Towards unbiased parentage assignment: Combining genetic, behavioural and spatial data in a Bayesian framework

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 15, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 3715-3730

  Hadfield, J D ^a   Richardson, D S ^b   Burke, T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Maternity; MCMC; Microsatellite; Parentage analysis; Paternity; Seychelles warbler

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETICS; PEDIGREE; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION GENETICS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SONGBIRD; VALIDATION STUDY;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; PEDIGREE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SONGBIRDS;

ACROCEPHALUS SECHELLENSIS;

EID: 33749824427     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03050.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Adams WT, Griffin AR, Moran GF (1992) Using paternity analysis to measure effective pollen dispersal in plant populations. American Naturalist, 140, 762-780.
2. Almudevar A (2003) A simulated annealing algorithm for maximum likelihood pedigree reconstruction. Theoretical Population Biology, 63, 63-75.
3. Blouin MS (2003) DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 503-511.
4. Brooks SP, Gelman A (1998) General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 7, 434-455.
5. Burczyk J, Adams WT, Moran GF, Griffin AR (2002) Complex patterns of mating revealed in a eucalyptus regnans seed orchard using allozyme markers and the neighbourhood model. Molecular Ecology, 11, 2379-2391.
6. Burczyk J, Adams WT, Shimizu JY (1996) Mating patterns and pollen dispersal in a natural knobcone pine (Pinus attenuata Lemmon) stand. Heredity, 77, 251-260.
7. Burland TM, Barratt EM, Nichols RA, Racey PA (2001) Mating patterns, relatedness and the basis of natal philopatry in the brown long-eared bat, Plecotus auritus. Molecular Ecology, 10, 1309-1321.
8. Devlin B, Roeder K, Ellstrand NC (1988) Fractional paternity assignment - theoretical development and comparison to other methods. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 76, 369-380.
9. Emery AM, Wilson IJ, Craig S, Boyle PR, Noble LR (2001) Assignment of paternity groups without access to parental genotypes: multiple mating and developmental plasticity in squid. Molecular Ecology, 10, 1265-1278.
10. Gagneux P, Boesch C, Woodruff DS (1997) Microsatellite scoring errors associated with noninvasive genotyping based on nuclear DNA amplified from shed hair. Molecular Ecology, 6, 861-868.
11. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB (2004) Bayesian Data Analysis, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, London.
12. Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Thuman KA (2002) Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Molecular Ecology, 11, 2195-2212.
13. Hoffman JI, Amos W (2005) Microsatellite genotyping errors: detection approaches, common sources and consequences for paternal exclusion. Molecular Ecology, 14, 599-612.
14. Jones AG, Ardren WR (2003) Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Molecular Ecology, 12, 2511-2523.
15. Jones B, Clark AG (2003) Bayesian sperm competition estimates. Genetics, 163, 1193-1199.
16. MacCluer JW, Vandeberg JL, Read B, Ryder OA (1986) Pedigree analysis by computer simulation. Zoo Biology, 5, 147-160.
17. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology, 7, 639-655.
18. Martin AD, Quinn KM, Pemstein D (2004) Scythe Statistical Library 1.0. http://scythe.wustl.edu/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
19. McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalised Linear Models, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, Cambridge.
20. Morgan MT (1998) Properties of maximum likelihood male fertility estimation in plant populations. Genetics, 149, 1099-1103.
21. Morgan MT, Conner JK (2001) Using genetic markers to directly estimate male selection gradients. Evolution, 55, 272-281.
22. Neff BD, Repka J, Gross MR (2001) A Bayesian framework for parentage analysis: the value of genetic and other biological data. Theoretical Population Biology, 59, 315-331.
23. Nielsen R, Mattila DK, Clapham PJ, Palsbøll PJ (2001) Statistical approaches to paternity analysis in natural populations and applications to the North Atlantic humpback whale. Genetics, 157, 1673-1682.
24. Pemberton JM, Slate J, Bancroft DR, Barrett JA (1995) Nonamplifying alleles at microsatellite loci - a caution for parentage and population studies. Molecular Ecology, 4, 249-252.
25. R Development Core Team (2004) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. http://www.r-project.org
26. Richardson DS, Jury FL, Blaakmeer K, Komdeur J, Burke T (2001) Parentage assignment and extra-group paternity in a cooperative breeder: the Seychelles warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis). Molecular Ecology, 10, 2263-2273.
27. Richardson DS, Jury FL, Dawson DA, Salgueiro P, Komdeur J, Burke T (2000) Fifty Seychelles warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis) microsatellite loci polymorphic in Sylviidae species and their cross-species amplification in other passerine birds. Molecular Ecology, 9, 2226-2231.
28. Roeder K, Devlin B, Lindsay BG (1989) Application of maximum-likelihood methods to population genetic data for the estimation of individual fertilities. Biometrics, 45, 363-379.
29. Rosenberg NA, Nordborg M (2002) Genealogical trees, coalescent theory and the analysis of genetic polymorphisms. Nature Reviews Genetics, 3, 380-390.
30. Sheehan NA (2000) On the application of Markov chain Monte Carlo methods to genetic analyses on complex pedigrees. International Statistical Review, 68, 83-110.
31. Slate J, Marshall T, Pemberton J (2000) A retrospective assessment of the accuracy of the paternity inference program CERVUS. Molecular Ecology, 9, 801-808.
32. Smouse PE, Meagher TR (1994) Genetic-analysis of male reproductive contributions in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) Gray (Liliaceae). Genetics, 136, 313-322.
33. Smouse PE, Meagher TR, Kobak CJ (1999) Parentage analysis in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) Gray (Liliaceae): why do some males have higher reproductive contributions? Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 12, 1069-1077.
34. Sorensen D, Gianola D (2002) Likelihood, Bayesian and MCMC Methods in Quantitative Genetics. Springer-Verlag, New York.
35. Tanner MA, Wong WH (1987) The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 528-540.
36. Thomas SC (2005) The estimation of genetic relationships using molecular markers and their efficiency in estimating heritability in natural populations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 360, 1457-1467.
37. Thompson EA (1976a) Inference of genealogical structure. Social Science Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales, 15, 477-526.
38. Thompson EA (1976b) Paradox of genealogical inference. Advances in Applied Probability, 8, 648-650.
39. Wang JL (2004) Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with-typing errors. Genetics, 166, 1963-1979.