Protein-protein docking

Reviews in Computational Chemistry

Volumn 17, Issue , 2001, Pages 61-97

  Ehrlich, Lutz P ^a,b   Wade, Rebecca C ^c  

^a EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

^b Axaron Bioscience AG   (Germany)

^c European Media Laboratory   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035765461     PISSN: 10693599     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1002/0471224413.ch2     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. ASP atomic solvation parameters, BD Brownian dynamics, DEE dead end elimination, DOF degrees of freedom, EM energy minimization, ES electrostatics, FFT fast Fourier transform, LP linear programming, MCSA Monte Carlo simulated annealing, MM molecular mechanics, PB Poisson-Boltzmann, vdW van der Waals.
2. M. Pellegrini, E. M. Marcotte, M. J. Thompson, D. Eisenberg, and T. O. Yeates, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 96, 4285 (1999). Assigning Protein Functions by Comparative Genome Analysis: Protein Phylogenetic Profiles.
3. E. M. Marcotte, M. Pellegrini, H. L. Ng, D. W. Rice, T. O. Yeates, and D. Eisenberg, Science, 285, 751 (1999). Detecting Protein Function and Protein-Protein Interactions from Genome Sequences.
4. M. Huynen, W. L. B. Snel, and P. Bork, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 10, 366 (2000). Exploitation of Gene Context.
5. P. Uetz, L. Giot, G. Cagney, T. A. Mansfield, R. S. Judson, J. R. Knight, D. Lockshon, V. Narayan, M. Srinivasan, P. Pochart, A. Qureshi-Emili, Y. Li, B. Godwin, D. Conover, T. Kalbfleisch, G. Vijayadamodar, M. Yang, M. Johnston, S. Fields, and J. M. Rothberg, Nature (London), 403, 623 (2000). Comprehensive Analysis of Protein-Protein Interactions in Saccbaromyces cerevisiae.
6. B. Küster and M. Mann, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 8, 393 (1998). Identifying Proteins and Post-Translational Modifications by Mass Spectrometry.
7. B. Rost, Structure, 6, 259 (1998). Marrying Structure and Genomics.
8. R. Sanchez and A. Sali, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 7, 206 (1997). Advances in Comparative Protein-Structure Modelling.
9. J. Skolnick and J. S. Fetrow, Trends Biotechnol., 18, 34 (2000). From Genes to Protein Structure and Function: Novel Application of Computational Approaches in the Genomic Era.
10. M. J. E. Sternberg, H. A. Gabb, and R. M. Jackson, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 8, 250 (1998). Predictive Docking of Protein-Protein and Protein-DMA Complexes.
11. L. Lo Conte, C. Chothia, and J. Janin, J. Mol. Biol., 285, 2177 (1999). The Atomic Structure of Protein-Protein Recognition Sites.
12. S. Jones and J. M. Thornton, J. Mol. Biol., 272, 133 (1997). Prediction of Protein-Protein Interaction Sites Using Patch Analysis.
13. T. O. Fischmann, G. A. Bentley, T. N. Bhat, G. Boulot, R. A. Mariuzza, S. E. Phillips, D. Tello, and R. J. Poljak, J. Biol. Chem., 266, 12915 (1991). Crystallographic Refinement of the Three-Dimensional Structure of the FabD1.3-Lysozyme Complex at 2.5 Å Resolution.
14. B. C. Braden, B. A. Fields, and R. J. Poljak, J. Mol. Recognit., 8, 317 (1995). Conservation of Water Molecules in an Antibody-Antigen Interaction.
15. J. Janin, Struct. Fold. Des., 7, R277 (1999). Wet And Dry Interfaces: The Role of Solvent in Protein-Protein and Protein Recognition.
16. D. G. Covell and A. Wallqvist, J. Mol. Biol., 269, 281 (1997). Analysis of Protein-Protein Interactions and the Effects of Amino Acid Mutations on Their Energetics. The Importance of Water Molecules in the Binding Epitope.
17. J. H. Lakey and E. M. Raggett, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 8, 119 (1998). Measuring Protein-Protein Interactions.
18. T. Clackson and J. A. Wells, Science, 267, 383 (1995). Hot Spot of Binding Energy in a Hormone-Receptor Interface.
19. G. Schreiber and A. R. Fersht, J. Mol. Biol., 248, 478 (1995). Energetics of Protein-Protein Interactions: Analysis of the Barnase-Barstar Interface by Single Mutations and Double Mutant Cycles.
20. Y. Wang, B. J. Shen, and W. Sebald, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 94, 1657 (1997). A Mixed-Charge Pair in Human Interleukin 4 Dominates High-Affinity Interaction with the Receptor Alpha Chain.
21. R. R. Gabdoulline and R. C. Wade, J. Mol. Recognit., 12, 226 (1999). On The Protein-Protein Diffusional Encounter Complex.
22. T. Selzer, S. Albeck, and G. Schreiber, Nat. Struct. Biol., 7, 537 (2000). Rational Design of Faster Associating and Tighter Binding Protein Complexes.
23. K. P. Murphy, Med. Res. Rev., 19, 333 (1999). Predicting Binding Energetics from Structure: Looking Beyond AG Degrees.
24. C. Frisch, G. Schreiber, C. M. Johnson, and A. R. Fersht, J. Mol. Biol., 267, 696 (1997). Thermodynamics of the Interaction of Barnase and Barstar: Changes in Free Energy Versus Changes in Enthalpy on Mutation.
25. S. P. Edgecomb and K. P. Murphy, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 11, 62 (2000). Structural Energetics of Protein Folding and Binding.
26. B. M. Baker and K. P. Murphy, J. Mol. Biol., 268, 557 (1997). Dissecting the Energetics of a Protein-Protein Interaction: The Binding of Ovomucoid Third Domain to Elastase.
27. B. M. Baker and K. P. Murphy, Methods Enzymol, 295, 294 (1998). Prediction of Binding Energetics from Structure Using Empirical Parameterization.
28. B. M. Baker and K. P. Murphy, Biophys. J., 71, 2049 (1996). Evaluation of Linked Protonation Effects in Protein Binding Reactions Using Isothermal Titration Calorimetry.
29. G. Schreiber and A. R. Fersht, Biochemistry, 32, 5145 (1993). Interaction of Barnase with Its Polypeptide Inhibitor Barstar Studied by Protein Engineering.
30. K. A. Xavier and R. C. Willson, Biophys. J., 74, 2036 (1998). Association and Dissociation Kinetics of Anti-Hen Egg Lysozyme Monoclonal Antibodies Hyhel-5 and Hyhel-10.
31. A. J. McCoy, C. V. Epa, and P. M. Colman, J. Mol. Biol., 268, 570 (1997). Electrostatic Complementarity at Protein/Protein Interfaces.
32. N. Horton and M. Lewis, Protein Sci., 1, 169 (1992). Calculation of the Free Energy of Association for Protein Complexes.
33. D. Xu, S. L. Lin, and R. Nussinov, J. Mol. Biol., 265, 68 (1997). Protein Binding Versus Protein Folding: The Role of Hydrophilic Bridges in Protein Associations.
34. J. A. McCammon and S. C. Harvey, Dynamics of Proteins and Nucleic Acids, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1987.
35. M. J. Betts and M. J. Sternberg, Protein Eng., 12, 271 (1999). An Analysis of Conformational Changes on Protein-Protein Association: Implications for Predictive Docking.
36. D. K. Hendrix, T. E. Klein, and I. D. Kuntz, Protein Sci., 8, 1010 (1999). Macromolecular Docking of a Three-Body System: The Recognition of Human Growth Hormone by Its Receptor.
37. A. Anderson and Z. Weng, J. Mol. Graphics Modell., 17, 180 (1999). VRDD: Applying Virtual Reality Visualization to Protein Docking and Design.
38. T. P. Lybrand, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., VCH Publishers, New York, 1990, Vol. 1, pp. 295-320. Computer Simulation of Biomolecular Systems Using Molecular Dynamics and Free Energy Perturbation Methods.
39. T. P. Straatsma, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., VCH Publishers, New York, 1996, Vol. 9, pp. 81-127. Free Energy by Molecular Simulation.
40. H. Meirovitch, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., Wiley-VCH, New York, 1998, Vol. 12, pp. 1-74. Calculation of the Free Energy and the Entropy of Macromolecular Systems by Computer Simulation.
41. M. R. Reddy, M. D. Erion, and A. Agarwal, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., Wiley-VCH, New York, 2000, Vol. 16, pp. 217-304. Free Energy Calculations: Use and Limitations in Predicting Ligand Binding Affinities.
42. B. O. Brandsdal and A. O. Smalas, Protein Eng., 13, 239 (2000). Evaluation of Protein-Protein Association Energies by Free Energy Perturbation Calculations.
43. L. Wesson and D. Eisenberg, Protein Sci., 1, 227 (1992). Atomic Solvation Parameters Applied to Molecular Dynamics of Proteins in Solution.
44. J. D. Madura, M. E. Davis, M. K. Gilson, R. C. Wade, B. A. Luty, and J. A. McCammon, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., VCH Publishers, New York, 1994, Vol. 5, pp. 229-267. Biological Applications of Electrostatic Calculations and Brownian Dynamics Simulations.
45. J. Cherfils, S. Duquerroy, and J. Janin, Proteins: Struct., Genet., Funct., 11, 271 (1991). Protein-Protein Recognition Analyzed by Docking Simulation.
46. R. R. Gabdoulline and R. C. Wade, Biophys. J., 72, 1917 (1997). Simulation of the Diffusional Association of Barnase and Barstar.
47. I. V. Ouporov, H. R. Krull, and K. A. Thomasson, Biophys. J., 76, 17 (1999). Brownian Dynamics Simulations of Interactions between Aldolase and G- or F-Actin.
48. H. A. Gabb, R. M. Jackson, and M. J. Sternberg, J. Mol. Biol., 272, 106 (1997). Modelling Protein Docking Using Shape Complementarity, Electrostatics and Biochemical Information.
49. M. Meyer, P. Wilson, and D. Schomburg, J. Mol. Biol., 264, 199 (1956). Hydrogen Bonding and Molecular Surface Shape Complementarity as a Basis for Protein Docking.
50. I. A. Vakser, Protein Eng., 8, 371 (1995). Protein Docking for Low-Resolution Structures.
51. D. W. Ritchie and G. J. Kemp, Proteins: Struct., Genet., Funct., 39, 178 (2000). Protein Docking Using Spherical Polar Fourier Correlations.
52. D. Fischer, S. L. Lin, H. L. Wolfson, and R. Nussinov, J. Mol. Biol., 248, 459 (1995). A Geometry-Based Suite of Molecular Docking Processes.
53. D. K. Hendrix and I. D. Kuntz, Pacific. Symp. Biocomput., 317 (1998). Surface Solid Angle-based Site Points for Molecular Docking.
54. B. Sandak, R. Nussinov, and H. J. Wolfson, Comput. Appl. Biosci., 11, 87 (1995). An Automated Computer Vision and Robotics-Based Technique for 3-D Flexible Biomolecular Docking and Matching.
55. R. M. Jackson, H. A. Gabb, and M. J. Sternberg, J. Mol. Biol., 276, 265 (1998). Rapid Refinement of Protein Interfaces Incorporating Solvation: Application to the Docking Problem.
56. E. Althaus, O. Kohlbacher, H.-P. Lenhof, and P. Müller, in Recomb 2000 - Proceedings of the Fourth Annual International Conference on Computational Molecular Biology, R. Shamir, S. Miyano, S. Istrail, P. Pevzner, and M. Waterman, Eds., ACM Press, New York, 2000, pp. 15-24.
57. Z. Weng, S. Vajda, and C. DeLisi, Protein Sci., 5, 614 (1996). Prediction of Protein Complexes Using Empirical Free Energy Functions.
58. R. Abagyan, M. Totrov, and D. Kuznetsov, J. Comput. Chem., 15, 488 (1994). ICM - A New Method for Protein Modelling and Design: Applications to Docking and Structure Prediction from the Distorted Native Conformation.
59. G. M. Ullmann, E.-W. Knapp, and N. M. Kostic, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 119, 42 (1997). Computational Simulation and Analysis of Dynamic Association Between Plastocyanin and Cytochrome F. Consequences for the Electron-Transfer Reaction.
60. I. A. Vakser, O. G. Matar, and C. F. Lam, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 96, 8477 (1999). Systematic Study of Low-Resolution Recognition in Protein-Protein Complexes.
61. J. Janin, Proteins: Struct., Genet., Funct., 28, 153 (1997). The Kinetics of Protein-Protein Recognition.
62. J. D. Madura, J. M. Briggs, R. C. Wade, and R. R. Gabdoulline, in Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry, P. v. R. Schleyer, N. L. Allinger, T. Clark, J. Gasteiger, P. A. Kollman, H. F. Schaefer, and P. R. Schreiner, Eds., Wiley, Chichester, UK, 1998, Vol. 1, pp. 141-154. Brownian Dynamics.
63. R. R. Gabdoulline and R. C. Wade, Methods, 14, 329 (1998). Brownian Dynamics Simulation of Protein-Protein Diffusional Encounter.
64. R. R. Gabdoulline and R. C. Wade, J. Phys. Chem., 100, 3868 (1996). Effective Charges for Macromolecules in Solvent.
65. P. N. Palma, L. Krippahl, J. E. Wampler, and J. J. Moura, Proteins: Struct., Genet., Funct., 39, 372 (2000). BiGGER: A New (Soft) Docking Algorithm for Predicting Protein Interactions.
66. E. Katchalski-Katzir, I. Shariv, M. Eisenstein, A. A. Friesem, C. Aflalo, and I. A. Vakser, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 89, 2195 (1992). Molecular Surface Recognition: Determination of Geometric Fit Between Proteins and Their Ligands by Correlation Techniques.
67. W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1993.
68. L. F. Ten Eyk, J. Mandell, V. A. Roberts, and M. E. Pique, in Proceedings of the 1995 ACM/ IEEE Supercomputing Conference, A. Hayes and M. Simmons, Eds., ACM Press, New York, 1995.
69. V. A. Roberts and M. E. Pique, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 38051 (1999). Definition of the Interaction Domain for Cytochrome C on Cytochrome C Oxidase.
70. M. E. Davis, J. D. Madura, B. A. Luty, and J. A. McCammon, Comput. Phys. Commun., 62, 187 (1991). Electrostatics and Diffusion of Molecules in Solution: Simulations with the University of Houston Brownian Dynamics Program.
71. A. Nicholls and B. Honig, J. Comput. Chem., 12, 435 (1991). A Rapid Finite Difference Algorithm, Utilizing Successive Over-Relaxation to Solve the Poisson-Boltzmann Equation.
72. I. A. Vakser and C. Aflalo, Proteins: Struct., Genet., Funct., 20, 320 (1994). Hydrophobic Docking: A Proposed Enhancement to Molecular Recognition Techniques.
73. A. Bridges, L. Gruenke, Y. T. Chang, I. A. Vakser, G. Loew, and L. Waskell, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 17036 (1998). Identification of the Binding Site on Cytochrome P450 2b4 for Cytochrome B5 and Cytochrome P450 Reductase.
74. B. K. Shoichet and I. D. Kuntz, J. Mol. Biol., 221, 327 (1991). Protein Docking and Complementarity.
75. B. Sandak, H. J. Wolfson, and R. Nussinov, Proteins: Struct., Genet., Funct., 32, 159 (1998). Flexible Docking Allowing Induced Fit in Proteins: Insights from an Open to Closed Conformational Isomers.
76. M. J. E. Sternberg, P. Aloy, H. A. Gabb, R. M.Jackson, G. Moont, E. Querol, and F. X. Aviles, in Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Systems in Molecular Biology, J. Glasgow, T. Littlejohn, F. Major, R. Lathrop, D. Sankoff, and C. Sensen, Eds., AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, 1998. pp. 183-192. A Computational System for Modelling Flexible Protein-Protein and Protein-DNA Docking.
77. W. Cornell, P. Cieplak, C. I. Bayly, R. Gould, K. M. Merz Jr., D. M. Ferguson, D. C. Spellmeyer, T. Fox, J. W. Caldwell, and P. A. Kollman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 117, 5179 (1995). A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids and Organic Molecules.
78. M. Totrov and R. Abagyan, Nat. Struct. Biol., 1, 259 (1994). Detailed Ab Initio Prediction of Lysozyme-Antibody Complex with 1.6 Å Accuracy.
79. B. R. Brooks, R. E. Bruccoleri, B. D. Olafson, D. J. States, S. Swaminathan, and M. Karplus, J. Comput. Chem., 4, 187 (1983). CHARMM: A Program for Macromolecular Energy, Minimization and Dynamics Calculations.
80. Y. Mauguen, R. W. Hartley, E. J. Dodson, G. G. Dodson, G. Bricogne, C. Chothia, and A. Jack, Nature, (London), 297, 162 (1982). Molecular Structure of a New Family of Ribonucleases.
81. 13C Assignments of Barstar Using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.
82. A. M. Buckle, G. Schreiber, and A. R. Fersht, Biochemistry, 33, 8878 (1994). Protein-Protein Recognition: Crystal Structural Analysis of a Barnase-Barstar Complex at 2.0-Å Resolution.
83. G. Schreiber and A. R. Fersht, Nat. Struct. Biol., 3, 427 (1996). Rapid, Electrostatically Assisted Association of Proteins.
84. H. Goldstein, Classical Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Boston, 1977.
85. A. Amadei, A. B. Linssen, and H. J. Berendsen, Proteins: Struct., Genet., Funct., 17, 412 (1993). Essential Dynamics of Proteins.
86. B. L. de Groot, D. M. F. van Aalten, R. M. Scheck, A. Amadei, G. Vriend, and H. J. C. Berendsen, Proteins: Struct., Genet., Funct., 29, 240 (1997). Prediction of Protein Conformational Freedom from Distance Constraints.
87. T. Haliloglu, I. Bahar, and B. Erman, Phys. Rev. Lett., 79, 3090 (1997). Gaussian Dynamics of Folded Proteins.
88. K. Hinsen, Proteins: Struct., Genet., Funct., 33, 417 (1998). Analysis of Domain Motions by Approximate Normal Mode Calculations.
89. A. A. Bogan and K. S. Thorn, J. Mol. Biol., 280, 1 (1998). Anatomy of Hot Spots in Protein Interfaces.
90. L. M. Rice and A. T. Brünger, Proteins: Struct., Genet., Funct., 19, 277 (1994). Torsion Angle Dynamics: Reduced Variable Conformational Sampling Enhances Crystallographic Structure Refinement.
91. C. R. Reeves, Ed., Modern Heuristic Techniques For Combinatorial Problems, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK, 1993.
92. R. Judson in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., VCH Publishers, New York, 1997, Vol. 10, pp. 1-73. Genetic Algorithms and Their Use in Chemistry.
93. I. Muegge and M. Rarey, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., Wiley-VCH, New York, 2001, Vol. 17, pp. 1-60. Small Molecule Docking and Scoring.
94. R. M. Jackson and R. B. Russell, J. Mol. Biol., 296, 325 (2000). The Serine Protease Inhibitor Canonical Loop Conformation: Examples Found in Extracellular Hydrolases, Toxins, Cytokines and Viral Proteins.
95. B. Roux and T. Simonson, Biophys. Chem., 78, (1999). Implicit Solvent Models for Biomolecular Simulations.
96. P. J. Goodford, J. Med. Chem., 28, 849 (1985). A Computational Procedure for Determining Energetically Favorable Binding Sites on Biologically Important Macromolecules.
97. M. Rarey, B. Kramer, and T. Lengauer, Proteins: Struct., Genet., Funct., 34, 17 (1999). The Particle Concept: Placing Discrete Water Molecules During Protein-Ligand Docking Predictions.
98. N. C. Strynadka, M. Eisenstein, E. Katchalski-Katzir, B. K. Shoichet, I. D. Kuntz, R. Abagyan, M. Totrov, J. Janin, J. Cherfils, F. Zimmerman, A. Olson, B. Duncan, M. Rao, R. Jackson, M. Sternberg, and M. N. James, Nat. Struct. Biol., 3, 233 (1996). Molecular Docking Programs Successfully Predict the Binding of a Beta-Lactamase Inhibitory Protein to Beta-Lactamase.
99. J. S. Dixon, Proteins: Struct., Genet., Funct., Suppl. 1, 198 (1997). Evaluation of the CASP2 Docking Section.
100. C. J. Camacho, S. R. Kimura, C. DeLisi, and S. Vajda, Biophys. J., 78, 1094 (2000). Kinetics of Desolvation-Mediated Protein-Protein Binding.
101. G. Vriend, J. Mol. Graphics, 8, 52 (1990). WHAT IF: A Molecular Modeling and Drug Design Program.
102. R. W. Hooft, C. Sander, and G. Vriend, Proteins: Struct., Genet., Funct., 26, 363 (1996). Positioning Hydrogen Atoms by Optimizing Hydrogen-Bond Networks in Protein Structures.
103. A. D. MacKerell Jr., D. Bashford, M. Bellott, R. L. Dunbrack, J. D. Evanseck, M. J. Field, S. Fischer, J. Gao, H. Guo, S. Ha, D. Joseph-McCarthy, L. Kuchnir, K. Kuczera, F. T. K. Lau, C. Mattos, S. Michnick, T. Ngo, D. T. Nguyen, B. Prodhom, W. E. Reiher III, B. Roux, M. Schlenkrich, J. C. Smith, R. Stote, J. Straub, M. Watanabe, J. Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera, D. Yin, and M. Karplus, J. Phys. Chem. B, 102, 3586 (1998). All-Atom Empirical Potential for Molecular Modeling and Dynamics Studies.
104. A. T. Brünger, X-PLOR. A System for X-Ray Crystallography and NMR, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 1992.
105. K. Hinsen, J. Comput. Chem., 21, 79 (2000). The Molecular Modelling Toolkit: A New Approach to Molecular Simulations.
106. F. C. Bernstein, T. F. Koetzle, G. J. B. Williams, E. F. Meyers Jr., M. D. Brice, J. R. Rodgers, O. Kennard, T. Shimanouchi, and M. Tasumi, J. Mol. Biol., 112, 535 (1977). The Protein Data Bank: A Computer-Based Archival File for Macromolecular Structures.
107. H. M. Berman, J. Westbrook, Z. Feng, G. Gilliland, T. N. Bhat, H. Weissig, I. N. Shindyalov, and P. E. Bourne, Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 235 (2000). The Protein Data Bank, www.rcsb.org/pdb/.