Motion and shape in common fate

Vision Research

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 301-310

  Uttal, William R ^a,b   Spillmann, Lothar ^a   Stürzel, Frank ^a   Sekuler, Allison B ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Coherent motion; Common fate; Dots; Form perception; Grouping

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL MASKING; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ADULT; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0033991882     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00177-7     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Britten K.H., Shadlen M.N., Newsome W.T., Movshon J.A. The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance. The Journal of Neuroscience. 12:1992;4745-4765.
2. Falzett M., Lappin J.S. Detection of visual forms in space and time. Vision Research. 23:1983;181-189.
3. French R.S. Pattern recognition in the presence of visual noise. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 47:1954;27-31.
4. Grind van de W., Doorn van A.J., Koenderink J.J. Detection of coherent movement in peripherally viewed random-dot patterns. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 73:1983;1674-1683.
5. Grzywacz N.M., Watamaniuk S.N., McKee S.P. Temporal coherence theory for the detection and measurement of visual motion. Vision Research. 35:1995;3183-3203.
6. Koffka K. Principles of Gestalt psychology. 1935;Harcourt and Brace, New York.
7. Köhler W. Gestalt psychology. 1929;Liveright, New York.
8. Lee S.H., Blake R. Visual form created solely from temporal structure. Science. 284:1999;1165-1168.
9. Newsome W.T, Britten K.H., Movshon J.A. Neuronal correlates of a perceptual decision. Nature. 341:1989;52-54.
10. Newsome W.T., Paré E.B. A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT). Journal of Neuroscience. 8:1988;2201-2211.
11. Niedeggen M., Wist E.R. Detection of motion direction is correlated with motion-evoked potentials. Perception. 21(Supplement 2):1992;32. (Abstract).
12. Oyama T., Yamada W. Perceptual grouping between successively presented stimuli and its relation to visual simultaneity and masking. Psychological Research. 40:1978;101-112.
13. Scase M.O., Braddick O.J., Raymond J.E. What is noise for the motion system? Vision Research. 36:1996;2579-2586.
14. Sekuler A.B. Motion segregation from speed differences: evidence for nonlinear processing. Vision Research. 30:1990;785-795.
15. Sekuler A.B. Simple-pooling of unidirectional motion predicts speed discrimination for looming stimuli. Vision Research. 32:1992;2277-2288.
16. Sekuler A.B., Bennett P.J., Protzner A.B. Temporal binding from synchronous luminance changes. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 40(Supplement S792):1999;4172. (Abstract).
17. Sekuler A.B., Sekuler R., Penbeci C. Perceived direction of motion vs. detection of global flow in random dot cinematograms. Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science. 37(Supplement S515):1996;2363. (Abstract).
18. Uttal W.R. An autocorrelation theory of form detection. 1975;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
19. Uttal W.R. Visual form detection in 3-D space. 1983;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
20. Uttal W.R. The detection of nonplanar surfaces in 3-D space. 1985;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
21. Uttal W.R. The perception of dotted forms. 1987;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
22. Uttal W.R., Bunnell L.M., Corwin S. On the detectability of straight lines in visual noise: an extension of French's paradigm into the millisecond domain. Perception and Psychophysics. 8:1970;385-388.
23. Verghese P., McKee S.P., Grzywacz N.M. Stimulus configuration determines the detectability of motion signals in noise. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 38(Supplement S215):1997;1033. (Abstract).
24. Watamaniuk S.N.J. Ideal observer for the discrimination of the global direction of dynamic random-dot stimuli. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 10:1993;16-28.
25. Watamaniuk S.K.J., McKee S.P., Grzywacz N.M. Detecting a trajectory embedded in random direction noise. Vision Research. 35:1995;65-67.
26. Watamaniuk S.N.J., Sekuler R. Temporal and spatial integration in random dot stimuli. Vision Research. 32:1992;2341-2347.
27. Watamaniuk S.N.J., Sekuler R., Williams D.W. Direction perception in complex dynamic displays. Vision Research. 29:1989;47-59.
28. Wertheimer M. Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. Psychologische Forschung. 4:1923;301-350.
29. Williams D.W., Sekuler R. Coherent global motion percepts from stochastic local motions. Vision Research. 24:1984;55-62.
30. Wist E.R., Ehrenstein W.H., Schrauf M. A computer-assisted test for the electrophysiological and psychophysical measurement of dynamic visual function based on motion contrast. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 80:1998;41-47.
31. Zohary E., Scase M.O., Braddick O.J. Integration across directions in dynamic random dot displays: vector summation or winner take all? Vision Research. 36:1996;2321-2331.