Interplay between structural rigidity and electrostatic interactions in the ligand binding domain of GluR2

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 656-671

  Mamonova, Tatyana ^a   Speranskiy, Kirill ^a,b   Kurnikova, Maria ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cleft; Computational modification; Conformational transition; Flexibility; Flipped unflipped; Glutamate; Hinge; Hydrogen bond; Mobility; Molecular dynamic simulation; Rigid cluster

Indexed keywords

GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR 2;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ELECTRICITY; HYDROGEN BOND; LIGAND BINDING; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MUTANT PROTEINS; PLIABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; RECEPTORS, AMPA; SALTS; STATIC ELECTRICITY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 57349195082     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22090     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Dingledine R, Borges K, Bowie D, Traynelis SF. The glutamate receptor ion channels. Pharmacol Rev 1999;51:7-61.
2. Mayer ML. Glutamate receptors at atomic resolution. Nature 2006;440:456-462.
3. Mayer ML, Armstrong N. Structure and function of glutamate receptor ion channels. Annu Rev Physiol 2004;66:161-181.
4. Burnashev N, Villarroel A, Sakmann B. Dimensions and ion selectivity of recombinant AMPA and kainate receptor channels and their dependence on Q/R site residues. J Physiol (London) 1996;496:165-173.
5. Armstrong N, Gouaux E. Mechanisms for activation and antagonism of an AMPA-Sensitive glutamate receptor: crystal structures of the GluR2 ligand binding core. Neuron 2000;28:165-181.
6. Armstrong N, Sun Y, Chen GQ, Gouaux E. Structure of a glutamate-receptor ligand-binding core in complex with kainate. Nature 1998;395:913-917.
7. McFeeters RL, Oswald RE. Structural mobility of the extracellular ligand-binding core of an ionotropic glutamate receptor. Analysis of NMR relaxation dynamics. Biochemistry 2002;41:10472-10481.
8. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
9. Abele R, Keinanen K, Madden DR. Agonist-induced isomerization in a glutamate receptor ligand-binding domain - a kinetic and mutagenetic analysis. J Biol Chem 2000;275:21355-21363.
10. Mayer ML, Ghosal A, Dolman NP, Jane DE. Crystal structures of the kainate receptor GluR5 ligand binding core dimer with novel GluR5-selective antagonists. J Neurosci 2006;26:2852-2861.
11. Weston MC, Gertler C, Mayer ML, Rosenmund C. Interdomain interactions in AMPA and kainate receptors regulate affinity for glutamate. J Neurosci 2006;26:7650-7658.
12. Kasper C, Pickering DS, Mirza O, Olsen L, Kristensen AS, Greenwood JR, Liljefors T, Schousboe A, Watjen F, Gajhede M, Sigurskjold BW, Kastrup JS. The structure of a mixed GluR2 ligand-binding core dimer in complex with (S)-glutamate and the antagonist (S)-NS1209. J Mol Biol 2006;357:1184-1201.
13. Valentine ER, Palmer AG. Microsecond-to-millisecond conformational dynamics demarcate the GluR2 glutamate receptor bound to agonists glutamate, quisqualate, and AMPA. Biochemistry 2005;44:3410-3417.
14. Ahmed AH, Loh AP, Jane DE, Oswald RE. Dynamics of the S1S2 glutamate binding domain of GluR2 measured using F-19 NMR spectroscopy. J Biol Chem 2007;282:12773-12784.
15. Jayaraman V. Spectroscopic and kinetic methods for ligand-protein interactions of glutamate receptor. Methods Enzymol 2004;380:170-187.
16. Mankiewicz KA, Rambhadran A, Du M, Ramanoudjame G, Jayaraman V. Role of the chemical interactions of the agonist in controlling alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5- methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor activation. Biochemistry 2007;46:1343-1349.
17. Mamonova T, Hespenheide B, Straub R, Thorpe MF, Kurnikova M. Protein flexibility using constraints from molecular dynamics simulations. Phys Biol 2005;2:S137-S147.
18. Speranskiy K, Kurnikova M. On the binding determinants of the glutamate agonist with the glutamate receptor ligand binding domain. Biochemistry 2005;44:11508-11517.
19. Arinaminpathy Y, Sansom MSP, Biggin PC. Molecular dynamics simulations of the ligand-binding domain of the ionotropic glutamate receptor GluR2. Biophys J 2002;82:676-683.
20. Arinaminpathy Y, Sansom MSP, Biggin PC. Binding site flexibility: Molecular simulation of partial and full agonists within a glutamate receptor. Mol Pharmacol 2006;69:5-12.
21. Robert A, Armstrong N, Gouaux JE, Howe JR. AMPA receptor binding cleft mutations that alter affinity, efficacy, and recovery from desensitization. J Neurosci 2005;25:3752-3762.
22. Jin R, Banke TG, Mayer ML, Traynelis SF, Gouaux E. Structural basis for partial agonist action at ionotropic glutamate receptors. Nat Neurosci 2003;6:803-810.
23. Jin R, Horning M, Mayer ML, Gouaux E. Mechanism of activation and selectivity in a ligand-gated ion channel: structural and functional studies of GluR2 and quisqualate. Biochemistry 2002;41:15635-15643.
24. Roccatano D, Mark AE, Hayward S. Investigation of the mechanism of domain closure in citrate synthase by molecular dynamics simulation. J Mol Biol 2001;310:1039-1053.
25. Pentikainen U, Settimo L, Johnson MS, Pentikainen OT. Subtype selectivity and flexibility of ionotropic glutamate receptors upon antagonist ligand binding. Org Biomol Chem 2006;4:1058-1070.
26. Mendieta J, Gago F, Ramirez G. Binding of 5′-GMP to the GluR2 AMPA receptor: insight from targeted molecular dynamics simulations. Biochemistry 2005;44:14470-14476.
27. Lau AY, Roux B. The free energy landscapes governing conformational changes in a glutamate receptor ligand-binding domain. Structure 2007;15:1203-1214.
28. Leach AR. Molecular modelling: principles and applications, 2nd ed. Harlow, England: Prentice Hall; 2001.
29. Thorpe MF, Lei M, Rader AJ, Jacobs DJ, Kuhn LA. Protein flexibility and dynamics using constraint theory. J Mol Graph Model 2001;19:60-69.
30. Jacobs DJ, Rader AJ, Kuhn LA, Thorpe MF. Protein flexibility predictions using graph theory. Proteins 2001;44:150-165.
31. Jayaraman V, Keesey R, Madden DR. Ligand-protein interactions in the glutamate receptor. Biochemistry 2000;39:8693-8697.
32. Pearlman DA, Case DA, Caldwell JW, Ross WS, Cheatham TE, Debolt S, Ferguson D, Seibel G, Kollman P. Amber, a package of computer-programs for applying molecular mechanics, normal-mode analysis, molecular dynamics and free-energy calculations to simulate the structural and energetic properties of molecules. Comput Phys Commun 1995;91:1-41.
33. Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, Gould IR, Merz KM, Ferguson DM, Spellmeyer DC, Fox T, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA. A 2nd generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic-acids, and organic-molecules. J Am Chem Soc 1995;117:5179-5197.
34. Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, Vangunsteren WF, Dinola A, Haak JR. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys 1984;81:3684-3690.
35. Stickle DF, Presta LG, Dill KA, Rose GD. Hydrogen-bonding in globular-proteins. J Mol Biol 1992;226:1143-1159.
36. Hayward S, Berendsen HJC. Systematic analysis of domain motions in proteins from conformational change: New results on citrate synthase and T4 lysozyme. Proteins 1998;30:144-154.
37. Hogner A, Kastrup JS, Jin R, Liljefors T, Mayer ML, Egebjerg J, Larsen IK, Gouaux E. Structural basis for AMPA receptor activation and ligand selectivity: crystal structures of five agonist complexes with the GluR2 ligand-binding core. J Mol Biol 2002;322:93-109.
38. Lampinen M, Pentikainen O, Johnson MS, Keinanen K. AMPA receptors and bacterial periplasmic amino acid-binding proteins share the ionic mechanism of ligand recognition. EMBO J 1998;17:4704-4711.