The status of graphical presentation in interior/architectural design education

International Journal of Art and Design Education

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 192-206

  Gurel, Meltem O ^a   Basa, Inci ^a  

^a BILKENT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 15344344238     PISSN: 14768062     EISSN: 14768070     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-8070.2004.00397.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. An ideally finalized graphical presentation is composed of well-executed technical and free hand drawings such as plans, sections, interior and exterior elevations, perspectives, etc. as well as properly organised and graphically enriched material boards, conceptual representations, etc.
2. Anthony, K. (1991) Design Juries on Trial. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, p. 12.
3. This study sets its 'research boundary' as the (educational) field of interior architecture. 'Circumscribing' interior architecture education (rather than architecture) as 'the field of research' is not to ignite territorial dispute or terminology in the fields of architecture and interior architecture, but because of both the position of design instructors and design students that the research here is undertaken for. However, the authors genuinely feel that same arguments, concepts, discussions ⋯ can as well be applied to architecture education since they share the same (or similar) precepts as well as resources, such as textbooks, in terms of graphical presentation. For the concept of establishment of research boundaries (demarcation),
4. see Jutla, R. S. (1996) 'An international approach to urban design', in Design Methods: Theories, Research, Education and Practice, Vol. 30, No. 1, p. 2313
5. For the concepts of mass of statements and (to be) institutionally defined
6. see Foucault, M. (1995) The Archaeology of Knowledge. (6th ed.) London: Routledge.
7. Anthony, K. Op. cit, p. 9.
8. Middleton, R. [Ed] (1982) The Beaux - Arts. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, p. 123.
9. Fraser, I. & Hemni, R. (1994) Envisioning Architecture. An Analysis of Drawing. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, p. 131.
10. Middleton, R. [Ed] Op. cit, p. 99.
11. Dutton, T. A. (1996) Cultural Studies and Critical Pedagogy: Cultural Pedagogy and Architecture in T. A. Dutton & L. H. Mann [Ed.] Reconstructing Architecture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, p. 158.
12. Teymur, N. (1982) Environmental Discourse. London: ?uestion Press, p. 21.
13. Foucault, M. Op. cit, pp. 41-2.
14. Ibid. p. 122.
15. Ibid. p. 109.
16. The term, hidden statements, is borrowed from M. Foucault. For the concept of accumulation of statement,
17. see Foucault, M. (1995).
18. Ibid. pp. 95-6.
19. Teymur, N. Op. cit, p.24.
20. The questionnaire is given to the undergraduate students and design instructors of Dept. of Interior Architecture and Environmental Design, Bilkent University, Ankara-Turkey.
21. Potthoff, J. & Woods, B. (1997) 'Relationship between introductory interior design curricula and content of interior design textbooks,' Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, Vol. 89, No. 3, pp. 42-47.
22. Fallacies may be defined as, 'unsound arguments that are often persuasive because they can appear to be logical, because they usually appeal to our emotions and prejudices, and because they often support conclusions that we want to believe are accurate'.
23. Chaffee, J. (1991) Thinking Critically. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, p. 541.
24. Griffin, A. W. & Alvarez-Brunicardi, V. (1998) Introduction to Architectural Presentation Graphics. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, p.8.
25. Schaller, T. W. (1997) The Art of Architectural Drawing. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, p. 128.
26. Burden, E. (1984) Design Presentation. New York: McGraw-Hill, p. VII.
27. Fraser, I. & Hemni, R. Op. cit, p. 131.
28. Doyle, M. E. (1993) Colour Drawing.New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, p. 9.
29. Wahl, M. I. (1987) Design Presentation for Architects. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, p. vii.
30. Eissen, K. (1990) Presenting Architectural Designs. London: Architecture Design & Technology Press, p. 84.
31. Duncan, R. (1986) Architectural Graphics and Communication. (2nd edn.) Iowa: Kendall / Hunt Publishing Company, p. 20.
32. Lockard, W. K. (1977) Drawing as a Means to Architecture. Tucson: Pepper Publ, p. 9.
33. Kasprisin, R. & Pettinari, J. (1995) Visual Thinking for Architects and Designers. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, p. xiii.
34. Diekman, N. & Pile, J. (1983) Drawing Interior Architecture. New York: Watson-Guptill Publications, p. 11.
35. Ching, F. (1985) Architectural Graphics. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, p. 8.
36. Miller, W. E. (1982) Basic Drafting for Interior Designers. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, p. IX.
37. Laseau, P. (2001) Graphic Thinking for Architects & Designers. (3rd edn.) New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., p. 39.
38. Porter, T. & Greenstreet, B. (1980) Manual of Graphic Techniques 1. London: Butterworth Architecture, p. 4.
39. Greenstreet, R. & Shields, J. W. (1988) Architectural Representation. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, p. 2.
40. Collins, G. R. (1980) Visionary Drawings of Architecture and Planning 20th Century Through the 1960s. (2nd edn.) Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
41. O'Gorman, J. F. (1989) On the Board. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press, p. 1.
42. Davis, D. & Walker, T. D. (2000) Plan Graphics. (5th edn.) New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., p. 4.
43. Robbins, E. (1994) Why Architects Draw. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, p. 48.
44. Herbert, D. M. (1993) Architectural Study Drawings.New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, p. 13.