Characterization of breast masses by dynamic enhanced MR imaging: A logistic regression analysis

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 585-592

  Ikeda, Osamu ^a   Yamashita, Y ^b   Morishita, S ^a   Kido, T ^a   Kitajima, M ^a   Okamura, K ^a   Fukuda, S ^a   Takahashi, M ^b  

^a KUMAMOTO ROSAI HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b KUMAMOTO UNIV SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms; MR diagnosis; Statistics

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0033219870     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/02841859909175592     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. BAKER L. H.: Breast cancer detection demonstration project. Five-year summary report. Cancer 32 (1982), 194.
2. BOETES C., BARENTSZ J. O., MUS R. D. et al.: MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced turbo FLASH subtraction technique. Radiology 193 (1994), 777.
3. CARD B. S.: Breast cancer staging with contrast material-enhanced MR imaging. Should it change patient treatment? Radiology 196 (1995), 16.
4. CIATTO S., CATALIOTTI L. & DISTANTE V: Nonpalpable lesions detected by mammography. Review of 512 consecutive cases. Radiology 165 (1987), 99.
5. DAVID L. B., PHILIP J. D. & STRARROUS M.: Microvessel density in invasive breast cancer assessed by dynamic Gd-DTPA-enhanced MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 7 (1997), 461.
6. FEIG S.: Breast masses. Mammographic and sonographic evaluation. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 30 (1992), 67.
7. FLICKINGER F. W., ALLISON J. D., SHERRY R. M. et al.: Differentiation of benign from malignant breast masses with time-intensity evaluation of contrast enhanced MRI. Magn. Reson. Imaging 11 (1993), 617.
8. FORNAGE B. D., TOUBAS O. & MOREL M.: Clinical, mammographic and sonographic determination of preoperative breast cancer size. Cancer 60 (1987), 765.
9. GALLARDO X., SENTIS M., CASTANER E. et al.: Enhancement of intramammary lymph nodes with lymphoid hyperplasia. A potential pitfall in breast MRI. Eur. Radiol. 8 (1998), 1662.
10. GILLES R., GUINEBRETIERE J., LUCIDARME O. et al.: Nonpalpable breast tumors. Diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 191 (1994), 625.
11. HARMS S. E. & FLAMIG D. P.: MR imaging of the breast. Technical approach and initial experience. Radiographies 13 (1993), 905
12. HARMS S. E., FLAMIG D. P., HESLY K. L. et al.: MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of the examination off resonance. Clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 187 (1993), 493.
13. HEYWANG S. H., WOLF A., PRUSS E. et al.: MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA. Use and limitations. Radiology 171 (1989), 95.
14. HEYWANG-KÖBRUNNER S. H.: Diagnosis of breast cancer with MR. Review after 1250 patient examinations. Electromedica 61 (1993), 43.
15. HEYWANG-KÖBRUNNER S. H., BECK R., LOMMATZSCH B. et al.: Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast. Survey of 1200 patient examinations. (Abstract.) Radiology 185 (1992), 246.
16. HULKA C. A., SMITH B. L., SGROI D. C. et al.: Benign and malignant breast lesions. Differentiation with echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 197 (1995), 33.
17. IKEDA D. & ANDERSON I.: Ductal carcinoma in situ. Atypical mammographic appearance. Radiology 172 (1989), 661.
18. JACKSON V., DINES K., BASSETT L. et al.: Diagnostic importance of the radiologic density of noncalcified breast masses. Analysis of 91 lesions. AJR 157 (1991), 25.
19. KAISER W. A. & REISER M.: False-positive cases in dynamic MR mammography. (Abstract.) Radiology 185 (1992), 245.
20. KAISER W. A. & REISER M.: Multifocality of breast cancer detected with dynamic MR mammography. (Abstract.) Radiology 185 (1992), 245.
21. KAISER W. A. & ZEITLER E.: MR imaging of the breast. Fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Radiology 170 (1989), 681.
22. KAWASIMA H.: Fat suppressed dynamic MR imaging of breast cancer. Radiologic-pathologic correlation. Nippon Acta Radiol. 56 (1996), 459.
23. MULLER-SCHIMPFLE M., STOLL P., STERN W. et al.: Do mammography, sonography, and MR mammography have a diagnostic benefit compared with mammography and sonography? AJR 168 (1997), 1323.
24. NUNES L. W., OREL S. G. & CHNALL M. D.: Diagnostic accuracy and lesion characteristic predictive values in the MR imaging evaluation of breast masses. (Abstract.) Radiology 193 (1994), 853.
25. OREL S. G., SCHNALL M. D., LIVOLSI V. A. et al.: Suspicious breast lesions. MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 190 (1994), 485.
26. PIERCE W. B., HARMS S. E., FLAMIG D. P. et al.: Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of the breast. Pulse sequence with fat suppression and magnetization transfer contrast - work in progress. Radiology 181 (1991), 493.
27. REVEL D., BRASCH R. C., PAAJANEN H. et al.: Gd-DTPA contrast enhancement and tissue differentiation in MR imaging of experimental breast carcinoma. Radiology 158 (1986), 319.
28. RUBENS D., TOTTERMAN S., CHACKO A. K. et al.: Gadopentate dimeglumine-enhanced chemical-shift MR imaging of the breast. AJR 157 (1991), 267.
29. SEWELL C. W.: Pathology of benign and malignant breast disorders. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 35 (1995), 1067.
30. SICKLES E.: Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers. AJR 146 (1986), 661.
31. STACK J. P., REDMOND O. M., CODD M. B. et al.: Breast disease. Tissue characterization with Gd-DTPA enhancement profiles. Radiology 174 (1990), 491.