Conjunction and linear non-separability effects in visual shape encoding

Vision Research

Volumn 40, Issue 22, 2000, Pages 3099-3115

  Arguin, Martin ^a,b   Saumier, Daniel ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b CENTRE DE RECHERCHE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Encoding; Shape; Visual search

Indexed keywords

CODING; CONTRAST; HUMAN; OBSERVATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPACE; VISUAL SYSTEM;

EID: 0033857897     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00155-3     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Arguin M., Bub D., Dudek G. Shape integration for visual object recognition and its implication in category-specific visual agnosia. Visual Cognition. 3:1996;221-275.
2. Ashby F.G. Multidimensional models of categorization. Ashby F.G. Multidimensional models of perception and cognition. 1992;449-483 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
3. Barr A.H. Superquadrics and angle-preserving transformations. YEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 1:1981;1-20.
4. Bauer B., Jolicoeur P., Cowan W.B. Visual search for colour targets that are or are not separable from distractors. Vision Research. 36:1996a;1439-1465.
5. Bauer B., Jolicoeur P., Cowan W.B. Distractor heterogeneity versus linear separability in colour visual search. Perception. 25:1996b;1281-1293.
6. Bauer B., Jolicoeur P., Cowan W.B. The linear separability effect in color visual search: ruling out the additive color hypothesis. Perception and Psychophysics. 60:1998;1083-1093.
7. Bauer B., Jolicoeur P., Cowan W.B. Convex hull test of the linear separability hypothesis in visual search. Vision Research. 39:1999;2681-2695.
8. Biederman I. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review. 94:1987;115-147.
9. Biederman I., Subramaniam S., Bar M., Kalocsai P., Fiser J. Subordinate-level object classification reexamined. Psychological Research. 62:1999;131-153.
10. Brooks R.A. Symbolic reasoning among 3-D models and 2-D images. Artificial Intelligence Journal. 17:1981;285-348.
11. Brown J.M., Weisstein N., May J.G. Visual search for simple volumetric shapes. Perception and Psychophysics. 51:1992;40-48.
12. Cavanagh P. Size and position invariance in the visual system. Perception. 7:1978;167-177.
13. Cortese J.M., Dyre B.P. Perceptual similarity of shapes generated from Fourier descriptors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 22:1996;133-143.
14. Dixon M., Bub D.N., Arguin M. The interaction of object form and object meaning in the identification performance of a patient with category-specific visual agnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 14:1997;1085-1130.
15. Dudek G., Arguin M., Dixon M., Bub D.N. Coding simple shapes for recognition and the integration of shape descriptors. Jenkins M., Harris L. Computational and psychophysical mechanisms of visual coding. 1997;44-60 Cambridge University Press, New York.
16. Duncan J., Humphreys G.W. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review. 96:1989;433-458.
17. D'Zmura M. Color in visual search. Vision Research. 31:1991;951-966.
18. D'Zmura M., Lennie P., Tiana C. Color search and visual field segregation. Perception and Psychophysics. 59:1997;381-388.
19. Ersoy O.K., Kim D.Y. Image recognition with the discrete rectangular-wave transform. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 5:1988;5-18.
20. Enns J.T., Rensink R.A. Preattentive recovery of three-dimensional orientation from line drawings. Psychological Review. 98:1991;335-351.
21. Feldman J., Richards W. Mapping the mental space of rectangles. Perception. 27:1998;1191-1202.
22. Garner W.R. The processing of information and structure. 1974;Erlbaum, Potomac, MD.
23. Hoffman D.D., Richards W.A. Parts of recognition. Cognition. 18:1984;65-96.
24. Hoffman D.D., Singh M. Salience of visual parts. Cognition. 63:1997;29-78.
25. Kurbat M.A. Structural description theories: is RBC/JIM a general-purpose theory of human entry-level object recognition? Perception. 23:1994;1339-1368.
26. Marr D. Vision. 1982;Freeman, San Francisco.
27. Marr D., Nishihara H.K. Representation and recognition of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B200:1978;269-294.
28. Palmer S.E. Flierarchical structure in perceptual representation. Cognitive Psychology. 9:1977;441-474.
29. Pentland A. On describing complex surface shapes. Image and Vision Computing. 3:1985;153-162.
30. Rosch E. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 104:1975;192-233.
31. Rosenholtz R. A simple saliency model explains a number of motion popout phenomena. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 39:1998;S629.
32. Shepard R.N. Integrality versus separability of stimulus dimensions: from an early convergence of evidence to a proposed theoretical basis. Lockhead G.R., Pomerantz J.R. The perception of structure: essays in honor of Wendell R. Garner. 1991;53-71 American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
33. Schyns P., Goldstone R.L., Thilbaut L-P. The development of features in object concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 21:1998;1-54.
34. Schyns P., Rodet L. Categorization creates functional features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 23:1997;681-696.
35. Singh M., Seyranian G.D., Hoffman D.D. Parsing silhouetes: the short-cut rule. Perception and Psychophysics. 61:1999;636-660.
36. Smith E.E., Medin D.L. Categories and concepts. 1981;Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
37. Snodgrass, J. G., & Townsend, J. T. (1980). Comparing parallel and serial models: theory and implementation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 330-354.
38. Treisman A.M., Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology. 12:1980;97-136.
39. Treisman A.M., Gormican S. Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review. 95:1988;15-48.
40. Treisman A.M., Sato S. Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 16:1990;459-478.
41. Wolfe J.M. Guided search 2.0: a revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 1:1994;202-238.
42. Wolfe J.M., Friedman-Hill S.R., Stewart M.L, O'Connell K.M. The role of categorization in visual search for orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 18:1992;34-49.