Screening a peptidyl database for potential ligands to proteins with side-chain flexibility

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 74-87

  Schnecke, Volker ^a   Swanson, Craig A ^b   Getzoff, Elizabeth D ^c   Trainer, John A ^c   Kuhn, Leslie A ^a  

^a Michigan State University   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Aspartic proteinase; Distance geometry; DNA repair enzyme; Docking; Drug design; Glycosyltransferase; Inducible complementarity; Peptidyl inhibitors; Protein peptide interactions; Serine protease

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; GEOMETRY; HYDROGEN BOND; HYDROPHOBICITY; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ASPARTIC ENDOPEPTIDASES; BINDING SITES; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DNA GLYCOSYLASES; GLUCOSYLTRANSFERASES; LIGANDS; N-GLYCOSYL HYDROLASES; PEPTIDES; SUBTILISINS; URACIL-DNA GLYCOSIDASE;

EID: 0032190489     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19981001)33:1<74::AID-PROT7>3.0.CO;2-L     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. McPhalen, C.A., James, M.N.G. Structural comparison of two serine proteinase-protein inhibitor complexes: Eglin-c-subtilisin Carlsberg and CI-2-subtilisin novo. Biochemistry 27:6582-6598, 1988.
2. Livnah, O., Stura, E.A., Johnson, D.L., Middleton, S.A. et al. Functional mimicry of a protein hormone by a peptide agonist: The EPO receptor complex at 2.8 Å. Science 273:464-471, 1996.
3. Hruby, V.J., Al-Obeidi, F., Kazmierski, W. Emerging approaches in the molecular design of receptor-selective peptide ligands: Conformational, topographical, and dynamic considerations. Biochem. J. 268:249-262, 1990.
4. Verlinde, C.L., Hol, W.G. Structure-based drug design: Progress, results and challenges. Structure 2:577-587, 1994.
5. Kuntz, I.D. Structure-based strategies for drug design and discovery. Science 257:1078-1081, 1992.
6. Kuntz, I.D., Meng, E.C., Shoichet B.K. Structure-based molecular design. Accounts of Chem. Res. 27:117-123, 1994.
7. Gschwend, D.A., Good, A.C., Kuntz, I.D. Molecular docking towards drug discovery. J. Mol. Recognition 9:175-186, 1996.
8. Moon, J.B., Howe, W.J. Computer design of bioactive molecules: A method for receptor-based de novo ligand design. Proteins 11:314-328, 1991.
9. Vakser, I.A. Evaluation of GRAMM low-resolution docking methodology on the hemagglutinin-antibody complex. Proteins Suppl. 1:226-230, 1997.
10. Gulukota, K., Vajda, S., DeLisi, C. Peptide docking using dynamic programming. J. Computat. Chem. 17:418-428, 1996.
11. Wallqvist, A., Covell, D.G. Docking enzyme-inhibitor complexes using a preference-based free-energy surface. Proteins 25:403-419, 1996.
12. Fischer, D., Lin, S.L., Wolfson, H.L., Nussinov, R. A geometry-based suite of molecular docking processes. J. Mol. Biol. 248:459-477, 1995.
13. Friedman, A.R., Roberts, V.A., Tainer, J.A. Predicting molecular interactions and inducible complementarity: Fragment docking of Fab-peptide complexes. Proteins 20: 15-24, 1994.
14. Gelhaar, D.K., Verkhivker, G.M., Reijto, P.A. et al. Molecular recognition of the inhibitor AG-1343 by HIV-1 protease: Conformationally flexible docking by evolutionary programming. Chemistry & Biology 2:317-324, 1995.
15. Knegtel, R.M.A., Kuntz, I.D., Oshiro, C.M. Molecutar docking to ensembles of protein structures. J. Mol. Biol. 266:424-440, 1997.
16. Leach, A.R., Kuntz, I.D. Conformational analysis of flexible ligands in macromolecular receptor sites. J. Computat. Chem. 13:730-748, 1992.
17. Rarey M., Wefing, S., Lengauer, T. Placement of medium-sized molecular fragments into active sites of proteins. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 10:41-54, 1996.
18. Rarey, M., Kramer, B., Lengauer, T., Klebe, G. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. J. Mol. Biol. 261:470-489, 1996.
19. Strynadka, N.C.J., Eisenstein, M., Katchalski-Katzir, E. et al. Molecular docking programs successfully predict the binding of a β-lactamase inhibitory protein to TEM-1 β-lactamase. Nat. Struct. Biol. 3:233-239, 1996.
20. Morris, G.M., Goodsell, D.S., Huey, R., Olson, A.J. Distributed automated docking of flexible ligands to proteins: Parallel applications of AutoDock 2.4. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 10:293-304, 1996.
21. Leach, A.R. Ligand docking to proteins with discrete side-chain flexibility. J. Mol. Biol. 235:345-356, 1994.
22. Jones, G., Willett, P., Glen, R.C. Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation. J. Mol. Biol. 245:43-53, 1995.
23. Jones, G., Willett, P., Glen, R.C., Leach, A.R., Taylor, R. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J. Mol. Biol. 267:727-748, 1997.
24. Kuntz, I.D., Blaney, J.M., Oatley, S.J., Langridge, R., Ferrin, T.E. A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 161:269-288, 1982.
25. Shoichet, B.K., Kuntz, I.D. Matching chemistry and shape in molecular docking. Protein Eng. 6:723-732, 1993.
26. Welch, W., Ruppert, J., Jain, A.N. Hammerhead: fast, fully automated docking of flexible ligands to protein binding sites. Chemistry & Biology 3:449-462, 1996.
27. Ruppert, J., Welch, W., Jain, A.N. Automatic identification and representation of protein binding sites for molecular docking. Protein Sci. 6:524-533, 1997.
28. Fersht, A.R. The hydrogen bond in molecular recognition. Trends in Biochem. Sci. 12:301-304, 1987.
29. Janin, J., Chothia, C. The structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J. Biol. Chem. 265:16027-16030, 1990.
30. Meyer, M., Wilson, P., Schomburg, D. Hydrogen bonding and molecular surface shape complementary as a basis for protein docking. J. Mol. Biol. 264:199-210, 1996.
31. Mizutani, M.Y., Tomioka, N., Itai, A. Rational automatic search method for stable docking models of protein and ligand. J. Mol. Biol. 243:310-326, 1994.
32. Crippen, G.M., Havel, T.F. "Distance Geometry and Molecular Conformation." New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1988.
33. Kuhl, F.S., Crippen, G.M., Friesen, D.K. A combinatorial algorithm for calculating ligand binding. J. Comp. Chem. 5(1):24-34, 1984.
34. Smellie, A.S., Crippen, G.M., Richards, W.G. Fast drug-receptor mapping by site-directed distances: A novel method for predicting new pharmacological leads. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 31:386-392, 1991.
35. Ghose, A.K., Crippen, G.M. Geometrically feasible binding modes of a flexible ligand molecule at the receptor site. J. Computat. Chem. 6:350-359, 1985.
36. Sheridan, R.P., Venkataraghavan, R. Designing novel nicotinic agonists by searching a database of molecular shapes. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 1:243-256, 1987.
37. DesJarlais, R.L., Sheridan, R.P., Seibel, G.L., Dixon, J.S., Kuntz, I.D. Using shape complementarity as an initial screen in designing ligands for a receptor binding site of known three-dimensional structure. J. Med. Chem. 31:722-729, 1988.
38. Lawrence, M.C., Davis, P.C. CLIX: A search algorithm for finding novel ligands capable of binding proteins of known three-dimensional structure. Proteins 12:31-41, 1992.
39. Gunner, O.F., Hughes, D.W., Dumont, L.M. An integrated approach to three-dimensional information management with MACCS-3D. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 31:408-414, 1991.
40. Shoichet, B.K., Stroud, R.M., Santi, D.V., Kuntz, I.D., Perry, K.M. Structure-based discovery of inhibitors of thymidylate synthase. Science 259:1445-1450, 1993.
41. Gschwend, D.A., Sirawaraporn, W., Santi, D.V., Kuntz, I.D. Specificity in structure-based drug design: Identification of a novel, selective inhibitor of Pneumocystis carinii dihydrofolate reductase. Proteins 29:59-67, 1997.
42. Makino, S., Kuntz, I.D. Automated flexible ligand docking method and its application for database search. J. Computat. Chem. 18(14):1812-1825, 1997.
43. Böhm, H.-J. On the use of LUDI to search the Fine Chemicals Directory for ligands of proteins of known three-dimensional structure. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 8:623-632, 1994.
44. Böhm, H.-J. The computer program LUDI: A new method for the de novo design of enzyme inhibitors. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 6:61-78, 1992.
45. Jain, A.N. Scoring noncovalent protein-ligand interactions: A continuous differentiable function tuned to compute binding affinities. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 10:427-440, 1996.
46. Hobohm, U., Sander, C. Enlarged representative set of protein structures. Protein Sci. 3:522-524, 1994.
47. Abola, E.E., Bernstein, F.C., Bryant, S.H., Koetzle, T.F., Weng, J. Protein data bank. In: "Crystallographic Databases - Information Content, Software Systems, Scientific Applications," Allen, F.H., Bergerhoff, G., Sievers, R. (eds.). Bonn/Cambridge/Chester: Data Commission of the International Union of Crystallography. 107-132, 1987.
48. Kuhn, L.A., Swanson, C.A., Pique, M.E., Tainer, J.A., Getzoff, E.D. Atomic and residue hydrophilicity in the context of folded protein structures. Proteins 23:536-547, 1995.
49. Hooft, R.W.W., Sander, C., Vriend, G. Positioning hydrogen atoms by optimizing hydrogen-bond networks in protein structures. Proteins 26:363-376, 1996.
50. Habermann, S.M., Murphy, K.P. Energetics of hydrogen bonding in proteins: A model compound study. Protein Sci. 5:1229-1239, 1996.
51. Böhm, H.-J. The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 8:243-256, 1994.
52. Mol, C.D., Arvai, A.S., Sanderson, R.J. et al. Crystal structure of human uracil-DNA glycosylase in complex with a protein inhibitor: Protein mimicry of DNA. Cell 82:701-708, 1995.
53. Mol, C.D., Arvai, A.S., Slupphaug, G. et al. Crystal structure and mutational analysis of human uracil-DNA glycosylase: Structural basis for specificity and catalysis. Cell 80:869-878, 1995.
54. Lunney, E.A. Structure-based design and two aspartic proteases. Network Science 1:http://www.netsci.org/Science/ Cheminform/feature01.html, 1995.
55. Hofmann, B.E., Bender, H., Schulz, G.E. Three-dimensional structure of cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase from Bacillus circulans at 3.4 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 209:793-800, 1989.
56. Collawn, J.F., Kuhn, L.A., Liu, L.-F.S., Tainer, J.A., Trowbridge, I.S. Transplanted LDL and mannose-6-phosphate receptor internalization signals promote high-efficiency endocytosis of the transferrin receptor. EMBO J. 10:3247-3253, 1991.
57. Craig, L., Sanschagrin, P.C., Rozek, A., Lackie, S., Kuhn, L.A., Scott, J.K. The role of structure in antibody cross-reactivity between peptides and folded proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 281:in press.
58. Morris, G.M., Goodsell, D.S., Halliday, R.S. et al. AutoDock 3.0: Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J. Computat. Chem., in press.
59. Raymer, M.L., Sanschagrin, P.C., Punch, W.F., Venkataraman, S., Goodman, E.D., Kuhn, L.A. Predicting conserved water-mediated and polar ligand interactions in proteins using a k-nearest-neighbors genetic algorithm. J. Mol. Biol. 265:445-464, 1997.
60. Edmundson, A.B., Harris, D.L., Fan, Z.-C. et al. Principles and pitfalls in designing site-directed peptide ligands. Proteins 16:246-267, 1993.
61. Abagyan, R., Totrov, M., Kuznetsov, D. ICM-A new method for protein modeling and design: Applications to docking and structure prediction from the distorted native conformation. J. Computat. Chem. 15:488-506, 1994.
62. Abagyan, R., Batalov, S., Cardozo, T., Totrov, M., Webber, J., Zhou, Y. Homology modeling with internal coordinate mechanics: Deformation zone mapping and improvements of models via conformational search. Proteins Suppl. 1:29-37, 1997.