Comparison of retention rates using traditional, drill sandwich, and incremental rehearsal flash card methods

School Psychology Review

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 584-595

  MacQuarrie, Lara L ^d   Tucker, James A ^a   Burns, Matthew K ^b   Hartman, Brian ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA   (United States)

^b CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Calculated Industries   (United States)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036996260     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Betts, E. A. (1946). Foundations of reading instruction. New York: American Book.
2. Browder, D. M., & Shear, S. M. (1996). Interspersal of known items in a treatment package to teach sight words to students with behavior disorders. The Journal of Special Education, 29, 400-413.
3. Burns, M. K., & Dean, V. J. (2002, February). Rethinking the instructional level: Impact on assessment and intervention. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Association of School Psychologists, Chicago, IL.
4. Carvajal, H., Hayes, J. E., Miller, H. R., & Wiebe, D. A. (1993). Comparisons of the vocabulary scores and IQs on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-III and the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test - Revised. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 76, 28-30.
5. Chase, D. H., & Symonds, P. M. (1992). Practice vs. motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 282-289.
6. nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
7. Cooke, N. L., Guzaukas, R., Pressley, J. S., & Kerr, K. (1993). Effects of using a ratio of new items to review items during drill and practice: Three experiments. Education and Treatment of Children, 16, 213-234.
8. Cooke, N. L., & Reichard, S. M. (1996). The effects of different interspersal drill ratios on acquisition and generalization of multiplication and division facts. Education and Treatment of Children, 19, 124-142.
9. Coulter, W. A., & Coulter, E. M. (1989). Curriculum-based assessment for instructional design: Trainer's manual. (Unpublished training manual available from Directions and Resources, P.O. Box 57113, New Orleans, LA 70157)
10. Daly, E. J., III, Hintze, J. M., & Hamler, K. R. (2000). Improving practice by taking steps toward technological improvements in academic interventions in the new millennium. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 61-72.
11. Dehaene, S., & Akhavein, R. (1995). Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 314-326.
12. Dempster, F. N. (1991). Synthesis of research on reviews and tests. Educational Leadership, 48, 71-76.
13. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Manual for forms L and M of the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test - Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
14. Gickling, E. E., & Havertape, S. (1981). Curriculum-based assessment (CBA). Minneapolis, MN: School Psychology Inservice Training Network.
15. Gickling, E., & Rosenfield, S. (1995). Best practices in curriculum-based assessment. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (3rd ed., pp. 587-595). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
16. Glenberg, A. M., & Smith, S. M. (1981). Spacing repetitions and solving problems are not the same. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 20, 110-119.
17. Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J., & Hall, R. V. (1984). Opportunity to respond and student academic performance. In W. Heward, T. Heron, D. Hill, & J. Trap-Porter (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 58-88). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing.
18. Janton, P. (1993). Esperanto: Language, literacy, and community. Albany, NY: State University of New York.
19. Jones, D., & Christensen, C. A. (1999). Relationship between automaticity in hand writing and student's ability to generate written text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 44-49.
20. Koegel, L. K., & Koegel, R. L. (1986). The effects of interspersed maintenance tasks on academic performance in a severe childhood stroke victim. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 425-430.
21. Logan, G. D., & Klapp, S. T. (1991). Alphabet arithmetic: Is extended practice necessary to produce automaticity? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 179-195.
22. Neef, N. A., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T. J. (1977). The effects of known item interspersal on acquisition and retention of spelling and sight-reading words. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 738.
23. Neef, N. A., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T. J. (1980). The effects of interspersal training versus high-density reinforcement on spelling acquisition and retention. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 153-158.
24. Ormond, J. E., & Lounge, J. P. (1990). Automaticity in spelling competence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 384-386.
25. Richardson, D. (1988). Esperanto: Learning and using the international language. El Cerrito, CA: Esperanto League for North America.
26. Roberts, M. L., & Shapiro, E. S. (1996). Effects of instructional ratios on students' reading performance in a regular education program. Journal of School Psychology, 34, 73-91.
27. Roberts, M. L., Turco, T. L., & Shapiro, E. S. (1991). Differential effects of fixed instructional ratios on students' progress in reading. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9, 308-318.
28. th ed.). San Diego, CA: Author.
29. Schnorr, J. M. (1989). Practicing math facts on the computer. Teacher Education and Special Education, 12, 65-69.
30. Semb, G. B., & Ellis, J. A. (1994). Knowledge taught In school: What is remembered? Review of Educational Research, 64, 253-286.
31. Shapiro, E. S. (1992). Use of Gickling's model of curriculum-based assessment to improve reading in elementary age students. School Psychology Review, 21, 168-176.
32. nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
33. Tucker, J. A., (1988). Basic flashcard technique when vocabulary is the goal. Unpublished teaching material, Andrews University, Berrien Springs, MI.
34. Tzelgov, J., Porat, Z., & Henik, A. (1997). Automaticity and consciousness: Is perceiving the word necessary for reading it? American Journal of Psychology, 110, 429-448.
35. Ysseldyke, J., Reschly, D., Dawson, P., Reynolds, M., Lehr, C., & Telzrow, C. (1997). School psychology: A blue-print for training and practice II. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.