Motivation to cooperate in organisations: The case of prototypical leadership and procedural fairness

Psychologica Belgica

Volumn 48, Issue 2-3, 2008, Pages 157-175

  De Cremer, David ^a,c,d   Van Dijke, Marius ^b   Brebels, Lieven ^a,c   Hoogervorst, Niek ^a,c  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

^c ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d Department Business Society Management ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 60849118646     PISSN: 00332879     EISSN: 2054670X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5334/pb-48-2-3-157     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Adams, J.S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422-436.
2. Aquino, K., Tripp, T.M., & Bies, R.J. (2006). Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offence as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 653-668.
3. Baumeister, R.F., & Leary, M.R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
4. Bies, R.J., & Moag, J.F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R.J. Lewicki, B.H. Sheppard, & M.H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in Organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43-55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5. Brebels, L., De Cremer, D., & Sedikides, C. (2008). Retaliation as a Response to Procedural Unfairness: A Self-Regulatory Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1511-1525.
6. Brockner, J., & Siegel, P. (1996). Understanding the interaction between procedural and distributive justice: The role of trust. In R.M. Kramer & T.R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 390-413). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Brockner, J., Tyler, T.R., & Cooper-Schneider, R. (1992). The influence of prior commitment to an institution on reactions to perceived unfairness: The higher they are, the harder they fall. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 241-261.
8. Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B.M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcome and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 189-208.
9. Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B.M. (2003). How, when and why does outcome favorability interact with procedural fairness. In J. Greenberg & J. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice: Fundamental questions about fairness in the workplace (pp. 525-554). Hillsday, N.Y.: Erlbaum.
10. Brockner, J., Wiesenfeld, B.M., & Martin, C.L. (1995). Decision frame, procedural justice, and survivors' reactions to job layoffs. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 59-68.
11. Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, RE. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278-321.
12. Colquitt, J.A., Conlon, D.E., Wesson, M.J., Porter, C.O.L.H., & Ng, K.Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium. A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-445.
13. Cropanzano, R., & Schminke, M. (2001). Using social justice to build effective work groups. In M.E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work (pp. 143-172). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. De Cremer, D. (2004). The influence of accuracy as a function of leader's bias: The role of trustworthiness in the psychology of procedural justice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 293-304.
15. De Cremer, D., & Blader, S.L. (2006). Why do people care about procedural fairness? The importance of belongingness in responding and attending to procedures. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 211-228.
16. De Cremer, D., & Oosterwegel, A. (2000). Collective self-esteem, personal selfesteem, and collective efficacy in in-group and out-group evaluations. Current Psychology, 18, 326-339.
17. De Cremer, D., & Sedikides, C. (2008). Reputational implications of procedural fairness for personal and relational self-esteem. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30, 66-75.
18. De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T.R. (2005a). Managing group behavior: The interplay between procedural justice, sense of self, and cooperation. In M.R Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 151-218). San Diego, CA, US: Elsevier Academic Press.
19. De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T.R. (2005c). A Matter of intragroup status: The importance of respect for the viability of groups. In B. Mannix, M. Neale, & M. Thomas- Hunt (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams (Vol. 7, pp. 1-21). Greenwich, CT: Elsevier Science Press.
20. De Cremer, D., Tyler, T.R., & den Ouden, N. (2005). Managing cooperation via procedural fairness: The mediating influence of self-other merging. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 393-406.
21. De Cremer, D., & van Dijk, E. (2002). Reactions to group success and failure as a function of identification level: A test of the goal-transformation hypothesis in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 435-442.
22. De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., & Mayer, D. (2008). The effects of own and other's procedural fairness on cooperation: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Manuscript in preparation.
23. De Cremer, D., & van Knippenberg, D. (2002). How do leaders promote cooperation? The effects of charisma and procedural fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 858-866.
24. De Cremer, D., & Van Vugt, M. (1999). Social identification effects in social dilemmas; a transformation of motives. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 871-893.
25. De Cremer, D., & Van Vugt, M. (2002). Intergroup and intragroup aspects of leadership in social dilemmas: A relational model of cooperation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 126-136.
26. De Cremer, D., Van Vugt, M., & Sharpe, J. (1999). Effect of collective self-esteem on in-group evaluations. Journal of Social Psychology, 139, 530-532.
27. Fielding, K.S., & Hogg, M.A. (1997). Social identity, self-categorization, and leadership: A field study of small interactive groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 1, 39-51.
28. Giesner, S.R., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). "License to fail": Goal definition, leader group prototypicality, and perceptions of leadership effectiveness after leader failure. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105, 14-35.
29. Giesner, S.R., van Knippenberg, D., & Sleebos, E. (in press). License to fail? How leader group prototypicality moderates the effects of leader performance on perceptions of leadership effectiveness. Leadership Quarterly.
30. Hains, S.C., Hogg, M.A., & Duck, J.M. (1997). Self-categorization and leadership: Effects of group prototypicality and leader stereotypicality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1087-1100.
31. Hogg, M.A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 85-111.
32. Hogg, M.A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London & New York: Routledge.
33. Hogg, M.A., Hains, S.C., & Mason, I. (1998). Identification and leadership in small groups: Salience, frame of reference, and leader stereotypicality effects on leader evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1248-1263.
34. Hogg, M.A., & Reid, S.A. (2001). Social identity, leadership, and power. In A.Y. Lee- Chai & J.A. Bargh (Eds.), The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption (pp. 159-180). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
35. Hogan, R., Curphy, G.J., & Hogan, J. (1994). What we know about leadership: Effectiveness and personality. American Psychologist, 49, 493-504.
36. Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9, 131-146.
37. Keller, T., & Dansereau, F. (1995). Leadership and empowerment: A social exchange perspective. Human Relations, 48, 127-146.
38. Leventhal, G.S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.), Social Exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum.
39. Lind, E.A., & Tyler, T.R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
40. Lipponen, J., Koivisto, S., & Olkkonen, M.-E. (2005). Procedural justice and status judgments: The moderating role of ingroup prototypicality. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 517-528.
41. Lord, R.G. (1985), An information processing approach to social perceptions, leadership and behavioral measurement in organizations, Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 87-128.
42. Lord, R.G., & Maher, K.J. (1991). Leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions and performance. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
43. Mansour-Cole, D.M., & Scott, S.G. (1998). Hearing it through the grapevine: The influence of source, leader relations, and legitimacy on survivor's fairness perceptions. Personnel Psychology, 51, 25-54.
44. Mossholder, K.W., Bennett, N., Kemery, E.R., Wesolowski, M.A. (1998). Relationships between bases of power and work reactions: The mediational role of procedural justice. Journal of Management, 24, 533-552.
45. Platow, M.J., Reid, S., & Andrew, S. (1998). Leadership endorsement: The role of distributive and procedural behavior in interpersonal and intergroup contexts. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 1, 35-47.
46. Platow, M.J., & van Knippenberg, D. (2001). A social identity analysis of leadership endorsement: The effects of leader ingroup prototypicality and distributive intergroup fairness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1508-1519.
47. Platow, M.J., van Knippenberg, D., Haslam, S.A., van Knippenberg, B., & Spears, R. (2006). A special gift we bestow on you for being representative of us: Considering leader charisma from a self-categorization perspective. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 303-320.
48. Prentice, D.A., Miller, D.T., & Lightdale, J.R. (1994). Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 484-493.
49. Rabbie, J.M., & Bekkers, F. (1978). Threatened leadership and intergroup competition. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 9-20.
50. Rahim, M.A. (1988). The development of a leader power inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 491-502.
51. Raven, B.H., Schwartzwald, J., & Kozlowsky, M. (1998). Conceptualizing and measuring a power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 307-332.
52. Reicher, S.D., & Hopkins, N. (1996a). Seeking influence through characterizing selfcategories: An analysis of anti-abortionist rhetoric. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55, 297-311.
53. Reicher, S.D., & Hopkins, N. (1996b). Self-category constructions in political rhetoric: An analysis of Thatcher's and Kinnock's speeches concerning the British miners' strike (1984-5). European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 353-371.
54. Sedikides, C., Hart, C., & De Cremer, D. (in press). The self in procedural fairness. Social and Personality Psychology Compass: Intraindividual Processes.
55. Skarlicki, D.P., & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 434-443.
56. Skarlicki, D.P., & Latham, G.R (1996). Increasing citizenship behavior within a labor union: A test of organizational justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 161-169.
57. Skarlicki, D.P., & Latham, G.R (1997). Leadership training in organizational justice to increase citizenship behavior within a labor union: A replication. Personnel Psychology, 50, 617-633.
58. Smith, K.G., Carroll, S.J., & Ashford, S.J. (1995). Intra- and interorganizational cooperation: Toward a research agenda. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 7-23.
59. Smith, H.J., Tyler, T.R., Huo, Y.J., Ortiz, D.J., & Lind, E.A. (1998). The self-relevant implications of the group-value model: Group membership, self-worth, and treatment quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 470-493.
60. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W.G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson Hall.
61. Thibaut, J.W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
62. Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., & Wetherell, M.S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group. A self-categorization theory. Oxford/New York: Basil Blackwell.
63. Tyler, T.R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 830-838.
64. Tyler, T.R. (1994). Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 850-863.
65. Tyler, T.R. (1999). Why people cooperate with organizations: An identity-based perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, 201-246.
66. Tyler, T.R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375-400.
67. Tyler, T.R., & Blader, S.L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
68. Tyler, T.R., & Blader, S.L. (2003a). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349-361.
69. Tyler, T.R., & Blader, S.L. (2003b). Social identity and fairness judgments. In D.P. Skarlicki, S.W. Gililand, & D. Steiner (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on values in organizations (pp. 67-96). Greenwich, Connecticut: Information Age Publishing.
70. Tyler, T.R., & Degoey, P. (1995). Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 482-497.
71. Tyler, T.R., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. (1996).Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913-930.
72. Tyler, T.R., & Lind, E.A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-292). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
73. Ullrich, J., Christ, O., & van Dick, R. (in press). Substitutes for procedural fairness: Prototypical leaders are endorsed whether they are fair or not. Journal of Applied Psychology.
74. van den Bos, K., Burrows, J.W., Umphress, E., Folger, R., Lavelle, J.J., Eaglestone, J., & Gee, J. (2005). Prior experiences as temporal frames of reference in social justice: The influence of previous fairness experiences on reactions to new and old supervisors. Social Justice Research, 18, 99-120.
75. van den Bos, K., & Spruijt, N. (2002). Appropriateness of decisions as a moderator of the psychology of voice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 57-72.
76. Van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2008a). The role of procedural fairness in explaining leader prototypicality effects. Manuscript submitted for publication.
77. Van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2008b). Leader prototypicality and identification effects on status judgments: Procedural fairness as a mediator. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17, 226-250.
78. van Knippenberg, D. (2000). Work motivation and performance: A social identity perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 357-371.
79. van Knippenberg, D., & Hogg, M.A. (2003). A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 243-296.
80. van Knippenberg, B., & van Knippenberg, D. (2005). Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 25-37.
81. Van Vugt, M., Snyder, M., Tyler, T.R., & Biel, A. (2000). Cooperation in modern society: Dilemmas and solutions. London: Routledge.
82. Yukl, G. (1998). Leadership in organizations (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.