Developing Legally Correct and Educationally Meaningful IEPs Using Curriculum-Based Measurement

Assessment for Effective Intervention

Volumn 28, Issue 3-4, 2003, Pages 73-88

  Yell, Mitchell L ^a   Stecker, Pamela M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992810142     PISSN: 15345084     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/073724770302800308     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bateman, B.D., & Linden, M.A. (1998). Better IEPS: How to develop legally correct and educationally useful programs (3rd ed.). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
2. Board of Education v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 (1982).
3. Carnine, D.W., Silbert, J., & Kameenui, E.J. (1997). Direct instruction reading (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4. County of San Diego v. California Special Education Hearing Officer, 24 IDELR 756 (9th Cir. 1996).
5. Deno, S.L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232.
6. Deno, S.L. (1992). The nature and development of curriculum-based measurement. Preventing School Failure, 36(2), 5–10.
7. Drasgow, E., Yell, M., & Robinson, T.R. (2001). Developing legally correct and educationally appropriate IEPs. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 359–373.
8. Eyer, T.L. (1998). Greater expectations: How the 1997 IDEA Amendments raise the basic floor of opportunity for children with disabilities. Education Law Report, 126, 1–19.
9. Fuchs, L.S., Deno, S.L., & Mirkin, P.K. (1984). The effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research journal, 21, 449–460.
10. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., & Ferguson, C. (1992). Effects of expert system consultation within curriculum-based measurement using a reading maze task. Exceptional Children, 58, 436–450.
11. Fuch, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress. How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22, 27–48.
12. Fuchs, L.S., & Shinn, M.R. (1989). Writing CBM IEP objectives. In M.R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 130–152). New York: Guilford Press.
13. Gorn, S. (1997). What do I do when… The answer book on individualized education programs. Horsham, PA: LRP Publications.
14. Huefner, D.S. (2001). Getting comfortable with special education law: A framework for working with children with disabilities. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
15. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1401 et seq.
16. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Regulations, 34 C.FR.§ 300 et seq.
17. Mager, R.F. (1962). Preparing instructional objectives. Palo Alto, CA: Fearon.
18. Mager, R.F. (1997). Preparing instructional objectives: A critical tool in the development of effective instruction (3rd ed.). Atlanta, GA: The Center for Effective Performance.
19. President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education (2002), Retrieved September 12, 2002 from http://www.ed.gov/inits/commissionsboards/whspecialeducation/
20. Reschly, D.J. (2001). Assessment and eligibility determination in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997. In C. Telzrow & M. Tankersley (Eds.), IDEA Amendments of 1997: Practice guidelines for school-based teams (pp. 65–104). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
21. Senate Report of the IDEA Amendments of 1997, No. 106–17, 105th Cong., 1st Sess. 28–29, 1997, Retrieved October 24, 1998 from http://www.gpo.gov.
22. Shinn, M.R. (1989). Identifying and defining academic problems: CBM screening and eligibility procedures. In M.R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum, based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 90–129). New York: Guilford Press.
23. Shinn, M.R., & Shinn, M.M. (2000). Writing and evaluating IEP goals and making appropriate revisions to ensure progress and participation in the general curriculum. In C. Telzrow & M. Tankersley (Eds.), IDEA Amendments of 1997: Practice guidelines for school-based teams (pp. 351–382). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
24. Stecker, P.M., & Fuchs, L.S. (2000). Effecting superior achievement using curriculum-based measurement: The importance of individual progress monitoring. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 128–134.
25. Yell, M.L. (1998). The law and special education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
26. Yell, M.L., & Drasgow, E. (2000). Litigating a free appropriate public education: The Lovaas hearings and cases. Journal of Special Education, 33, 206–215.
27. Zettel, J.J., & Ballard, J. (1982). The Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 (P.L. 94–142): Its history, origins, and concepts. In J. Ballard, B. Ramirez, & F. Weintraub (Eds.), Special education in America: Its legal and governmental foundations (pp. 11–22). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.