Students and lecturers as markers. Application in assessing oral presentations;Los alumnos y los profesores como evaluadores. Aplicación a la calificación de presentaciones orales

Revista Espanola de Pedagogia

Volumn 67, Issue 242, 2009, Pages 79-98

  Marín García, Juan A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Agreement among markers; Oral presentations; Peer assessment; Reliability of the assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 58749083951     PISSN: 00349461     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. AL-FALLAY, I. (2004) The Role of Some Selected Psychological and Personality Traits of the Rater in the Accuracy of Self-and Peer-Assessment, System, 32:3, pp. 407-427.
2. BORDAS ALSINA, I. y CABRERA RODRIGUEZ, F. A. (2001) Estrategias de evaluación de los aprendizajes centradas en el proceso, revista española de pedagogía, 59:218, pp 25-48.
3. CHENG, W. y WARREN. M. (1999) Peer and Teacher Assessment of the Oral and Written Tasks of a Group Project, Assesment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24:3, pp. 301-314.
4. DOCHY. F.; SEGERS, M. y SLUIJSMANS, D. (1999) The Use of Self-, Peer and Co-Assessment in Higher Education: a Review, Studies in Higher Education, 24:3, pp. 331-350.
5. FALCHIKOV, N. (1995) Peer Feedback Marking - Developing Peer Assessment, Innovations in Education and Training International, 32:2, pp. 175-187.
6. FALCHIKOV, N. y GOLDFINCH, J. (2000) Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks, Review of Educational Research, 70:3, pp. 287-322.
7. FREEMAN, M. (1995) Peer Assessment by Groups of Group Work, Assesment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 20, pp. 289-300.
8. GATFIELD, T. (1999) Examining Student Satisfaction With Group Projects and Peer Assessment, Assesment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 24:4, pp. 365-377.
9. KANE, J. y LAWLER III, E. E. (1978) Methods of Peer Assessment, Psychological Bulletin, 85:3, pp. 555-586.
10. KWAN, K.-P. y LEUNG, R. (1996) Tutor Versus Peer Group Assessment of Student Performance in a Simulation Training Exercise, Assesment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21:3, pp. 205-214.
11. LANGAN, M.; WHEATER, P.; SHAW, E.; HAINES, B.; CULLEN, R.; BOYLE, J.; PENNEY, D.; OLDEKOP, J.; ASHCROFT, C.; LOCKEY, L. y PREZIOSI, R. (2005) Peer Assessment of Oral Presentations: Effects of Student Gender, University Affiliation and Participation in the Development of Assessment Criteria, Assesment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30:1, pp. 21-34.
12. MACALPINE, J. M. K. (1999) Improving and Encouraging Peer Assessment of Student Presentations, Assesment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24:1, pp. 15-25.
13. MACLELLAN, E. (2001) Assesment for Learning: the Differing Perceptions of Tutors and Students, Assesment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26:4, pp. 307-318.
14. MACPHERSON, K. (1999) The Development of Critical Thinking Skills in Undergraduate Supervisory Management Units: Efficacy of Student Peer Assessment, Assesment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24:3, pp. 273-284.
15. MAGIN, D. J. (2001a) A Novel Technique for Comparing the Reliability of Multiple Peer Assessments With That of Single Teacher Assessments of Group Process Work, Assesment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 26:2, pp. 139-152.
16. MAGIN, D. J. (2001b) Reciprocity As a Source of Bias in Multiple Peer Assessment of Group Work, Studies in Higher Education, 26:1, pp. 53-63.
17. MAGIN, D. J. y HELMORE, P. (2001) Peer and Teacher Assessments of Oral Presentation Skills; How Reliable Are They?, Studies in Higher Education, 26:3, pp. 287-298.
18. ORSMOND, P.; MERRY, S. y REILING, K. (1996) The Importance of Marking Criteria in the Use of Peer Assessment, Assesment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21:3, pp. 239-250.
19. ORSMOND, P.; MERRY, S. y REILING, K. (2000) The Use of Student Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self-Assessment, Assesment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25:1, pp. 23-38.
20. PASCUAL GÓMEZ I. y GAVIRIA SOTO J. L. (2004) El problema de la fiabilidad en la evaluación de la eficiencia docente en la universidad: una alternativa metodológica, revista española de pedagogía, 62:229, pp. 359-376.
21. REYNOLDS, M. y TREHAN. K. (2000) Assessment: a Critical Perspective, Studies in Higher Education, 25:3, pp. 267-278.
22. SEARBY, M. y EWERS, T. (1997) An Evaluation ot ihe Use of Peer Assessment in Higher Educartion: a Case Study Un the School of Music, Kingston University, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 22:4, pp. 371.
23. SULLIVAN, K. y HALL, C. (1997) Introducing Students to Self-Assessment, Assesment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 22:3, pp. 289-305.
24. TARIQ, V. N.; STEFANI, L. A. J.; BUTCHER, A. C. y HEYLINGS, D. J. A. (1998) Developing a New Approach to the Assessment of Project Work, Assesment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23:3, pp. 221-240.
25. VVAA. (2002). SPSS 10 Guía para el análisis de datos. Servicio de informática Universidad de Cádiz.
26. WARD, M.; GRUPPEN, L. y REGEHR, G. (2002) Measuring Self-Assessment: Current State of the Art, Advances in Health Sciences Education, 7:1, pp. 63-80.