The molecular sociology of the cell

Nature

Volumn 450, Issue 7172, 2007, Pages 973-982

  Robinson, Carol V ^a   Sali, Andrej ^b   Baumeister, Wolfgang ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYPEPTIDE; PROTEASOME; RNA;

CELL ORGANELLE; ELECTRON; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; PROTEIN;

CELL FUNCTION; CELL STRUCTURE; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; CYTOARCHITECTURE; EXOSOME; MASS SPECTROMETER; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW;

EID: 37249065351     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature06523     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. Blundell, T. L. & Johnson, L. Protein Crystallography (Academic, New York, 1976).
2. Wimberley, B. T. et al. Structure of the 30S ribosomal subunit. Nature 407, 327-339 (2000).
3. Ban, N., Nissen, P., Hansen, J., Moore, P. B. & Steitz, T. A. The complete atomic structure of the large ribosomal subunit at 2.4 Å. Science 289, 905-920 (2000).
4. Schluenzen, F. et al. Structure of functionally activated small ribosomal subunit at 3.3 Å resolution. Cell 102, 615-623 (2000).
5. Malhotra, A. & Harvey, S. C. A quantitative model of the Escherichia coli 16S RNA in the 30S ribosomal subunit. J. Mol. Biol. 240, 308-340 (1994).
6. Alber, F., Kim, M. F. & Sali, A. Structural characterization of assemblies from overall shape and subcomplex compositions. Structure 13, 435-445 (2005).
7. Alber, F. et al. Determining the architectures of macromolecular assemblies. Nature 450, 683-694 (2007).
8. Sali, A., Glaeser, R., Earnest, T. & Baumeister, W. From words to literature in structural proteomics. Nature 422, 216-225 (2003).
9. Hernandez, H., Dziembowski, A., Taverner, T., Seraphin, B. & Robinson, C. V. Subunit architecture of multimeric complexes isolated directly from cells. EMBO Rep. 7, 605-610 (2006).
10. Davis, F. P. et al. Protein complex compositions predicted by structural similarity. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 2943-2952 (2006).
11. van Dijk, A. D. et al. Modeling protein-protein complexes involved in the cytochrome c oxidase copper-delivery pathway. J. Proteome Res. 6, 1530-1539 (2007).
12. Todd, A. E., Marsden, R. L., Thornton, J. M. & Orengo, C. A. Progress of structural genomics initiatives: an analysis of solved target structures. J. Mol. Biol. 348, 1235-1260 (2005).
13. Alber, F., Eswar, N. & Sali, A. in Practical Bioinformatics 1950-1954 (Springer, Heidelberg, 2004).
14. Sivasubramanian, A., Chao, G., Pressler, H. M., Wittrup, K. D. & Gray, J. J. Structural model of the mAb 806-EGFR complex using computational docking followed by computational and experimental mutagenesis. Structure 14, 401-414 (2006).
15. Rossmann, M. G., Morais, M. C., Leiman, P. G. & Zhang, W. Combining X-ray crystallography and electron microscopy. Structure 13, 355-362 (2005).
16. Fotin, A. et al. Structure of an auxilin-bound clathrin coat and its implications for the mechanism of uncoating. Nature 432, 649-653 (2004).
17. Mitchell, P., Petfalski, E., Shevchenko, A., Mann, M. & Tollervey, D. The exosome: a conserved eukaryotic RNA processing complex containing multiple 3′→5′ exoribonucleases. Cell 91, 457-466 (1997).
18. Baumeister, W., Walz, J., Zuhl, F. & Seemuller, E. The proteasome: paradigm of a self-compartmentalizing protease. Cell 92, 367-380 (1998).
19. Lim, R. Y. & Fahrenkrog, B. The nuclear pore complex up close. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18, 342-347 (2006).
20. Beck, M., Lucic, V., Forster, F., Baumeister, W. & Medalia, O. Snapshots of nuclear pore complexes in action captured by cryo-electron tomography. Nature 449, 611-615 (2007).
21. Alber, F. et al. The molecular architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Nature 450, 695-701 (2007).
22. Meinhart, A. & Cramer, P. Recognition of RNA polymerase II carboxy-terminal domain by 3′-RNA-processing factors. Nature 430, 223-226 (2004).
23. Liu, Q., Greimann, J. C. & Lima, C. D. Reconstitution, activities, and structure of the eukaryotic RNA exosome. Cell 127, 1223-1237 (2006).
24. Egea, P. F. et al. Substrate twinning activates the signal recognition particle and its receptor. Nature 427, 215-221 (2004).
25. Bonvin, A. M., Boelens, R. & Kaptein, R. NMR analysis of protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 9, 501-508 (2005).
26. Zuiderweg, E. R. Mapping protein-protein interactions in solution by NMR spectroscopy. Biochemistry 41, 1-7 (2002).
27. McCoy, M. A. & Wyss, D. F. Structures of protein-protein complexes are docked using only NMR restraints from residual dipolar coupling and chemical shift perturbations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 2104-2105 (2002).
28. Wuthrich, K. The way to NMR structures of proteins. Nature Struct. Biol. 8, 923-925 (2001).
29. Rieping, W., Habeck, M. & Nilges, M. Inferential structure determination. Science 309, 303-306 (2005).
30. Vachette, P., Koch, M. H. & Svergun, D. I. Looking behind the beamstop: X-ray solution scattering studies of structure and conformational changes of biological macromolecules. Methods Enzymol. 374, 584-615 (2003).
31. Nagar, B. & Kuriyan, J. SAXS and the working protein. Structure 13, 169-170 (2005).
32. Tidow, H. et al. Quaternary structures of tumor suppressor p53 and a specific p53 DNA complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 12324-12329 (2007).
33. Grishaev, A., Wu, J., Trewhella, J. & Bax, A. Refinement of multidomain protein structures by combination of solution small-angle X-ray scattering and NMR data. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 16621-16628 (2005).
34. Rosenberg, O. S., Deindl, S., Sung, R. J., Nairn, A. C. & Kuriyan, J. Structure of the autoinhibited kinase domain of CaMKII and SAXS analysis of the holoenzyme. Cell 123, 849-860 (2005).
35. Sondermann, H., Nagar, B., Bar-Sagi, D. & Kuriyan, J. Computational docking and solution X-ray scattering predict a membrane-interacting role for the histone domain of the Ras activator son of sevenless. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 16632-16637 (2005).
36. Yamagata, A. & Tainer, J. A. Hexameric structures of the archaeal secretion ATPase GspE and implications for a universal secretion mechanism. EMBO J. 26, 878-890 (2007).
37. Hainfeld, J. F. & Powell, R. D. New frontiers in gold labeling. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 48, 471-480 (2000).
38. Pye, V. E. et al. Structural insights into the p97-Ufd1-Npl4 complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 467-472 (2007).
39. Guan, J. Q., Almo, S. C., Reisler, E. & Chance, M. R. Structural reorganization of proteins revealed by radiolysis and mass spectrometry: G-actin solution structure is divalent cation dependent. Biochemistry 42, 11992-12000 (2003).
40. 2H exchange and protein docking. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 13264-13269 (2003).
41. Lee, T. et al. Docking motif interactions in MAP kinases revealed by hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell 14, 43-55 (2004).
42. Yan, Y. & Marriott, G. Analysis of protein interactions using fluorescence technologies. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 7, 635-640 (2003).
43. Muller, E. G. et al. The organization of the core proteins of the yeast spindle pole body. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 3341-3352 (2005).
44. Gavin, A. C. et al. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 440, 631-636 (2006).
45. Sharon, M., Taverner, T., Ambroggio, X. I., Deshaies, R. J. & Robinson, C. V. Structural organization of the 19S proteasome lid: insights from MS of intact complexes. PLoS Biol. 4, e267 (2006).
46. Parrish, J. R., Gulyas, K. D. & Finley, R. L. Yeast two-hybrid contributions to interactome mapping. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 17, 387-393 (2006).
47. Uetz, P. et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 403, 623-627 (2000).
48. Michnick, S. W., Ear, P. H., Manderson, E. N., Remy, I. & Stefan, E. Universal strategies in research and drug discovery based on protein-fragment complementation assays. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 6, 569-582 (2007).
49. Landgraf, C. et al. Protein interaction networks by proteome peptide scanning. PLoS Biol. 2, e14 (2004).
50. MacBeath, G. & Schreiber, S. L. Printing proteins as microarrays for high-throughput function determination. Science 289, 1760-1763 (2000).
51. Piehler, J. New methodologies for measuring protein interactions in vivo and in vitro. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 15, 4-14 (2005).
52. Collins, S. R. et al. Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map. Nature 446, 806-810 (2007).
53. Krogan, N. J., Cagney, G., Haiyuan, Y., Zhong, G. & Guo, X. Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 440, 637-643 (2006).
54. Collins, S. R. et al. Toward a comprehensive atlas of the physical interactome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6, 439-450 (2007).
55. Bauer, A. & Kuster, B. Affinity purification - mass spectrometry. Powerful tools for the characterization of protein complexes. Eur. J. Biochem. 270, 570-578 (2003).
56. Rappas, M. et al. Structural insights into the activity of enhancer-binding proteins. Science 307, 1972-1975 (2005).
57. Poliakov, A. et al. Macromolecular mass spectrometry and electron microscopy as complementary tools for investigation of the heterogeneity of bacteriophage portal assemblies. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 371-383 (2007).
58. Hernandez, H. & Robinson, C. V. Determining the stoichiometry and interactions of macromolecular assemblies from mass spectrometry. Nature Protoc. 2, 715-726 (2007).
59. Lorentzen, E. et al. The archaeal exosome core is a hexameric ring structure with three catalytic subunits. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 575-581 (2005).
60. Buttner, K., Wenig, K. & Hopfner, K. P. Structural framework for the mechanism of archaeal exosomes in RNA processing. Mol. Cell 20, 461-471 (2005).
61. Aloy, P. et al. Structure-based assembly of protein complexes in yeast. Science 303, 2026-2029 (2004).
62. Voges, D., Zwickl, P. & Baumeister, W. The 26S proteasome: a molecular machine designed for controlled proteolysis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68, 1015-1068 (1999).
63. Groll, M. et al. Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4 Å resolution. Nature 386, 463-471 (1997).
64. Sprangers, R. & Kay, L. E. Quantitative dynamics and binding studies of the 20S proteasome by NMR. Nature 445, 618-622 (2007).
65. Hanna, J. & Finley, D. A proteasome for all occasions. FEBS Lett. 581, 2854-2861 (2007).
66. Scheres, S. H. W. et al. Disentangling conformational states of macromolecules in 3D-EM through likelihood optimization. Nature Methods 4, 27-29 (2007).
67. Nickell, S. et al. Automated cryoelectron microscopy of 'single particles' applied to the 26S proteasome. FEBS Lett. 581, 2751-2756 (2007).
68. Davy, A. et al. A protein-protein interaction map of the Caenorhabditis elegans 26S proteasome. EMBO Rep. 2, 821-828 (2001).
69. Ferrell, K., Wilkinson, C. R., Dubiel, W. & Gordon, C. Regulatory subunit interactions of the 26S proteasome, a complex problem. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 83-88 (2000).
70. Hinshaw, J. E., Carragher, B. O. & Milligan, R. A. Architecture and design of the nuclear pore complex. Cell 69, 1133-1141 (1992).
71. Rout, M. P. et al. The yeast nuclear pore complex: composition, architecture, and transport mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 148, 635-651 (2000).
72. Devos, D. et al. Simple fold composition and modular architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 2172-2177 (2006).
73. Koster, A. J. et al. Perspectives of molecular and cellular electron tomography. J. Struct. Biol. 120, 276-308 (1997).
74. Nickell, S., Kofler, C., Leis, A. P. & Baumeister, W. A visual approach to proteomics. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 225-230 (2006).
75. Baumeister, W. From proteomic inventory to architecture. FEBS Lett. 579, 933-937 (2005).
76. Benesch, J. L., Ruotolo, B. T., Simmons, D. A. & Robinson, C. V. Protein complexes in the gas phase: technology for structural genomics and proteomics. Chem. Rev. 107, 3544-3567 (2007).
77. Lowe, J. et al. Crystal structure of the 20S proteasome from the archaeon T. acidophilum at 3.4 Å resolution. Science 268, 533-539 (1995).
78. Unno, M. et al. The structure of the mammalian 20S proteasome at 2.75 Å resolution. Structure 10, 609-618 (2002).
79. Kwon, Y. D., Nagy, I., Adams, P. D., Baumeister, W. & Jap, B. K. Crystal structures of the Rhodococcus proteasome with and without its pro-peptides: implications for the role of the pro-peptide in proteasome assembly. J. Mol. Biol. 335, 233-245 (2004).
80. Ortiz, J. O., Forster, F., Kurner, J., Linaroudis, A. A. & Baumeister, W. Mapping 70S ribosomes in intact cells by cryoelectron tomography and pattern recognition. J. Struct. Biol. 156, 334-341 (2006).
81. Gabashvili, I. S. et al. Solution structure of the E. coli 70S ribosome at 11.5 Å resolution. Cell 100, 537-549 (2000).
82. Sharon, M. & Robinson, C. V. The role of mass spectrometry in structure elucidation of dynamic protein complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 76, 167-193 (2007).
83. 6/L10 rather than canonical pentameric complexes are found by tandem MS of intact ribosomes from thermophilic bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad Sci. USA 102, 8192-8197 (2005).
84. Aebersold, R. & Mann, M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 422, 198-207 (2003).
85. Synowsky, S. A., van den Heuvel, R. H., Mohammed, S., Pijnappel, P. W. & Heck, A. J. Probing genuine strong interactions and post-translational modifications in the heterogeneous yeast exosome protein complex. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 5, 1581-1592 (2006).
86. Back, J. W., de Jong, L., Muijsers, A. O. & de Koster, C. G. Chemical cross-linking and mass spectrometry for protein structural modeling. J. Mol. Biol. 331, 303-313 (2003).
87. Vasilescu, J. & Figeys, D. Mapping protein-protein interactions by mass spectrometry. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 17, 394-399 (2006).
88. von Helden, G., Wyttenbach, T. & Bowers, M. T. Conformation of macromolecules in the gas phase: use of matrix-assisted laser desorption methods in ion chromatography. Science 267, 1483-1485 (1995).
89. Ruotolo, B. T. et al. Evidence for macromolecular protein rings in the absence of bulk water. Science 310, 1658-1661 (2005).
90. Ruotolo, B. T. et al. Ion mobility-mass spectrometry reveals long-lived, unfolded intermediates in the dissociation of protein complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 46, 8001-8004 (2007).
91. Henderson, R. Realizing the potential of electron cryo-microscopy. Q. Rev. Biophys. 37, 3-13 (2004).
92. Suloway, C. et al. Automated molecular microscopy: the new Leginon system. J. Struct. Biol. 151, 41-60 (2005).
93. Johnson, J. E. & Chiu, W. DNA packaging and delivery machines in tailed bacteriophages. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 17, 237-243 (2007).
94. Taylor, D. J. et al. Structures of modified eEF2 80S ribosome complexes reveal the role of GTP hydrolysis in translocation. EMBO J. 26, 2421-2431 (2007).
95. Vaughan, C. K. et al. Structure of an Hsp90-Cdc37-Cdk4 complex. Mol. Cell 23, 697-707 (2006).
96. Woodhead, J. L. et al. Atomic model of a myosin filament in the relaxed state. Nature 436, 1195-1199 (2005).
97. Wang, H. W. & Nogales, E. Nucleotide-dependent bending flexibility of tubulin regulates microtubule assembly. Nature 435, 911-915 (2005).
98. Stark, H. & Luhrmann, R. Cryo-electron microscopy of spliceosomal components. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 35, 435-457 (2006).
99. Fath, S., Mancias, J. D., Bi, X. & Goldberg, J. Structure and organization of coat proteins in the COPII cage. Cell 129, 1325-1336 (2007).
100. Mitra, K. & Frank, J. Ribosome dynamics: insights from atomic structure modeling into cryo-electron microscopy maps. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 35, 299-317 (2006).