Use of brief experimental analysis for selecting reading interventions for english language learners

School Psychology Review

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 291-310

  Malloy, Kimberley J ^a   Gilbertson, Donna ^a   Maxfield, Janie ^a  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547176815     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ardoin, S. P., Witt, J. C., Suldo, S. M., Connell, J. E., Koenig, J. L., Resetar, J. L., et al. (2005). Accuracy of readability estimates' predictions of CBM performance. School Psychology Quarterly, 20, 1-22.
2. Artiles, A. J., Rueda, R., Salazar, J. J., & Higareda, I. (2005). Within-group diversity in minority disproportionate representation: English language learners in urban school districts. Exceptional Children, 71, 283-300.
3. August, D., Carlo, M., Dressler, C., & Snow, C. (2005). The critical role of vocabulary development for English language learners. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 20, 50-57.
4. August, D., & Hakuta, K. (1997). Improving schooling for language-minority children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5. Baker, S. K., & Good, R. (1995). Curriculum-based measurement of English language reading with bilingual Hispanic students: A validation study with second-grade students. School Psychology Review, 24, 561-578.
6. Baker, S. K., Simmons, D. C., & Kameenui, E. J. (1998). Vocabulary acquisition: Instructional and curricular bases and implications. In D. C. Simmons & E. J. Kameenui (Eds.), What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs: Bases and basics (pp. 219-238). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Beck, I., & McKeown, M. (1991). Conditions of vocabulary acquisition. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 789-814). New York: Longman.
8. Biemiller, A. (2003). Vocabulary: Needed if more children are to read well. Reading Psychology, 24, 323-335.
9. Bonfiglio, C. M., Daly, E. J., Persampieri, M., & Andersen, M. (2006). An experimental analysis of the effects of reading interventions in a small group reading instruction context. Journal of Behavioral Education, 15, 93-109.
10. Dale, E., & Chall, J. S. (1948). A formula for predicting readability. Educational Research Bulletin, 27, 37-53.
11. Daly, E. J., Martens, B. K., Dool, E. J., & Hintze, J. M. (1998). Using brief functional analysis to select interventions for oral reading. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 203-218.
12. Daly, E. J., Martens, B. K., Hamler, K. R., Dool, E. J., & Eckert, T. L. (1999). A brief experimental analysis for identifying instructional components needed to improve oral reading fluency. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 83-94.
13. Daly, E. J., Martens, B. K., Kilmer, A., & Massie, D. (1996). The effects of instructional match and content overlap on generalized reading performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 507-518.
14. Daly, E. J., Murdoch, A., Lilienstein, L., Webber, L., & Lentz, F. E. (2002). An examination of methods for testing treatments: Conducting brief experimental analyses of the effects of instructional components on oral reading fluency. Education and Treatment of Children, 25, 288-316.
15. Daly, E. J., Witt, J. C., Martens, B. K., & Dool, E. J. (1997). A model for conducting a functional analysis of academic performance problems. School Psychology Review, 26, 554-574.
16. Daly, E. J., Persampieri, M., McCurdy, M., & Gortmaker, V. (2005). Generating reading interventions through experimental analysis of academic skills: Demonstration and empirical evaluation. School Psychology Review, 34, 395-414.
17. Del Vecchio, A., & Guerreo, M. (1995). Handbook of English language proficiency tests. Albuquerque, NM: Evaluation Assistance Center, Western Region.
18. Dufrene, B. A., Noell, G. H., Gilbertson, D., & Duhon, G. J. (2005). Monitoring implementation of reciprocal peer tutoring: Identifying and intervening with students who do not maintain accurate implementation. School Psychology Review, 34, 74-86.
19. Duhon, G. J., Noell, G. H., Witt, J. C., Freeland, J. T., Dufrene, B. A., & Gilbertson, D. (2004). Identifying academic skill and performance deficits: The experimental analysis of brief assessments of academic skills. School Psychology Review, 33, 429-443.
20. Fletcher, T. V., Bos, C. S., & Johnson, L. M. (1999). Accommodating English language learners with language and learning disabilities in bilingual education classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 14, 80-91.
21. Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1982). Developing goals and objectives for educational programs. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
22. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1992). Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress. School Psychology Review, 21, 45-58.
23. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Speece, D. L. (2002). Treatment validity as a unifying construct for identifying learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 33-45.
24. Gersten, R., & Baker, S. (2000). What we know about effective instructional practices for English-language learners. Exceptional Children, 66, 454-470.
25. Good, R. H., Simmons, D., Kameenui, E., Kaminski, R. A., & Wallin, J. (2002). Summary of decision rules for intensive, strategic, and benchmark instructional recommendations in kindergarten through third grade (Technical Report No. 11). Eugene: University of Oregon.
26. Gottardo, A. (2002). The relationship between language and reading skills in bilingual Spanish-English speakers. Topics in Language Disorder, 22, 46-71.
27. Hakuta, K. (2001). A critical period for second language acquisition? In D. B. Bailey, J. T. Bruer, F. J. Symons, & J. W. Lichtman (Eds.), Critical thinking about critical periods (pp. 193-205). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
28. Hintze, J. M., & Christ, T. J. (2004). An examination of variability as a function of passage variance in CBM progress monitoring. School Psychology Review, 33, 204-217.
29. Heubert, J. P., & Hauser, R. M. (Eds.). (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
30. Jitendra, A. K., & Rohena-Diaz, E. (1996). Language assessment of students who are linguistically diverse: Why a discrete approach is not the answer. School Psychology Review, 25, 40-56.
31. Jones, K. M., & Wickstrom, K. F. (2002). Done in sixty seconds: Further analysis of the brief assessment model for academic problems. School Psychology Review, 31, 554-568.
32. Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Klingner, J. K., Artiles, A. J., & Barletta, L. M. (2006). English language learners who struggle with reading: Language acquisition or LD? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 108-128.
34. MacQuarrie, L. L., Tucker, J. A., Burns, M. K., & Hartman, B. (2002). Comparison of retentional rates using traditional, drill sandwich, and incremental rehearsal flash card methods. School Psychology Review, 31, 584-595.
35. Martens, B. K., Eckert, T. L., Bradley, T. A., & Ardoin, S. P. (1999). Identifying effective treatments from brief experimental analysis: Using single-case design elements to aid decision making. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 163-181.
36. Meyer, M. S., & Felton, R. H. (1999). Repeated reading to enhance fluency: Old approaches and new directions. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 283-306.
37. Noell, G. H., Freeland, J., Witt, J. C., & Gansle, K. (2001). Using brief assessments to identify effective interventions for individual students. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 335-355.
38. Ortiz, A. A., & Kushner, M. I. (1997). Bilingualism and the possible impact on academic performance. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 6, 657-679.
39. Pearson, P. D., Johnson, D. D., Clymer, T., Indirsano, R., Venezky, R. L., Baumann, J. F., et al. (1989). World of Reading. Needham, MA: Silver, Burdett, and Ginn.
40. Rousseau, M. K., Tam, B. K. Y., & Ramnain, R. (1993). Increasing reading proficiency of language-minority students with speech and language impairments. Education and Treatments of Children, 16, 254-271.
41. Rueda, R., & Windmueller, M. P. (2006). English language learners and overrepresentation: A multiplelevel analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 99-107.
42. Shin, J., Deno, S. L., & Espin, C. (2000). Technical adequacy of the maze task for curriculum-based measurement of reading growth. Journal of Special Education, 34, 164-172.
43. Shinn, M. R. (Ed.). (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford Press.
44. Spache, G. (1953). A new readability formula for primary-grade reading materials. The Elementary School Journal, 55, 410-413.
45. VanAuken, T. L., Chafouleas, S. M., Bradley, T. A., & Martens, B. (2002). Using brief experimental analysis to select oral reading interventions: An investigation of treatment utility. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11, 163-179.
46. Wickstrom, K. F., Jones, K. M., LaFleur, L. H., & Witt, J. C. (1998). An analysis of treatment integrity in school-based behavioral consultation. School Psychology Quarterly, 13, 141-154.