The consequences of direct versus indirect species interactions to selection on traits: Pollination and nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata

American Naturalist

Volumn 167, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 315-328

  Irwin, Rebecca E ^a,b  

^a Dartmouth College   (United States)

^b ROCKY MOUNTAIN BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Indirect effects; Ipomopsis aggregata; Natural selection; Nectar robbing; Path analysis; Pollen limitation

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; NATURAL SELECTION; NECTAR; POLLEN LIMITATION; POLLINATION;

ANGIOSPERM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIRD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; FLOWER; GENETIC SELECTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT SEED; POLLEN; REPRODUCTION;

ANGIOSPERMS; ANIMALS; BEES; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; BIRDS; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; FLOWERS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POLLEN; REPRODUCTION; SEEDS; SELECTION (GENETICS); SELECTION, GENETIC;

ANIMALIA; IPOMOPSIS AGGREGATA;

EID: 33645507780     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/499377     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Abrams, P. A., B. A. Menge, G. G. Mittelbach, D. A. Spiller, and P. Yodzis. 1996. The role of indirect effects in food webs. Pages 371-395 in G. A. Polis and K. O. Winemiller, eds. Food webs: integration of patterns and dynamics. Chapman & Hall, New York.
2. Adler, L. S., R. Karban, and S. Y. Strauss. 2001. Direct and indirect effects of alkaloids on plant fitness via herbivory and pollination. Ecology 82:2032-2044.
3. Althoff, D., K. A. Segraves, and O. Pellmyr. 2005. Community context of an obligate mutualism: pollinator and florivore effects on Yucca filamentosa. Ecology 86:905-913.
4. Ashman, T. L., T. M. Knight, J. A. Steets, P. Amarasekare, M. Burd, D. R. Campbell, M. R. Dudash, et al. 2004. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology 85:2408-2421.
5. Brody, A. K. 1997. Effects of pollinators, herbivores, and seed predators on flowering phenology. Ecology 78:1624-1631.
6. Brody, A. K., and R. J. Mitchell. 1997. Effects of experimental manipulation of inflorescence size on pollination and pre-dispersal seed predation in the hummingbird-pollinated plant Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia (Berlin) 110:86-93.
7. Campbell, D. R. 1989. Inflorescence size: test of the male function hypothesis. American Journal of Botany 76:730-738.
8. _. 1991a. Comparing pollen dispersal and gene flow in a natural population. Evolution 45:1965-1968.
9. _. 1991b. Effects of floral traits on sequential components of fitness in Ipomopsis aggregata. American Naturalist 137:713-737.
10. _. 1996. Evolution of floral traits in a hermaphroditic plant: field measurements of heritabilities and genetic correlations. Evolution 50:1442-1453.
11. Campbell, D. R., and K. J. Halama. 1993. Resource and pollen limitations to lifetime seed production in a natural plant population. Ecology 74:1043-1051.
12. Campbell, D. R., N. M. Waser, M. V. Price, E. A. Lynch, and R. J. Mitchell. 1991. Components of phenotypic selection: pollen export and flower corolla width in Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 45:1458-1467.
13. Campbell, D. R., N. M. Waser, and M. V. Price. 1996. Mechanisms of hummingbird-mediated selection for flower width in Ipomopsis aggregata. Ecology 77:1463-1472.
14. Carpenter, S. R., and J. F. Kitchell. 1993. The trophic cascade in lakes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
15. Conner, J. K. 1996. Understanding natural selection: an approach integrating selection gradients, multiplicative fitness components, and path analysis. Ethology Ecology & Evolution 8:387-397.
16. Cousyn, C., L. de Meester, J. K. Colbourne, L. Brendonck, D. Verschuren, and F. Volckaert. 2001. Rapid, local adaptation of zooplankton behavior to changes in predation pressure in the absence of neutral genetic changes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 98:6256-6260.
17. Ehrlén, J. 1997. Risk of grazing and flower number in a perennial plant. Oikos 80:428-434.
18. Engel, E. C., and R. E. Irwin. 2003. Linking pollinator-visitation rate and pollen receipt. American Journal of Botany 90:1612-1618.
19. Galen, C. 1983. The effects of nectar-thieving ants on seedset in floral scent morphs of Polemonium viscosum. Oikos 41:245-249.
20. _. 1996. Rates of floral evolution: adaptation to bumblebee pollination in an alpine wildflower, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution 50:120-125.
21. _. 1999. Flowers and enemies: predation by nectar-thieving ants in relation to variation in floral form of an alpine wildflower, Polemonium viscosum. Oikos 85:426-434.
22. Galen, C., and J. Cuba. 2001. Down the tube: pollinators, predators, and the evolution of flower shape in the alpine skypilot, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution 55:1963-1971.
23. Gómez, J. M. 2003. Herbivory reduces the strength of pollinator-mediated selection in the Mediterranean herb Erysimum mediohispanicum: consequences for plant specialization. American Naturalist 162:242-256.
24. Gómez, J. M., and R. Zamora. 2000. Spatial variation in the selective scenarios of Hormathophylla spinosa (Cruciferae). American Naturalist 155:657-668.
25. Hainsworth, F. R., L. L. Wolf, and T. Mercier. 1985. Pollen limitation in a monocarpic species, Ipomopsis aggregata. Journal of Ecology 73:263-270.
26. Hamback, P. A. 2001. Direct and indirect effects of herbivory: feeding by spittlebugs affects pollinator visitation rates and seedset of Rudbeckia hirta. Ecoscience 8:45-50.
27. Herrera, C. M. 2000. Measuring the effects of pollinators and herbivores: evidence for non-additivity in a perennial herb. Ecology 81:2170-2176.
28. Inouye, B., and J. R. Stinchcombe. 2001. Relationships between ecological interaction modifications and diffuse coevolution: similarities, differences, and causal links. Oikos 95:353-360.
29. Inouye, D. W. 1980. The terminology of floral larceny. Ecology 61:1251-1253.
30. Irwin, R. E. 2000. Hummingbird avoidance of nectar-robbed plants: spatial location or visual cues. Oikos 91:499-506.
31. Irwin, R. E., and A. K. Brody. 1998. Nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata: effects on pollinator behavior and plant fitness. Oecologia (Berlin) 116:519-527.
32. _. 1999. Nectar-robbing bumble bees reduced the fitness of Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). Ecology 80:1703-1712.
33. _. 2000. Consequences of nectar robbing for realized male function in a hummingbird-pollinated plant. Ecology 81:2637-2643.
34. Irwin, R. E., and J. E. Maloof. 2002. Variation in nectar robbing over time, space, and species. Oecologia (Berlin) 133:525-533.
35. Irwin, R. E., A. K. Brody, and N. M. Waser. 2001. The impact of floral larceny on individuals, populations, and communities. Oecologia (Berlin) 129:161-168.
36. Irwin, R. E., L. S. Adler, and A. K. Brody. 2004. The dual role of floral traits: pollinator attraction and plant defense. Ecology 85:1503-1511.
37. Johnson, M. T. J., and A. A. Agrawal. 2005. Plant genotype and environment interact to shape a diverse arthropod community on evening primrose (Oenothera biennis). Ecology 86:874-885.
38. Juenger, T., and J. Bergelson. 1998. Pairwise versus diffuse natural selection and the multiple herbivores of scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 52:1583-1592.
39. _. 2000. The evolution of compensation to herbivory in scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata: herbivore-imposed natural selection and the quantitative genetics of tolerance. Evolution 54:764-777.
40. Kearns, C. A., and D. W. Inouye. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. University of Colorado Press, Niwot, CO.
41. Kingsolver, J. G., and D. W. Schemske. 1991. Path analysis of selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 6:276-280.
42. Kingsolver, J. G., H. E. Hoekstra, J. M. Hoekstra, D. Berrigan, S. N. Vignieri, C. E. Hill, A. Hoang, P. Gilbert, and P. Beerli. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. American Naturalist 157:245-261.
43. Krupnick, G. A., A. E. Weis, and D. R. Campbell. 1999. The consequences of floral herbivory for pollinator service to Isomeris arborea. Ecology 80:125-134.
44. Langerhans, R. B., C. A. Layman, and T. J. DeWitt. 2005. Male genital size reflects a trade-off between attracting mates and avoiding predators in two live-bearing fish species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 102:7618-7623.
45. Lara, C., and J. F. Ornelas. 2001. Preferential nectar robbing of flowers with long corollas: experimental studies of two hummingbird species visiting three plant species. Oecologia (Berlin) 128:263-273.
46. Lehtilä, K., and S. Y. Strauss. 1997. Leaf damage by herbivores affects attractiveness to pollinators in wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum. Oecologia (Berlin) 111:396-403.
47. Lloyd, D. G., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1996. Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. Chapman & Hall, New York.
48. Maloof, J. E., and D. W. Inouye. 2000. Are nectar robbers cheaters or mutualists? Ecology 81:2651-2661.
49. Mauricio, R., and L. E. Mojonnier. 1997. Reducing bias in the measurement of selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 12:433-436.
50. Mayfield, M. M., N. M. Waser, and M. V. Price. 2001. Exploring the "most effective pollinator principle" with complex flowers: bumblebees and Ipomopsis aggregata. Annals of Botany 88:591-596.
51. McDade, L. A., and S. Kinsman. 1980. The impact of floral parasitism in two Neotropical hummingbird-pollinated plant species. Evolution 34:944-958.
52. Mitchell, R. J. 1992. Testing evolutionary and ecological hypotheses using path analysis and structural equation modeling. Functional Ecology 6:123-129.
53. _. 1993. Path analysis: pollination. Pages 211-231 in S. M. Scheiner and J. Gurevitch, eds. Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman & Hall, New York.
54. _. 1994. Effects of floral traits, pollinator visitation, and plant size on Ipomopsis aggregata fruit production. American Naturalist 143:870-889.
55. Mitchell, R. J., J. D. Karron, K. G. Holmquist, and J. M. Bell. 2004. The influence of Mimulus ringens floral display size on pollinator visitation patterns. Functional Ecology 18:116-124.
56. Mothershead, K., and R. J. Marquis. 2000. Fitness impacts of herbivory through indirect effects on plant-pollinator interactions in Oenothera macrocarpa. Ecology 81:30-40.
57. Petraitis, P. S., A. E. Dunham, and P. H. Niewiarowski. 1996. Inferring multiple causality: the limitations of path analysis. Functional Ecology 10:421-431.
58. Pleasants, J. M. 1983. Nectar production in Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 70:1468-1475.
59. Price, M. V., N. M. Waser, R. E. Irwin, D. R. Campbell, and A. K. Brody. 2005. Temporal and spatial variation in pollination of a montane herb: a seven-year study. Ecology 86:2106-2116.
60. Roubik, D. W. 1982. The ecological impact of nectar-robbing bees and pollinating hummingbirds on a tropical shrub. Ecology 63:354-360.
61. Sakamoto, Y., M. Ishiguro, and G. Kitagawa. 1986. Akaike Information Criterion statistic. KTK Scientific, Tokyo.
62. Sharaf, K. E., and M. V. Price. 2004. Does pollination limit tolerance to browsing in Ipomopsis aggregata? Oecologia (Berlin) 138:396-404.
63. Shipley, B. 1999. Testing causal explanations in organismal biology: causation, correlation and structural equation modelling. Oikos 86:374-382.
64. _. 2000. Cause and correlation in biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
65. Stoks, R., M. A. McPeek, and J. L. Mitchell. 2003. Evolution of prey behavior in response to changes in predation regime: damselflies in fish and dragonfly lakes. Evolution 57:574-585.
66. Strauss, S. Y., and R. E. Irwin. 2004. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of multispecies plant-animal interactions. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35:435-466.
67. Strauss, S. Y., J. K. Conner, and S. L. Rush. 1996. Foliar herbivory affects floral characters and plant attractiveness to pollinators: implications for male and female plant fitness. American Naturalist 147:1098-1107.
68. Strauss, S. Y., H. Sahli, and J. K. Conner. 2005. Toward a more trait-centered approach to diffuse (co)evolution. New Phytologist 165:81-90.
69. Temeles, E. J., and I. L. Pan. 2002. Effect of nectar robbery on phase duration, nectar volume, and pollination in a protandrous plant. International Journal of Plant Sciences 163:803-808.
70. Thompson, J. N., and B. M. Cunningham. 2002. Geographic structure and dynamics of coevolutionary selection. Nature 417:735-738.
71. Traveset, A., M. F. Willson, and C. Sabag. 1998. Effect of nectar-robbing birds on fruit set of Fuchsia magellanica in Tierra del Fuego: a disrupted mutualism. Functional Ecology 12:459-464.
72. Waser, N. M., and M. V. Price. 1989. Optimal outcrossing in Ipomopsis aggregata: seed set and offspring fitness. Evolution 43:1097-1109.
73. _. 1991. Reproductive costs of self-pollination in Ipomopsis aggregata: are ovules usurped? American Journal of Botany 78:1036-1043.
74. Waser, N. M., M. V. Price, A. K. Brody, and D. R. Campbell. 2000. Pollination success and plant population size: how strong are the links? Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 85(suppl.):277.
75. Werner, E. E., and S. D. Peacor. 2003. A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 84:1083-1100.
76. Wolf, P. G., and D. R. Campbell. 1995. Hierarchical analysis of allozymic and morphometric variation in a montane herb, Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). Journal of Heredity 86:386-394.
77. Wootton, J. T. 1993. Indirect effects and habitat use in an intertidal community: interaction chains and interaction modifications. American Naturalist 141:71-89.
78. _. 2002. Indirect effects in complex ecosystems: recent progress and future challenges. Journal of Sea Research 48:157-172.