Informing Stylistic Learning Behavior, Disposition, and Achievement Through Ability Subtests - Or, More Illusions of Meaning?

School Psychology Review

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 163-175

  McDermott, Paul A ^a   Glutting, Joseph J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031528014     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. American Psychological Association. (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Clemans, W. V. (1965). An analytical and empirical examination of some properties of ipsative measures. Psychometric Monographs (No. 14).
3. Cohen, M., & Nagel, N. (1934). An introduction to logic and scientific method. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.
4. Conger, A. J., Conger, J. C., Farrell, A. D., & Ward, D. (1979). What can the WISC-R measure? Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 431-436.
5. Education of All Handicapped Children Act. (1977). 20 U.S.C. § 1401, 1414.
6. Elliot, C. D. (1990). Differential Ability Scales introductory and technical handbook. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
7. Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 378-382.
8. Glutting, J. J., & McDermott, P. A. (1988). Generality of test-session observations to kindergartners' classroom behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 16, 527-537.
9. Glutting, J. J., & McDermott, P. A. (1990a). Patterns and prevalence of core profile types in the WPPSI standardization sample. School Psychology Review, 19, 471-491.
10. Glutting, J. J., & McDermott, P. A. (1990b). Score structures and applications of core profile types in the McCarthy scales standardization sample. Journal of Special Education, 24, 212-233.
11. Glutting, J. J., McDermott, P. A., & Konold, T. R. (1997). Ontology, structure, and diagnostic benefits of a normative subtest taxonomy from the WISC-III standardization sample. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 349-372). New York: Guilford.
12. Glutting, J. J., McGrath, E. A., Kamphaus, R. W., & McDermott, P. A. (1992). Taxonomy and validity of subtest profiles on the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. Journal of Special Education, 26, 85-115.
13. Glutting, J. J., & Oakland, T. (1993). Guide to the assessment of test session behavior. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
14. Glutting, J. J., Oakland, T., & McDermott, P. A. (1989). Observing child behavior during testing: Constructs, validity, and situational generality. Journal of School Psychology, 27, 155-164.
15. Gnys, J. A., Willis, W. G., & Faust, D. (1995). School psychologists' diagnoses of learning disabilities: A study of illusory correlation. Journal of School Psychology, 33, 59-73.
16. Hale, R. L. (1979). The utility of WISC-R subtest scores in discriminating among adequate and underachieving children. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14, 245-253.
17. Hicks, L. E. (1970). Some properties of ipsative, normative, and forced-choice normative measures. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 167-184.
18. Holland, A. M., & McDermott, P. A. (1996). Discovering core profile types in the school-age standardization sample of the Differential Ability Scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 14, 131-146.
19. Kamphaus, R. W. (1993). Clinical assessment of children's intelligence. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
20. Kaufman, A. S. (1979). Intelligent testing with the WISC-R. New York: Wiley & Sons.
21. Kaufman, A. S. (1994). Intelligent testing with the WISC-III. New York: Wiley & Sons.
22. Mine, R. B., Snyder, J., & Castellanos, M. (1996). Lessons from the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC): Toward a new cognitive assessment model. Psychological Assessment, 8, 7-17.
23. Kline, R. B., Snyder, J., Guilmette, S., & Castellanos, M. (1992, August). WISC-R, K-ABC, and Stanford-Binet profile variability: Another validity cul-de-sac. Paper presented at the Centennial Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
24. McDermott, P. A. (1984). Comparative functions of preschool learning style and IQ in predicting future academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 9, 38-47.
25. McDermott, P. A. (1994). National profiles in youth psychopathology: Manual of Adjustment Scales for Children and Adolescents. Philadelphia, PA: Edumetric and Clinical Science.
26. McDermott, P. A., & Beitman, B. S. (1984). Standardization of a scale for the Study of Children's Learning Styles: Structure, stability, and criterion validity. Psychology in the Schools, 21, 5-14.
27. McDermott, P. A., Fantuzzo, J. W., & Glutting, J. J. (1990). Just say no to subtest analysis: A critique on Wechsler's theory and practice. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 290-302.
28. McDermott, P. A., Fantuzzo, J. W., Glutting, J. J., Watkins, M. W., & Baggaley, A. R. (1992). Illusions of meaning in the ipsative assessment of children's ability. Journal of Special Education, 25, 504-526.
29. McDermott, P. A., Glutting, J. J., Jones, J. N., & Noonan, J. V. (1989). Typology and prevailing composition of core profiles in the WAIS-R standardization sample. Psychological Assessment, 1, 118-125.
30. McDermott, P. A., Glutting, J. J., Jones, J. N., Watkins, M. W., & Kush, J. (1989). Core profile types in the WISC-R national sample: Structure, membership, and applications. Psychological Assessment, 1, 292-299.
31. McDermott, P. A., Green, L. F., Francis, J. M., & Stott, D. H. (1996). Learning Behaviors Scale. Philadelphia, PA: Edumetric and Clinical Science.
32. McGrew, K. S. (1994). Clinical interpretation of the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability-Revised. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
33. Meehl, P. E. (1973). Why I do not attend case conferences. In P. E. Meehl (Ed.), Psychodiagnosis: Selected readings (pp. 225-301). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
34. Moffit, T. E., Caspi, A., Harkness, A. R., & Silva, P. A. (1993). The natural history of change in intellectual performance: Who changes? How much? Is it meaningful? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34, 455-506.
35. The Psychological Corporation. (1992). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test. San Antonio, TX: Author.
36. Radcliffe, J. A. (1963). Some properties of ipsative score matrices and their relevance for some current interest tests. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 1-11.
37. Sattler, J. M. (1992). Assessment of children. San Diego, CA: Author.
38. Saville, P., & Wilson, E. (1991). The reliability and validity of normative and ipsative approaches in the measurement of personality. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 64, 219-239.
39. Stott, D. H., McDermott, P. A., Green, L. F., & Francis, J. M. (1988). Learning Behaviors Scale and Study of Children's Learning Behaviors research edition manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
40. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1988). Current population survey [Machine-readable data file]. Washington, DC: Author.
41. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1992). Current population survey [Machine-readable data file]. Washington, DC: Author.
42. U.S. Department of Education. (1989). Eleventh annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Education of the Handicapped Act. Washington, DC: Author.
43. Watkins, M. W., & Kush, J. C. (1988). Micro-CONGRU: A computer program for measuring levels of overall and partial congruence among multiple observers on nominal scales. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 20, 513-514.
44. Watkins, M. W., & Kush, J. C. (1994). Wechsler subtest analysis: The right way, the wrong way, or no way? School Psychology Review, 23, 640-651.
45. Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
46. Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.