Wordform memory as intuitive statistics in languages with different consistency;Wortformgedächtnis als intuitive Statistik in Sprachen mit unterschiedlicher Konsistenz

Zeitschrift fur Psychologie

Volumn 213, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 133-141

  Jacobs, M ^a   Graf, Ralf ^b  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF EICHSTÄTT INGOLSTADT   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computer models; Computer simulation; Consistency; Lexical decision task; Nonlinear dynamic systems; Visual word recognition; Wordform memory

Indexed keywords

EID: 29144488976     PISSN: 00443409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1026/0044-3409.213.3.133     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Aghababian, V. & Nazir, T. A. (2000). Developing normal reading skills: Aspects of the visual processes underlying word recognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 76, 123-150.
2. Aghababian, V., Nazir, T. A., Lancon, C. & Tardy, M. (2001). From "logographic" to normal reading: The case of a deaf beginning reader. Brain and Language 78, 212-223.
3. Ans, B., Carbonnel, S. & Valdois, S. (1998). A connectionist multiple-trace memory model for polysyllabic word reading. Psychological Review, 105, 678-723.
4. Brunswik, E. (1943). Organismic achievement and environmental probability. Psychological Review, 50, 255-272.
5. Bühler, K. (1934). Sprachtheorie. Tübingen: UTB.
6. Carreiras, M., Álvarez, C. J. & De Vega, M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 766-780.
7. Cohen, L. & S. Dehaene (2004). Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area. Neuroimage, 22, 466-476.
8. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T. & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention & Performance VI (pp. 535-555). London: Academic Press.
9. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R. & Ziegler, J. C. (2001). DRC: A dual route model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
10. Conrad, M. & Jacobs, A. M. (2004). Replicating syllable frequency effects in Spanish in German: A challenge to current models of visual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 369-390.
11. Dayan, P., Hinton, G. E., Neal, R. M. & Zemel, R. S. (1995), The Helmholtz Machine. Neural Computation, 7, 889-904.
12. Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179-211.
13. Elman, J. L. (2004). "An alternative view of the mental lexicon." Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 301-306.
14. Friston, K. (2002). "Beyond phrenology: What can neuroimaging tell us about distributed circuitry?" Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25, 221-250.
15. Friston, K. J., Penny, W. et al. (2002). "Classical and Bayesian iNachbarschaftsfrequenzeffektrence in neuroimaging: Theory." Neuroimage, 16: 465W.483.
16. Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development, Appleton Century Croft.
17. Glushko, R. J. (1979). "Organization and Activation of Orthographic Knowledge in Reading Aloud." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 674W.691.
18. Graf, R., Nagler, M. & Jacobs, A. M. (2005). F6: Zur experimentellen Kontrolle und Kognition von Wörtern. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, im Druck.
19. Grainger, J., Ferrand, L. & Jacobs, A. M. (2004). Vers une approche psychophysique en psycholinguistique. In. L. Ferrand & J. Grainger (Eds.), Psycholinguistique Cognitive(pp. 163-186). Paris: de Boeck.
20. Grainger, J. & Jacobs, A. M. (1993). Masked partial-word priming in visual word recognition: effects of positional letter frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 951-964.
21. Grainger, J. & Jacobs, A. M. (1994). A dual-read out model of word context effects in letter perception: Further investigations of the word superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1158-1176,
22. Grainger, J. & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
23. Grainger, J. & Jacobs, A. M. (2004). Pseudoword context effects on letter perception. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, in press.
24. Grainger, J., O'Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M. & Segui, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 189-195.
25. Grossberg, S. & Stone, G. O. (1986). Neural dynamics of word recognition and recall: attentional priming, lexikalische Entscheidungsaufgaberning, and resonance. Psychological Review, 93, 46-74.
26. Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley & Sons.
27. Herrmann. T. (2004). Weißer Jahrgang. In Helmut E. Lück (Hrsg.), Psychologie in Selbstdarstellungen. Pabst Science Publishers.
28. Herrmann,Th. & Grabowski, J. (1994). Sprechen - Psychologie der Sprachproduktion. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.
29. Holcomb, P. J., Grainger, J. & O'Rourke, T. (2002). An electrophysiological study of the effects of orthographic neighborhood size on printed word perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 938-950.
30. Hutzler, F., Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Wimmer, H. & Zorzi, M. (2004). Do current connectionist learning models account for reading development in different languages? Cognition, 91, 273-296.
31. Hutzler, F., Bergmann, J., Conrad, M., Kronbichler, M., Stenneken, P. & Jacobs, A. M. (2004). Inhibitory effects of first syllable-frequency in lexical decision: An event related Potenzial study. Neuroscience Letters, 372, 179-184.
32. Hutzler, F., Conrad, M. & Jacobs, A. M. (2005). Effects of Syllable-Frequency in Lexical Decision and Naming: An Eye Movement Study. Brain and Language, 92, 138-152.
33. Jackendoff, R. S. (2002). Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, and Evolution, Oxford University Press.
34. Jacobs, A. M. (2002). The cognitive psychology of literacy. In N.J. Smelser & P.B. Baltes (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 8971 -8975). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
35. Jacobs, A. M. (2003). Simulative Methoden. In G. Rickheit, T. Hermann & W. Deutsch (eds.). Handbuch der Psycholinguistik. (S. 125-142). Berlin: de Gruyter.
36. Jacobs, A. M. (2004). Hirnaktivitätsmessung. In Funke, J. & P. Frensch (Hrsg.). Handbuch der Psychologie. Göttingen: Hogrefe, im Druck.
37. Jacobs, A. M., Graf, R. & Kinder, A. (2003). Receiver-Operating Characteristics in the Lexical Decision Task: evidence for a simple signal detection process simulated by the Multiple Read-Out Model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learrning, memory and cognition, 29, 481-488.
38. Jacobs, A. M. & Grainger, J. (1992). Testing a semi-stochastic variant of the interactive activation model in different word recognition experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1174-1188.
39. Jacobs, A. M. & Grainger, J. (1994). Models of visual word recognition: Sampling the state of the art. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1311-1334.
40. Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C. & Grainger, J. (1998). MROM-P: An interactive activation, multiple read-out model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. In J. Grainger, J. & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 147-187), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41. Landauer, T. K. and S. T. Dumais (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 704, 211-240.
42. Makeig, S., Debener, S., Onton, J. & Delorme, A. (2004). Mining event-related brain dynamics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 204-210.
43. Massaro, D. W. (1989). A Precis of Speech-Perception by Ear and Eye - a Paradigm for Psychological Inquiry. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 72, 741-754.
44. McCandliss, B. D., Cohen, L. & Dehaene, S. (2003). The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 293-299.
45. McClelland, J. L. & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
46. Miller, G. A. (1993). Wörter: Streifzüge durch die Psycholinguistik. Frankfurt: Zweitausendeins.
47. Mishkin, M. & Forgays, D. G. (1952). Word Recognition as a Function of Retinal Locus. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 43-48.
48. Movellan, J. R. & McClelland, J.L. (2001 ). The Morton-Massaro law of information integration: Implications for models of perception. Psychological Review, 108, 113-148.
49. Nazir, T. A. (2003). On hemispheric specialisation and visual field effects in the perception of print: A comment on Jordan, Patching, and Thomas. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 73-80.
50. Nazir, T. A., Decoppet, N. & Aghababian, V. (2003). On the origins of age-of-acquisition effects in the perception of printed words. Developmental Science, 6, 143-150.
51. Nazir, T. A., Ben-Boutayab, N., Decoppet, N., Deutsch, A. & Frost, R. (2004). Reading habits, perceptual lexikalische Entscheidungsaufgaberning, and recognition of printed words. Brain and Language, 88, 294-311.
52. Nazir, T. A., Jacobs, A. M. & O'Regan, J. K. (1998). Letter legibility and visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 26, 810-821.
53. Nazir, T. A., O'Regan, J. K. & Jacobs, A. M. (1991). On words and their letters. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 171-174.
54. Nuerk, H. C. (2001). On the importance of visual determinants in word recognition. Dissertation. Philipps-Universität Marburg.
55. Nuerk, H. C., Rey, A., Graf, R. & Jacobs, A. M. (2000). Phonographic sublexical units in visual word recognition. Current Psychology Letters: Behavior, Brain & Cognition, 2, 27-38.
56. O'Regan, J. K. & Jacobs, A. M. (1992). The optimal viewing position effect in word recognition: a challenge to current theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 185-197.
57. Paap, K., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E. & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: the word superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 573-594.
58. Polk, T. A. & Farah, M. L. (2002). "Functional MRI evidence for an abstract, not perceptual, word-form area." Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 65-72.
59. Price, C. J. and J. T. Devlin (2004). "The pro and cons of labelling a left occipitotemporal region: "the visual word form area". Neuroimage, 22, 477-479.
60. Rey, A., & Jacobs, A. M., Schmidt-Weigand, F. & Ziegler, J. C. (1998). A phoneme effect in visual word recognition. Cognition, 68, B71-B80.
61. Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C. & Jacobs, A. M. (2000). Graphemes are perceptual reading units. Cognition., 75, B1-B12.
62. Richman, H. B. & Simon, H. A. (1989). Context Effects in Letter Perception - Comparison of 2 Theories. Psychological Review, 96, 417-432.
63. Rodd, J. M., Gaskell, M. G. & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2004). Modelling the effects of semantic ambiguity in word recognition. Cognitive Science, 28, 89-104.
64. Roweis, S. & Ghahramani, Z. (1999). A unifying review of linear gaussian models. Neural Computation, 11, 305-345.
65. Rubenstein, H., Garfield, L. & Millikan, J. A. (1970). Homographie entries in the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Lexikalische Entscheidungsaufgaberning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 487-494.
66. Rumelhart, D. E. (1979). Some problems with the notion that words have literal meanings. In Metaphor and Thought (Ortony, A., Ed.), pp. 71-82. Cambridge University Press.
67. Shepard, R. N. (1984). Ecological Constraints on Internal Representation - Resonant Kinematics of Perceiving, Imagining, Thinking, and Dreaming. Psychological Review, 91, 417-447.
68. Stenneken, P., Conrad, M., Goldenberg, G. & Jacobs, A. (2003). Visual Processing of Sublexical Units in Dyslexia. Brain and Language, 87, 137-138.
69. Stenneken, P., Bastiaanse, R., Huber, W. & Jacobs, A. M. (in press). Syllable Structure and Sonority in Language Inventory and Aphasie Neologisms. Brain and Language.
70. Stone, G. O., Vanhoy, M. & Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 337-359.
71. Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R. & RichmondWelly, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107-136.
72. Van Orden, G. C., Stone, G. O. & Pennington, B. (1990). Word Identification in Reading and the Promise of Subsymbolic Psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488-522.
73. Zemel, R. S. & Mozer, M. C. (2001). "Localist attractor networks." Neural Computation, 13, 1045-1064.
74. Ziegler, J. C. & Goswami, U. C. (in press). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin.
75. Ziegler, J. & Jacobs, A. M. (1995). Phonological information provides early sources of constraint in the processing of letter strings. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 567-593.
76. Ziegler, J. C., Jacobs, A. M. & Stone, G. O. (1996). Statistical analysis of the bi-directional inconsistency of spelling and sound in French. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 504-515.
77. Ziegler, J. C., Montant, M. & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). The feedback consistency effect in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 533-554.
78. Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C. Jacobs, A. M. & Braun, M. (2001). Identical words are read differently in different languages. Psychological Science, 27, 547-559.
79. Ziegler, J. C., Stone, G. O. & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). What's the pronounciation for OUGH and the Spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29, 600-618.
80. Ziegler, J. C., Van Orden, G. C. & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). Phonology can help or hurt the perception of print. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 845-860.