla lonicera. Oecologia 46: 68-74.
68. Thomson JD, McKenna MA, Cruzan MB. 1989. Temporal patterns of nectar and pollen production in Aralia hispida: implications for reproductive success. Ecology 70: 1061-1068.
69. Waddington KD. 2001. Subjective evaluation and choice behavior by nectar- and pollen-collecting bees. In: Chittka L, Thomson JD, eds. Cognitive ecology of pollination: animal behavior and floral evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 41-60.
70. Wilson P, Castellanos MC, Hogues JN, Thomson JD, Armbruster WS. 2004. A multivariate search for pollination syndrome among penstemons. Oikos 104: 345-361.
71. Worley AC, Barrett SCH. 2000. Evolution of floral display in Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae): direct and correlated responses to selection on flower size and number. Evolution. 54: 1533-1545.
72. Young HJ, Stanton ML. 1990. Influences of floral variation on pollen removal and seed production in wild radish. Ecology 71: 536-547.
73. Zimmerman M. 1983. Plant reproduction and optimal foraging: experimental nectar manipulations in Delphinium nelsonii. Oikos 41: 57-63.
74. Zimmerman M, Pyke GH. 1986. Reproduction in Polemonium: patterns and implications of floral nectar production and standing crops. American Journal of Botany 73: 1405-1415.