Unbiased estimation of relative reproductive success of different groups: Evaluation and correction of bias caused by parentage assignment errors

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 14, Issue 13, 2005, Pages 4097-4109

  Araki, Hitoshi ^a   Blouin, Michael S ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assignment error; Incomplete samples; Microsatellite; Parentage; Relative reproductive success; Salmonid

Indexed keywords

ONCORHYNCHUS MYKISS; SALMONIDAE;

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETICS; PEDIGREE; POPULATION GENETICS; RAINBOW TROUT; REPRODUCTION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); GENE FREQUENCY; GENETICS, POPULATION; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; ONCORHYNCHUS MYKISS; PEDIGREE; REPRODUCTION;

EID: 33646147102     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02689.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Avise JC (2004) Molecular Markers, Natural History, and Evolution, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
2. Bernatchez L, Duchesne P (2000) Individual-based genotype analysis in studies of parentage and population assignment: how many loci, how many alleles? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 57, 1-12.
3. Bishop JM, Jarvis JU, Spinks AC, Bennett NC, O'Ryan C (2004) Molecular insight into patterns of colony composition and paternity in the common mole-rat Cryptomys hottentotus hottentotus. Molecular Ecology, 13, 1217-1229.
4. Brohede J, Primmer CR, Moller A, Ellegren H (2002) Heterogeneity in the rate and pattern of germline mutation at individual microsatellite loci. Nucleic Acids Research, 30, 1997-2003.
5. Burczyk J, Adams WT, Moran GF, Griffin AR (2002) Complex patterns of mating revealed in a Eucalyptus regnans seed orchard using allozyme markers and the neighbourhood model. Molecular Ecology, 11, 2379-2391.
6. Cairney M, Taggart JB, Hoyheim B (2000) Characterization of microsatellite and minisatellite loci in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) and cross-species amplification in other salmonids. Molecular Ecology, 9, 2175-2178.
7. Davies N, Villablanca FX, Roderick GK (1999) Determining the source of individuals: multilocus genotyping in nonequilibrium population genetics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 17-21.
8. Devlin B, Roeder K, Ellstrand NC (1988) Fractional paternity assignment: theoretical development and comparison to other methods. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 76, 369-380.
9. Hoffman JI, Amos W (2005) Microsatellite genotyping errors: detection approaches, common sources and consequences for paternal exclusion. Molecular Ecology, 14, 599-612.
10. Jones AG, Ardren WR (2003) Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Molecular Ecology, 12, 2511-2523.
11. Kruuk EB, Slate J, Pemberton JM et al. (2002) Antler size in red deer: heritability and selection but no evolution. Evolution, 56, 1683-1695.
12. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LE, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology, 7, 639-655.
13. Morgan MT, Conner JK (2001) Using genetic markers to directly estimate male selection gradients. Evolution, 55, 272-281.
14. Morris DB, Richard KR, Wright JM (1996) Microsatellites from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and their use for genetic study of salmonids. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 53, 120-126.
15. Neff BD, Repka J, Gross MR (2001) A Bayesian framework for parentage analysis: the value of genetic and other biological data. Theoretical Population Biology, 59, 315-331.
16. Nelson RJ, Beacham TD, Small MP (1998) Microsatellite analysis of the population structure of a Vancouver island sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) stock complex using nondenaturing gel electrophoresis. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology, 7, 312-319.
17. Nichols KM, Young WP, Danzmann RG et al. (2003) A consolidated linkage map for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Animal Genetics, 34, 102-115.
18. Nielsen R, Mattila DK, Clapham PJ, Palsboll PJ (2001) Statistical approaches to paternity analysis in natural populations and applications to the North Atlantic humpback whale. Genetics, 157, 1673-1682.
19. Oddou-Muratorio S, Houot ML, Demesure-Musch B, Austerlitz F (2003) Pollen flow in the wildservice tree, Sorbus torminalis (L.) Crantz. I. Evaluating the paternity analysis procedure in continuous populations. Molecular Ecology, 12, 3427-3439.
20. Richardson DS, Jury FL, Blaakmeer K, Komdeur J, Burke T (2001) Parentage assignment and extra-group paternity in a cooperative breeder: the Seychelles warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis). Molecular Ecology, 10, 2263-2273.
21. SanCristobal M, Chevalet C (1997) Error tolerant parent identification from a finite set of individuals. Genetical Research, 70, 53-62.
22. Smouse PE, Meagher TR (1994) Genetic analysis of male reproductive contributions in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) gray (Liliaceae). Genetics, 136, 313-322.
23. Spies IB, Brasier DJ, O'Reilly PTL, Seamons TR, Bentzen P (2005) Development and characterization of novel tetra-, tri-, and dinucleotide microsatellite markers in rainbow trout (Onchrhynchus mykiss). Molecular Ecology Notes. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.00900.x.
24. Thompson EA (1975) The estimation of pairwise relationships. Annual of Human Genetics, 39, 173-188.