Cautions on direct gene flow estimation in plant populations

Evolution

Volumn 58, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 956-963

  Burczyk, Jaroslaw ^a   Chybicki, Igor J ^a  

^a KAZIMIERZ WIELKI UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Gene flow; Genetic markers; Genotypic exclusion; Mating model; Parentage analysis

Indexed keywords

ESTIMATION METHOD; GENE FLOW; GENETIC MARKER; POLLEN;

EMBRYOPHYTA;

EID: 2542483014     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00430.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Adams, W. T. 1992. Gene dispersal within forest tree populations. New For. 6:217-240.
2. Adams, W. T., and D. S. Birkes. 1991. Estimating mating patterns in forest tree populations. Pp. 157-172 in S. Fineschi, M. E. Malvolti, F. Cannata, and H. H. Hattemer, eds. Biochemical markers in the population genetics of forest trees. The Hague, The Netherlands.
3. Adams, W. T., and J. Burczyk. 2000. Magnitude and implications of gene flow in gene conservation reserves. Pp. 215-224 in A. Young, D. Booshier, and T. Boyle, eds. Forest conservation genetics: principles and practice. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia.
4. Bossart, J. L., and D. P. Prowell. 1998. Genetic estimates of population structure and gene flow: limitations, lessons and new directions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:202-206.
5. Broyles, S. B., A. Schnabel, and R. Wyatt. 1994. Evidence for long-distance pollen dispersal in milkweeds (Asclepias exaltata). Evolution 48:1032-1040.
6. Burczyk, J., W. T. Adams, G. F. Moran, and A. R. Griffin. 2002. Complex patterns of mating revealed in a Eucalyptus regnans seed orchard using allozyme markers and the neighbourhood model. Mol. Ecol. 11:2379-2391.
7. Burczyk, J., S. P. DiFazio, and W. T. Adams. 2004. Gene flow in forest trees: how far do genes really travel? In L. Paule, G. G. Vendramin, and D. Gomory, eds. Population and evolutionary genetics of forest trees. Arbora Publishers, Zvolen, Slovakia. In press.
8. Chakraborty, R., T. R. Meagher, and P. E. Smouse. 1988. Parentage analysis with genetic markers in natural populations. I. The expected proportion of offspring with unambiguous paternity. Genetics 118:527-536.
9. Chase, M., R. Kesseli, and K. Bawa. 1996. Microsatellite markers for population and conservation genetics of tropical trees. Am. J. Bot. 83:51-57.
10. Crow, J. F., and M. Kimura. 1970. An introduction to population genetics theory. Harper and Row, New York.
11. Devlin, B., and N. C. Ellstrand. 1990. The development and application of a refined method for estimating gene flow from angiosperm paternity analysis. Evolution 44:248-259.
12. DiFazio, S. P., G. T. Slavov, J. Burczyk, S. Leonardi, and S. H. Strauss. 2004. Gene flow from tree plantations and implications for transgenic risk assessment. In C. Walter and M. Carson, eds. Plantation forest biotechnology for the 21st century. Research Signpost, Kerala, India. In press.
13. Dow, B. D., and M. V. Ashley. 1996. Microsatellite analysis of seed dispersal and parentage of saplings in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Mol. Ecol. 5:120-130.
14. Goodell, K., D. R. Elam, J. D. Nason, and N. C. Ellstrand. 1997. Gene flow among small populations of a self-incompatible plant: an interaction between demography and genetics. Am. J. Bot. 84:1362-1371.
15. Hamrick, J. L., and J. D. Nason. 2000. Gene flow in forest trees. Pp. 81-90 in A. Young, D. Boshier, and T. Boyle, eds. Forest conservation genetics: principles and practice, CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia.
16. Jamieson, A. 1994. The effectiveness of using co-dominant polymorphic allelic series for (1) checking pedigrees and (2) distinguishing full-sib pair members. Animal Genetics 25:37-44.
17. Kaufman, S. R., P. E. Smouse, and E. R. AlvarezBuylla. 1998. Pollen-mediated gene flow and differential male reproductive success in a tropical pioneer tree, Cecropia obtusifolia Bertol. (Moraceae): a paternity analysis. Heredity 81:164-173.
18. Marshall, T. C., J. Slate, L. E. Kruuk, and J. M. Pemberton. 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 7:639-655.
19. Massey, L. K., and J. L. Hamrick. 1999. Breeding structure of a Yucca filamentosa (Agavaceae) population. Evolution 53: 1293-1298.
20. Morgan, M. T., and J. K. Conner. 2001. Using genetic markers to directly estimate male selection gradients. Evolution 55: 272-281.
21. Nason, J. D., and J. L. Hamrick. 1997. Reproductive and genetic consequences of forest fragmentation: two case studies of neotropical canopy trees. J. Hered. 88:264-276.
22. Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 106: 283-292.
23. Neigel, J. E. 1997. A comparison of alternative strategies for estimating gene flow from genetic markers. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28:105-128.
24. ST obsolete? Conserv. Genet. 3:167-173.
25. Rieseberg, L. H., and J. M. Burke. 2001. The biological reality of species: gene flow, selection, and collective evolution. Taxon 50:47-67.
26. Ritland, K., and Y. A. El-Kassaby. 1985. The nature of inbreeding in a seed orchard of Douglas fir as shown by an efficient multilocus model. Theor. Appl. Genet. 71:375-384.
27. Schnabel, A., and J. L. Hamrick. 1995. Understanding the population genetic structure of Gleditsia triacanthos L: the scale and pattern of pollen gene flow. Evolution 49:921-931.
28. Simpson, E. H. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688.
29. Smith, D. B., and W. T. Adams. 1983. Measuring pollen contamination in clonal seed orchards with the aid of genetic markers. Pp. 69-77 in Proceedings of 17th Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
30. Smouse, P. E., R. S. Waples, and J. A. Tworek. 1990. A genetic mixture analysis for use with incomplete source population data. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 47:620-634.
31. Smouse, P. E., and V. L. Sork. 2004. Measuring pollen flow in forest trees: An exposition of alternative approaches. For. Ecol. Manage. In press.
32. Smouse, P. E., T. R. Meagher, and C. J. Kobak. 1999. Parentage analysis in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) Gray (Liliaceae): why do some males have higher reproductive contributions? J. Evol. Biol. 12:1-9.
33. Snow, A. A., and P. Morán-Palma. 1997. Commercialization of transgenic plants: potential ecological risks. BioScience 47: 86-97.
34. Sork, V. L., J. Nason, D. R. Campbell, and J. F. Fernandez. 1999. Landscape approaches to historical and contemporary gene flow in plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14:219-224.
35. Stacy, E. A., J. L. Hamrick, J. D. Nason, S. P. Hubbell, R. B. Foster, and R. Condit. 1996. Pollen dispersal in low-density populations of three neotropical tree species. Am. Nat. 148:275-298.
36. Waples, R. S. 1998. Separating the wheat from the chaff: patterns of genetic differentiation in high gene flow species. J. Hered. 89:438-450.
37. ST not equal 1/(4Nm + 1). Heredity 82:117-125.
38. Wright, S. 1951. The genetic structure of populations. Annu. Eugen. 15:323-354.
39. Xie, C. Y., F. C. Yeh, B. P. Dancik, and C. Strobeck. 1991. Joint estimation of immigration and mating system parameters in gymnosperms using the EM algorithm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 137-140.