The pedagogical mediation of a developmental learner corpus for classroom-based language instruction

Language Learning and Technology

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 33-52

  Belz, Julie A ^a,b,c   Vyatkina, Nina ^d,e,f  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TESOL Graduate Certificate Program

^c Indiana Center for Intercultural Communication   (United States)

^d Department of German/Applied Linguistics ^*

^e German Language Program

^f UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54949134444     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10943501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Aston G. (2002). The learner as corpus designer. In B. Kettemann, & G. Marko (Eds.), Teaching and learning by doing corpus analysis (pp. 9-25). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
2. Belz, J. A. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 60-81.
3. Belz, J. A. (2005). Corpus-driven characterizations of pronominal da-compound use by learners and native speakers of German. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 38(1), 43-59.
4. Belz, J. A. (2008). The role of computer mediation in the instruction and development of L2 pragmatic competence. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 45-75.
5. Belz, J. A., & Kinginger, C. (2003). Discourse options and the development of pragmatic competence by classroom learners of German: The case of address forms. Language Learning, 53(4), 591-647.
6. Belz, J. A., & Thorne, S. L. (Eds). (2006). Computer-mediated intercultural foreign language education. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
7. Belz, J. A., & Vyatkina, N. (2005). Learner corpus analysis and the development of L2 pragmatic competence in networked inter-cultural language study: The case of German modal particles. Canadian Modern Language Review/Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 62(1), 17-48.
8. Bernardini, S. (2002). Exploring new directions for discovery learning. In B. Kettemann, & G. Marko (Eds.), Teaching and learning by doing corpus analysis (pp. 165-181). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
9. Bernardini, S. (2004). Corpora in the classroom: An overview and some reflections on future developments. In J. Sinclair (Ed.), How to use corpora in language teaching (pp. 15-36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
10. Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Cook, G. (1998). The uses of reality: A reply to Ronald Carter. ELT Journal, 52, 57-63.
12. Coxhead, A. (2002). The academic wordlist: A corpus-based word list for academic purposes. In B. Kettemann, & G. Marko (Eds.), Teaching and learning by doing corpus analysis (pp. 73-89). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
13. De Cock, S. (2004). Preferred sequences of words in NS and NNS speech. Belgian Journal of English Language and Literatures, 2, 225-246.
14. Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83-107.
15. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Preemptive focus on form in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35(3), 407-432.
16. Flowerdew, L. (2005). An integration of corpus-based and genre-based approaches to text analysis in EAP/ESP: Countering criticisms against corpus-based methodologies. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 321-332.
17. Gavioli, L., & Aston, G. (2001). Enriching reality: Language corpora in language pedagogy. ELT Journal, 55(3), 238-246.
18. Götze, L. (1993). Modalpartikeln aus der Sicht der Sprachlehr- und Sprachlernforschung. [Modal particles from the perspective of language teaching and learning research.] Deutsch als Fremdsprache, 4, 227-232.
19. Granger, S. (1998). The computer learner corpus: A versatile new source of data for SLA research. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on computer (pp. 3-18). London: Longman.
20. Granger S., Dagneaux, E., & Meunier F. (2002) The International Corpus of Learner English. Handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain (162 pp.).
21. Granger, S., Hung, J., & Petch-Tyson, S. (Eds.). (2002). Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
22. Granger S., & Tribble, C. (1998). Learner corpus data in the foreign language classroom: form-focused instruction and data-driven learning. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on Computer (pp. 199-209). London: Longman.
23. Johns, T. (1986). Microconcord: A language learner's research tool. System, 14(2), 151-162.
24. Kasper, G., & Rose, K. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
25. Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Layder, D. (1993). New strategies in social research. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
27. Lee, D., & Swales, J. (2006). A corpus-based EAP course for NNS doctoral students: Moving from available specialized corpora to self-compiled corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 25(1), 56-75.
28. Leech, G. (1997). Teaching and language corpora: A convergence. In A. Wichmann, S. Fligelstone, A. M. McEnery, & G. Knowles (Eds.), Teaching and language corpora (pp. 1-23). London: Longman.
29. McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (1995). Spoken grammar: What is it and how do we teach it? ELT Journal, 49(3), 207-218.
30. Mellow, D., Reeder, K., & Forster, E. (1996). Using time-series research designs to investigate the effects of instruction on SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 325-350.
31. Mindt, D. (2002). A corpus-based grammar for ELT. In B. Kettemann, & G. Marko (Eds.), Teaching and learning by doing corpus analysis (pp. 91-105). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
32. Möllering, M. (2001). Teaching German modal particles: A corpus-based approach. Language Learning & Technology, 5(3), 130-151.
33. Möllering, M. (2004). The acquisition of German modal particles. Bern: Lang.
34. Möllering, M., & Nunan, D. (1995). Pragmatics in interlanguage: German modal particles. Applied Language Learning, 6(1-2), 41-64.
35. Nesselhauf, N. (2004). Learner corpora and their potential for language teaching. In Sinclair, J. (Ed.), How to use corpora in language teaching (pp. 125-152). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
36. Nesselhauf, N. (2005). Collocations in a learner corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
37. O'Dowd, R. (Ed.) (2007). On-line intercultural exchange: A practical introduction for foreign language teachers. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
38. Ortega, L., & Byrnes, H. (Eds.). (2008). The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39. Ortega, L., & Iberri-Shea, G. (2005). Longitudinal research in second language acquisition: Recent trends and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 26-45.
40. Pravec, N. (2002). Survey of learner corpora. ICAME Journal, 26, 81-114.
41. Prodromou, L. (1996). Correspondence. ELT Journal, 50(4), 371-373.
42. Robinson, P. (1997). Generalizability and automaticity of second language learning under implicit, incidental, enhanced, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 223-47.
43. Römer, U. (2004). A corpus-driven approach to modal auxiliaries and their didactics. In Sinclair, J. (Ed.), How to use corpora in language teaching (pp. 185-199). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
44. Rundell, M., & Granger, S. (2007). From corpora to confidence. English Teaching Professional, 50, 15-18.
45. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Seidlhofer, B. (2002). Pedagogy and local learner corpora. In Granger, S., Hung, J., & Petch-Tyson, S. (Eds.), Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching (pp. 213-234). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
47. Seidlhofer, B. (2003). Controversies in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48. Sinclair, J. (2003). Reading concordances: An introduction. New York: Longman.
49. St. John, E. (2001). A case for using a parallel corpus and concordancer for beginners of a foreign language. Language Learning & Technology, 5(3), 185-203.
50. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371-391.
51. Tao, H., & McCarthy, M. J. (2001). Understanding non-restrictive which-clauses in spoken English, which is not an easy thing. Language Sciences, 2, 651-677.
52. Thurstun, J., & Candlin, C. N. (1998). Concordancing and the teaching of the vocabulary of academic English. English for Specific Purposes, 17, 267-280.
53. Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus linguistics at work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
54. Vyatkina, N. (2007). Development of second language pragmatic competence: the data-driven teaching of German modal particles based on a learner corpus. The Pennsylvania State University, Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
55. Vyatkina, N., & Belz, J. A. (2006). A learner corpus-driven intervention for the development of L2 pragmatic competence. In K. Bardovi-Harlig, C. Félix-Brasdefer, & A. S. Omar (Eds.), Pragmatics and language learning (pp. 315-357). University of Hawai'i at Manoa, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
56. Vyatkina, N., & Johnson, K. E. (2007). Teaching German modal particles: A corpus-based approach. University Park, PA: CALPER Publications. Retrieved September 25, 2008, from http://calper.la.psu.edu/ publications.php
57. Weydt, H. (1969). Abtönungspartikel. Bad Homburg v.d.H., Berlin, Zürich: Verlag Gehlen.
58. Weydt, H., Harden, T., Hentschel, H., & Rösler, D. (1983). Kleine deutsche Partikellehre. Ernst Klett: Stuttgart.
59. Widdowson, H. G. (1991). Aspects of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60. Widdowson, H. G. (2000). On the limitations of linguistics applied. Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 3-25.