Short-term estimates of growth using curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: Estimating standard error of the slope to construct confidence intervals

School Psychology Review

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 128-133

  Christ, Theodore J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646718778     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational and Psychological Research Association.
2. Christ, T. J. (2003). The effects of passage-difficulty on CBM progress monitoring outcomes: Stability and accuracy. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 63, 10. (UMI No. 4960)
3. Christ, T. J. (in press). Curriculum based measurement of reading progress: Measurement error and bias across durations, measurement conditions, and trend estimation procedures. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment.
4. Christ, T. J., & Silberglitt, B. (2005). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: Estimates for the standard error of measurement. Manuscript submitted for publication.
5. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/ correlational analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
7. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
8. Deno, S. L. (1986). Formative evaluation of individual student programs: A new role for school psychologists. School Psychology Review, 15, 358-374.
9. Deno, S. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. Journal of Special Education, 37, 184-192.
10. Deno, S. L., Fuchs, L. S., Marston, D., & Shin, J. (2001). Using curriculum-based measurement to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 30, 507-524.
11. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect. School Psychology Review, 22, 27-48.
12. Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (2002). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (DIBELS) (6th ed.). Retrieved August 27, 2002, from http://dibels.uoregon. edu/index.php
13. Good, R. H., & Shinn, M. R. (1990). Forecasting accuracy of slope estimates for reading curriculum-based measurement: Empirical evidence. Behavioral Assessment, 12, 179-193.
14. Hintze, J. M., & Christ, T. J. (2004). An examination of variability as a function of passage variance in CBM progress monitoring. School Psychology Review, 33, 204-217.
15. Howe, K. B., & Shinn, M. M. (2002). Standard reading assessment passages (RAPs) for use in general out-come measurement: A manual describing development and technical features. Retrieved October, 2004, from www.aimsweb.com
16. Parker, R., & Others, A. (1992). Estimating trends in progress monitoring data: A comparison of simple line-fitting methods. School Psychology Review, 21, 300-312.
17. Shinn, M. R. (2002). Best practices in using curriculum-based measurement in a problem-solving model. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 671-698). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
18. Shinn, M. R., Good, R. H., & Stein, S. (1989). Summarizing trend in student achievement: A comparison of methods. School Psychology Review, 18, 356-370.
19. Skiba, R. J., Deno, S. L., Marston, D., & Wesson, C. (1986). Characteristics of time-series data collected through curriculum-based reading measurement. Diagnostique, 12, 3-15.