Appropriateness of decisions as a moderator of the psychology of voice

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 57-72

  Van Den Bos, Kees ^a   Spruijt, Nienke ^b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036108765     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.61     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Brockner J, Heuer L, Siegel PA, Wiesenfeld B, Martin C, Grover S, Reed T, Bjorgvinsson S. 1998. The moderating effect of self-esteem in reaction to voice: Converging evidence from five studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75: 394-407.
2. Dachler HP, Wilpert B. 1978. Conceptual dimensions and boundaries of participation in organizations: A critical evaluation. Administrative Science Quarterly 23: 1-39.
3. DIO International Research Team. 1983. A contingency model of participative decision making: An analysis of 56 decisions in three Dutch organizations. Journal of Occupational Psychology 56: 1-18.
4. Earley PC, Lind EA. 1987. Procedural justice and participation in task selection: The role of control in mediating justice judgements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52: 1148-1160.
5. Folger R. 1977. Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of "voice" and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35: 108-119.
6. Lind EA, Kanfer R, Barley PC. 1990. Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59: 952-959.
7. Lind EA, Tyler TR. 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. Plenum: New York.
8. Locke EA, Schweiger DM. 1979. Participation in decision-making: One more look. Organizational Behavior 1: 265-339.
9. Peterson RS. 1999. Can you have too much of a good thing? The limits of voice for improving satisfaction with leaders. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25: 313-324.
10. Sagie A, Elizur D, Koslowsky M. 1989. Effect of participation in strategic and tactical decisions on acceptance of planned change. The Journal of Social Psychology 130: 459-465.
11. Sagie A, Elizur D, Koslowsky M. 1995. Decision type, participative decision making (PDM), and organizational behavior: An experimental simulation. Human Performance 8: 81-94.
12. Strauss G. 1992. Workers' participation in management. Employment Relations. Blackwell: Oxford.
13. Thibaut J, Walker L. 1975. Procedural Justice: A psychological analysis. Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.
14. Tyler TR. 1987. Conditions leading to value-expressive effects in judgement of procedural justice: A test of four models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52: 333-344.
15. Tyler TR, Lind EA. 1992. A relational model of authority in groups. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 25), Zanna M (ed.). Academic Press: San Diego, CA; 115-191.
16. Tyler TR, Smith HJ. 1998. Social justice and social movements. In The Handbook of Social Psychology, Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Lindzey G (eds). Oxford University Press: New York; 595-639.
17. Van den Bos K. 2001. Uncertainty management: The influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80: 931-941.
18. Van den Bos K, Bruins J, Wilke HAM, Dronkert E. 1999. Sometimes unfair procedures have nice aspects: On the psychology of the fair process effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77: 324-366.
19. Van den Bos K, Lind EA, Vermunt R, Wilke HAM. 1997. How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others?: The psychology of the fair process effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72: 1034-1046.
20. Van den Bos K, Vermunt R, Wilke HAM. 1996. The consistency rule and the voice effect: The influence of expectations on procedural fairness judgements and performance. European Journal of Social Psychology 26: 411-428.
21. Van den Bos K, Wilke HAM, Lind EA. 1998. When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75: 1449-1458.
22. Van den Bos K, Wilke HAM, Lind EA, Vermunt R. 1998. Evaluating outcomes by means of the fair process effect: Evidence for different processes in fairness and satisfaction judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74: 1493-1503.
23. Vermunt R, Wit AP, Van den Bos K, Lind EA. 1996. The effects of unfair procedure on affect and protest. Social Justice Research 9: 109-119.
24. Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54: 1063-1070.