Using curriculum-based assessment in consultation: A review of three levels of research

Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 63-78

  Burns, Matthew K ^a,b  

^a CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Central Michigan University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4544230341     PISSN: 10474412     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s1532768xjepc1501_3     Document Type: Review

References (81)

1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. Angello, L. M., & Shapiro, E. (2002, February). Curriculum-based assessment: An update of knowledge, use, and attitudes among school psychologists. Paper presented at the annual convention of the National Association of School Psychologists, Chicago.
3. Archer, A. L., Adams, A., Ellis, E. S., Isaacson, S., Morehead, M. K., & Schiller, E. P. (1987). Working with mildly handicapped students: Design and delivery of academic lessons. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
4. Bickel, W. E., Zigmond, N., McCall, R., & McNelis, R. H. (1999). Final report: Instructional support team best practices in Pennsylvania. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.
5. Betts, E. A. (1946). Foundations of reading instruction. New York: American Book.
6. Bradley-Johnson, S., & Dean, V. J. (2000). Role change for school psychology: The challenge continues in the new millennium. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 1-5.
7. Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (1995). Learning rate, learning opportunities, and the development of forgetting. Developmental Psychology, 31, 251-262.
8. Browder, D. M., & Shear, S. M. (1996). Interspersal of known items in a treatment package to teach sight words to students with behavior disorders. Journal of Special Education, 29, 400-413.
9. Burns, M. K. (2001). Measuring acquisition and retention rates with curriculum-based assessment. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 19, 148-157.
10. Burns, M. K. (2002). Utilizing a comprehensive system of assessment to intervention using curriculum-based assessments. Intervention in School and Clinic, 38, 8-13.
11. Burns, M. K. (2004). Age as a predictor of acquisition rates as measured by curriculum-based assessment: Evidence of consistency with cognitive research. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 29(2), 31-38.
12. Burns, M. K. (in press). Empirical analysis of drill ratio research: Refining the instructional level for drill tasks. Remedial and Special Education.
13. Burns, M. K., & Dean, V. J. (2002, February). Rethinking the instructional level: The impact on assessment and intervention. Paper presented at the annual convention of the National Association of School Psychologists, Chicago.
14. Burns, M. K., MacQuarrie, L. L., & Campbell, D. T. (1999). The difference between instructional assessment (curriculum-based assessment) and curriculum-based measurement: A focus on purpose and result. Communiqué, 27(6), 18-19.
15. Burns, M. K., Tucker, J. A., Frame, J., Foley, S., & Hauser, A. (2000). Interscorer, alternate form, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability of Gickling's model of curriculum-based assessment for reading. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 18, 353-360.
16. Cangelosi, J. (2000). Assessment strategies for monitoring student learning. New York: Addison-Wesley-Longman.
17. Clark-Kudless, D. (1996). Bringing psychology to the table: Issues facing the American Psychological Association as psychology approaches the new millennium: A conversation with Doroty W. Cantor. Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 27, 252-258.
18. Clifford, M. M. (1990). Students need challenge, not easy success. Educational Leadership, 48(1), 22-26.
19. Cooke, N. L., Guzaukas, R., Pressley, J. S., & Kerr, K. (1993). Effects of using a ratio of new items to review items during drill and practice: Three experiments. Education and Treatment of Children, 16, 213-234.
20. Cooke, N. L., & Reichard, S. M. (1996). The effects of different interspersal drill ratios on acquisition and generalization of multiplication and division facts. Education and Treatment of Children, 19, 124-142.
21. Coulter, W. A. (1988). Curriculum-based assessment: What's in a name? Communiqué 18(3), 13.
22. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
23. Deno, S. L. (1989) Curriculum-based measurement and special education services: A fundamental and direct relationship. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 1-17). New York: Guilford.
24. Dettmer, P., Thurston, L. P., & Dyck, N. (2002). Consultation, collaboration, and teamwork for students with special needs. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
25. Eckert, T. L., Shapiro, E. S., & Lutz, J. G. (1995). Teachers' ratings of the acceptability of curriculum-based assessment methods. School Psychology Review, 24, 497-511.
26. Ellis, A. K. (2001). Research on educational innovations (3rd ed.). Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
27. Enggren, P., & Kovaleski, J. F. (1996). Instructional assessment. Harrisburg: Instructional Support System of Pennsylvania.
28. Fry, A., & Hale, S. (1996). Relationships among processing speed, working memory and fluid intelligence in children. Biological Psychology, 54, 1-34.
29. Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Phonological working memory: A critical building block for reading development and vocabulary acquisition? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 8, 259-272.
30. Gersten, R., Keating, T., & Irvin, L. K. (1999). The burden of proof: Validity as improvement of instructional practice. Exceptional Children, 61, 510-519.
31. Gickling, E. E. (1984, October). Operationalizing academic learning time for low achieving and handicapped mainstreamed students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Northern Rocky Mountain Educational Research Association, Jackson Hole, WY. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED256115)
32. Gickling, E. E., & Havertape, S. (1981). Curriculum-based assessment (CBA). Minneapolis, MN: School Psychology Inservice Training Network.
33. Gickling, E., & Rosenfield, S. (1995). Best practices in curriculum-based assessment. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology III (pp. 587-595). Washington DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
34. Gickling, E. E., Shane, R. L., & Croskery, K. M. (1989). Developing math skills in low-achieving high school students through curriculum-based assessment. School Psychology Review, 18, 344-356.
35. Gickling, E., & Thompson, V. (1985). A personal view of curriculum-based assessment. Exceptional Children, 52, 205-218.
36. Goodwin, L. D., & Goodwin, W. L. (1999). Measurement myths and misconceptions. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 408-427.
37. Gravois, T. A., & Gickling, E. E. (2002). Best practices in curriculum-based assessment. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (Vol. 2, pp. 885-898). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
38. Gregory, R. J. (2000). Psychological testing: History, principles, and applications (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
39. Gutkin, T. B., & Curtis, M. J. (1999). School-based consultation theory and practice: The art and science of indirect service delivery. In C. R. Reynolds & T. B. Gutkins (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (3rd ed., pp. 598-637). New York: Wiley.
40. Hargis, C. (1995). Curriculum-based assessment: A primer (2nd ed.). Springfield, IL: Thomas.
41. Henry, L. A., & Millar, S. (1991). Memory span increase with age: A test of two hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 459-484.
42. Kirschner, P. A. (2002). Cognitive load theory: Implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learning & Instruction, 12, 1-10.
43. Kovaleski, J. F., Gickling, E. E., Morrow, H., & Swank, P. (1999). High versus low implementation of instructional support teams: A case for maintaining program fidelity. Remedial & Special Education, 20, 170-183.
44. Kovaleski, J. F., Tucker, J. A., & Duffy, D. J. (1995). School reform through instructional support: The Pennsylvania Initiative (Part I). Communiqué, 23(8, Insert).
45. MacQuarrie, L. L., Tucker, J. A., Burns, M. K., Hartman, B. (2002). Comparison of retention rates using traditional, drill sandwich, and incremental rehearsal flashcard methods. School Psychology Review, 31, 584-595.
46. Marston, D. B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18-78). New York: Guilford.
47. McEvoy, A., & Welker, R. (2000). Antisocial behavior, academic failure, and school climate: A critical review. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 130-140.
48. Meijer, J., & Elshout, J. J. (2001). The predictive and discriminant validity of the zone of proximal development. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 93-113.
49. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
50. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741-749.
51. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
52. Miller, L. T., & Vernon, P. A. (1996). Intelligence, reaction time, and working memory in 4- to 6-year-old children. Intelligence, 22, 155-190.
53. Neef, N. A., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T. J. (1977). The effects of known item interspersal on acquisition and retention of spelling and sight-reading words. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 738.
54. Nilholm, C. (1999). The zone of proximal development: A comparison of children with Down syndrome and typical children. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 24, 265-279.
55. Rabinowitz, M., Ornstein, P. A., Folds-Benett, T. H., & Schneider, W. (1994). Age-related differences in speed of processing: Uncounfounding age and experience. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57, 449-459.
56. Roberts, A. H., & Rust, J. O. (1994). Role and function of school psychologists, 1992-93: A comparative study. Psychology in the Schools, 31, 113-119.
57. Roberts, M. L., Marshall, J., Nelson, J. R., & Albers, C. A. (2001). Curriculum-based assessment procedures embedded within functional behavioral assessments: Identifying escape-motivated behaviors in a general education classroom. School Psychology Review, 30, 264-277.
58. Roberts, M. L., & Shapiro, E. S. (1996). Effects of instructional ratios on students' reading performance in a regular education program. Journal of School Psychology, 34, 73-91.
59. Roberts, M. L., Turco, T. L., & Shapiro, E. S. (1991). Differential effects of fixed instructional ratios on students progress in reading. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9, 308-318.
60. Rosenfield, S. A., & Gravois, T. A. (1996). Instructional consultation teams: Collaborating for change. New York: Guilford.
61. Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (2004). Assessment (9th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
62. Sarason, S. B. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform: Can we change before it's too late? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
63. Sawka, K. D., McCurdy, B. L., & Mannella, M. C. (2002). Strengthening emotional support services: An empirically based model for training teachers of students with behavior disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10, 223-232.
64. Schulte, A. C., Osborne, S. S., & McKinney, J. D. (1990). Academic outcomes for students with learning disabilities in consultation and resource programs. Exceptional Children, 57, 162-172.
65. Scweickert, R., & Boruff, B. (1986). Short-term memory capacity: Magic number or magic spell? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 419-425.
66. Shapiro, E. S. (1992). Use of Gickling's model of curriculum-based assessment to improve reading in elementary age students. School Psychology Review, 21, 168-176.
67. Shapiro, E. S. (2000). School psychology from an instructional perspective: Solving big, not little problems. School Psychology Review, 29, 560-572.
68. Shapiro, E. S., & Ager, C. (1992). Assessment of special education students in regular education programs: Linking assessment to instruction. Elementary School Journal, 92, 283-296.
69. Shapiro, E. S., & Eckert, T. L. (1993). Curriculum-based assessment among school psychologists: Knowledge, use, and attitudes. Journal of School Psychology, 31, 375-383.
70. Shapiro, E. S., & Eckert, T. L. (1994). Acceptability of curriculum-based assessment by school psychologists. Journal of School Psychology, 32, 167-183.
71. Sheridan, S. M., & Gutkin, T. B. (2000). The ecology of school psychology: Examining and changing our paradigm for the 21st century. School Psychology Review, 29, 485-502.
72. Shinn, M. R. (2002). Best practices in using curriculum-based measurement in a problem solving model. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (Vol. 1, pp. 671-698). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
73. Shinn, M. R., Rosenfield, S., & Knutson, N. (1989). Curriculum-based assessment: A comparison of models. School Psychology Review, 18, 299-316.
74. Thompson, V. P., Gickling, E., & Havertape, J. F. (1983). The effects of medication and curriculum management on task-related behaviors of attention deficit disordered and low achieving peers. Monographs in Behavioral Disorders: Severe Behavior Disorders of Children and Youth (Series No. 6). Tempe, AZ: Council for Children with Behavioral Disorders, Arizona State University.
75. Tucker, J. A. (1985). Curriculum-based assessment: An introduction. Exceptional Children, 52, 199-204.
76. Tucker, J. A. (1987). Curriculum-based assessment is no fad. Collaborative Educator, 1, 4-10.
77. Van Gerven, P. W. M., Paas, F. G. W. C., Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Schmidt, H. G. (2002). Cognitive load theory and aging: Effects of worked examples on training efficiency. Learning & Instruction, 12, 87-105.
78. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
79. Wallace, W. A., & Hall, D. L. (1996). Psychological consultation: Perspectives and applications. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
80. Wesson, C. L. (1991). Curriculum-based measurement and two models of follow-up consultation. Exceptional Children, 57, 246-256.
81. Zins, J. E., & Erchul, W. P. (2002). Best practices in school consultation. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 625-644). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.