Comments on Nickels and Howard (2004) "Dissociating effects of number of phonemes, number of syllables, and syllable complexity on word production in aphasia: It's the number of phonemes that counts"

Cognitive Neuropsychology

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 528-530

  Martin, Nadine ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; APHASIA; APRAXIA; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; HUMAN; LANGUAGE ABILITY; PHONEME; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SOUND; SPEECH ARTICULATION;

EID: 4344617708     PISSN: 02643294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02643290442000221     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Cutler, A. (1981). The reliability of speech error data. Linguistics, 19, 561-582.
2. Dell, G. S. (1984). Representations of serial order in speech: Evidence from the repeated phoneme effect in speech errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 222-233.
3. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Nickels, L., & Howard, D. (2004). Dissociating effects of number of phonemes, number of syllables, and syllabic complexity on word production in aphasia: It's the number of phonemes that counts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21(1), 57-78.
5. Shallice, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.