Visual perception I: Basic principles

Handbook of Cognition

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 3-47

  Wagemans, Johan ^a   Wichmann, Felix A ^b   Op De Beeck, Hans ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38749100676     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781848608177.n1     Document Type: Chapter

References (480)

1. Adelson E. H., Bergen J. R. Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion Journal of the Optical Society of America A 2 (1985) 284-299 doi:10.1364/JOSAA.2.000284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.2.000284
2. Adelson, E. H., & Bergen, J. R. (1991). The plenoptic function and the elements of early vision. In M. S. Landy & J. A. Movshon (Eds.), Computational models of visual processing (pp. 3-20). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Adelson E. H., Movshon J. A. Phenomenological coherence of moving visual patterns Nature 300 (1982) 523-525 doi:10.1038/300523a0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/300523a0
4. Aglioti S., DeSouza J. F. X., Goodale M. A. Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand Current Biology 5 (1995) 679-685 doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(95)00133-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822%2895%2900133-3
5. Albright T. D., Stoner G. R. Contextual influences on visual processing Annual Review of Neuroscience 25 (2002) 339-379 doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142900
6. Allman J., Miezin F., McGuinness E. Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons Annual Review of Neuroscience 8 (1985) 407-430 doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.08.030185.002203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.08.030185.002203
7. Alvarado M. C., Bachevalier J. Revisiting the maturation of medial temporal lobe memory functions in primates Learning and Memory 7 (2000) 244-256 doi:10.1101/lm.35100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.35100
8. Amit, D. J. (1989). Modelling brain function: the world of attractor neural networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Anderson B. L. Hysteresis, cooperativity, and depth averaging in dynamic random-dot stereograms Perception and Psychophysics 51 (1992) 511-528 doi:10.3758/BF03211649 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03211649
10. Anderson B. L., Nakayama K. Toward a general theory of stereopsis: binocular matching, occluding contours, and fusion Psychological Review 101 (1994) 414-445 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.414
11. Arbib M. A. From visual affordances in monkey parietal cortex to hippocampoparietal interactions underlying rat navigation Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 352 (1997) 1429-1436 doi:10.1098/rstb.1997.0129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1997.0129
12. Arguin M., Saumier D. Conjunction and linear non-separability effects in shape encoding Vision Research 40 (2000) 3099-3115 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00155-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989%2800%2900155-3
13. Asch, M. G. (1995). Gestalt psychology in German culture, 1890-1967: Holism and the quest for objectivity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Atick J. J. Could information theory provide an ecological theory of sensory processing? Network: Computation in Neural Systems 3 (1992) 213-251 doi:10.1088/0954-898X/3/2/009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0954-898X/3/2/009
15. Attneave F. Some informational aspects of visual perception Psychological Review 61 (1954) 183-193 doi:10.1037/h0054663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0054663
16. Attneave F. Multistability in perception Scientific American 225 (1971) 62-71 doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1271-62 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1271-62
17. Attneave, F. (1982). Pregnanz and soap bubble systems: a theoretical exploration. In J. Beck (ed.), Organization and representation in perception (pp. 11-29). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Baker C. I., Behrmann M., Olson C. R. Impact of learning on representation of parts and wholes in monkey inferotemporal cortex Nature Neuroscience 5 (2002) 1210-1216 doi:10.1038/nn960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn960
19. Ballard D. Animate vision Artificial Intelligence 48 (1991) 57-86 doi:10.1016/0004-3702(91)90080-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702%2891%2990080-4
20. Barlow H. B. Summation and inhibition in the frog's retina Journal of Physiology 119 (1953) 69-88
21. Barlow, H. B. (1961). Possible principles underlying the transformation of sensory messages. In W. A. Rosenblith (ed.), Sensory communication (pp. 217-234). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Barlow H. B. Single units and sensation: a neuron doctrine for perceptual psychology? Perception 1 (1972) 371-394 doi:10.1068/p010371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p010371
23. Barlow H. B. The exploitation of regularities in the environment by the brain Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2001) 602-607
24. Barlow H. B., Blakemore C., Pettigrew J. D. The neural mechanisms of binocular depth discrimination Journal of Physiology 193 (1967) 327-342
25. Beck D. M., Palmer S. E. Top-down influences on perceptual grouping Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28 (2002) 1071-1084 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.28.5.1071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.5.1071
26. Bell A. J., Sejnowski T. J. The ‘independent components’ of natural scenes are edge filters Vision Research 37 (1997) 3327-3338 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00121-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989%2897%2900121-1
27. Ben-Av M. B., Sagi D. Perceptual grouping by similarity and proximity: experimental results can be predicted by intensity autocorrelations Vision Research 35 (1995) 853-866 doi:10.1016/0042-6989(94)00173-J http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989%2894%2900173-J
28. Bertamini M. The importance of being convex: an advantage for convexity when judging position Perception 30 (2001) 1295-1310 doi:10.1068/p3197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p3197
29. Bertamini M., Proffitt D. R. Hierarchical motion organization in random dot configurations Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 (2000) 1371-1386 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.26.4.1371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.26.4.1371
30. Bertenthal B., Pinto J. Global processing of biological motion Psychological Science 5 (1994) 221-225 doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00504.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00504.x
31. Bhalla M., Proffitt D. R. Visuo-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 1076-1096 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.25.4.1076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.4.1076
32. Biederman I. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding Psychological Review 94 (1987) 115-147 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.115
33. Biederman I., Bar M. One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects Vision Research 39 (1999) 2885-2899 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00309-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989%2898%2900309-5
34. Biederman I., Kalocsai P. Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 352 (1997) 1203-1219 doi:10.1098/rstb.1997.0103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1997.0103
35. Biederman I., Rabinowitz J. C., Glass A. L., Stacy E. W. Jr. On the information extracted from a glance at a scene Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (1974) 597-600 doi:10.1037/h0037158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0037158
36. Bingham G. P. Perceiving the size of trees: biological form and the horizon ratio Perception and Psychophysics 54 (1993a) 485-495 doi:10.3758/BF03211771 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03211771
37. Bingham G. P. Perceiving the size of trees: form as information about scale Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19 (1993b) 1139-1161 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.19.6.1139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.19.6.1139
38. Blake, A., & Yuille, A. (Eds.) (1992). Active vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Blake R. A neural theory of binocular rivalry Psychological Review 96 (1989) 145-167 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.1.145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.1.145
40. Blake R. Cats perceive biological motion Psychological Science 4 (1993) 54-57 doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00557.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00557.x
41. Blake R. Gibson's inspired but latent prelude to visual motion perception Psychological Review 101 (1994) 324-328 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.324
42. Blake R., Logothetis N. K. Visual competition Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3 (2002) 1-11
43. Blakemore C., Campbell F. W. On the existence of neurons in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images Journal of Physiology 203 (1969) 237-260
44. Booth M. C. A., Rolls E. T. View-invariant representations of familiar objects by neurons in the inferior temporal visual cortex Cerebral Cortex 8 (1998) 510-523 doi:10.1093/cercor/8.6.510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/8.6.510
45. Bootsma R. J., van Wieringen P. C. W. Timing an attacking forehand drive in table tennis Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16 (1990) 21-29 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.21 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.21
46. Boselie F. Local and global factors in visual occlusion Perception 23 (1994) 517-528 doi:10.1068/p230517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p230517
47. Brooks R. A. Intelligence without representation Artificial Intelligence 47 (1991) 139-159 doi:10.1016/0004-3702(91)90053-M http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702%2891%2990053-M
48. Bruno N. When does action resist visual illusions? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (2001) 379-382 doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01725-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613%2800%2901725-3
49. Brunswik E., Kamiya J. Ecological cue-validity of ‘proximity’ and of other Gestalt factors American Journal of Psychology 66 (1953) 20-32 doi:10.2307/1417965 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1417965
50. Bullier J., Hup J.-M., James A. C., Girard P. The role of feedback connections in shaping the responses of visual cortical neurons Progress in Brain Research 134 (2001) 193-204 doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(01)34014-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123%2801%2934014-1
51. Bolthoff I., Bolthoff H. H., Sinha P. Top-down influences on stereoscopic depth-perception Nature Neuroscience 1 (1998) 254-257 doi:10.1038/699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/699
52. Caelli T., Dodwell P. The discrimination of structure in vector-graphs: local and global effects Perception and Psychophysics 32 (1982) 314-326 doi:10.3758/BF03206237 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03206237
53. Campbell F. W., Gubitsch R. W. Optical quality of the human eye Journal of Physiology 186 (1966) 558-578
54. Campbell F. W., Robson J. G. Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings Journal of Physiology 197 1968 551-566
55. Carey S., Diamond R. From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces Science 195 1977 312-314 doi:10.1126/science.831281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.831281
56. Cassirer E. The concept of group and the theory of perception Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 5 1944 1-35 doi:10.2307/2102891 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2102891
57. Chang J. J., Julesz B. Cooperative phenomena in apparent movement perception of random-dot cinematograms Vision Research 24 1984 1781-1788 doi:10.1016/0042-6989(84)90009-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989%2884%2990009-9
58. Chater N. Reconciling simplicity and likelihood principles in perceptual organization Psychological Review 103 1996 566-591 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.566
59. Chiel H., Beer R. The brain has a body: adaptive behavior emerges from interactions of nervous system, body and environment Trends in Neurosciences 20 1997 553-557 doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(97)01149-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236%2897%2901149-1
60. Clark A. An embodied cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 1999 345-351 doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01361-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613%2899%2901361-3
61. Cliff D., Noble J. Knowledge-based vision and simple visual machines Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 352 1997 1165-1175 doi:10.1098/rstb.1997.0100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1997.0100
62. Compton B. J., Logan G. D. Evaluating a computational model of perceptual grouping Perception and Psychophysics 53 1993 403-421 doi:10.3758/BF03206783 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03206783
63. Coren S., Girgus J. S. Principles of perceptual organization and spatial distortion: the Gestalt illusions Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 6 1980 404-412 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.6.3.404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.6.3.404
64. Creem S. H., Proffitt D. R. Two memories for geographical slant: separation and interdependence of action and awareness Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 5 1998 22-36 doi:10.3758/BF03209455 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03209455
65. Creem S. H., Proffitt D. R. Defining the cortical visual systems: ‘what’, ‘where’, and ‘how’. Acta Psychologica 107 2001a 43-68 doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(01)00021-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918%2801%2900021-X
66. Creem S. H., Proffitt D. R. Grasping objects by their handles: a necessary interaction between cognition and action Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 2001b 218-228 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.218
67. Crick F., Koch C. Consciousness and neuroscience Cerebral Cortex 8 1998 97-107 doi:10.1093/cercor/8.2.97 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/8.2.97
68. Cumming B. G., DeAngelis G. C. The physiology of stereopsis Annual Review of Neuroscience 24 2001 203-238 doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.203
69. Cutting J. E. Six tenets for event perception Cognition 10 1981a 71-78 doi:10.1016/0010-0277(81)90027-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277%2881%2990027-5
70. Cutting J. E. Coding theory adapted to gait perception Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 7 1981b 71-87 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.7.1.71 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.7.1.71
71. Cutting, J. E. (1986). Perception with an eye for motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
72. Cutting J. E., Moore C., Morrison R. Masking the motions of human gait Perception and Psychophysics 44 1988 339-347 doi:10.3758/BF03210415 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03210415
73. Cutting J. E., Proffitt D. R. The minimum principle and the perception of absolute, common, and relative motion Cognitive Psychology 14 1982 211-246 doi:10.1016/0010-0285(82)90009-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285%2882%2990009-3
74. Cutting J. E., Proffitt D. R., Kozlowski L. T. A biomechanical invariant for gait perception Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 4 (1978) 357-372 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.4.3.357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.4.3.357
75. Cutting, J. E., & Vishton, P. M. (1995). Perceiving layout and knowing distances: the integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In W. Epstein & S. Rogers (Eds.), Perception of space and motion (pp. 69-117). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
76. Dakin S. C. The detection of structure in Glass patterns: psychophysics and computational models Vision Research 37 (1997) 2227-2246 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00038-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989%2897%2900038-2
77. Dakin S. C., Hess R. F. The spatial mechanisms mediating symmetry perception Vision Research 37 (1997) 2915-2930 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00031-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989%2897%2900031-X
78. Dakin S. C., Watt R. J. Detection of bilateral symmetry using spatial filters Spatial Vision 8 (1994) 393-413 doi:10.1163/156856894X00071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156856894X00071
79. Daugman J. G. Spatial visual channels in the Fourier plane Vision Research 24 (1984) 891-910 doi:10.1016/0042-6989(84)90065-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989%2884%2990065-8
80. Daugman J. G. Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensional visual cortical filters Journal of the Optical Society of America A 2 (1985) 1160-1169 doi:10.1364/JOSAA.2.001160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.2.001160
81. Derrington A. M., Henning G. B. Some observations on the masking effects of two-dimensional stimuli Vision Research 29 (1989) 241-246 doi:10.1016/0042-6989(89)90127-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989%2889%2990127-2
82. Desimone R., Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention Annual Review of Neuroscience 18 (1995) 193-222 doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
83. De Valois D. L., Albrecht D. G., Thorell L. G. Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex Vision Research 22 (1982) 545-559 doi:10.1016/0042-6989(82)90113-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989%2882%2990113-4
84. Diamond R., Carey S. Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115 (1986) 107-117 doi:10.1037/0096-3445.115.2.107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.115.2.107
85. DiLollo V., Enns J. T., Rensink R. Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of re-entrant visual processes Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129 (2000) 481-507 doi:10.1037/0096-3445.129.4.481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.4.481
86. DiLollo V., Kawahara J., Zuvic S. M., Visser T. A. W. The preattentive emperor has no clothes: a dynamic redressing Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130 (2001) 479-492 doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.479
87. Dobbins A., Zucker S. W., Cynader M. S. End-stopped neurons in the visual cortex as a substrate for calculating curvature Nature 329 (1987) 438-441 doi:10.1038/329438a0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/329438a0
88. Dodwell P. C. The Lie transformation group model of visual perception Perception and Psychophysics 34 (1983) 1-16 doi:10.3758/BF03205890 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03205890
89. Duncker K. Nber induzierte Bewegung Psychologische Forschung 12 (1929) 180-259 doi:10.1007/BF02409210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02409210
90. Edelman, G. (1989). The remembered present. New York: Basic Books.
91. Edelman, S. (1999). Representation and recognition in vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
92. Edelman S., Intrator N. Towards structural systematicity in distributed, statically bound visual representations Cognitive Science 27 (2003) 73-109 doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2701_3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2701_3
93. Elder J. H., Goldberg R. M. Ecological statistics of Gestalt laws for the perceptual organization of contours Journal of Vision 2 (2002) 324-353 http://journalofvision.org/2/4/5/, DOI 10.1167/2.4.5
94. Elder J. H., Zucker S. W. A measure of closure Vision Research 34 (1994) 3361-3369 doi:10.1016/0042-6989(94)90070-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989%2894%2990070-1
95. Elder J. H., Zucker S. W. Evidence for boundaryspecific grouping Vision Research 38 (1998) 143-152 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00138-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989%2897%2900138-7
96. Engel A. K., Singer W. Temporal binding and the neural correlates of sensory awareness Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (2001) 16-25 doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01568-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613%2800%2901568-0
97. Enroth-Cugell C., Robson J. G. The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat Journal of Physiology 187 (1966) 517-522
98. Exner S. Experimentelle Untersuchung der einfachsten psychischen Processe Pflogers Archiv for die Gesammte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere 11 (1875) 403-432 doi:10.1007/BF01659311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01659311
99. Farah M. J., Wilson K. D., Drain M., Tanaka J. N. What is ‘special’ about face perception? Psychological Review 105 (1998) 482-498 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.3.482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.3.482
100. Farid H. Temporal synchrony in perceptual grouping: a critique Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (2002) 284-288 doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01927-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613%2802%2901927-7
101. Feldman J. Curvilinearity, covariance, and regularity in perceptual groups Vision Research 37 (1997) 2835-2848 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00096-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989%2897%2900096-5
102. Felleman D. J., Van Essen D. C. Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex Cerebral Cortex 1 (1991) 1-47 doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1-a http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/1.1.1-a
103. Ferster D., Miller K. D. Neural mechanisms of orientation selectivity in the visual cortex Annual Review of Neuroscience 23 (2000) 441-471 doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.441
104. Field D. J. Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells Journal of the Optical Society of America A 4 (1987) 2379-2394 doi:10.1364/JOSAA.4.002379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.4.002379
105. Field D. J. What is the goal of sensory coding? Neural Computation 6 (1994) 559-601 doi:10.1162/neco.1994.6.4.559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/neco.1994.6.4.559
106. Field D. J., Hayes A., Hess R. F. Contour integration by the human visual system: evidence for a local ‘association field’. Vision Research 33 (1993) 173-193 doi:10.1016/0042-6989(93)90156-Q http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989%2893%2990156-Q
107. Flock H. R. Optical texture and linear perspective as stimuli for slant perception Psychological Review 72 (1965) 505-514 doi:10.1037/h0022613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0022613
108. Fodor J. A., Pylyshyn Z. W. How direct is visual perception? Some reflections on Gibson's ‘Ecological Approach’. Cognition 9 (1981) 139-196 doi:10.1016/0010-0277(81)90009-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277%2881%2990009-3
109. Fox R., McDaniel C. The perception of biological motion by human infants Science 218 (1982) 486-487 doi:10.1126/science.7123249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.7123249
110. Franz V. H., Gegenfurtner K. R., Bolthoff H. H., Fahle M. Grasping visual illusions: no evidence for a dissociation between perception and action Psychological Science 11 (2000) 20-25 doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00209
111. Freeman R. B. Ecological optics and visual slant Psychological Review 72 (1965) 501-504 doi:10.1037/h0022614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0022614
112. Garner, W. R. (1974). The processing of information and structure. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
113. Gegenfurtner K. R., Kiper D. C., Fenstemaker S. B. Processing of color, form, and motion in macaque area V2 Visual Neuroscience 13 (1996) 161-172 doi:10.1017/S0952523800007203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0952523800007203
114. Geisler W. S., Perry J. S., Super B. J., Gallogly D. P. Edge co-occurence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance Vision Research 41 (2001) 711-724 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00277-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989%2800%2900277-7
115. Geman S., Geman D. Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distribution, and the Bayesian restoration of images IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence PAMI-6 (1984) 721-742 doi:10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767596
116. Gepshtein S., Kubovy M. The emergence of visual objects in space-time Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 97 (2000) 8186-8191 doi:10.1073/pnas.97.14.8186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.14.8186
117. Gibson E. J., Riccio G., Schmuckler M. A., Stoffregen T. A., Rosenberg D., Taormina J. Detection of the traversability of surfaces by crawling and walking infants Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 13 (1987) 533-544 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.13.4.533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.13.4.533
118. Gibson, J. J. (1950a). The perception of the visual world. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
119. Gibson J. J. The perception of visual surfaces American Journal of Psychology 63 (1950b) 367-384 doi:10.2307/1418003 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1418003
120. Gibson J. J. The visual perception of objective motion and subjective movement Psychological Review 61 (1954) 304-314 (Reprinted in 1994, Psychological Review, 101, 318-323.)doi:10.1037/h0061885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0061885
121. Gibson J. J. Information contained in light Acta Psychologica 17 (1960) 23-30 doi:10.1016/0001-6918(60)90003-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918%2860%2990003-2
122. Gibson J. J. Ecological optics Vision Research 1 (1961) 253-262 doi:10.1016/0042-6989(61)90005-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989%2861%2990005-0
123. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
124. Gibson J. J. On the analysis of change in the optic array Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 18 (1977) 161-163 doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.1977.tb00272.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1977.tb00272.x
125. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
126. Gibson, J. J. (1982). Notes on affordances. In E. Reed & R. Jones (Eds.), Reasons for realism: selected essays of James J. Gibson (pp. 401-418). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
127. Giese, M. A. (1999). Dynamic neural field theory for motion perception. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
128. Giese M. A., Lappe M. Measurement of generalization fields for the recognition of biological motion Vision Research 42 (2002) 1847-1858 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00093-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989%2802%2900093-7
129. Giese M. A., Poggio T. Morphable models for the analysis and synthesis of complex motion patterns International Journal of Computer Vision 38 (2000) 59-73 doi:10.1023/A:1008118801668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008118801668
130. Giese, M. A., & Poggio, T. (2002). Biologically plausible neural model for the recognition of biological motion and actions (AI Memo 2002-012). Cambridge, MA: MIT AI Lab.
131. Giese M. A., Poggio T. Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4 (2003) 179-192 doi:10.1038/nrn1057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn1057
132. Gilbert C. D., Sigman M., Crist R. E. The neural basis of perceptual learning Neuron 31 (2001) 681-697 doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00424-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273%2801%2900424-X
133. Gillam, B. (1998). Illusions at century's end. In J. Hochberg (ed.), Perception and cognition at century's end (pp. 95-136). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
134. Ginsburg, A. P. (1986). Spatial filtering and visual form perception. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. R. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 2, pp. 34-1-34-41). New York: Wiley.
135. Glass L., Perez R. Perception of random dot interference patterns Nature 246 (1973) 360-362 doi:10.1038/246360a0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/246360a0
136. Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos. London: Penguin Books.
137. Gobet F. Expert memory: a comparison of four theories Cognition 66 (1998) 115-152 doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00020-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277%2898%2900020-1
138. Gold J. M., Murray R. F., Bennett P. J., Sekuler A. B. Deriving behavioural receptive fields for visually completed contours Current Biology 10 (2000) 663-666 doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00523-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822%2800%2900523-6
139. Goodale M. A., Milner A. D. Separate visual pathways for perception and action Trends in Neurosciences 15 (1992) 22-25
140. Gottschaldt K. Nber den Einfluss der Ehrfahrung auf die Wahrnehmung von Figuren, I Psychologische Forschung 8 (1926) 261-317 doi:10.1007/BF02411523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02411523
141. Graham N., Nachmias J. Detection of grating patterns containing two spatial frequencies: a comparison of single-channel and multiple-channel models Vision Research 11 (1971) 251-259 doi:10.1016/0042-6989(71)90189-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989%2871%2990189-1
142. Greeno J. G. Gibson's affordances Psychological Review 101 (1994) 336-342 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.336
143. Grezes J., Decety J. Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study Neuropsychologia 40 (2002) 212-222 doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00089-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932%2801%2900089-6
144. Grosof D. H., Shapley R. M., Hawken M. J. Macaque V1 neurons can signal ‘illusory’ contours Nature 365 (1993) 550-552 doi:10.1038/365550a0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/365550a0
145. Gross C. G. How inferior temporal cortex became a visual area Cerebral Cortex 4 (1994) 455-469 doi:10.1093/cercor/4.5.455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/4.5.455
146. Grossberg S., Mingolla E. Neural dynamics of form perception: boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading Psychological Review 92 (1985) 173-211 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.92.2.173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.2.173
147. Grossman E. D., Blake R. Brain areas active during visual perception of biological motion Neuron 35 (2002) 1167-1175 doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00897-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273%2802%2900897-8
148. Haffenden A. M., Goodale M. A. The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10 (1998) 122-136 doi:10.1162/089892998563824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/089892998563824
149. Haken, H. (1983). Synergetics. Berlin: Springer.
150. Han S., Humphreys G. W., Chen L. Uniform connectedness and classical Gestalt principles of perceptual grouping Perception and Psychophysics 61 (1999) 661-674 doi:10.3758/BF03205537 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03205537
151. Hassenstein B., Reichardt W. Systemtheoretische Analyse der Zeit, Reihenfolgen und Vorzeichenauswertung bei der Bewegungsrezeption des Rosselkefers Chlorophanus Zeitschrift for Naturforschung, Teil B 11 (1956) 513-524
152. Hatfield G., Epstein W. The status of the minimum principle in the theoretical analysis of visual perception Psychological Bulletin 97 (1985) 155-186 doi:10.1037/0033-2909.97.2.155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.97.2.155
153. Hatsopoulus N., Gabbiani F., Laurent G. Elementary computation of object approach by a widefield visual neuron Science 270 (1995) 1000-1003 doi:10.1126/science.270.5238.1000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.270.5238.1000
154. Heath, R. A. (2000). Nonlinear dynamics: techniques and applications in psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
155. Hecht H. Heuristics and invariants in dynamic event perception: immunized concepts or non-statements? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 3 (1996) 61-70 doi:10.3758/BF03210741 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03210741
156. Hecht S., Shlaer S., Pirenne M. H. Energy, quanta, and vision Journal of General Physiology 25 (1942) 819-840 doi:10.1085/jgp.25.6.819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.25.6.819
157. Hegde J., Van Essen D. C. Selectivity for complex shapes in primate visual area V2 Journal of Neuroscience 20 (2000) RC61
158. Heitger F., von der Heydt R., Peterhans E., Rosenthaler L., Kubler O. Simulation of neural contour mechanisms: representing anomalous contours Image and Vision Computing 16 (1998) 407-421 doi:10.1016/S0262-8856(97)00083-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0262-8856%2897%2900083-8
159. Henning G. B., Bird C. M., Wichmann F. A. Contrast discrimination with pulse-trains in pink noise Journal of the Optical Society of America A 19 (2002) 1259-1266 doi:10.1364/JOSAA.19.001259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.19.001259
160. Henning G. B., Hertz B. G., Broadbent D. E. Some experiments bearing on the hypothesis that the visual system analyzes patterns in independent bands of spatial frequency Vision Research 15 (1975) 887-899 doi:10.1016/0042-6989(75)90228-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989%2875%2990228-X
161. Hildreth E. C., Koch C. The analysis of visual motion: from computational theory to neuronal mechanisms Annual Review of Neuroscience 10 (1987) 477-533 doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.10.030187.002401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.10.030187.002401
162. Hirsch J., DeLaPaz R. L., Relkin N. R., Victor J., Kim K., Li T., Borden P., Rubin N., Shapley R. Illusory contours activate specific regions in human visual cortex: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 92 (1995) 6469-6473 doi:10.1073/pnas.92.14.6469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.14.6469
163. Hochberg, J. (1998). Gestalt theory and its legacy: organization in eye and brain, in attention and mental representation. In J. Hochberg (ed.), Perception and cognition at century's end (pp. 253-306). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
164. Hochberg J., McAlister E. A quantitative approach to figural goodness Journal of Experimental Psychology 46 (1953) 361-364 doi:10.1037/h0055809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0055809
165. Hochberg J., Silverstein A. A quantitative index of stimulus-similarity: proximity versus differences in brightness American Journal of Psychology 69 (1956) 456-458 doi:10.2307/1419052 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1419052
166. Hochstein S., Ahissar M. View from the top: hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system Neuron 36 (2002) 791-804 doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01091-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273%2802%2901091-7
167. Hock H. S., Kelso J. A. S., Schner G. Bistability and hysteresis in the organization of apparent motion patterns Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19 (1993) 63-80 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.19.1.63 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.19.1.63
168. Hock H. S., Schner G., Hochstein S. Perceptual stability and the selective adaptation of perceived and unperceived motion directions Vision Research 36 (1996) 3311-3323 doi:10.1016/0042-6989(95)00277-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989%2895%2900277-4
169. Hoffman D. D., Flinchbaugh B. E. The interpretation of biological motion Biological Cybernetics 42 (1982) 195-204
170. Hoffman W. C. The Lie algebra of visual perception Journal of Mathematical Psychology 3 (1966) 65-98 doi:10.1016/0022-2496(66)90005-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496%2866%2990005-8
171. Hoffman W. C. Geometric psychology generates the visual Gestalt Canadian Journal of Psychology 39 (1985) 491-528 doi:10.1037/h0080077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0080077
172. Hoffman W. C. Conformal structures in perceptual psychology Spatial Vision 8 (1994) 19-31 doi:10.1163/156856894X00215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156856894X00215
173. Homa D., Haver B., Schwartz T. Perceptibility of schematic face stimuli: evidence for a perceptual Gestalt Memory and Cognition 4 (1976) 176-185
174. Hopfield J. J. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 79 (1982) 2554-2558 doi:10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554
175. Hoyer P., Hyverinen A. A two-layer sparse coding model learns simple and complex cell receptive fields and topography from natural images Vision Research 42 (2002) 1593-1605 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00017-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989%2802%2900017-2
176. Hubel D. H., Wiesel T. N. Receptive fields of single neurons in the cat's striate cortex Journal of Physiology 148 (1959) 574-591
177. Hubel D. H., Wiesel T. N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex Journal of Physiology 148 (1962) 574-591
178. Hubel D. H., Wiesel T. N. Receptive fields of cells in striate cortex of very young, visually inexperienced kittens Journal of Neurophysiology 26 (1963) 994-1002
179. Hubel D. H., Wiesel T. N. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex Journal of Physiology 195 (1968) 215-243
180. Hummel, J. E. (2000). Where view-based theories break down: the role of structure in shape perception and object recognition. In E. Dietrich & A. Markman (Eds.), Cognitive dynamics: conceptual change in humans and machines (pp. 157-185). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
181. Hummel J. E., Biederman I. Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition Psychological Review 99 (1992) 480-517 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.480
182. Hup J. M., James A. C., Payne B. R., Lomber S. G., Girard P., Bullier J. Cortical feedback improves discrimination between figure and background by V1, V2 and V3 neurons Nature 394 (1998) 784-787
183. Hurvich L. M., Jameson D. An opponentprocess theory of color vision Psychological Review 64 (1957) 384-404 doi:10.1037/h0041403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0041403
184. Hyverinen A., Hoyer P. Emergence of phase and shift invariant features by decomposition of natural images into independent feature subspaces Neural Computation 12 (2000) 1705-1720 doi:10.1162/089976600300015312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/089976600300015312
185. Janssen P., Vogels R., Orban G. A. Threedimensional shape coding in inferior temporal cortex Neuron 27 (2000) 385-397 doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00045-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273%2800%2900045-3
186. Johansson, G. (1950). Configurations in event perception. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.
187. Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis Perception and Psychophysics 14 (1973) 201-211 doi:10.3758/BF03212378 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03212378
188. Johansson G. Visual motion perception Scientific American 232 (1975) 76-88 doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0675-76 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0675-76
189. Johnston J. C., McClelland J. L. Perception of letters in words: seek not and ye shall find Science 184 (1974) 1192-1194 doi:10.1126/science.184.4142.1192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.184.4142.1192
190. Jones J. P., Stepnoski A., Palmer L. A. The two-dimensional spectral structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex Journal of Neurophysiology 58 (1987) 1212-1232
191. Julesz B. Binocular depth perception without familiarity cues Science 145 (1964) 356-362 doi:10.1126/science.145.3630.356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.145.3630.356
192. Julesz, B. (1971). Foundations of cyclopean perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
193. Kaas, J. H. (2000). The reorganization of sensory and motor maps after injury in adult mammals. In M. S. Gazzaniga (ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (pp. 223-236). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
194. Kanizsa G. Subjective contours Scientific American 234 (1976) 48-52 doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0476-48 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0476-48
195. Kanizsa, G. (1979). Organization in vision: essays on Gestalt perception. New York: Praeger.
196. Kanizsa, G., & Gerbino, W. (1976). Convexity and symmetry in figure-ground organization. In M. Henle (ed.), Art and artefacts (pp. 25-32). New York: Springer.
197. Kanwisher N. Neural events and perceptual awareness Cognition 79 (2001) 83-113
198. Kauffman, S. (1995). At home in the universe: the search for the laws of self-organization and complexity. New York: Oxford University Press.
199. Kellman P. J., Shipley T. F. A theory of visual interpolation in object perception Cognitive Psychology 23 (1991) 141-221 doi:10.1016/0010-0285(91)90009-D http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285%2891%2990009-D
200. Kelly F., Grossberg S. Neural dynamics of 3-D surface perception: figure-ground separation and lightness perception Perception and Psychophysics 62 (2000) 1596-1618 doi:10.3758/BF03212158 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03212158
201. Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: the self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
202. Kersten D. Predictability and redundancy of natural images Journal of the Optical Society of America A 4 (1987) 2395-2400 doi:10.1364/JOSAA.4.002395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.4.002395
203. Keysers C., Perrett D. I. Visual masking and RSVP reveal neural competition Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (2002) 120-125 doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01852-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613%2800%2901852-0
204. Kimchi R. Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: a critical review Psychological Bulletin 112 (1992) 24-38 doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.24 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.24
205. Kimchi R. The role of wholistic configural properties versus global properties in visual form perception Perception 23 (1994) 489-504 doi:10.1068/p230489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p230489
206. Kimchi R. Uniform connectedness and grouping in the perceptual organization of hierarchical patterns Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 1105-1118 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.4.1105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.4.1105
207. Kimchi R., Bloch B. The importance of configural properties in visual form perception Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 5 (1998) 135-139 doi:10.3758/BF03209469 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03209469
208. Kirkpatrick S., Gelatt C. D. Jr., Vecchi M. P. Optimization by simulated annealing Science 220 (1983) 671-680 doi:10.1126/science.220.4598.671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4598.671
209. Klein F. Vergleichende Betrachtungen ober neuere geometrische Forschungen (‘Erlanger Programm’) Mathematische Annalen 43 (1893) 63-100 doi:10.1007/BF01446615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01446615
210. Klein, F. (1908). Elementary mathematics from an advanced standpoint. New York: Macmillan.
211. Knierim J. J., Van Essen D. C. Neuronal responses to static texture patterns in area V1 of the alert macaque monkey Journal of Neurophysiology 67 (1992) 961-980
212. Kobatake E., Wang G., Tanaka K. Effects of shape-discrimination training on the selectivity of inferotemporal cells in adult monkeys Journal of Neurophysiology 80 (1998) 324-330
213. Koenderink J. J. The structure of images Biological Cybernetics 50 (1984) 363-370 doi:10.1007/BF00336961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00336961
214. Koenderink J. J. Optic flow Vision Research 26 (1986) 161-180 doi:10.1016/0042-6989(86)90078-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989%2886%2990078-7
215. Koenderink J. J. Operational significance of receptive field assemblies Biological Cybernetics 58 (1988) 163-171 doi:10.1007/BF00364136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00364136
216. Koenderink J. J. The brain a geometry engine Psychological Research 52 (1990) 122-127 doi:10.1007/BF00877519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00877519
217. Koenderink J. J., Kappers A. M. L., Todd J. T., Norman J. F., Phillips F. Surface range and attitude probing in stereoscopically presented dynamic scenes Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22 (1996) 869-878 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.22.4.869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.22.4.869
218. Koenderink J. J., van Doorn A. J. Representation of local geometry in the visual system Biological Cybernetics 55 (1987) 367-375 doi:10.1007/BF00318371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00318371
219. Koenderink J. J., van Doorn A. J. Receptive field families Biological Cybernetics 63 (1990) 291-297 doi:10.1007/BF00203452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00203452
220. Koenderink J. J., van Doorn A. J. Generic neighborhood operators IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence PAMI-14 (1992) 597-605 doi:10.1109/34.141551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/34.141551
221. Koenderink, J. J., & van Doorn, A. J. (2003). Pictorial space. In H. Hecht, R. Schwartz, & M. Atherton (Eds.), Looking into pictures: an interdisciplinary approach to pictorial space (pp. 239-299). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
222. Koenderink J. J., van Doorn A. J., Kappers A. M. L. Pappus in optical space Perception and Psychophysics 64 (2002) 380-391 doi:10.3758/BF03194711 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03194711
223. Koenderink J. J., van Doorn A. J., Lappin J. S. Direct measurement of the curvature of visual space Perception 29 (2000) 69-79 doi:10.1068/p2921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p2921
224. Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
225. Kogo, N., Strecha, C., Caenen, G., Wagemans, J., & Van Gool, L. (2002). Reconstruction of subjective surfaces from occlusion cues. In H. H. Bulthoff, S.-W. Lee, T. A. Poggio, & C. Wallraven (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Proceedings BMCV 2002 (pp. 311-321). Heidelberg: Springer.
226. Khler, W. (1929). Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright.
227. Khler, W. (1940). Dynamics in psychology. New York: Liveright.
228. Komatsu H., Ideura Y. Relationships between color, shape, and pattern selectivities of neurons in the inferior temporal cortex of the monkey Journal of Neurophysiology 70 (1993) 677-694
229. Kovzcs I. Gestalten of today: early processing of visual contours and surfaces Behavioural Brain Research 82 (1996) 1-11 doi:10.1016/S0166-4328(97)81103-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4328%2897%2981103-5
230. Kovzcs I., Julesz B. A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: effect of closure in figureground segmentation Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 90 (1993) 7495-7497 doi:10.1073/pnas.90.16.7495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.16.7495
231. Kubovy M., Holcombe A. O., Wagemans J. On the lawfulness of grouping by proximity Cognitive Psychology 35 (1998) 71-98 doi:10.1006/cogp.1997.0673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1997.0673
232. Kubovy M., Wagemans J. Grouping by proximity and multistability in dot lattices: a quantitative Gestalt theory Psychological Science 6 (1995) 225-234 doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00597.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00597.x
233. Kuffler S. W. Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina Journal of Neurophysiology 16 (1953) 37-68
234. Lamme V. A. F. The neurophysiology of figureground segregation in primary visual cortex Journal of Neuroscience 15 (1995) 1605-1615
235. Lamme V. A. F. Neural mechanisms of visual awareness: a linking proposition Brain and Mind 1 (2000) 385-406 doi:10.1023/A:1011569019782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1011569019782
236. Lamme V. A. F. Blindsight: the role of feedforward and feedback corticocortical connections Acta Psychologica 107 (2001) 209-228 doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(01)00020-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918%2801%2900020-8
237. Lamme V. A. F., Rodriguez V., Spekreijse H. Separate processing dynamics for texture elements, boundaries and surfaces in primary visual cortex Cerebral Cortex 9 (1999) 406-413 doi:10.1093/cercor/9.4.406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/9.4.406
238. Lamme V. A. F., Roelfsema P. R. The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing Trends in Neurosciences 23 (2000) 571-579 doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01657-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236%2800%2901657-X
239. Lamme V. A. F., Supr H., Spekreijse H. Feedforward, horizontal, and feedback processing in the visual cortex Current Opinion in Neurobiology 8 (1998) 529-535 doi:10.1016/S0959-4388(98)80042-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4388%2898%2980042-1
240. Lamme V. A. F., Zipser K., Spekreijse H. Masking interrupts figure-ground signals in V1 Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14 (2002) 1044-1053 doi:10.1162/089892902320474490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/089892902320474490
241. Land E. H. Recent advances in retinex theory and some implications for cortical computations: color vision and the natural image Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 80 (1983) 5163-5169 doi:10.1073/pnas.80.16.5163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.80.16.5163
242. Lappin J. S., Craft W. D. Foundations of spatial vision: from retinal images to perceived shapes Psychological Review 107 (2000) 6-38 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.107.1.6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.1.6
243. Lappin J. S., Fuqua M. A. Accurate visual measurement of three-dimensional moving patterns Science 221 (1983) 480-482 doi:10.1126/science.6867726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.6867726
244. Lashley K. S., Chow K. L., Semmes J. An examination of the electrical field theory of cerebral integration Psychological Review 58 (1951) 123-136 doi:10.1037/h0056603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0056603
245. Lee D. N., Reddish P. E. Plummeting gannets: a paradigm of ecological optics Nature 293 (1981) 293-294 doi:10.1038/293293a0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/293293a0
246. Lee S.-H., Blake R. Visual form created solely from temporal structure Science 284 (1999) 1165-1168 doi:10.1126/science.284.5417.1165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5417.1165
247. Lee S.-H., Blake R. Neural synergy in visual grouping: when good continuation meets common fate Vision Research 41 (2001) 2057-2064 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00086-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989%2801%2900086-4
248. Lee T. S., Mumford D., Romero R., Lamme V. A. F. The role of the primary visual cortex in higher level vision Vision Research 38 (1998) 2429-2454 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00464-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989%2897%2900464-1
249. Lee T. S., Nguyen M. Dynamics of subjective contour formation in the early visual cortex Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 98 (2001) 1907-1911 doi:10.1073/pnas.031579998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.031579998
250. Lee T. S., Yang C. F., Romero R., Mumford D. Neural activity in early visual cortex reflects behavioral experience and higher-order perceptual saliency Nature Neuroscience 5 (2002) 589-597 doi:10.1038/nn0602-860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn0602-860
251. Leeuwenberg E. L. J. Quantitative specification of information in sequential patterns Psychological Review 76 (1969) 216-220 doi:10.1037/h0027285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0027285
252. Leeuwenberg E. L. J. A perceptual coding language for visual and auditory patterns American Journal of Psychology 84 (1971) 307-349 doi:10.2307/1420464 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1420464
253. Leeuwenberg E., Boselie F. Against the likelihood principle in visual perception Psychological Review 95 (1988) 485-491 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.485
254. Lennie P. Single units and visual cortical organization Perception 27 (1998) 889-935 doi:10.1068/p270889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p270889
255. Leopold D. A., Logothetis N. K. Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys’ percepts during binocular rivalry Nature 379 (1996) 549-553 doi:10.1038/379549a0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/379549a0
256. Leopold D. A., Logothetis N. K. Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (1999) 254-264 doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01332-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613%2899%2901332-7
257. Leopold D. A., O’Toole A. J., Vetter T., Blanz V. Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level after effects Nature Neuroscience 4 (2001) 89-94 doi:10.1038/82947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/82947
258. Lettvin J. Y., Maturana H. R., McCulloch W. S., Pitts W. H. What the frog's eye tells the frog's brain Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers 47 (1959) 1940-1951
259. Lewin, R. (1992). Complexity: life at the edge of chaos. New York: Macmillan.
260. Liang J., Williams D. R. Aberrations and retinal image quality of the normal human eye Journal of the Optical Society of America A 14 (1997) 2873-2883 doi:10.1364/JOSAA.14.002873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.14.002873
261. Livingstone M. S., Hubel D. H. Anatomy and physiology of a color system in the primate visual cortex Journal of Neuroscience 4 (1984) 309-356
262. Logothetis N. K. Single units and conscious vision Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 353 (1998) 1801-1818 doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1998.0333
263. Logothetis N. K., Pauls J., Poggio T. Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys Current Biology 5 (1995) 552-563 doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(95)00108-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822%2895%2900108-4
264. Logothetis N. K., Schall J. D. Neuronal correlates of subjective visual perception Science 245 (1989) 761-763 doi:10.1126/science.2772635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.2772635
265. Logothetis N. K., Sheinberg D. L. Visual object recognition Annual Review of Neuroscience 19 (1996) 577-621 doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.19.030196.003045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.19.030196.003045
266. Lumer E. D., Friston E. J., Rees G. Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain Science 280 (1998) 1930-1934 doi:10.1126/science.280.5371.1930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5371.1930
267. Mach, E. (1959). The analysis of sensations. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1896.).
268. Maes, P. (ed.) (1991). Designing autonomous agents: theory and practice from biology to engineering and back. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
269. Mallat, S. G. (1987). A theory of multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. GRASP Lab Technical Memo. University of Pennsylvania, Department of Computer and Information Science, MSCIS-87-22.
270. Maloney L. T., Wandell B. A. Color constancy: a method for recovering surface spectral reflectance Journal of the Optical Society of America 3 (1986) 29-33
271. Mark L. S. Eye-height-scaled information about affordances: a study of sitting and stair climbing Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 13 (1987) 361-370 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.13.3.361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.13.3.361
272. Mark L. S., Todd J. T. Describing perceptual information about human growth in terms of geometric invariants Perception and Psychophysics 37 (1985) 249-256 doi:10.3758/BF03207572 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03207572
273. Marr, D. (1982). Vision: a computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
274. Marr D., Nishihara H. K. Representation and recognition of three-dimensional shapes Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 200 (1978) 269-294 doi:10.1098/rspb.1978.0020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1978.0020
275. Mather G., Radford K., West S. Low-level visual processing of biological motion Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 249 (1992) 149-155 doi:10.1098/rspb.1992.0097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1992.0097
276. Mazer J. A., Vinje W. E., McDermott J., Schiller P. H., Gallant J. L. Spatial frequency and orientation tuning dynamics in area V1 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 99 (2002) 1645-1650 doi:10.1073/pnas.022638499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.022638499
277. McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E., and the PDP Research Group (1986). Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 2: Psychological and biological models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
278. McLeod P., Dittrich W., Driver J., Perrett D., Zihl J. Preserved and impaired detection of structure from motion by a ‘motion-blind’ patient Visual Cognition 3 (1996) 363-391 doi:10.1080/135062896395634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/135062896395634
279. Metzger, W. (1975). Gesetze des Sehens (3rd ed.). Frankfurt: Kramer. (First edition published 1936.).
280. Michaels C. F. Apparent motion: evidence for the detection of affordances Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14 (1988) 231-240 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.14.2.231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.14.2.231
281. Michaels C. F. Destination compatibility, affordances, and coding rules: a reply to Proctor, Van Zandt, Lu, and Weeks Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19 (1993) 1121-1127 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.19.5.1121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.19.5.1121
282. Michaels, C. F., & Carello, C. (1981). Direct perception. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
283. Michaels C. F., de Vries M. M. Higher order and lower order variables in the visual perception of relative pulling force Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 526-546 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.2.526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.2.526
284. Michotte, A. (1946). La perception de la causalit. Leuven: Institut Suprieur de Philosophie.
285. Michotte, A., Thins, G., & Crabb, G. (1964). Les complments amodaux des structures perceptives. Leuven: Studia Psychologica.
286. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
287. Morgan M. J. The Poggendorff illusion: a bias in the estimation of the orientation of virtual lines by second-stage filters Vision Research 39 (1999) 2361-2380 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00243-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989%2898%2900243-0
288. Morgan M. J., Casco C. Spatial filtering and spatial primitives in early vision: an explanation of the Zllner-Judd class of geometrical illusion Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 242 (1990) 1-10 doi:10.1098/rspb.1990.0095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1990.0095
289. Morgan M. J., Hole G. J., Glennerster A. Biases and sensitivities in geometrical illusions Vision Research 30 (1990) 1793-1810 doi:10.1016/0042-6989(90)90160-M http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989%2890%2990160-M
290. Nakayama K. Biological image motion processing: a review Vision Research 25 (1985) 625-660 doi:10.1016/0042-6989(85)90171-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989%2885%2990171-3
291. Nakayama K. James J. Gibson - an appreciation Psychological Review 101 (1994) 329-335 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.329
292. Nakayama, K. (1998). Vision fin de sicle: a reductionist explanation of perception for the 21st century? In J. Hochberg (ed.), Perception and cognition at century's end (pp. 307-331). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
293. Nakayama, K., He, Z. J., & Shimojo, S. (1995). Visual surface representation: a critical link between lowerlevel and higher-level vision. In S. M. Kosslyn & D. N. Osherson (Eds.), Visual cognition (pp. 1-70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
294. Navon D. Forest before trees: the precedence of global features in visual perception Cognitive Psychology 9 (1977) 353-383 doi:10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285%2877%2990012-3
295. Navon D. The forest revisited: more on global precedence Psychological Research 43 (1981) 1-32 doi:10.1007/BF00309635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00309635
296. Niall K. Projective invariance and the kinetic depth effect Acta Psychologica 81 (1992) 127-168 doi:10.1016/0001-6918(92)90003-V http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918%2892%2990003-V
297. Niall K., McNamara J. Projective invariance and picture perception Perception 19 (1990) 637-660 doi:10.1068/p190637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p190637
298. Nolfi S., Floreano D. Synthesis of autonomous robots through evolution Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (2002) 31-36 doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01812-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613%2800%2901812-X
299. Nunez P. L. Toward a quantitative description of large-scale neocortical dynamic function and EEG Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2000) 371-437 doi:10.1017/S0140525X00003253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00003253
300. Olshausen B. A., Field D. J. Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images Nature 381 (1996) 607-609 doi:10.1038/381607a0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/381607a0
301. Op de Beeck H., Vogels R. Spatial sensitivity of macaque inferior temporal neurons Journal of Comparative Neurology 426 (2000) 505-518 doi:10.1002/1096-9861(20001030)426:4<505::AID-CNE1>3.0.CO;2-M http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1096-9861%2820001030%29426:4%3C505::AID-CNE1%3E3.0.CO;2-M
302. Op de Beeck H., Wagemans J., Vogels R. Inferotemporal neurons represent low-dimensional configurations of parameterized shapes Nature Neuroscience 4 (2001) 1244-1252 doi:10.1038/nn767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn767
303. Op de Beeck H., Wagemans J., Vogels R. The effect of category learning on the representation of shape: dimensions can be biased, but not differentiated Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132 (2003) 491-511 doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.491
304. Oram M. W., Foldiak P. Learning generalisation and localisation: competition for stimulus type and receptive field Neurocomputing 11 (1996) 297-321 doi:10.1016/0925-2312(95)00099-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0925-2312%2895%2900099-2
305. Oram M. W., Perrett D. I. Responses of anterior superior temporal polysensory (STPa) neurons to biological motion stimuli Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 6 (1994) 99-116 doi:10.1162/jocn.1994.6.2.99 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1994.6.2.99
306. Oyama T. Perceptual grouping as a function of proximity Perceptual and Motor Skills 3 (1961) 305-306
307. Palmer, S. E. (1982). Symmetry, transformation, and the structure of perceptual systems. In J. Beck (ed.), Organization and representation in perception (pp. 95-144). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
308. Palmer, S. E. (1983). The psychology of perceptual organization: a transformational approach. In J. Beck, B. Hope, & A. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Human and machine vision (Vol. 1, pp. 269-339). New York: Academic Press.
309. Palmer, S. E. (2002). Perceptual organization in vision. In S. Yantis (ed.), Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology (3rd ed.). Vol. 1: Sensation and perception (pp. 177-234). New York: Wiley.
310. Palmer S. E., Rock I. Rethinking perceptual organization: the role of uniform connectedness Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1 (1994) 29-55 doi:10.3758/BF03200760 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03200760
311. Pascual-Leone A., Walsh V. Fast backprojections from the motion to the primary visual area necessary for visual awareness Science 292 (2001) 510-512 doi:10.1126/science.1057099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1057099
312. Pasupathy A., Connor C. E. Shape representation in area V4: position-specific tuning for boundary conformation Journal of Neurophysiology 86 (2001) 2505-2519
313. Pasupathy A., Connor C. E. Population coding of shape in V4 Nature Neuroscience 5 (2002) 1332-1338 doi:10.1038/nn972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn972
314. Perotti V. J., Todd J. T., Lappin J. S., Phillips F. The perception of surface curvature from optical motion Perception and Psychophysics 60 (1998) 377-388 doi:10.3758/BF03206861 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03206861
315. Peterhans E., Heitger F. Simulation of neuronal responses defining depth order and contrast polarity at illusory contours in monkey area V2 Journal of Computational Neuroscience 10 (2001) 195-211 doi:10.1023/A:1011273115282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1011273115282
316. Peterhans E., von der Heydt R. Subjective contours: bridging the gap between psychophysics and physiology Trends in Neurosciences 14 (1991) 112-119 doi:10.1016/0166-2236(91)90072-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0166-2236%2891%2990072-3
317. Peterson M. A. The proper treatment of uniform connectedness Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1 (1994) 509-514 doi:10.3758/BF03210956 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03210956
318. Phillips W. A., Singer W. In search of common foundations for cortical computation Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1997) 657-722 doi:10.1017/S0140525X9700160X http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X9700160X
319. Pillow J., Rubin N. Perceptual completion across the vertical meridian and the role of early visual cortex Neuron 33 (2002) 805-813 doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00605-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273%2802%2900605-0
320. Pittenger J. B., Shaw R. E., Mark L. S. Perceptual information for the age-level of faces as a higher-order invariant of growth Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 5 (1979) 478-493 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.5.3.478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.5.3.478
321. Ploeger A., van der Maas H. L. J., Hartelman P. A. I. Stochastic catastrophe analysis of switches in the perception of apparent motion Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9 (2002) 26-42 doi:10.3758/BF03196255 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196255
322. Poggio T., Edelman S. A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects Nature 343 (1990) 263-266 doi:10.1038/343263a0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/343263a0
323. Poggio T., Girosi F. Regularization algorithms for learning that are equivalent to multilayer networks Science 247 (1990) 978-982 doi:10.1126/science.247.4945.978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.247.4945.978
324. Polat U. Functional architecture of long-range perceptual interactions Spatial Vision 12 (1999) 143-162 doi:10.1163/156856899X00094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156856899X00094
325. Polat U., Sagi D. The architecture of perceptual spatial interactions Vision Research 34 (1994) 73-78 doi:10.1016/0042-6989(94)90258-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989%2894%2990258-5
326. Pomerantz J. R. Several strange effects arising from perceptual grouping in vision Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society 6 № 564 (2002) 83
327. Pomerantz J. R., Garner W. R. Stimulus configuration in selective attention tasks Perception and Psychophysics 14 (1973) 565-569 doi:10.3758/BF03211198 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03211198
328. Pomerantz, J. R., & Kubovy, M. (1986). Theoretical approaches to perceptual organization: simplicity and likelihood principles. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 2, pp. 36-46). New York: Wiley.
329. Pomerantz J. R., Pristach E. Emergent features, attention, and the perceptual glue in visual form perception Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15 (1989) 635-649 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.15.4.635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.15.4.635
330. Pomerantz J. R., Sager L. C., Stoever R. J. Perception of wholes and of their component parts: some configural superiority effects Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3 (1977) 422-435 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.3.3.422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.3.3.422
331. Pont, S. C., & Koenderink, J. J. (2002). Bidirectional texture contrast function. In A. Heyden, G. Sparr, M. Nielsen, & P. Johansen (Eds.), Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision - ECCV2002, (Vol. 4, pp. 808-822). Heidelberg: Springer.
332. Proctor R. W., Van Zandt T., Lu C.-H., Weeks D. J. Stimulus-response compatibility for moving stimuli: perception of affordances or directional coding? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19 (1993) 81-91 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.19.1.81 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.19.1.81
333. Proesmans, M., Pauwels, E., & Van Gool, L. (1994). Coupled geometry-driven diffusion equations for lowlevel vision. In B. M. ter Haar Romeny (ed.), Geometrydriven diffusion in computer vision (pp. 191-228). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
334. Proesmans, M., & Van Gool, L. (1999). Grouping based on coupled diffusion maps. In D. A. Forsyth, J.L. Mundy, V. di Ges, & R. Cipolla (Eds.), Shape, contour and grouping in computer vision (pp. 196-213). Berlin: Springer.
335. Proffitt D. R., Bhalla M., Gossweiler R., Midgett J. Perceiving geographical slant Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2 (1995) 409-428 doi:10.3758/BF03210980 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03210980
336. Proffitt D. R., Creem S. H., Zosh W. D. Seeing mountains in mole hills: geographical slant perception Psychological Science 12 (2001) 418-423 doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00377
337. Proffitt D. R., Cutting J. E. An invariant for wheel-generated motions and the logic of its determination Perception 9 (1980) 435-449 doi:10.1068/p090435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p090435
338. Proffitt, D. R., & Kaiser, M. K. (1998). The internalization of perceptual processing constraints. In J. Hochberg (ed.), Perception and cognition at century's end (pp. 169-197). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
339. Proverbio A. M., Zani A. Electrophysiological indexes of illusory contours perception in humans Neuropsychologia 40 (2002) 479-491 doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00135-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932%2801%2900135-X
340. Pylyshyn Z. W. Situating vision in the world Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (2000) 197-207 doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01477-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613%2800%2901477-7
341. Quinlan P. T., Wilton R. N. Grouping by proximity or similarity? Competition between the Gestalt principles in vision Perception 27 (1998) 417-430 doi:10.1068/p270417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p270417
342. Rainer G., Miller E. K. Effects of visual experience on the representation of objects in the prefrontal cortex Neuron 27 (2000) 179-189 doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00019-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273%2800%2900019-2
343. Rainville S. J. M., Kingdom F. A. A. The functional role of oriented spatial filters in the perception of mirror symmetry: psychophysics and modeling Vision Research 40 (2000) 2621-2644 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00110-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989%2800%2900110-3
344. Ramachandran V. S. The neurobiology of perception Perception 14 (1985) 97-103
345. Ramachandran, V. S. (1990). Interactions between motion, depth, color, and form: the utilitarian theory of perception. In C. Blakemore (ed.), Vision: coding and efficiency (pp. 346-360). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
346. Ramachandran V. S., Anstis S. M. Perceptual organization in moving patterns Nature 304 (1983) 529-531 doi:10.1038/304529a0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/304529a0
347. Reed, E. S. (1988). James J. Gibson and the psychology of perception. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
348. Reichardt, W. (1961). Autocorrelation: a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system. In W. A. Rosenblith (ed.), Sensory communication (pp. 303-317). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
349. Reicher G. M. Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus materials Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1969) 275-280 doi:10.1037/h0027768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0027768
350. Restle F. Coding theory of the perception of motion configurations Psychological Review 86 (1979) 1-24 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.86.1.1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.86.1.1
351. Riesenhuber M., Poggio T. Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex Nature Neuroscience 2 (1999) 1019-1025
352. Rind E. C., Simmons P. J. Seeing what is coming: building collision sensitive neurons Trends in Neurosciences 22 (1999) 215-220 doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(98)01332-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236%2898%2901332-0
353. Rodman H. R., Scalaidhe S. P. O., Gross C. G. Response properties of neurons in temporal cortical visual areas of infant monkeys Journal of Neurophysiology 70 (1993) 1115-1136
354. Roelfsema P. R., Lamme V. A. F., Spekreijse H. Object-based attention in the primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey Nature 395 (1998) 376-381 doi:10.1038/26475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/26475
355. Roelfsema P. R., Lamme V. A., Spekreijse H., Bosch H. Figure-ground segregation in a recurrent network architecture Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14 (2002) 525-537 doi:10.1162/08989290260045756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/08989290260045756
356. Rossi A. F., Desimone R., Ungerleider L. G. Contextual modulation in primary visual cortex of macaques Journal of Neuroscience 21 (2001) 1698-1709
357. Rubin E. Visuell wahrgenommene wirkliche Bewegungen Zeitschrift for Psychologie 103 (1927) 384-392
358. Ruderman D. L., Bialek W. Statistics of natural images: scaling in the woods Physical Review 73 (1994) 814-817
359. Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., and the PDP Research Group (1986). Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
360. Runeson S. On the possibility of ‘smart’ perceptual mechanisms Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 18 (1977) 172-179 doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.1977.tb00274.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1977.tb00274.x
361. Runeson S., Frykholm G. Visual perception of lifted weight Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 7 (1981) 733-740 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.7.4.733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.7.4.733
362. Runeson S., Juslin P., Olsson H. Visual perception of dynamic properties: cue heuristics versus direct-perceptual competence Psychological Review 107 (2000) 525-555 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.525
363. Sakai K., Miyashita Y. Neural organization for the long-term memory of paired associates Nature 354 (1991) 152-155 doi:10.1038/354152a0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/354152a0
364. Saul A. B., Cynader M. S. Adaptation in single units in visual cortex: the tuning of aftereffects in the spatial domain Visual Neuroscience 2 (1989) 593-607 doi:10.1017/S0952523800003527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0952523800003527
365. Savelsbergh G. J. P., Whiting T. H. A., Bootsma R. J. Grasping tau Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 17 (1991) 315-322 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.17.2.315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.17.2.315
366. Schenk T., Zihl J. Visual motion perception after brain damage. Part 1: Deficits in global motion perception Neuropsychologia 35 (1997a) 1289-1297 doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00004-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932%2897%2900004-3
367. Schenk T., Zihl J. Visual motion perception after brain damage. Part 2: Deficits in form-frommotion perception Neuropsychologia 35 (1997b) 1299-1310 doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00005-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932%2897%2900005-5
368. Schoups A., Vogels R., Qian N., Orban G. A. Practising orientation identification improves orientation coding in V1 neurons Nature 412 (2001) 549-553 doi:10.1038/35087601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35087601
369. Schumann F. Einige Beobachtungen ober die Zusammenfassung von Gesichtseindrucken zu Einheiten Zeitschrift for Psychologie 23 (1900) 1-23
370. Schumann F. Beitrege zur Analyse der Gesichtswahrnehmungen. IV. Die Schetzung der Richtung Zeitschrift for Psychologie 36 (1904) 161-185
371. Schwartz O., Simoncelli E. P. Natural signal statistics and sensory gain control Nature Neuroscience 4 (2001) 819-825 doi:10.1038/90526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/90526
372. Sengpiel F., Stawinski P., Bonhffer T. Influence of experience on orientation maps in cat visual cortex Nature Neuroscience 2 (1999) 727-732 doi:10.1038/11192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/11192
373. Shadlen M., Movshon J. Synchrony unbound: a critical evaluation of the temporal binding hypothesis Neuron 24 (1999) 67-77 doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80822-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273%2800%2980822-3
374. Shams L., von der Malsburg C. The role of complex cells in object recognition Vision Research 42 (2002) 2547-2554 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00202-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989%2802%2900202-X
375. Sharma J., Angelucci A., Sur M. Induction of visual orientation modules in auditory cortex Nature 404 (2000) 841-847 doi:10.1038/35009043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35009043
376. Shepard R. N. Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2001) 581-601
377. Shiffrar M., Lichtey L., Heptulla-Chatterjee S. The perception of biological motion across apertures Perception and Psychophysics 59 (1997) 51-59 doi:10.3758/BF03206847 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03206847
378. Shipley T. F., Kellman P. J. Perception of partly occluded objects and illusory figures: evidence for an identity hypothesis Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18 (1992) 106-120 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.1.106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.1.106
379. Sigman M., Cecchi G. A., Gilbert C. D., Magnasco M. O. On a common circle: natural scenes and Gestalt rules Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 98 (2001) 1935-1940 doi:10.1073/pnas.031571498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.031571498
380. Sillito A. M., Grieve K. L., Jones H. E., Cudeiro J., Davis J. Visual cortical mechanisms detecting focal orientation discontinuities Nature 378 (1995) 492-496 doi:10.1038/378492a0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/378492a0
381. Simoncelli E. P., Adelson E. H. Non-separable extensions of quadrature mirror filters to multiple dimensions Proceedings of the IEEE 78 (1990) 652-664 doi:10.1109/5.54805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/5.54805
382. Simoncelli E. P., Olshausen B. A. Natural image statistics and neural representation Annual Review of Neuroscience 24 (2001) 1193-1216 doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.1193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.1193
383. Singer W., Gray C. Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis Annual Review of Neuroscience 18 (1995) 555-586 doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.003011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.003011
384. Spillman L. From elements to perception: local and global processing in visual neurons Perception 28 (1999) 1461-1492 doi:10.1068/p2763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p2763
385. Stankiewicz B. J. Empirical evidence for independent dimensions in the visual representation of three-dimensional shape Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28 (2002) 913-932 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.28.4.913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.4.913
386. Stoerig P., Cowey A. Blindsight in man and monkey Brain 120 (1997) 535-559 doi:10.1093/brain/120.3.535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/120.3.535
387. Stoffregen T. A., Bardy B. G. On specification and the senses Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2001) 195-261 doi:10.1017/S0140525X01003946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01003946
388. Stone J. V. Independent component analysis: an introduction Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (2002) 59-64 doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01813-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613%2800%2901813-1
389. Sumi S. Upside-down presentation of the Johansson moving light-spot pattern Perception 13 (1984) 283-286 doi:10.1068/p130283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p130283
390. Sun H. J., Frost B. J. Computation of different optical variables of looming objects in pigeon nucleus rotundus neurons Nature Neuroscience 1 (1998) 296-303
391. Suzuki S., Cavanagh P. A shape-contrast effect for briefly presented stimuli Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 1315-1341 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.5.1315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.5.1315
392. Suzuki S., Grabowecky M. Evidence for perceptual ‘trapping’ and adaptation in multistable binocular rivalry Neuron 36 (2002) 143-157 doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00934-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273%2802%2900934-0
393. Tanaka K. Inferotemporal cortex and object vision Annual Review of Neuroscience 19 (1996) 109-139 doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.19.030196.000545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.19.030196.000545
394. Tanner W. P., Swets J. A. A decision-making theory of visual detection Psychological Review 61 (1954) 401-409 doi:10.1037/h0058700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0058700
395. Tarr M. J., Bolthoff H. H. Image-based object recognition in man, monkey, and machine Cognition 67 (1998) 1-20 doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00026-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277%2898%2900026-2
396. Thompson E., Varela F. J. Radical embodiment: neural dynamics and consciousness Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (2001) 418-425 doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01750-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613%2800%2901750-2
397. Tibau S., Willems B., Wagemans J. The influence of two-dimensional stimulus properties in a reproductionfrom-depth task with minimal information stimuli Spatial Vision 13 (2000) 359-376 doi:10.1163/156856800741252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156856800741252
398. Todd J. T., Chen L., Norman J. F. On the relative salience of euclidean, affine, and topological structure for 3-D form discrimination Perception 27 (1998) 273-282 doi:10.1068/p270273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p270273
399. Todd J. T., Norman J. F., Koenderink J. J., Kappers A. M. L. Effects of texture, illumination, and surface reflectance on stereoscopic shape perception Perception 26 (1997) 807-822 doi:10.1068/p260807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p260807
400. Todd J. T., Oomes A. H. J., Koenderink J. J., Kappers A. M. L. On the affine structure of perceptual space Psychological Science 12 (2001) 191-196 doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00335
401. Todd J. T., Reichel F. D. Ordinal structure in the visual perception and cognition of smoothly curved surfaces Psychological Review 96 (1989) 643-657 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.643
402. Tolhurst D. J., Thompson I. D. On the variety of spatial frequency selectivities shown by neurons in area 17 of the cat Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 213 (1982) 183-199 doi:10.1098/rspb.1981.0061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1981.0061
403. Tong F., Nakayama K., Vaughan J. T., Kanwisher N. Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex Neuron 21 (1998) 753-759 doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80592-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273%2800%2980592-9
404. Tresilian J. R. Visually timed action: time-out for ‘tau’? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (1999) 301-310 doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01352-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613%2899%2901352-2
405. Treue S. Neural correlates of attention in primate visual cortex Trends in Neurosciences 24 (2001) 295-300 doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01814-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236%2800%2901814-2
406. Turvey M. T., Shaw R. E., Reed E. S., Mace W. M. Ecological laws of perceiving and acting: in reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn Cognition 9 (1981) 237-304 doi:10.1016/0010-0277(81)90002-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277%2881%2990002-0
407. Turvey M. T., Shockley K., Carello C. Affordance, proper function, and the physical basis of perceived heaviness Cognition 73 (1999) B17-B26
408. Ullman S. Against direct perception Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1980) 373-415 doi:10.1017/S0140525X0000546X http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0000546X
409. Ullman S. Visual routines Cognition 18 (1984) 97-159 doi:10.1016/0010-0277(84)90023-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277%2884%2990023-4
410. Ullman S. Sequence seeking and counter-streams: a computational model for bidirectional information flow in the visual cortex Cerebral Cortex 5 (1995) 1-11 doi:10.1093/cercor/5.1.1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/5.1.1
411. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D.J. Eagle, M.A. Goodale, & R. J. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
412. Usher M., Donnelly N. Visual synchrony affects binding and segmentation in perception Nature 394 (1998) 179-182 doi:10.1038/28166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/28166
413. Uttal W. R., Spillman L., Sturzel F., Sekuler A. Motion and shape in common fate Vision Research 40 (2000) 301-310 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00177-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989%2899%2900177-7
414. Vaina L. M. Functional segregation of color and motion processing in the human visual-cortex: clinical evidence Cerebral Cortex 4 (1994) 555-572 doi:10.1093/cercor/4.5.555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/4.5.555
415. Vaina L. M., LeMay M., Bienfang D. C., Choi A. Y., Nakayama K. Intact biological motion and structure from motion perception in a patient with impaired motion mechanisms: a case-study Visual Neurosciences 5 (1990) 353-369 doi:10.1017/S0952523800000444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0952523800000444
416. Vaina L. M., Solomon J., Chowdhury S., Sinha P., Belliveau J. W. Functional neuroanatomy of biological motion perception in humans Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 98 (2001) 11656-11661 doi:10.1073/pnas.191374198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.191374198
417. van der Helm P. A. The dynamics of Pregnanz Psychological Research 56 (1994) 224-236 doi:10.1007/BF00419653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00419653
418. van der Helm P. A. Simplicity versus likelihood in visual perception: from surprisals to precisals Psychological Bulletin 126 (2000) 770-800 doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.770
419. van der Helm P. A., Leeuwenberg E. L. J. Goodness of visual regularities: a nontransformational approach Psychological Review 103 (1996) 429-456 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.429
420. van der Helm P. A., Leeuwenberg E. L. J. A better approach to goodness: reply to Wagemans (1999) Psychological Review 106 (1999) 622-630 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.622
421. van Ee R., Anderson B. L. Motion direction, speed and orientation in binocular matching Nature 410 (2001) 690-694 doi:10.1038/35070569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35070569
422. Van Gool L. Projective subgroups for grouping Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A 356 (1998) 1251-1266
423. Van Gool L., Moons T., Pauwels E., Oosterlinck A. Vision and Lie's approach to invariance Image and Vision Computing 13 (1995) 259-277 doi:10.1016/0262-8856(95)99715-D http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0262-8856%2895%2999715-D
424. Van Gool L., Moons T., Pauwels E., Wagemans J. Invariance from the Euclidean geometer's perspective Perception 23 (1994) 547-561 doi:10.1068/p230547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p230547
425. van Hateren J. H., Ruderman D. L. Independent component analysis of natural image sequences yields spatio-temporal filters similar to simple cells in primary visual cortex Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 265 (1998) 2315-2320 doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0577
426. van Leeuwen C., van den Hof M. What has happened to Pregnanz? Coding, stability, or resonance Perception and Psychophysics 50 (1991) 435-448 doi:10.3758/BF03205060 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03205060
427. van Leeuwen L., Smitsman A., van Leeuwen C. Affordances, perceptual complexity, and the development of tool use Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 174-191 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.1.174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.20.1.174
428. van Lier R. J., van der Helm P. A., Leeuwenberg E. L. J. Competing global and local completions in visual occlusions Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 (1995) 571-583 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.571
429. van Lier R. J., Wagemans J. Effects of physical connectivity on the representational unity of multipart configurations Cognition 69 (1998) B1-B9
430. van Lier R., Wagemans J. From images to objects: global and local completions of self-occluded parts Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 1721-1741 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.25.6.1721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.6.1721
431. van Oeffelen M. P., Vos P. G. An algorithm for pattern description on the level of relative proximity Pattern Recognition 16 (1983) 341-348 doi:10.1016/0031-3203(83)90040-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-3203%2883%2990040-7
432. van Santen J. P. H., Sperling G. Elaborated Reichardt detectors Journal of the Optical Society of America A 1 (1985) 451-473 doi:10.1364/JOSAA.1.000451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.1.000451
433. Varela F., Lachaux J.-P., Rodriguez E., Martinerie J. The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2 (2001) 229-239 doi:10.1038/35067550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35067550
434. Verfaillie K. Orientation-dependent priming effects in the perception of biological motion Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19 (1993) 992-1023 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.19.5.992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.19.5.992
435. Verfaillie K. Perceiving human locomotion: priming effects in direction discrimination Brain and Cognition 44 (2000) 192-213 doi:10.1006/brcg.2000.1228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/brcg.2000.1228
436. Verstraelen, L. (2002, December). Some remarks on geometry and vision. Talk presented at the UNESCO Conference for Mathematics and the Development of Human Sciences, Bucharest, Romania.
437. Verstraelen, L. (2003). A remark on visual illusions and neuroscience: ‘Basically, we only see what there is to be seen.’ Psychological Reports (April 2003). Leuven, Belgium: University of Leuven, Laboratory of Experimental Psychology.
438. Vinje W. E., Gallant J. L. Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision Science 287 (2000) 1273-1276 doi:10.1126/science.287.5456.1273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5456.1273
439. Vogels R., Biederman I., Bar M., Lorincz A. Inferior temporal neurons show greater sensitivity to nonaccidental than to metric shape differences Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 13 (2001) 444-453 doi:10.1162/08989290152001871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/08989290152001871
440. Vogels R., Eeckhout H., Orban G. A. The effect of feature uncertainty on spatial discriminations Perception 17 (1988) 565-577 doi:10.1068/p170565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p170565
441. von der Heydt, R. (1994). Form analysis in visual cortex. In M. S. Gazzaniga (ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 365-382). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
442. von der Heydt R., Peterhans E., Baumgartner G. Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses Science 224 (1984) 1260-1262 doi:10.1126/science.6539501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.6539501
443. von der Malsburg C. The what and where of visual binding: the modeler's perspective Neuron 24 (1999) 95-104 doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80825-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273%2800%2980825-9
444. von Ehrenfels C. F. Nber Gestaltqualiteten Vierteljahrsschrift for wissenschaftliche Philosophie 14 (1890) 249-292
445. von Helmholtz H. Nber die Theorie der zusammengesetzten Farben Annalen der Physik, Leipzig 887 (1852) 45-66
446. Wagemans J. Skewed symmetry: a nonaccidental property used to perceive visual forms Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19 (1993) 364-380 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.19.2.364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.19.2.364
447. Wagemans J. Detection of visual symmetries Spatial Vision 9 (1995) 9-32 doi:10.1163/156856895X00098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156856895X00098
448. Wagemans J. Characteristics and models of human symmetry detection Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1 (1997) 346-352 doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01105-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613%2897%2901105-4
449. Wagemans J. Toward a better approach to goodness: comments on van der Helm and Leeuwenberg (1996) Psychological Review 106 (1999) 610-621 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.610
450. Wagemans J., Lamote C., Van Gool L. Shape equivalence under perspective and projective transformations Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 4 (1997) 248-253 doi:10.3758/BF03209401 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03209401
451. Wagemans J., Tibau S. Visual measurement of relative distances between three collinear dots rotating in a slanted plane Perception 28 (1999) 267-282 doi:10.1068/p2736b http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p2736b
452. Wagemans J., Van Gool L., Lamote C. The visual system's measurement of invariants need not itself be invariant Psychological Science 7 (1996) 232-236 doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00365.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00365.x
453. Wagemans J., Van Gool L., Lamote C., Foster D. H. Minimal information to determine affine shape equivalence Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 (2000) 443-468 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.443
454. Wagemans J., Van Gool L., Swinnen V., Van Horebeek J. Higher-order structure in regularity detection Vision Research 33 (1993) 1067-1088 doi:10.1016/0042-6989(93)90241-N http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989%2893%2990241-N
455. Wagner H. Flow field variables trigger landing in flies Nature 297 (1982) 147-148 doi:10.1038/297147a0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/297147a0
456. Wallis G., Rolls E. T. Invariant face and object recognition in the visual system Progress in Neurobiology 51 (1997) 167-194 doi:10.1016/S0301-0082(96)00054-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0082%2896%2900054-8
457. Wandell, B. A. (1995). Foundations of vision. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
458. Ward, L. M. (2002). Dynamical cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
459. Watt, R. J. (1991). Understanding vision. New York: Academic Press.
460. Watt R. J., Phillips W. A. The function of dynamic grouping in vision Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (2000) 447-454 doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01553-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613%2800%2901553-9
461. Webb J. A., Aggarwal J. K. Structure from motion of rigid and jointed objects Artificial Intelligence 19 (1982) 107-130 doi:10.1016/0004-3702(82)90023-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702%2882%2990023-6
462. Weisstein N., Harris C. S. Visual detection of line segments: an object superiority effect Science 186 (1974) 752-755 doi:10.1126/science.186.4165.752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.186.4165.752
463. Wenderoth P. The role of pattern outline in bilateral symmetry detection with briefly flashed dot patterns Spatial Vision 9 (1995) 57-77 doi:10.1163/156856895X00115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156856895X00115
464. Wenderoth P. The effects of dot pattern parameters and constraints on the relative salience of vertical bilateral symmetry Vision Research 36 (1996) 2311-2320 doi:10.1016/0042-6989(95)00252-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989%2895%2900252-9
465. Wertheimer M. Experimentelle Studien ober das Sehen von Bewegung Zeitschrift for Psychologie 71 (1912) 161-265
466. Wertheimer M. Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt Psychologische Forschung 4 (1923) 301-350 doi:10.1007/BF00410640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00410640
467. Westheimer G. The Fourier theory of vision Perception 30 (2001) 531-541 doi:10.1068/p3193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p3193
468. Wheatstone C. Contributions to the physiology of vision. Part I: On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 128 (1838) 371-394 doi:10.1098/rstl.1838.0019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1838.0019
469. Wheeler D. D. Processes in word recognition Cognitive Psychology 1 (1970) 59-85 doi:10.1016/0010-0285(70)90005-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285%2870%2990005-8
470. Williams D. R., Brainard D. H., McMahon M. J., Navarro R. Double-pass and interferometric measures of the optical quality of the eye Journal of the Optical Society of America A 11 (1994) 3123-3135 doi:10.1364/JOSAA.11.003123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.11.003123
471. Williams D., Phillips G., Sekuler R. Hysteresis in the perception of motion direction as evidence for neural cooperativity Nature 324 (1994) 253-255 doi:10.1038/324253a0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/324253a0
472. Wilson, H. R. (1999). Spikes, decision, and actions: dynamical foundations of neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press.
473. Wilson H. R., Blake R., Lee S.-H. Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception Nature 412 (2001) 907-910 doi:10.1038/35091066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35091066
474. Wraga M. The role of eye height in perceiving affordances and object dimensions Perception and Psychophysics 61 (1999a) 490-507 doi:10.3758/BF03211968 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03211968
475. Wraga M. Using eye height in different postures to scale the heights of objects Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999b) 518-530 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.25.2.518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.2.518
476. Wraga M., Creem S. H., Proffitt D. R. Perceptionaction dissociations of a walkable MollerLyer configuration Psychological Science 11 (2000) 239-243 doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00248
477. Yen S.-C., Finkel L. H. Extraction of perceptually salient contours by striate cortical networks Vision Research 38 (1998) 719-741 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00197-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989%2897%2900197-1
478. Young T. The Bakerian lecture: on the theory of light and colours Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 92 (1802) 12-48 doi:10.1098/rstl.1802.0004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1802.0004
479. Zeki, S. (1993). A vision of the brain. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.
480. Zhu S.-C. Embedding Gestalt laws in Markov random fields IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence PAMI-21 (1999) 1170-1187