Assortative mating and differential male mating success in an ash hybrid zone population

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 6, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Gérard, Pierre R ^a   Klein, Etienne K ^b   Austerlitz, Frédéric ^a   Fernández Manjarrés, Juan F ^a   Frascaria Lacoste, Nathalie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSORTATIVE MATING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLOWER MORPHOLOGY; FLOWERING; FRAXINUS; FRAXINUS ANGUSTIFOLIA; FRAXINUS EXCELSIOR; GENOTYPE PHENOTYPE CORRELATION; HYBRID ZONE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; POLLEN ANALYSIS; POLLEN GERMINATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; INBREEDING; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHENOTYPE; POLLEN; STATISTICAL MODEL; THEORETICAL MODEL; TIME;

FRAXINUS EXCELSIOR;

EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FRAXINUS; GENOTYPE; INBREEDING; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHENOTYPE; POLLEN; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33751328043     PISSN: 14712148     EISSN: 14712148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-6-96     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Arnold ML: Natural hybridization and evolution. In Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution Edited by: May RM, Harvey PH. New York , Oxford University Press; 1997:215 p..
2. Barton NH: The role of hybridization in evolution. Mol Ecol 2001, 10:551-568.
3. Coyne JA, Orr HA: Speciation. Sunderland, MA, USA , Sinauer Associates Inc.; 2004.
4. Rundle HD, Nosil P: Ecological speciation. Ecol Letters 2005, 8:336-352.
5. Austerlitz F, Mariette S, Machon N, Gouyon PH, Godelle B: Effects of colonization processes on genetic diversity: differences between annual plants and tree species. Genetics 2000, 154:1309-1321.
6. Austerlitz F, Garnier-Géré P: Modelling the impact of colonization on genetic diversity and differentiation of forest trees: interaction of life cycle, pollen flow and seed long-distance dispersal. Heredity 2003, 90:282-290.
7. Klein EK, Lavigne C, Gouyon PH: Mixing of propagules from discrete sources at long distance: comparing a dispersal tail to an exponential. BMC Ecol 2006, 6:3.
8. Sork VL, Nason J, Campbell DR, Fernandez JF: Landscape approaches to historical and contemporary gene flow in plants. Trends Ecol Evol 1999, 14(6):219-224.
9. Cheptou PO, Lepart J, Escarre J: Mating system variation along a successional gradient in the allogamous and colonizing plant Crepis sancta (Asteraceae). J Evol Biol 2002, 15:753-762.
10. Goodwillie C, Kalisz S, Eckert CG: The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 2005, 36:47-79.
11. Jarne P, Charlesworth D: The evolution of the selfing rate in functionally hermaphrodite plants and animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1993, 24:441-466.
12. McNeilly T, Antonovics J: Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations. IV. Barriers to gene flow. Heredity 1968, 23:205-218.
13. Silvertown J, Servaes C, Biss P, Macleod D: Reinforcement of reproductive isolation between adjacent populations in the Park Grass Experiment. Heredity 2005, 95:198-205.
14. Lamont BB, He T, Enright NJ, Krauss SL, Miller BP: Anthropogenic disturbance promotes hybridization between Banksia species by altering their biology. J Evol Biol 2003, 16:551-557.
15. Hendry AP, Day T: Population structure attributable to reproductive time: isolation by time and adaptation by time. Mol Ecol 2005, 14:901-916.
16. Fox GA: Assortative mating and plant phenology: evolutionary and practical consequences. Evol Ecol Res 2003, 5:1-18.
17. Weis AE, Winterer J, Vacher C, Kossler TM, Young CA, Le Buhn GL: Phenological assortative mating in flowering plants: the nature and consequences of its frequency-dependence. Evol Ecol Res 2005, 7:161-181.
18. Cruzan MB, Arnold ML: Assortative mating and natural selection in an Iris hybrid zone. Evolution 1994, 48:1946-1958.
19. Bacilieri R, Ducousso A, Petit RJ, Kremer A: Mating system and asymmetric hybridization in a mixed stand of european oaks. Evolution 1996, 50(2):900-908.
20. Cornman RS, Burke JM, Wesselingh RA, Arnold ML: Contrasting genetic structure of adults and progeny in a Louisiana Iris hybrid population. Evolution 2004, 58(12):2669-2681.
21. Valbuena-Carabaña M, González-Martínez SC, Sork VL, Collada C, Soto A, Goicoechea PG, Gil L: Gene flow and hybridization in a mixed oak forest (Quercus pyrenaica Willd. and Quercus petraea (Matts.) Liebl.) in central Spain. Heredity 2005, 95:457-465.
22. Nürnberger BD, Barton NH, Kruuk LEB, Vines TH: Mating patterns in a hybrid zone of fire-bellied toads (Bombina): inferences from adult and full-sib genotypes. Heredity 2005, 94:247-257.
23. Weis AE: Direct and indirect assortative mating: a multivariate approach to plant flowering schedules. J Evol Biol 2005, 18:536-546.
24. Oddou-Muratorio S, Klein EK, Austerlitz F: Pollen flow in the wild-service tree, Sorbus torminalis (L.) Crantz. II. Pollen dispersal and heterogeneity in mating success inferred from parent-offspring analysis. Mol Ecol 2005, 14:4441-4452.
25. Fernandez-Manjarrés JF, Gérard PR, Dufour J, Raquin C, Frascaria-Lacoste N: Differential patterns of morphological and molecular hybridization between Fraxinus excelsior L. and F. angustifolia Vahl. (Oleaceae) in Eastern and Western France. Mol Ecol 2006, 15:3245-3257.
26. Jato V, Rodriguez-Rajo FJ, Dacosta N, Aira MJ: Heat and chill requirements of Fraxinus flowering in Galicia (NW Spain). Grana 2004, 43:217-223.
27. Raquin C, Brachet S, Jeandroz S, Vedel F, Frascaria-Lacoste N: Combined analyses of microsatellite and RAPD markers demonstrate possible hybridisation between Fraxinus excelsior L. and Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl. For Genet 2002, 9(2):103-111.
28. Gérard PR, Fernandez-Manjarrés JF, Frascaria-Lacoste N: Temporal cline in a hybrid zone population between Fraxinus excelsior L. and F. angustifolia Vahl. Mol Ecol 2006, 15:3655-3667.
29. Bacles CFE, Burczyk J, Lowe AJ, Ennos RA: Historical and contemporary mating patterns in remnant populations of the forest tree Fraxinus excelsior L. Evolution 2005, 59:979-990.
30. Morand-Prieur ME: Evolution et maintien d'un système de reproduction polymorphe. Approche génétique et écologique de la polygamie chez le frêne commun, Fraxinus excelsior L. Paris , ENGREF Paris; 2003:95 p..
31. Adams WT, Birkes DS: Estimating mating patterns in forest tree populations. In Biochemical markers in the population genetics of forest trees Edited by: Fineschi S, Malvolti ME, Cannata F, Hattemer HH. The Hague, Netherlands , SPB Academic Publishing; 1991:157-172.
32. Burczyk J, Koralewski TE: Parentage versus two-generation analyses for estimating pollen-mediated gene flow in plant populations. Mol Ecol 2005, 14:2525-2537.
33. Araki H, Blouin MS: Unbiased estimation of relative reproductive success of different groups: evaluation and correction of bias caused by parentage assignment errors. Mol Ecol 2005, 14:4097-4109.
34. Slavov GT, Howe GT, Gyaourova AV, Birkes DS, Adams WT: Estimating pollen flow using SSR markers and paternity exclusion: accounting for mistyping. Mol Ecol 2005, 14:3109-3121.
35. Oddou-Muratorio S, Houot ML, Demesure-Musch B, Austerlitz F: Pollen flow in the wildservice tree, Sorbus torminalis (L.) Crantz. I. Evaluating the paternity analysis procedure in continuous populations. Mol Ecol 2003, 12:3427-3439.
36. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM: Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 1998, 7:639-655.
37. Burczyk J, Prat D: Male reproductive success in Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco: the effects of spatial structure and flowering characteristics. Heredity 1997, 79:638-647.
38. Streiff R, Ducousso A, Lexer C, Steinkellner H, Gloessl J, Kremer A: Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed oak stand of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Mol Ecol 1999, 8:831-841.
39. Nurminiemi M, Tufto J, Nilsson NO, Rognli OA: Spatial models of pollen dispersal in the forage grass meadow fescue. Evol Ecol 1998, 12:487-502.
40. Hardy OJ, González-Martínez SC, Fréville H, Boquien G, Mignot A, Colas B, Olivieri I: Fine-scale genetic structure and gene dispersal in Centaurea corymbosa (Asteraceae). I. Pattern of pollen dispersal. J Evol Biol 2004, 17:795-806.
41. Devaux C, Lavigne C, Falentin-Guyomarc'h H, Vautrin S, Lecomte J, Klein EK: High diversity of oilseed rape pollen clouds over an agro-ecosystem indicates long-distance dispersal. Mol Ecol 2005, 14:2269-2280.
42. Austerlitz F, Dick CW, Dutech C, Klein EK, Oddou-Muratorio S, Smouse PE, Sork VL: Using genetic markers to estimate the pollen dispersal curve. Mol Ecol 2004, 13:937-954.
43. Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Gil L: Patterns of pollen dispersal in a small population of Pinus sylvestris L. revealed by total-exclusion paternity analysis. Heredity 2005, 94:13-22.
44. Broyles SB: Hybrid bridges to gene flow: a case study in milk-weeds (Asclepias). Evolution 2002, 56:1943-1953.
45. Porcher E, Lande R: The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression under pollen discounting and pollen limitation. J Evol Biol 2005, 18:497-508.
46. Klinkhamer PGL, de Jong TJ, Metz H: Sex and size in cosexual plants. Trends Ecol Evol 1997, 12:260-265.
47. Morand-Prieur ME, Raquin C, Shykoff JA, Frascaria-Lacoste N: Males outcompete hermaphrodites for seed siring success in controlled crosses in the polygamous Fraxinus excelsior (Oleaceae). Am J Bot 2003, 90(6):949-953.
48. Charnov EL: The theory of sex allocation. Princeton, NJ , Princeton University Press; 1982.
49. Klinkhamer PGL, De Jong TJ: Evolutionary Ecology of Plant Reproductive Strategies. Cambridge, UK , Cambridge University Press; 2005.
50. Cadet C, Metz JAJ, Klinkhamer PGL: Size and the not-so-single sex: disentangling the effects of size and budget on sex allocation in hermaphrodites. Am Nat 2004, 164:779-792.
51. Campbell DR: Experimental tests of sex-allocation theory in plants. Trends Ecol Evol 2000, 15:227-232.
52. Broyles SB, Wyatt R: Paternity analysis in a natural population of Asclepias exaltata: multiple paternity, functional gender, and the "pollen-donation hypothesis". Evolution 1990, 44:1454-1468.
53. Conner JK, Rush S, Kercher S, Jennetten P: Measurements of natural selection on floral traits in wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum). II. Selection through lifetime male and total fitness. Evolution 1996, 50:1137-1146.
54. Devlin B, Ellstrand NC: Male and female fertility variation in wild radish, a hermaphrodite. Am Nat 1990, 136(1):87-107.
55. Wardle P: Biological flora of the British Isles. Fraxinus excelsior L. J Ecol 1961, 49:739-751.
56. Gérard PR, Fernandez-Manjarrés JF, Bertolino P, Dufour J, Raquin C, Frascaria-Lacoste N: New insights in the recognition of the European ash species Fraxinus excelsior L. and Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl as useful tools for forest management. Ann For Sci 2006, 63:733-738.
57. Ferdy JB, Austerlitz F: Extinction and introgression in a community of partially cross-fertile plant species. Am Nat 2002, 160(1):74-86.
58. Jeandroz S, Roy A, Bousquet J: Phylogeny and phylogeography of the circumpolar genus Fraxinus (Oleaceae) based on Internal Transcribed Spacer sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Mol Phylogenet Evol 1997, 7(2):241-251.
59. Picard JF: A propos du frêne oxyphylle, Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl. Forêt-Entreprise 1983, 83:2-4.
60. Marigo G, Peltier JP, Girel J, Pautou G: Success in the demographic expansion of Fraxinus excelsior L. Trees 2000, 15:1-13.
61. Binggeli P, Power J: Gender variation in ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.). [http://members.tripod.co.uk/WoodyPlantEcology/species/ash.htm].
62. Raquin C, Jung-Muller B, Dufour J, Frascaria-Lacoste N: Rapid seedling obtaining from European ash species Fraxinus excelsior (L.) and Fraxinus angustifolia (Vahl.). Ann For Sci 2002, 59:219-224.
63. Brachet S, Jubier MF, Richard M, Jung-Muller B, Frascaria-Lacoste N: Rapid identification of microsatellite loci using 5′ anchored PCR in the common ash Fraxinus excelsior. Mol Ecol 1999, 8:157-168.
64. Lefort F, Brachet S, Frascaria-Lacoste N, Edwards KJ, Douglas GC: Identification and characterization of microsatellite loci in ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) and their conservation in the olive family (Oleaceae). Mol Ecol 1999, 8:1075-1092.
65. Morand ME, Brachet S, Rossignol P, Dufour J, Frascaria-Lacoste N: A generalized heterozygote deficiency assessed with microsatellites in French common ash populations. Mol Ecol 2002, 11:377-385.
66. Elle E, Meagher TR: Sex allocation and reproductive success in the andromonoecious perennial Solanum carolinense. II. Paternity and functional gender. Am Nat 2000, 156(6):622-636.
67. Smouse PE, Meagher TR, Kobak CJ: Parentage analysis in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) Gray (Liliaceae): why do some males have higher reproductive contributions? J Evol Biol 1999, 12:1069-1077.
68. Jones AG, Ardren WR: Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Mol Ecol 2003, 12:2511-2523.
69. Meagher TR: Analysis of paternity within a natural population of Chamaelirium luteum. I. Identification of most-likely male parents. Am Nat 1986, 128(2):199-215.
70. Ritland K: Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independant loci. Heredity 2002, 88:221-228.
71. Abramowitz M, Stegun IA: Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. Washington, DC , US Government Printing Office; 1964.
72. Clark JS: Why trees migrate so fast: confronting theory with dispersal biology and the paleorecord. Am Nat 1998, 152:204-224.
73. Coles S: An Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Values. London, UK , Springer-Verlag; 2001.
74. Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Austerlitz F, Smouse PE: A new method of estimating the pollen dispersal curve independently of the effective density. Genetics 2006, 173:1033-1045.