Dominance of configural properties in visual form perception

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 135-139

  Kimchi, Ruth ^a   Bloch, Benny ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000294508     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03209469     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. ENNS, J. T., & RENSINK, R. A. (1990). Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. Science, 247, 721-723.
2. GARNER, W. E. (1978). Aspects of a stimulus: Features, dimensions, and configurations. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 99-133). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. KIMCHI, R. (1992). Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 24-38.
4. KIMCHI, R. (1994). The role of wholistic/configural properties versus global properties in visual form perception. Perception, 23, 489-504.
5. KLEFFNER, D. A., & RAMACHANDRAN, V. S. (1992). On the perception of shape from shading. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 18-36.
6. KOLINSKY, R., & MORAIS, J. (1986). Evidence for early extraction of emergent properties in visual perception: A replication. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 63, 171-174.
7. LASAGA, M. I. (1989). Gestalts and their components: Nature of information-precedence. In B. Shepp & S. Ballesteros (Eds.), Object perception: Structure and process (pp. 165-202). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. NAVON, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
9. POMERANTZ, J. R., & PRISTACH, E. A. (1989). Emergent features, attention, and perceptual glue in visual form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 635-649.
10. POMERANTZ, J. R., SAGER, L. C., & STOEVER, R. J. (1977). Perception of wholes and their component parts: Some configural superiority effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 422-435.
11. RENSINK, R. A., & ENNS, J. T. (1995). Preemption effects in visual search: Evidence for low-level grouping. Psychological Review, 1, 101-130.
12. ROCK, I. (1986). The description and analysis of object and event perception. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 2, pp. 33-1 to 33-71). New York: Wiley.
13. TREISMAN, A., & GORMICAN, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15-48.
14. TREISMAN, A., & PATERSON, R. (1984). Emergent features, attention, and object perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 12-31.
15. WERTHEIMER, M. (1967). Gestalt theory. In W. D. Ellis (Ed.), A source book of Gestalt psychology (pp. 1-16). London: Routhedge & Kegan Paul. (Originally published in German, 1923)
16. WOLFE, J. M., FRIEDMAN-HILL, S. R., & BILSKY, A. B. (1994). Parallel processing of part-whole information in visual search tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 537-550.
17. WOLFE, J. M., YEE, A., & FRIEDMAN-HILL, S. R. (1992). Curvature is a basic feature for visual search tasks. Perception, 21, 465-480.