Conservation and coevolution in the scale-free human gene coexpression network

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 21, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 2058-2070

  Jordan, I King ^a   Mariño Ramírez, Leonardo ^a   Wolf, Yuri I ^a   Koonin, Eugene V ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Gene expression; Human evolution; Natural selection; Network; Self organixation; Substitution rate

Indexed keywords

3' UNTRANSLATED REGION; ADAPTATION; ANASTOMOSIS GROUP (TAXONOMY); ARTICLE; COEVOLUTION; GENE COEXPRESSION NETWORK; GENE CONTROL; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME; HUMAN; MOLECULAR SYSTEMATICS; MOUSE; NATURAL SELECTION; NETWORK SELF ORGANIZATION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEIC ACID BASE SUBSTITUTION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; SUBSTITUTION RATE; TISSUE SPECIFICITY;

3' UNTRANSLATED REGIONS; 5' UNTRANSLATED REGIONS; ANIMALS; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENOME, HUMAN; HUMANS; MICE; MODELS, GENETIC; MULTIGENE FAMILY; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 6344241652     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msh222     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Agrawal, H. 2002. Extreme self-organization in networks constructed from gene expression data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89:268702.
2. Ashburner, M., C. A. Ball, J. A. Blake et al. 2000. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 25:25-29.
3. Barabasi, A. L., and R. Albert. 1999. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286:509-512.
4. Barabasi, A. L., and Z. N. Oltvai. 2004. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5:101-113.
5. Bergmann, S., J. Ihmels, and N. Barkai. 2004. Similarities and differences in genome-wide expression data of six organisms. PLoS Biol. 2:0085-0093.
6. Bhan, A., D. J. Galas, and T. G. Dewey. 2002. A duplication growth model of gene expression networks. Bioinformatics 18:1486-1493.
7. Bloom, J. D., and C. Adami. 2003. Apparent dependence of protein evolutionary rate on number of interactions is linked to biases in protein-protein interactions data sets. BMC Evol. Biol. 3:21.
8. Britten, R. J., and E. H. Davidson. 1969. Gene regulation for higher cells: a theory. Science 165:349-357.
9. Carbone, A., A. Zinovyev, and F. Kepes. 2003. Codon adaptation index as a measure of dominating codon bias. Bioinformatics 19:2005-2015.
10. Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species. John Murray, London.
11. Duret, L., and D. Mouchiroud. 2000. Determinants of substitution rates in mammalian genes: expression pattern affects selection intensity but not mutation rate. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:68-74.
12. Eisen, M. B., P. T. Spellman, P. O. Brown, and D. Botstein. 1998. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:14863-14868.
13. Farris, J. S. 1977. Phylogenetic analysis under Dollo's law. Syst. Zool. 26:77-88.
14. Fraser, H. B., A. E. Hirsh, L. M. Steinmetz, C. Scharfe, and M. W. Feldman. 2002. Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network. Science 296:750-752.
15. Fraser, H. B., D. P. Wall, and A. E. Hirsh. 2003. A simple dependence between protein evolution rate and the number of protein-protein interactions. BMC Evol. Biol. 3:11.
16. Giot, L., J. S. Bader, C. Brouwer et al. 2003. A protein interaction map of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 302:1727-1736.
17. Gu, Z., D. Nicolae, H. H. Lu, and W. H. Li. 2002. Rapid divergence in expression between duplicate genes inferred from microarray data. Trends Genet. 18:609-613.
18. Hedges, S. B., H. Chen, S. Kumar, D. Y. Wang, A. S. Thompson, and H. Watanabe. 2001. A genomic timescale for the origin of eukaryotes. BMC Evol. Biol. 1:4.
19. Higgins, D. G., J. D. Thompson, and T. J. Gibson. 1996. Using CLUSTAL for multiple sequence alignments. Methods Enzymol. 266:383-402.
20. Hirsh, A. E., and H. B. Fraser. 2001. Protein dispensability and rate of evolution. Nature 411:1046-1049.
21. Ho, Y., A. Gruhler, A. Heilbut et al. 2002. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 415:180-183.
22. Hoyle, D. C., M. Rattray, R. Jupp, and A. Brass. 2002. Making sense of microarray data distributions. Bioinformatics 18:576-584.
23. Jeong, H., S. P. Mason, A. L. Barabasi, and Z. N. Oltvai. 2001. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 411:41-42.
24. Jeong, H., B. Tombor, R. Albert, Z. N. Oltvai, and A. L. Barabasi. 2000. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 407:651-654.
25. Jordan, I. K., I. B. Rogozin, Y. I. Wolf, and E. V. Koonin. 2002. Essential genes are more evolutionarily conserved than are nonessential genes in bacteria. Genome Res. 12:962-968.
26. Jordan, I. K., Y. I. Wolf, and E. V. Koonin. 2003. No simple dependence between protein evolution rate and the number of protein-protein interactions: only the most prolific interactors tend to evolve slowly. BMC Evol. Biol. 3:1.
27. Jukes, T. H., and C. R. Cantor. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. Pp. 21-132 in H. N. Munro. ed. Mammalian protein metabolism. Academic, New York.
28. Kamath, R. S., A. G. Fraser, Y. Dong et al. 2003. Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature 421:231-237.
29. Karev, G. P., Y. I. Wolf, A. Y. Rzhetsky, F. S. Berezovskaya, and E. V. Koonin. 2002. Birth and death of protein domains: a simple model of evolution explains power law behavior. BMC Evol. Biol. 2:18.
30. Khaitovich, P., G. Weiss, M. Lachmann, I. Hellman, W. Enard, B. Muetzel, U. Wiekner, W. Ansorge, and S. Paabo. 2004. A neutral model of transcriptome evolution. PLOS Biol. 2:0682-0689.
31. King, M. C., and A. C. Wilson. 1975. Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees. Science 188:107-116.
32. Koonin, E. V., N. D. Fedorova, J. D. Jackson et al. 2004. A comprehensive evolutionary classification of proteins encoded in complete eukaryotic genomes. Genome Biol. 5:R7.
33. Koonin, E. V., Y. I. Wolf, and G. P. Karev. 2002. The structure of the protein universe and genome evolution. Nature 420:218-223.
34. Krylov, D. M., Y. I. Wolf, I. B. Rogozin, and E. V. Koonin. 2003. Gene loss, protein sequence divergence, gene dispensability, expression level, and interactivity are correlated in eukaryotic evolution. Genome Res. 13:2229-2235.
35. Kuznetsov, V. A., G. D. Knott, and R. F. Bonner. 2002. General statistics of stochastic process of gene expression in eukaryotic cells. Genetics 161:1321-1332.
36. Lander, E., S. L. M. Linton, B. Birren et al. 2001. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409:860-921.
37. Li, S., C. M. Armstrong, N. Berlin et al. 2004. A map of the interactome network of the metazoan C. elegans. Science 303:540-543.
38. Li, W. H. 1997. Molecular evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
39. Luscombe, N. M., J. Qian, Z. Zhang, T. Johnson, and M. Gerstein. 2002. The dominance of the population by a selected few: power-law behaviour applies to a wide variety of genomic properties. Genome Biol. 3:RESEARCH0040.
40. Makova, K. D., and W. H. Li. 2003. Divergence in the spatial pattern of gene expression between human duplicate genes. Genome Res. 13:1638-1645.
41. Nei, M., and T. Gojobori. 1986. Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 3:418-426.
42. Pal, C., B. Papp, and L. D. Hurst. 2001. Highly expressed genes in yeast evolve slowly. Genetics 158:927-931.
43. -. 2003. Genomic function: rate of evolution and gene dispensability. Nature 421:496-497.
44. Pennisi, E. 2003. Systems biology: tracing life's circuitry. Science 302:1646-1649.
45. Ravasz, E., A. L. Somera, D. A. Mongru, Z. N. Oltvai, and A. L. Barabasi. 2002. Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science 297:1551-1555.
46. Rzhetsky, A., and S. M. Gomez. 2001. Birth of scale-free molecular networks and the number of distinct DNA and protein domains per genome. Bioinformatics 17:988-996.
47. Su, A. I., M. P. Cooke, K. A. Ching et al. 2002. Large-scale analysis of the human and mouse transcriptomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:4465-4470.
48. Tatusov, R. L., N. D. Fedorova, J. D. Jackson et al. 2003. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics 4:41.
49. Ueda, H. R., S. Hayshi, S. Matsuyama, T. Yomo, S. Hashimoto, S. A. Kay, J. B. Hogenesch, and M. Iino. 2004. Universality and flexibility in gene expression from bacteria to human. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:3765-3769.
50. Wagner, A. 2000. Decoupled evolution of coding region and mRNA expression patterns after gene duplication: implications for the neutralist-selectionist debate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:6579-6584.
51. -. 2003. How the global structure of protein interaction networks evolves. Proc. R. Soc. Loncd B Biol. Sci. 270:457-466.
52. Waterston, R. H. K. Lindblad-Toh, E. Birney et al. 2002. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 420:520-562.
53. Yanai, I., D. Graur, and R. Ophir. 2004. Incongruent expression profiles between human and mouse orthologous genes suggest widespread neutral evolution of transcription control. OMICS 8:15-24.
54. Yang, J., Z. Gu, and W. H. Li. 2003. Rate of protein evolution versus fitness effect of gene deletion. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:772-774.
55. Yang, Z. 1997. PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput Appl. Biosci. 13:555-556.
56. Zhang, L., and W. H. Li. 2004. Mammalian housekeeping genes evolve more slowly than tissue-specific genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:236-239.