Dual functions of DNA replication forks in checkpoint signaling and PCNA ubiquitination

Cell Cycle

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 191-194

  Yang, Xiaohong H ^a   Zou, Lee ^a,b  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

ATR; Checkpoint; Chk1; DNA damage; PCNA; Replication fork; Ubiquitination

Indexed keywords

ATR PROTEIN; CHECKPOINT KINASE 1; CYCLINE; NUCLEIC ACID BINDING PROTEIN; PROTEIN CLASPIN; PROTEIN RAD17; PROTEIN TIMELESS; RAD18 PROTEIN; REGULATOR PROTEIN; SMALL INTERFERING RNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

CELL PROLIFERATION; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPLICATION; DNA SYNTHESIS; GENOTOXICITY; HELA CELL; HUMAN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REVIEW; UBIQUITINATION;

EID: 58549095664     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.8.2.7357     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Cimprich KA and Cortez D. ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008; 9:616-27.
2. Zou L. Single- and double-stranded DNA: building a trigger of ATR-mediated DNA damage response. Genes Dev 2007; 21:879-85.
3. Lehmann AR. Translesion synthesis in mammalian cells. Exp Cell Res 2006; 312:2673-6.
4. Kannouche PL, Wing J and Lehmann AR. Interaction of human DNA polymerase eta with monoubiquitinated PCNA: a possible mechanism for the polymerase switch in response to DNA damage. Mol Cell 2004; 14:491-500.
5. Watanabe K, et al. Rad18 guides poleta to replication stalling sites through physical interaction and PCNA monoubiquitination. Embo J 2004; 23:3886-96.
6. Bi X, et al. Rad18 regulates DNA polymerase kappa and is required for recovery from S-phase checkpoint-mediated arrest. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26:3527-40.
7. Yang XH, Shiotani B, Classon M and Zou L. Chk1 and Claspin potentiate PCNA ubiquitination. Genes Dev 2008; 22:1147-52.
8. Garg P and Burgers PM. Ubiquitinated proliferating cell nuclear antigen activates translesion DNA polymerases eta and REV1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:18361-6.
9. Huang TT, et al. Regulation of monoubiquitinated PCNA by DUB autocleavage. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8:339-47.
10. Leach CA and Michael WM. Ubiquitin/SUMO modification of PCNA promotes replication fork progression in Xenopus laevis egg extracts. J Cell Biol 2005; 171:947-54.
11. Frampton J, et al. Postreplication repair and PCNA modification in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Biol Cell 2006; 17:2976-85.
12. Chang DJ, Lupardus PJ and Cimprich KA. Monoubiquitination of proliferating cell nuclear antigen induced by stalled replication requires uncoupling of DNA polymerase and mini-chromosome maintenance helicase activities. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:32081-8.
13. Byun TS, Pacek M, Yee MC, Walter JC and Cimprich KA. Functional uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATR-dependent checkpoint. Genes Dev 2005; 19:1040-52.
14. Sogo JM, Lopes M and Foiani M. Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 2002; 297:599-602.
15. Lopes M, Foiani M and Sogo JM. Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions. Mol Cell 2006; 21:15-27.
16. Zou L and Elledge SJ. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 2003; 300:1542-8.
17. Namiki Y and Zou L. ATRIP associates with replication protein A-coated ssDNA through multiple interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:580-5.
18. Tsuji Y, et al. Recognition of forked and single-stranded DNA structures by human RAD18 complexed with RAD6B protein triggers its recruitment to stalled replication forks. Genes Cells 2008; 13:343-54.
19. Niimi A, et al. Regulation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen ubiquitination in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105:16125-30.
20. Davies AA, Huttner D, Daigaku Y, Chen S and Ulrich HD. Activation of ubiquitindependent DNA damage bypass is mediated by replication protein a. Mol Cell 2008; 29:625-36.
21. Zou L, Liu D and Elledge SJ. Replication protein A-mediated recruitment and activation of Rad17 complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100:13827-32.
22. Zou L, Cortez D and Elledge SJ. Regulation of ATR substrate selection by Rad17-dependent loading of Rad9 complexes onto chromatin. Genes Dev 2002; 16:198-208.
23. Kumagai A, Lee J, Yoo HY and Dunphy WG. TopBP1 activates the ATR-ATRIP complex. Cell 2006; 124:943-55.
24. Fu Y, et al. Rad6-Rad18 mediates a eukaryotic SOS response by ubiquitinating the 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp. Cell 2008; 133:601-11.
25. Scorah J, et al. A conserved proliferating cell nuclear antigen-interacting protein sequence in Chk1 is required for checkpoint function. J Biol Chem 2008; 283:17250-9.
26. Gotter AL, Suppa C and Emanuel BS. Mammalian TIMELESS and Tipin are evolutionarily conserved replication fork-associated factors. J Mol Biol 2007; 366:36-52.
27. Unsal-Kacmaz K, et al. The human Tim/Tipin complex coordinates an Intra-S checkpoint response to UV that slows replication fork displacement. Mol Cell Biol 2007; 27:3131-42.
28. Katou Y, et al. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 2003; 424:1078-83.
29. Lou H, et al. Mrc1 and DNA polymerase epsilon function together in linking DNA replication and the S phase checkpoint. Mol Cell 2008; 32:106-17.
30. Wang X, et al. Rad17 phosphorylation is required for claspin recruitment and Chk1 activation in response to replication stress. Mol Cell 2006; 23:331-41.
31. Chini CC, Wood J and Chen J. Chk1 is required to maintain claspin stability. Oncogene 2006; 25:4165-71.
32. Petermann E, et al. Chk1 requirement for high global rates of replication fork progression during normal vertebrate S phase. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26:3319-26.
33. Tong AH, et al. Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 2004; 303:808-13.
34. Osborn AJ and Elledge SJ. Mrc1 is a replication fork component whose phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress activates Rad53. Genes Dev 2003; 17:1755-67.
35. Xu H, Boone C and Klein HL. Mrc1 is required for sister chromatid cohesion to aid in recombination repair of spontaneous damage. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:7082-90.
36. Tourriere H, Versini G, Cordon-Preciado V, Alabert C and Pasero P. Mrc1 and Tof1 promote replication fork progression and recovery independently of Rad53. Mol Cell 2005; 19:699-706.
37. Calzada A, Hodgson B, Kanemaki M, Bueno A and Labib K. Molecular anatomy and regulation of a stable replisome at a paused eukaryotic DNA replication fork. Genes Dev 2005; 19:1905-19.
38. Szyjka SJ, Viggiani CJ and Aparicio OM. Mrc1 is required for normal progression of replication forks throughout chromatin in S. cerevisiae. Mol Cell 2005; 19:691-7.
39. Hodgson B, Calzada A and Labib K. Mrc1 and Tof1 regulate DNA replication forks in different ways during normal S phase. Mol Biol Cell 2007; 18:3894-902.
40. Mohanty BK, Bairwa NK and Bastia D. The Tof1p-Csm3p protein complex counteracts the Rrm3p helicase to control replication termination of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:897-902.
41. Petermann E, Helleday T and Caldecott KW. Claspin promotes normal replication fork rates in human cells. Mol Biol Cell 2008; 19:2373-8.
42. Yoshizawa-Sugata N and Masai H. Human Tim/Timeless-interacting protein, Tipin, is required for efficient progression of S phase and DNA replication checkpoint. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:2729-40.
43. Chou DM and Elledge SJ. Tipin and Timeless form a mutually protective complex required for genotoxic stress resistance and checkpoint function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:18143-7.