Pollen flow in the wildservice tree, Sorbus torminalis (L.) Crantz. I. Evaluating the paternity analysis procedure in continuous populations

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 12, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 3427-3439

  Oddou Muratorio, S ^a   Houot, M L ^a   Demesure Musch, B ^a   Austerlitz, F ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

CERVUS; Microsatellite; Parentage assignment; Population size; Scoring error; Simulations

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FRANCE; GENE FREQUENCY; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PEDIGREE; POLLEN; POPULATION DYNAMICS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SORBUS;

EMBRYOPHYTA; SORBUS TORMINALIS; TORMINALIS;

EID: 0344668683     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01989.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Austerlitz F, Smouse PE (2002) Two generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. IV. Estimating the dispersal parameter. Genetics, 141, 355-363.
2. Coltman DW, Bowen WD, Wright JM (1998) Male mating success in an aquatically mating pinniped, the harbour seal (Phoca vitulina), assessed by microsatellite DNA markers. Molecular Ecology, 7, 627-638.
3. Devlin B, Ellstrand NC (1990) The development and application of refined methods for estimating gene flow from angiosperm paternity analysis. Evolution, 44, 248-259.
4. Dick CW (2001) Genetic rescue of remnant tropical trees by an alien pollinator. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 268, 2391-2396.
5. Dow BD, Ashley MV (1996) Microsatellite analysis of seed dispersal and parentage of saplings in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Molecular Ecology, 5, 615-627.
6. Dow BD, Ashley MV (1998) High levels of gene flow in bur oak revealed by paternity analysis using microsatellites. Journal of Heredity, 89, 62-70.
7. Garnier JN, Bruford MW, Goossens B (2001) Mating system and reproductive skew in the black rhinoceros. Molecular Ecology, 10, 2031-2041.
8. Griffin AR, Sedgley M (1989) Sexual Reproduction of Tree Crops - London. Academic Press, London.
9. Jamieson A, Taylor SS (1997) Comparisons of three probability formulae for parentage exclusion. Animal Genetics, 28, 397-400.
10. Kaufman SR, Smouse DE, Alvarez-Buylla ER (1998) Pollen-mediated gene flow and differential male reproductive success in a tropical pioneer tree, Cecropia obtusitoua Bertol. (Moraceae): a paternity analysis. Heredity, 81, 164-173.
11. Konuma A, Tsumura Y, Lee CT, Lee SL, Okuda T (2000) Estimation of gene flow in the tropical-rainforest tree Neobalanocarpus heimii (Dipterocarpaceae), inferred from paternity analysis. Molecular Ecology, 9, 1843-1852.
12. Lebas NR (2001) Microsatellite determination of male reproductive success in a natural population of the territorial ornate dragon lizard, Ctenophorus ornatus. Molecular Ecology, 10, 193-203.
13. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology, 7, 639-655.
14. Meagher TR (1986) Analysis of paternity within a natural population of Chamaelirium luteum. I. Identification of most-likely male parents. American Naturalist, 128, 199-215.
15. Nielsen R, Mattila DK, Clapham PJ, Palsboll PJ (2001) Statistical approaches to paternity analysis in natural populations and application to the north atlantic humpback whale. Genetics, 157, 1673-1682.
16. Oddou-Muratorio S, Aligon C, Decroocq S et al. (2001b) Microsatellite primers for Sorbus torminalis and related species. Molecular Ecology Notes, 1, 297-299.
17. Oddou-Muratorio S, Petit RJ, Le Guerroué B, Guesnet D, Demesure B (2001a) Pollen-versus seed-mediated gene flow in a scattered woody species. Evolution, 55, 1123-1135.
18. Ritland K (2000) Marker-inferred relatedness as a tool for detecting heritability in nature. Molecular Ecology, 9, 1195-1204.
19. San Cristobal M, Chevalet C (1997) Error tolerant parent identification from a finite set of individuals. Genetical Research, 70, 53-62.
20. Slate J, Marshall T, Pemberton J (2000) A retrospective assessment of the accuracy of the paternity inference program CERVUS. Molecular Ecology, 9, 801-807.
21. Slavov GT, DiFazio SP, Strauss SH (2002) Gene flow in forest trees: from empirical estimates to transgenic risk assessment. In: Scientific Methods Workshop: Ecological and Agronomic consequences of gene flow from Transgenic Crops to Wild Relatives (eds Snow A, Mallory-Smith C, Kushard N, Holt J, Quenada H), pp. 113-133. Colombils Chio. http:// www.fsl.orst.edu/tgerc/pubs/ Strauss_2002_Ohio.pdf.
22. Smouse P, Meagher T (1994) Genetic analysis of male reproductive contributions in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) gray (Liliaceae). Genetics, 136, 313-322.
23. Stacy EA (2001) Cross-fertility in two tropical tree species: evidence of inbreeding depression within populations and genetic divergence among populations. American Journal of Botany, 88, 1041-1051.
24. Stacy EA, Hamrick JL, Nason JD et al. (1996) Pollen dispersal in low-density populations of three neotropical tree species. American Naturalist, 148, 275-298.
25. Streiff R, Ducousso A, Lexer C et al. (1999) Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed oak stand of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Molecular Ecology, 8, 831-841.
26. Worthington Wilmer J, Allen PJ, Pomeroy PP, Twiss SD, Amos W (1999) Where have all the fathers gone? An extensive microsatellite analysis of paternity in the grey seal (Halichoerus grypus). Molecular Ecology, 8, 1417-1429.