Done in sixty seconds: Further analysis of the brief assessment model for academic problems

School Psychology Review

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 554-568

  Jones, Kevin M ^a   Wickstrom, Katherine F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036989689     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Clymer, T., Indrisano, R., Johnson, D. D., Pearson, P. D., & Venezky, R. L. (1987). Ginn reading series. Lexington, MA: Ginn & Company.
2. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
3. Daly, E. J., III, Hintze, J. M., & Hamler, K. R. (2000). Improving practice by taking steps toward technological improvements in academic intervention in the new millenium. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 61-72.
4. Daly, E. J., III, Lentz, F. E., Jr., & Boyer, J. (1996). The instructional hierarchy: Conceptual model for understanding the effective components of reading interventions. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 369-386.
5. Daly, E. J., III, Martens, B. K., Dool, E. J., & Hintze, J. M. (1998). Using brief functional analysis to select interventions for oral reading. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 203-218.
6. Daly, E. J., III, Martens, B. K., Hamler, K. R., Dool, E. J., & Eckert, T. L. (1999). A brief experimental analysis for identifying instructional components needed to improve oral reading fluency. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 83-94.
7. Daly, E. J., III, Witt, J. C., Martens, B. K., & Dool, E. J. (1997). A model for conducting a functional analysis of academic performance problems. School Psychology Review, 26, 554-574.
8. Eckert, T. L., Ardoin, S. P., Daisey, D. M., & Scarola, M. D. (2000). Empirically evaluating the effectiveness of reading interventions: The use of brief experimental analysis and single case designs. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 463-473.
9. Ervin, R. A., Radford, P. M., Bertsch, K., Piper, A. L., Ehrhardt, K. E., & Poling, A. (2001). A descriptive analysis and critique of the empirical literature on school-based functional assessment. School Psychology Review, 30, 193-210.
10. Fry, E. B. (1977). Fry's readability graph: Clarification, validity, and extension to level 17. Journal of Reading, 21, 242-252.
11. Fry, E. B. (1989). Reading formulas - maligned but valid. Journal of Reading, 32, 292-297.
12. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 204-219.
13. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1999). Monitoring Student progress toward the development of reading competence: A review of three forms of classroom-based assessment. School Psychology Review, 28, 659-671.
14. Gresham, F. M., & Witt, J. C. (1997). Utility of intelligence tests for treatment planning, classification, and placement decisions: Recent empirical findings and future directions. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 249-267.
15. Grossen, B. (1997). 30 years of research: What we now know about how children learn to read: A synthesis of research on reading from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development commissioned by the Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning with funding support from the Pacific Bell Foundation. Santa Cruz, CA: The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning.
16. Haring, N. G., Lovitt, T. C., Eaton, M. D., & Hansen, C. L. (1978). The fourth R: Research in the classroom. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
17. Hintze, J. M., Owen, S. V., Shapiro, E. S., & Daly, E. J. (2000). Generalizability of oral reading fluency measures: Application of G theory to curriculum-based measurement. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 52-68.
18. Hintze, J. M., Shapiro, E. S., & Daly, E. J., III. (1998). An investigation of the effects of passage difficulty level on outcomes of oral reading fluency progress monitoring. School Psychology Review, 27, 433-445.
19. House, A. E., House, B. G., & Campbell, M. B. (1981). Measures of interobserver agreement: Calculation formula and distribution effect. Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 3, 37-57.
20. Howell, K. W., & Nolet, V. (2000). Curriculum-based evaluation: Teaching and decision making (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
21. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997 (PL 105-17). 20 U.S.C. Chapter 33, Sections 1400-1485 (Statute).
22. Jones, K. M., Harmon, A., & Wickstrom, K. F. (2001). A comparison of brief and extended experimental analyses of oral reading fluency. Proven Practice: Prevention and Remediation Solutions for Schools, 3, 61-67.
23. Marston, D. B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it? In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18-78). New York: Guilford.
24. Martens, B. K., Eckert, T. L., Bradley, T. A., & Ardoin, S. P. (1999). Identifying effective treatments from a brief experimental analysis: Using single-case design elements to aid decision making. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 163-181.
25. McComas, J. J., & Mace, F. C. (1999). Theory and practice in conducting functional analysis. In E. S. Shapiro & T. R. Kratochwill (Eds.), Behavioral assessment in the schools (2nd ed., pp. 78-103). New York: Guilford.
26. Noell, O. H., Freeland, J. T., Witt, I. C., & Gansle, K. A. (2001). Using brief assessments to identify effective interventions for individual students. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 335-355.
27. Northup, J., George, T., Jones, K., Broussard, C., & Vollmer, T. R. (1996). A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods: The utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 201-212.
28. Reschly, D. J., Tilly, W. D., & Grimes, J. P. (Eds.) (1999). Special education in transition: Functional assessment and noncategorical programming (pp. 259-283). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
29. Roberts, M. L., Marshall, J., Nelson, J. R., & Albers, C. A. (2001). Curriculum-based assessment procedures embedded within functional behavioral assessments: Identifying escape-motivated behaviors in a general education classroom. School Psychology Review, 30, 264-277.
30. Shapiro, E. S. (1996). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
31. Shinn, M. R. (Ed.). (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford.
32. Shinn, M. R. (Ed.). (1998). Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement. New York: Guilford.
33. Shinn, M. R., & Bamonto, S. (1998). Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement: "Big ideas" and avoiding confusion. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 1-31). New York: Guilford.
34. Swanson, H. L., & Sachse-Lee, C. (2000). A meta-analysis of single-subject-design intervention research for students with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 114-136.
35. Ysseldyke, J., & Marston, D. (1999). Origins of categorical special education services in schools and a rationale for changing them. In D. J. Reschly, W. D. Tilly, & J. P. Grimes (Eds.), Special education in transition: Functional assessment and noncategorical programming (pp. 1-18). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.