Choosing between the dutch past-tense suffixes -te and -de

Linguistics in the Netherlands

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 77-88

  Ernestus, Mirjam ^a   Baayen, Harald ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989367401     PISSN: 09297332     EISSN: 15699919     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/avt.18.10ern     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Baayen, R.H., Piepenbrock, R. and Gulikers, L. (1995) The CELEX Lexical Database (Release 2) [CD-ROM]. Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania [Distributor], Philadelphia, PA.
2. Baayen, R. H., Schreuder, R., De Jong, N. H. and Krott, A. (forthcoming) ‘Dutch Inflection: the Rules that Prove the Exception’. In S. Nooteboom, S. F. Weerman and F. Wijnen, eds., Storage and Computation in the Language Faculty. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
3. Boersma, P. (1996) ‘Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer’. Ms. University of Amsterdam.
4. Booij, G.E. (1995) The Phonology of Dutch. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
5. Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.H. and Stone, C.J. (1984) Classification and Regression Trees. Chapman & Hall, New York.
6. Eddington, D. (2000) ‘Spanish Stress Assignment within the Analogical Modeling of Language’. Language 76, 92-109.
7. Daelemans, W., Gillis, S. and Durieux, G. (1994) ‘The Acquisition of Stress, a Data-Oriented Approach’. Computational Linguistics 20, 421-451.
8. Ernestus, M. (2000) Voice Assimilation and Segment Reduction in Casual Dutch, a Corpus-Based Study of the Phonology-Phonetics Interface. LOT, Utrecht.
9. Ernestus, M. and Baayen, R. H. (2001) ‘Phonological Interpretation of Neutralized Segments in Unknown Words’. Ms. Interfaculty Research Unit for Language and Speech, University of Nijmegen and Max-Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
10. Haeringen, C. B. Van (1940) ‘De Taaie Levenskracht van het Sterke Werkwoord’. De Nieuwe Taalgids 34, 241-255.
11. Krott, A., Baayen, R.H. and Schreuder, R. (2001) ‘Analogy in Morphology: Modeling the Choice of Linking Morphemes in Dutch’. Linguistics 39, 51-93.
12. Skousen, R. (1989) Analogical Modeling of Language. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
13. Zonneveld, W. (1983) ‘Lexical and Phonological Properties of Dutch Devoicing Assimilation’. In M. van den Broecke, V. van Heuven & W. Zonneveld, eds., Sound structures: Studies for Antonie Cohen. Dorecht: Foris, 297-312.