Paternity analysis of pollen-mediated gene flow for Fraxinus excelsior L. in a chronically fragmented landscape

Heredity

Volumn 101, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 368-380

  Bacles, C F E ^a,b   Ennos, R A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UMR 1202 BIOGECO   (France)

Author keywords

Fraxinus excelsior L; Genetic connectivity; Habitat fragmentation; Landscape genetics; Microsatellites; Paternity assignment

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

DECIDUOUS TREE; GENE FLOW; GENOTYPE; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; IMMIGRATION; PATERNITY; POLLINATION; SEED DISPERSAL;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECOSYSTEM; FRAXINUS; GENE FLOW; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT SEED; POLLEN; POLLINATION; POPULATION GENETICS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TREE;

ECOSYSTEM; FRAXINUS; GENE FLOW; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOTYPE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; POLLEN; POLLINATION; SEEDS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TREES;

EURASIA; EUROPE; SCOTLAND; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

FRAXINUS; FRAXINUS EXCELSIOR;

EID: 52549102476     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2008.66     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Aldrich PR, Hamrick JL (1998). Reproductive dominance of pasture trees in a fragmented tropical forest mosaic. Science 28: 103-105.
2. Amos W, Hoffman JI, Frodsham A, Zhang L, Best S, Hill AVS et al. (2007). Automated binning of microsatellite alleles: problems and solutions. Mol Ecol Notes 7: 10-14.
3. Araki H, Blouin MS (2005). Unbiased estimation of relative reproductive success of different groups: evaluation and correction of bias caused by parentage assignment errors. Mol Ecol 14: 4097-4109.
4. Bacles CFE, Burczyk J, Lowe AJ, Ennos RA (2005). Historical and contemporary mating patterns in remnant populations of the forest tree Fraxinus excelsior L. Evolution 59: 979-990.
5. Bacles CFE, Lowe AJ, Ennos RA (2006). Effective seed dispersal across a fragmented landscape. Science 311: 628.
6. Bittencourt JVM, Sebbenn AM (2007). Patterns of pollen and seed dispersal in a small fragmented population of the wind-pollinated tree Araucaria angustifolia in southern Brazil. Heredity 99: 580-591.
7. Brachet S, Jubier MF, Richard M, Jung-Muller B, Frascaria-Lacoste N (1999). Rapid identification of microsatellite loci using 5′ anchored PCR in the common ash Fraxinus excelsior. Mol Ecol 8: 157-168.
8. Burczyk J, Adams WT, Moran GF, Griffin AR (2002). Complex patterns of mating revealed in a Eucalyptus regnans seed orchard using allozyme markers and the neighbourhood model. Mol Ecol 11: 2379-2391.
9. Burczyk J, Chybicki IJ (2004). Cautions on direct gene flow estimation in plant populations. Evolution 58: 956-963.
10. Dakin EE, Avise JC (2004). Microsatellite null alleles in parentage analysis. Heredity 93: 504-509.
11. Dick CW (2001). Genetic rescue of remnant tropical trees by an alien pollinator. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 268: 2391-2396.
12. Dow BD, Ashley MV (1998). High levels of gene flow in bur oak revealed by paternity analysis using microsatellites. J Hered 89: 62-70.
13. Ferrazzini D, Monteleone I, Belletti P (2007). Genetic variability and divergence among Italian populations of common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.). Ann For Sci 64: 159-168.
14. FRAXIGEN (2005). Ash Species in Europe: Biological Characteristics and Practical Guidelines for Sustainable Use. Oxford Forestry Institute, University of Oxford: UK, pp 128.
15. Gerard PR, Klein E, Austerlitz F, Fernandez-Manjarres JF, Frascaria-Lacoste N (2006). Assortative mating and differential male mating success in an ash hybrid zone population. BMC Evol Biol 6: 96.
16. Gerber S, Chabrier P, Kremer A (2003). FAMOZ: a software for parentage analysis using dominant, codominant and uniparentally inherited markers. Mol Ecol Notes 3: 479-481.
17. Gerber S, Mariette S, Streiff R, Bodenes C, Kremer A (2000). Comparison of microsatellites and amplified fragment length polymorphism markers for parentage analysis. Mol Ecol 9: 1037-1048.
18. Hadfield JD, Richardson DS, Burke T (2006). Towards unbiased parentage assignment: combining genetic, behavioural and spatial data in a Bayesian framework. Mol Ecol 15: 3715-3730.
19. Hamrick J (2004). Response of forest trees to global environmental changes. For Ecol Manage 197: 323-335.
20. Hazlitt SL, Sigg DP, Eldridge MDB, Goldizen AW (2006). Restricted mating dispersal and strong breeding group structure in a mid-sized marsupial mammal (Petrogale penicillata). Mol Ecol 15: 2997-3007.
21. Hebel I, Aldinger E, Haas R, Karopka M, Bogenrieder A, Dounavi A et al. (2007). Pollen dispersal and pollen contamination in an ash seed orchard (Fraxinus excelsior L.). Allgemeine forst und jagdzeitung 178: 44-49.
22. Heuertz M, Hausman F, Hardy OJ, Vendramin GG, Frascaria-Lacoste N, Vekemans X (2004). Nuclear microsatellites reveal contrasting patterns of genetic structure between western and southeastern European populations of the common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.). Evolution 58: 976-988.
23. Heuertz M, Hausman F, Tsvetkov I, Frascaria-Lacoste N, Vekemans X (2001). Assessment of genetic structure within and among Bulgarian populations of the common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.). Mol Ecol 10: 1615-1623.
24. Hobbs R (2007). Managing plant populations in fragmented landscapes: restoration or gardening? Aus J Bot 55: 371-374.
25. Hoffman JI, Amos W (2005). Microsatellite genotyping errors: detection approaches, common sources and consequences for paternity exclusion. Mol Ecol 14: 599-612.
26. Imbert E, Lefèvre F (2003). Dispersal and gene flow of Populus nigra (Salicaceae) along a dynamic river system. J Ecol 91: 447-456.
27. Janzen DH (1986). Blurry catastrophes. Oikos 47: 1-2.
28. Jones AG, Ardren WR (2003). Methods of parentage analyses in natural populations. Mol Ecol 12: 2511-2523.
29. Julien M-P, Alard D, Balent G (2006). Patterns of ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) colonization in mountain grasslands: the importance of management practices. Plant Ecol 183: 177-189.
30. Jump AS, Penuelas J (2006). Genetic effects of chronic habitat fragmentation in a wind-pollinated tree. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 8096-8100.
31. Klein E, Lavigne C, Gouyon P-H (2006). Mixing of propagules from discrete sources at long distances: comparing a dispersal tail to an exponential. BMC Ecol 6: 3.
32. Kokko H, Lopez-Sepulcre A (2006). From individual dispersal to species range: perspectives in a changing world. Science 313: 789-790.
33. Lefort F, Brachet S, Frascaria-Lacoste N, Edwards KJ, Douglas GC (1999). Identification and characterization of microsatellite loci in ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) and their conservation in the olive family (Oleaceae). Mol Ecol 8: 1075-1092.
34. Lowe AJ, Boshier DH, Ward M, Bacles CFE, Navarro C (2005). Genetic resource impacts of habitat loss and degradation: reconciling empirical evidence and predicted theory for neotropical trees. Heredity 95: 255-273.
35. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton J (1998). Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7: 639-655.
36. Meagher TR (2007). Paternity analysis in a fragmented landscape. Heredity 99: 563-564.
37. Morand ME, Brachet S, Rossignol P, Dufour J, Frascaria-Lacoste N (2002). A generalized heterozygote deficiency assessed with microsatellites in French common ash populations. Mol Ecol 11: 377-385.
38. Morissey MB, Wilson AJ (2005). The potential costs of accounting for genotypic errors in molecular parentage analyses. Mol Ecol 14: 4111-4121.
39. Nathan R (2006). Long-distance dispersal of plants. Science 313: 786-788.
40. Nielsen R, Mattila DK, Clapham PJ, Palsbøll PJ (2001). Statistical approaches to paternity analysis in natural populations and applications to the North Atlantic Humpback whale. Genetics 157: 1673-1682.
41. O'Connell LM, Mosseler A, Rajora OP (2006). Impacts of forest fragmentation on the mating system and genetic diversity of white spruce (Picea glauca) at the landscape scale. Heredity 97: 418-426.
42. Oddou-Muratorio S, Houot M-L, Demesure-Musch B, Austerlitz F (2003). Pollen flow in the wild service tree, Sorbus torminalis (L.) Crantz I. Evaluating the paternity analysis procedure in continuous populations. Mol Ecol 12: 3427-3439.
43. Ritland K (2002). Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independent loci. Heredity 88: 221-228.
44. Signorovitch J, Nielsen R (2002). PATRI - paternity inference using genetic data. Bioinformatics 18: 341-342.
45. Slate J, Marshall T, Pemberton J (2000). A retrospective assessment of the accuracy of the paternity inference program CERVUS. Mol Ecol 9: 801-808.
46. Slavov GT, Howe GT, Gyaourova AV, Birkes DS, Adams WT (2005). Estimating pollen flow using SSR markers and paternity exclusion: accounting for mistyping. Mol Ecol 14: 3109-3121.
47. Smouse PE, Sork VL (2004). Measuring pollen flow in forest trees. For Ecol Manage 197: 21-38.
48. Sork VL, Davis FW, Smouse PE, Apsit PE, Dyer RJ, Fernandez JF et al. (2002). Pollen movement in declining populations of California Valley Oak, Quercus lobata: where have all the fathers gone? Mol Ecol 11: 1657-1668.
49. Sork VL, Nason JD, Campbell DR, Fernandez JF (1999). Landscape approaches to historical and contemporary gene flow in plants. Trends Ecol Evol 14: 219-224.
50. Sork VL, Smouse PE (2006). Genetic analysis of landscape connectivity in tree populations. Landsc Ecol 21: 821-836.
51. Wagner AP, Creel S, Kalinowski ST (2006). Estimating relatedness and relationships using microsatellite loci with null alleles. Heredity 97: 336-345.
52. White GM, Boshier DH, Powell W (2002). Increased pollen flow counteracts fragmentation in a tropical dry forest: an example from Swietenia humilis Zuccarini. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 2038-2042.
53. st≠1/(4Nm+1). Heredity 82: 117-125.
54. Young A, Boyle T, Brown AHD (1996). The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol Evol 11: 413-418.