Assessment focus in studio: What is most prominent in architecture, art and design?

International Journal of Art and Design Education

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 37-51

  de la Harpe, Barbara ^a   Peterson, J Fiona ^a   Frankham, Noel ^b   Zehner, Robert ^c   Neale, Douglas ^d   Musgrave, Elizabeth ^d   McDermott, Ruth ^e  

^a RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^e Raffles College of Design and Commerce   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 63349093847     PISSN: 14768062     EISSN: 14768070     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-8070.2009.01591.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. AIAS Studio Culture Taskforce (2003) Studio culture discussion. Paper by the American Institute of Architecture Students discussed at the NAAB Validation Conference, 24-25 October, Santa Fe, New Mexico.
2. American Association for Higher Education (AAHE) (1996) Principles of good practice for assessing student learning (online). Available from URL: Ultibase.rmit.edu.au/Articles/june97/ameri1.htm (accessed 31 March 2008).
3. Biggs, J. (2003) Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
4. Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2007) Teaching for Quality Learning at University, third edn. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
5. Boud, D. & Falchikov, N., [Eds] (2007) Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education: Learning for the Longer Term. New York: Routledge Falmer.
6. Caglar, N. & Uludag, Z. (2006) Architectural design education: designing a library, public communication and information centre in the manufacturing zone of central Eskisehir Turkey, a case study, International Journal of Art & Design Education, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 231-40.
7. Chickering, A. W. & Gamson, Z. F. (1999) Development and adaptations of the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education, http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/86011233/home New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 〈http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/ journal/101523931/issue〉 No. 80, pp. 75-81.
8. Corkery, L., Roche, B., Watson, K. & Zehner, B. (2007) Transforming design studio learning and teaching through real world, interdisciplinary projects. Refereed proceedings of the ConnectED 2007 International Conference on Design Education, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, 9-12 July.
9. de la Harpe, B. & Peterson, J. F. (in press) Through the learning and teaching looking glass: What do academics in art, design and architecture publish most about ?Journal of Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education..
10. de la Harpe, B., Peterson, J. F., Horvat, L., Berry, M. & Anastasiou, P. (2007) Studio collaboration across disciplinary and international borders. Refereed proceedings of the Connect ED 2007 International Conference on Design Education, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, 9-12 July.
11. Demirbas, O. O. & Demirkan, H. (2007) Learning styles of design students and the relationship of academic performance and gender in design education, Learning and Instruction, Vol. 17, pp. 345-59.
12. Ehmann, D. (2005) Using assessment to engage graphic design students in their learning experience. Paper presented at the 2005 Evaluations and Assessment Conference, 30 November-1 December, Sydney.
13. Eilouti, B. (2006) A problem-based learning project for computer-supported architectural design pedagogy, Art Design & Communication in Higher Education, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 197-212.
14. Ellmers, G. (2006) Assessment Practice in the Creative Arts: Developing a Standardised Assessment Framework. Teaching and Learning Scholars Report, Faculty of Creative Arts, University of Wollongong.
15. Fernando, N. A. (2006) Design as exploration: An integrative model, Open House International, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 10-16.
16. Forsyth, G., Zehner, B. & McDermott, R., [Eds] (2007) National Forum on Studio Teaching, 13 July, College of Fine Arts, University of New South Wales, Sydney.
17. Geahigan, G. (1999) Teaching preservice art education majors: 'the world of the work', Art Education, Vol. 52, No. 5, pp. 12-17.
18. Gibbs, G. & Simpson, C. (2004) Conditions under which assessment supports students' learning, Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, Vol. 1, pp. 3-31.
19. Goldschmidt, G. (2003) Expert knowledge or creative spark? Predicaments in design education. Paper presented at the Expertise in Design, Design Thinking Research Symposium 6, 17-19 November, University of Technology Sydney.
20. Gore, N. (2004) Craft and innovation: Serious play and the direct experience of the real, Journal of Architectural Education, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 39-44.
21. Gurel, M. O. & Basa, I. (2004) The status of graphical presentation in interior/architectural design education, International Journal of Art & Design Education, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 192-206.
22. Hickman, R. (2001) Art rooms and art teaching, Art Education, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 6-11.
23. Higher Education Academy (2006) http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/York/ documents/ourwork/tla/assessment/a_SENLEF_seven_principles.pdf The Seven Principals document blank The seven principles for good feedback practice developed by the Student Enhanced Learning through Effective Feedback (SENLEF) Project (online). Available from URL: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/ourwork/learning/assessment/senlef/principles (accessed 31 March 2008).
24. Jackson, T. A. (1999) Ontological shifts in studio art education: emergent-pedagogical models, Art Journal, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 68-73 http://proquest.umi.com.ezproxy.lib.rmit.edu.au/pqdweb?RQT=318&pmid= 27974&TS=1205115650&clientId=16532&VInst=PROD&VName= PQD&VType=PQD
25. Kellogg, C. (2004) The Studio Culture Summit: An Overview Report. Washington, DC: American Institute of Architecture Students (AIAS).
26. Koch, A., Schwennsen, K., Dutton, T. & Smith, D. (2002) The Redesign of Studio Culture. A report of the AIAS Studio Culture Taskforce. Washington, DC: American Institute of Architecture Students.
27. Lawson, B. (2003) Schemata, gambits and precedent: Some factors in design expertise. Paper presented at the Expertise in Design, Design Thinking Research Symposium 6, 17-19 November, University of Technology Sydney.
28. Lindström, L. (2006) Creativity: What is it?Can you assess it?Can it be taught ?International Journal of Art & Design Education, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 53-66.
29. Loveday, T. (2002) The studio in tertiary education, IDEA (Interior Design/Interior Architecture Educators Association), pp. 71-90.
30. Marx, J. (2000) A proposal for alternative methods for teaching digital design, Automation in Construction, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 19-35.
31. Merriam, S. B. (1990) Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32. Mitchell, K. (2006) Lessons from practice: Architectural education and the notion of critical enquiry, Open House International, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 17-24.
33. Öztürk, M. N. & Türkkan, E. E. (2006) The design studio as teaching/learning medium - a process-based approach, International Journal of Art & Design Education, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 96-104.
34. Petry, E. (2004) Work in progress - education and practice: Assessment for architecture education. Paper presented at the 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 20-23 October, Savannah, GA.
35. QAA (2006) Code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education: Section 6: Assessment of students (online). Available from URL: Qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/ codeOfPractice/section6/ (accessed 31 March 2008).
36. Quinlan, A. (2004) Connecting enquiry, process, and community: Student design studio learning, UNSW Compendium of Good Practice in Learning and Teaching, (1), pp. 62-74.
37. Ramsden, P. (2003) Learning to Teach in Higher Education, 2nd edn. London: Routledge Falmer.
38. Rust, C. (2002) The impact of assessment on studio learning: How can the research literature practically help to inform the development of departmental assessment strategies and learner-centred assessment practices? Active Learning in Higher Education, Vol. 3, pp. 145-57.
39. Rust, C., Price, M. & O'Donovan, B. (2003) Improving students' learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes, Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 147-64.
40. Sabol, F. R. (2006) Identifying exemplary criteria to evaluate studio products in art education, Art Education, Vol. 59, No. 6, pp. 6-11.
41. Sagun, A., Demirkan, H. & Goktepe, M. (2001) A framework for the design studio in web-based education, Journal of Art & Design Education, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 332-42.
42. Siskin, S. (2006) Drawing the circle: From the community to the studio to the classroom and back again, Women and Environments International Magazine, No. 72/73, p. 6.
43. Ulusoy, Z. (1999) To design versus to understand design: The role of graphic representations and verbal expressions, Design Studies, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 123-30.
44. Walton, T. (2002) Package design: A nexus for creativity and business success, Design Management Journal, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 6-9.