Sublexical frequency measures for orthographic and phonological units in German

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 620-629

  Hofmann, Markus J ^a   Stenneken, Prisca ^a,b   Conrad, Markus ^a   Jacobs, Arthur M ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF EICHSTÄTT INGOLSTADT   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PERIODICITY; PHONETICS;

HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; PERIODICITY; PHONETICS; VOCABULARY;

EID: 35748949884     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: 15543528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193034     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Aichert, I., & Ziegler, W. (2004). Syllable frequency and syllable structure in apraxia of speech. Brain & Language, 88, 148-159.
2. Aichert, I., & Ziegler, W. (2005). Is there a need to control for sublexi-cal frequencies? Brain & Language, 95, 170-171.
3. Alameda, J. R., & Cuetos, F. (1995). Diccionario de frecuencia de las unidades lingüísticas del castellano (Vols. 1 & 2). Oviedo: Universi-dad de Oviedo.
4. Ans, B., Carbonnel, S., & Valdois, S. (1998). A connectionist multiple-trace memory model for polysyllabic word reading. Psychological Review, 105, 678-723.
5. Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory & Language, 37, 94-117.
6. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
7. Bailey, T. M., & Hahn, U. (2001). Determinants of Wordlikeliness: Phonotactics or Lexical Neighborhoods? Journal of Memory & Language, 44, 568-591.
8. Barber, H., Vergara, M., & Carreiras, M. (2004). Syllable-frequency effects in visual word recognition: Evidence from ERPs. NeuroRe-port, 15, 545-548.
9. Carreiras, M., Álvarez, C. J., & De Vega, M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 766-780.
10. Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2004). Effects of syllable neighbourhood frequency in visual word recognition and reading: Cross-task comparisons. In L. Ferrand & J. Grainger (Eds.), Psycholinguistique cognitive. Bruxelles: De Broeck Université.
11. Cholin, J., Levelt, W. J. M., & Schiller, N. O. (2006). Effects of syllable frequency in speech production. Cognition, 99, 205-235.
12. Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidis-ciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 991-1060.
13. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
14. Conrad, M., Carreiras, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (in press-a). Contrasting effects of token and type syllable frequency in lexical decision. Language & Cognitive Processes.
15. Conrad, M., Carreiras, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (in press-b). Syllable frequency and orthographic redundancy evidence for two different processing mechanisms in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
16. Conrad, M., Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. (2007). Phonology as the source of syllable frequency effects in visual word recognition: Evidence from French. Memory & Cognition, 35, 974-983.
17. Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2004). Replicating syllable frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition. Language & Cognitive Processes, 19, 369-390.
18. Conrad, M., Stenneken, P., & Jacobs, A. M. (2006). Associated or dissociated effects of syllable-frequency in lexical decision and naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 339-345.
19. Davis, C., & Perea, M. (2005). BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 665-671.
20. Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M., & Vinckier, F. (2005). The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9,335-341.
21. De Jong, N. H., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2000). The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language & Cognitive Processes, 15, 329-365.
22. del Prado Martín, F. M., Ernestus, M., & Baayen, R. H. (2004). Do type and token reflect different mechanisms? Connectionist modeling of Dutch past-tense formation and final devoicing. Brain & Language, 90, 287-298.
23. del Prado Martín, F. M., Kostic, A., & Baayen, R. H. (2004). Putting the bits together: An information theoretical perspective on morphological processing. Cognition, 94, 1-18.
24. Duyck, W., Desmet, T., Verbeke, L. P. C., & Brysbaert, M. (2004). WordGen: A tool for word selection and nonword generation in Dutch, English, German, and French. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 488-499.
25. Eddington, D. (2004). Issues in modeling language processing analogically. Lingua, 114, 849-871.
26. Ernestus, M., & Baayen, R. H. (2001). Choosing between the Dutch past-tense suffixes -te and -de. In T. van der Wouden (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2001 (pp. 81-93). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
27. Ernestus, M., & Baayen, R. H. (2003). Predicting the unpredictable: Interpreting neutralized segments in Dutch. Language, 79, 5-38.
28. Geyken, A. (2007). The DWDS-corpus: A reference corpus for the German language of the 20th century. In C. Fellbaum (Eds.), Collocations and idioms: Linguistic, lexicographic, and computational aspects. London: Continuum.
29. Goslin, J., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2000). A comparison of theoretical and human syllabification. Language & Speech, 44, 409-436.
30. Goswami, U., & Ziegler, J. C. (2006). A developmental perspective on the neural code for written words. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,10,142-143.
31. Goswami, U., Ziegler, J. C., Dalton, L., & Schneider, W. (2003). Nonword reading across orthographies: How flexible is the choice of reading units? Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 235-247.
32. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1993). Masked partial-word priming in visual word recognition: effects of positional letter frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 951-964.
33. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
34. Grainger, J., & Whitney, C. (2004). Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 58-59.
35. Hutzler, F., Bergmann, J., Conrad, M., Kronbichler, M., Sten-neken, P., & Jacobs, A. M. (2004). Inhibitory effects of first syllable-frequency in lexical decision: An event-related potential study. Neuro-science Letters, 372, 179-184.
36. Hutzler, F., Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2005). Effects of syllable-frequency in lexical decision and naming: An eye-movement study. Brain & Language, 92, 138-152.
37. Jacobs, A. M. (2002). The cognitive psychology of literacy. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 8971-8975). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
38. Jacobs, A. M., & Graf, R. (2005). Wortformgedächtnis als intuitive Statistik in Sprachen mit unterschiedlicher Konsistenz [Word form memory as intuitive statistics in languages with different consistency]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 213, 133-141.
39. Jacobs, A. M., Graf, R., & Kinder, A. (2003). Receiver operating characteristics in the lexical decision task: Evidence for a simple signal-detection process simulated by the multiple read-out model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 481-488.
40. Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C., & Grainger, J. (1998). MROM-P: An interactive activation, multiple read-out model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. In J. Grainger & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition. (pp. 147-187). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Kuchinke, L., Jacobs, A. M., Grubich, C., Võ, M. L.-H., Conrad, M., & Herrmann, M. (2005). Incidental effects of emotional valence in single word processing: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 28, 1022-1032.
42. Laganaro, M. (2005). Syllable frequency effect in speech production: Evidence from aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 18, 221-235.
43. Leung, M.-T., Law, S.-P., & Fung, S.-Y. (2004). Type and token frequencies of phonological units in Hong Kong Cantonese. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 500-505.
44. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75.
45. Liberman, I., Liberman, A. M., Mattingly, I., & Shankweiler, D. (1980). Orthography and the beginning reader. Baltimore, OH: University Park Press.
46. Martin, N. (2004). Comments on Nickels and Howard (2004) "Dissociating effects of number of phonemes, number of syllables, and syllable complexity on word production in aphasia: It's the number of phonemes that counts." Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 528-530.
47. Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M. (1994). Visual, orthographic, phonological, and lexical influences in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 1107-1128.
48. Mathey, S., & Zagar, D. (2002). Lexical similarity in visual word recognition: The effect of syllabic neighborhood in French. Current Psychology Letters: Behavior, Brain & Cognition, 8, 107-121.
49. New, B., Brysbaert, M., Segui, J., Ferrand, L., & Rastle, K. (2004). The processing of singular and plural nouns in French and English. Journal of Memory & Language, 51, 568-585.
50. New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., & Ferrand, L. (2004). Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 516-524.
51. Nickels, L. A., & Howard, D. (2004a). Dissociating effects of number of phonemes, number of syllables, and syllabic complexity on word production in aphasia: It's the number of phonemes that counts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 57-78.
52. Nickels, L. A., & Howard, D. (2004b). Correct responses, error analyses, and theories of word production: A response to Martin. Cognitive Neuropsycholog y, 21, 531-536.
53. Novick, L. R., & Sherman, S. J. (2004). Type-based bigram frequencies for five-letter words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 397-401.
54. Nuerk, H.-C., Rey, A., Graf, R., & Jacobs, A. M. (2000). Phonographic sublexical units in visual word recognition. Current Psychology Letters: Behavior, Brain, & Cognition, 2, 27-38.
55. Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (1998). Effects of syllable frequency and syllable neighborhood frequency in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 134-144.
56. Peressotti, F., & Grainger, J. (1999). The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 691-706.
57. Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition, 19, 1-30.
58. Seidenberg, M. S. (1987). Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 245-263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
59. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
60. Stella, V., & Job, R. (2001). Le sillabe PD/DPSS: Una base di dati sulla frequenza sillabica dell'italiano scritto. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 28, 633-639.
61. Stenneken, P., Bastiaanse, R., Huber, W., & Jacobs, A. M. (2005). Syllable structure and sonority in language inventory and aphasic neologisms. Brain & Language, 95, 280-292.
62. Stenneken, P., Conrad, M., Hutzler, F., Braun, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2005). Frequency effects with visual words and syllables in a dyslexic reader. Behavioral Neurology, 16, 1-15.
63. Stenneken, P., Hofmann, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2005). Patterns of phoneme and syllable frequency in jargon aphasia. Brain & Language, 95, 221-222.
64. Stone, G. O., Vanhoy, M., & Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 36, 337-359.
65. Sumiya, H., & Healy, A. F. (2004). Phonology in the bilingual Stroop effect. Memory & Cognition, 32, 752-758.
66. Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15, 181-198.
67. Varley, R., & Whiteside, S. P. (2001). What is the underlying impairment in acquired apraxia of speech? Aphasiology, 15, 39-49.
68. Yates, M. (2005). Phonological neighbors speed visual word processing: Evidence from multiple tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 1385-1397.
69. Ziegler, J. C., & Ferrand, L. (1998). Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 683-689.
70. Ziegler, J. C., Ferrand, L., & Montant, M. (2004). Visual phonology: The effects of orthographic consistency on different auditory word recognition tasks. Memory & Cognition, 32, 732-741.
71. Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholin-guistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3-29.
72. Ziegler, J. C., Jacobs, A. M., & Stone, G. O. (1996). Statistical analysis of the bidirectional inconsistency of spelling and sound in French. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 504-515.
73. Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Coltheart, M. (2003). Speed of lexical and nonlexical processing in French: The case of the regularity effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 947-953.
74. Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Jacobs, A. M., & Braun, M. (2001). Identical words are read differently in different languages. Psychological Science, 12, 379-384.
75. Ziegler, J. C., Stone, G. O., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). What is the pronunciation for -ough and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29, 600-618.
76. Ziegler, J. C., Van Orden, G. C., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). Phonology Can Help or Hurt the Perception of Print. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 845-860.
77. Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998). Two Routes or One in Reading Aloud? A Connectionist Dual-Process Model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1131-1161.