Diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions using an empirical mathematical model for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 593-603

  Fan, Xiaobing ^a   Medved, Milica ^a   Karczmar, Gregory S ^a   Yang, Cheng ^a   Foxley, Sean ^a   Arkani, Sanaz ^a   Recant, Wendy ^a   Zamora, Marta A ^a   Abe, Hiroyuki ^a   Newstead, Gillian M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast lesion; DCE MRI; Gd DTPA; Pharmacokinetic modeling

Indexed keywords

GADODIAMIDE;

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; APPARATUS; ARTICLE; BREAST DISEASE; CALCULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DRUG UPTAKE; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARAMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 34249337110     PISSN: 0730725X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2006.10.011     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Goscin C.P., Berman C.G., and Clark R.A. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Cancer Control 8 (2001) 399-406
2. Orel S.G., and Schnall M.D. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 220 (2001) 13-30
3. Brix G., Kiessling F., Lucht R., Darai S., Wasser K., Delorme S., et al. Microcirculation and microvasculature in breast tumors: pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic MR image series. Magn Reson Med 52 (2004) 420-429
4. Orel S.G. MR imaging of the breast. Radiol Clin North Am 38 (2000) 899-913
5. Rankin S.C. MRI of the breast. Br J Radiol 73 (2000) 806-818
6. Tofts P.S., and Kermode A.G. Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging: 1. Fundamental concepts. Magn Reson Med 17 (1991) 357-367
7. Brix G., Semmler W., Port R., Schad L.R., Layer G., and Lorenz W.J. Pharmacokinetic parameters in CNS Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 15 (1991) 621-628
8. Buckley D.L., Kerslake R.W., Blackband S.J., and Horsman A. Quantitative analysis of multi-slice Gd-DTPA enhanced dynamic MR images using an automated simplex minimization procedure. Magn Reson Med 32 (1994) 646-651
9. Hayton P., Brady M., Tarassenko L., and Moore N. Analysis of dynamic MR breast images using a model of contrast enhancement. Med Image Anal 1 (1997) 207-224
10. Tofts P.S. Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 7 (1997) 91-101
11. Tofts P.S., Brix G., Buckley D.L., Evelhoch J.L., Henderson E., Knopp M.V., et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 10 (1999) 223-232
12. Li X., Huang W., Yankeelov T.E., Tudorica A., Rooney W.D., and Springer C.S.J. Shutter-speed analysis of contrast reagent bolus-tracking data: preliminary observations in benign and malignant breast disease. Magn Reson Med 53 (2005) 724-729
13. Port R.E., Knopp M.V., Hoffmann U., Milker-Zabel S., and Brix G. Multicompartment analysis of gadolinium chelate kinetics: blood-tissue exchange in mammary tumors as monitored by dynamic MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 10 (1999) 233-241
14. Evelhoch J.L. Key factors in the acquisition of contrast kinetic data for oncology. J Magn Reson Imaging 10 (1999) 254-259
15. Moate P.J., Dougherty L., Schnall M.D., Landis R.J., and Boston R.C. A modified logistic model to describe gadolinium kinetics in breast tumors. Magn Reson Imaging 22 (2004) 467-473
16. Kaiser W.A., and Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. Radiology 170 (1989) 681-686
17. Buadu L.D., Murakami J., Murayama S., Hashiguchi N., Sakai S., Masuda K., et al. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis. Radiology 200 (1996) 639-649
18. Szabo B.K., Aspelin P., Wiberg M.K., and Bone B. Dynamic MR imaging of the breast. Analysis of kinetic and morphologic diagnostic criteria. Acta Radiol 44 (2003) 379-386
19. Ikeda O., Yamashita Y., Morishita S., Kido T., Kitajima M., Okamura K., et al. Characterization of breast masses by dynamic enhanced MR imaging. A logistic regression analysis. Acta Radiol 40 (1999) 585-592
20. Kuhl C.K., Mielcareck P., Klaschik S., Leutner C., Wardelmann E., Gieseke J., et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?. Radiology 211 (1999) 101-110
21. Benner T., Heiland S., Erb G., Forsting M., and Sartor K. Accuracy of gamma-variate fits to concentration-time curves from dynamic susceptibility-contrast enhanced MRI: influence of time resolution, maximal signal drop and signal-to-noise. Magn Reson Imaging 15 (1997) 307-317
22. Fan X., Medved M., River J.N., Zamora M., Corot C., Robert P., et al. New model for analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data distinguishes metastatic from nonmetastatic transplanted rodent prostate tumors. Magn Reson Med 51 (2004) 487-494
23. Fan X., Medved M., Foxley S., River J.N., Zamora M., Karczmar G.S., et al. Multi-slice DCE-MRI data using P760 distinguishes between metastatic and non-metastatic rodent prostate tumors. MAGMA 17 (2006)
24. Medved M., Karczmar G., Yang C., Dignam J., Gajewski T.F., Kindler H., et al. Semiquantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in cancer patients: variability and changes in tumor tissue over time. J Magn Reson Imaging 20 (2004) 122-128
25. Bushberg J.T., Seibert J.A., Leidholdt Jr. E.M., and Boone J.M. The essential physics of medical imaging. 2nd ed. (2001), Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia
26. Karnavas W.J., Sanchez P., and Bahill A.T. Sensitivity analyses of continuous and discrete systems in the time and frequency domains. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC 23 (1993) 488-501
27. Kumar A.S., Chen D.F., Au A., Chen Y.Y., Leung J., Garwood E.R., et al. Biologic significance of false-positive magnetic resonance imaging enhancement in the setting of ductal carcinoma in situ. Am J Surg 192 (2006) 520-524
28. Heywang-Kobrunner S.H., Bick U., Bradley W.G.J., Bone B., Casselman J., Coulthard A., et al. International investigation of breast MRI: results of a multicentre study (11 sites) concerning diagnostic parameters for contrast-enhanced MRI based on 519 histopathologically correlated lesions. Eur Radiol 11 (2001) 531-546
29. Cosgrove D.O., and Bamber J.C. Colour Doppler in breast diseases. Br J Radiol 62 (1989) 659
30. Weind K.L., Maier C.F., Rutt B.K., and Moussa M. Invasive carcinomas and fibroadenomas of the breast: comparison of microvessel distributions - implications for imaging modalities. Radiology 208 (1998) 477-483
31. Bone B., Wiberg M.K., Parrado C., Falkmer U., Aspelin P., and Gad A. Mechanism of contrast enhancement in breast lesions at MR imaging. Acta Radiol 39 (1998) 494-500
32. Yankeelov T.E., Rooney W.D., Li X., and Springer C.S.J. Variation of the relaxographic "shutter-speed" for transcytolemmal water exchange affects the CR bolus-tracking curve shape. Magn Reson Med 50 (2003) 1151-1169
33. Tozaki M., Igarashi T., Matsushima S., and Fukuda K. High-spatial-resolution MR imaging of focal breast masses: interpretation model based on kinetic and morphological parameters. Radiat Med 23 (2005) 43-50
34. Orel S.G. Differentiating benign from malignant enhancing lesions identified at MR imaging of the breast: are time-signal intensity curves an accurate predictor?. Radiology 211 (1999) 5-7
35. Liberman L., Morris E.A., Dershaw D.D., Abramson A.F., and Tan L.K. Ductal enhancement on MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181 (2003) 519-525
36. Armitage P., Behrenbruch C., Brady M., and Moore N. Extracting and visualizing physiological parameters using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Med Image Anal 9 (2005) 315-329
37. Kovar D.A., Lewis M., and Karczmar G.S. A new method for imaging perfusion and contrast extraction fraction: input functions derived from reference tissues. J Magn Reson Imaging 8 (1998) 1126-1134
38. Yang C., Karczmar G.S., Medved M., and Stadler W.M. Estimating the arterial input function using two reference tissues in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI studies: fundamental concepts and simulations. Magn Reson Med 52 (2004) 1110-1117
39. Yankeelov T.E., Luci J.J., Lepage M., Li R., Debusk L., Lin P.C., et al. Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model. Magn Reson Imaging 23 (2005) 519-529