An experimental analysis of accommodation decisions on large-scale mathematics tests

Exceptional Children

Volumn 69, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 211-225

  Helwig, Robert ^a   Tindal, Gerald ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 7444242805     PISSN: 00144029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001440290306900206     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Elliott, S. N., Kratochwill, T. R., & Schulte, A. G. (1998). The assessment accommodation checklist: Who, what, where, when, why, and how. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 31(2), 10-14.
2. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Eaton, S. B., Hamlett, C. L., & Karns, K. M. (2000). Supplementing teacher judgments of mathematics test accommodations with objective data sources. School Psychology Review, 29, 65-85.
3. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C., Eaton, S. B., Binkley, E., & Crouch, R. (2000). Using objective data sources to enhance teacher judgments about test accommodations. Exceptional Children, 67, 67-81.
4. Goldman, S. R., Hogaboam, T. W., Bell, L. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (1980). Short-term retention of discourse during reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 647-655.
5. Helwig, R., Rozek-Tedesco, M. A., & Tindal, G. (2002). An oral versus standard administration of a large-scale mathematics test. Journal of Special Education, 36, 39-47.
6. Helwig, R., Rozek-Tedesco, M. A., Tindal, G., Heath, B., & Almond, P. J. (1999). Reading as an access to mathematics problem solving on multiple-choice tests for sixth-grade students. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 113-125.
7. Johnson, E. S. (2000). The effects of accommodations on performance assessments. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 261-267.
8. Johnson, E. S., Kimball, K., Brown, S. O., & Anderson, D. (2001). A statewide review of the use of accommodations in large-scale, high-stakes assessments. Exceptional Children, 67, 251-264.
9. Joshi, R. M., Williams, K. A., & Wood, J. R. (1998). Predicting reading comprehension from listening comprehension: Is this the answer to the IQ debate? In C. Hulme & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 319-327). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Luger, G. P., Johnson, P., Stern, C., Newman, J. E., & Yeo, R. (1994). Cognitive science: The science of intelligent systems. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11. Oakhill, J., & Yuill, N. (1996). Higher order factors in comprehension disability: Processes and remediation. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and interventions (pp. 69-92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Swanson, H. L., Cochran, K. F., & Ewers, C. A. (1990). Can learning disabilities be determined from working memory performance? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 59-67.
13. Thurlow, M., House, A. L., Scott, D. L., & Ysseldyke, J. (2000). Students with disabilities in large-scale assessments: State participation and accommodation policies. Journal of Special Education, 34, 154-163.
14. Tindal, G., & Fuchs, L. S. (1999). A summary of research on test change: An empirical basis for defining accommodation. Lexington: University of Kentucky, Mid-South Regional Resource Center.
15. Tindal, G., Heath, B., Hollenbeck, K., Almond, P. J., & Harniss, M. (1998). Accommodating students with disabilities on large-scale tests: An experimental study. Exceptional Children, 64, 439-450.
16. Weston, T. J. (1999). Investigating the validity of the accommodation of oral presentation in testing (Doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado, 1999). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, A1083.