Surface Range and Attitude Probing in Stereoscopically Presented Dynamic Scenes

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 869-878

  Koenderink, Jan J ^a   Kappers, Astrid M L ^a   Todd, James T ^b   Norman, J Farley ^b   Phillips, Flip ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ATTENTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 0030208380     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.22.4.869     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Blake, A., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1991). Shape from specularities: Computation and psychophysics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 331, 237-252.
2. Bülthoff, H. H., & Mallot, H. A. (1988). Integration of depth modules: Stereo and shading. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 5, 1749-1758.
3. Burke, W. L. (1985). Applied differential geometry. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
4. Cipolla, R., & Blake, A. (1990). The dynamic analysis of apparent contours. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Computer Vision, 616-623.
5. Faugeras, O. D., & Papadopoulo, T. (1990). A theory of motion fields of curves. International Journal of Computer Vision, 10, 125-156.
6. Foley, J. D., van Dam, A., Feiner, S. K., & Hughes, J. F. (1990). Computer graphics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7. Gregory, R. L. (1966). Eye and brain. New York: McGraw-Hill.
8. Horn, B. K. P., & Brooks, M. J. (Eds.). (1989). Shape from shading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Koenderink, J. J. (1984). What does the occluding contour tell us about solid shape? Perception, 13, 321-330.
10. Koenderink, J. J., & van Doorn, A. J. (1980). Photometric invariants related to solid shape. Optica Acta, 27, 981-996.
11. Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J., & Kappers, A. M. L. (1992). Surface perception in pictures. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 487-496.
12. Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J., & Kappers, A. M. L. (1995). Depth relief. Perception, 24, 115-126.
13. Mach, E. (1959). The analysis of sensations and the relation of the physical to the psychical (Rev. ed.). New York: Dover. (Original work published in German in 1866)
14. Mingolla, E., & Todd, J. T. (1986). Perception of solid shape from shading. Biological Cybernetics, 53, 137-151.
15. Norman, J. F., & Todd, J. T. (1994). Perception of rigid motion in depth from the optical deformations of shadows and occlusion boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 343-356.
16. Norman, J. F., Todd, J. T., & Phillips, F. (1995). The perception of surface orientation from multiple sources of optical information. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 629-636.
17. Stevens, K. A. (1983a). Slant-tilt: The visual encoding of surface orientation. Biological Cybernetics, 46, 183-195.
18. Stevens, K. A. (1983b). Surface tilt (the direction of slant): A neglected psychophysical variable. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 241-250.
19. Strubecker, K. (1969). Differentialgeometrie. Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.