An experimental analysis of the effects of reading interventions in a small group reading instruction context

Journal of Behavioral Education

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 93-109

  Bonfiglio, Christine M ^a   Daly III, Edward J ^b   Persampieri, Michael ^b   Andersen, Melissa ^b  

^a Elkhart Community Schools   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic interventions; Effective reading treatments; Experimental analysis; Oral reading fluency

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746040897     PISSN: 10530819     EISSN: 15733513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10864-006-9009-7     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Barnett, D. W., Daly, E. J., III, Jones, K. M., & Lentz, F. E., Jr. (2004). Response to intervention: Empirically based special service decisions from single-case designs of increasing and decreasing intensity. Journal of Special Education, 38, 66-79.
2. Billingsley, F. F. (1977). The effects of self- and externally-imposed schedules of reinforcement on oral reading performance. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10, 549-559.
3. Bonfiglio, C. M., Daly, E. J., III, Martens, B. K., Lin, L. R., & Corsaut, S. (2004). An experimental analysis of reading interventions: Generalization across instructional strategies, passages, and time. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 111-114.
4. Busk, P. L., & Serlin, R. C. (1992). Meta-analysis for single-case research. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis: Applications in psychology and education (pp. 187-212). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Cossairt, A., Hall, R. V., & Hopkins, B. L. (1973). The effects of experimenter's instructions, feedback, and praise on teacher praise and student attending behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 89-100.
6. Daly, E. J., Martens, B. K., Dool, E. J., & Hintze, J. M. (1998). Using brief functional analysis to select interventions for oral reading. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 203-218.
7. Daly, E. J., III, Martens, B. K., Hamler, K. R., Dool, E. J., & Eckert, T. L. (1999). A brief experimental analysis for identifying instructional components needed to improve oral reading fluency. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 83-94.
8. Duhon, G. J., Noell, G. H., Witt, J. C., Freeland, J. T., Dufrene, B. A., & Gilbertson, D. N. (2004). Identifying academic skills and performance deficits: The experimental analysis of brief assessments of academic skills. School Psychology Review, 33, 429-443.
9. Eckert, T. L., Ardoin, S. P., Daisey, D. M., & Scarola, M. D. (2000). Empirically evaluating the effectiveness of reading interventions: The use of brief experimental analysis and single-case designs. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 463-474.
10. Eckert, T. L., Ardoin, S. P., Daly, E. J., III, & Martens, B. K. (2002). Improving oral reading fluency: An examination of the efficacy of combining skill-based and performance-based interventions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 271-281.
11. Ervin, R. A., Radford, P. M., Bertsch, K., Piper, A. L., Ehrhardt, K. E., & Poling, A. (2001). A descriptive analysis and critique of the empirical literature on school-based functional assessment. School Psychology Review, 30, 193-210.
12. Foorman, B. R., & Torgesen, J. (2001). Critical elements of classroom and small-group instruction promote reading success in all children. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 203-212.
13. Gresham, F. M., & Lopez, M. F. (1996). Social validation: A unifying concept for school-based consultation research and practice. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 204-227.
14. Haring, N. G., & Eaton, M. D. (1978). Systematic instructional procedures: An instructional hierarchy. In N. G. Haring, T. C. Lovitt, M. D. Eaton, & C. L. Hansen (Eds.), The fourth R: Research in the classroom (pp. 23-40). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
15. Hendrickson, J. M., Gable, R. A., Novak, C., & Peck, S. (1996). Functional assessment as strategy assessment for teaching academics. Education and Treatment of Children, 19, 257-271.
16. Jones, K. M., & Wickstrom, K. F. (2002). Done in sixty seconds: Further analysis of the brief assessment model for academic problems. School Psychology Review, 31, 554-568.
17. Lentz, F. E., Jr. (1988). Effective reading interventions in the regular classroom. In J. L. Graden, J. E. Zins, & M. L. Curtis (Eds.)Alternative educational delivery systems: Enhancing instructional options for all students (pp. 351-370). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
18. Lerman, D. C., & Iwata, B. A. (1993). Descriptive and experimental analyses of variables maintaining self-injurious behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 293-319.
19. Levy, B. A., Nicholls, A., & Kohen, D. (1993). Repeated readings: Process benefits for good and poor readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 303-327.
20. Martens, B. K., Witt, J. C., Elliott, S. N., & Darveaux, D. X. (1985). Teacher judgments concerning the acceptability of school-based interventions. Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 16, 191-198.
21. McComas, J. J., Wacker, D. P., Cooper, L. J., Asmus, J. M., Richman, D., & Stoner, B. (1996). Brief experimental analysis of stimulus prompts for accurate responding on academic tasks in an outpatient clinic. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 397-401.
22. The National Center for Education Statistics (2001). The nation's report card: Fourth grade reading 2000. The National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved November 1, 2001, from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/.
23. Noell, G. H., Gansle, K. A., Witt, J. D., Whitmarsh, E. L., Freeland, J. T., LaFleur, L. H., Gilbertson, D. N., & Northup, J. (1998). Effects of contingent reward and instruction on oral reading performance at differing levels of passage difficulty. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 659-664.
24. Rose, T. L., & Beattie, J. R. (1986). Relative effects of teacher-directed and taped previewing on oral reading. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 193-199.
25. Rosenberg, M. S. (1986). Error-correction during oral reading: A comparison of three techniques. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 182-192.
26. Skinner, C. H., Ford, J. M., & Yunker, B. D. (1991). An analysis of instructional response requirements on the multiplication performance of behavior disordered students. Behavior Disorders, 17, 56-65.
27. Spache, G. (1953). A new readability formula for primary grade materials. Elementary English, 53, 410-413.
28. Taylor, J. C., & Romanczyk, R. G. (1994). Generating hypotheses about the function of student problem behavior by observing teacher behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 251-265.
29. VanAuken, T., Chafouleas, S. M., Bradley, T. A., & Martens, B. K. (2002). Using brief experimental analysis to select oral reading interventions: An investigation of treatment utility. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11, 165-181.
30. Wolery, M., Bailey, D. B., Jr., & Sugai, G. M. (1988). Effective teaching: Principles and procedures of applied behavior analysis with exceptional children. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, Inc.