Ductal enhancement on MR imaging of the breast

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 181, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 519-525

  Liberman, Laura ^a   Morris, Elizabeth A ^a   Dershaw, D David ^a   Abramson, Andrea F ^a   Tan, Lee K ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST DUCT; BREAST FIBROSIS; BREAST HYPERPLASIA; BREAST TUMOR; CELL TYPE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; FIBROADENOMA; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTITIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TUMOR BIOPSY;

EID: 0042344971     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.181.2.1810519     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 2001;220:13-30
2. Schnall MD, Ikeda DM. Lesion Diagnosis Working Group report. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:982-990
3. Morris EA. Illustrated breast MR lexicon. In: Miller WT, Berg WA, eds. Breast imaging, vol. 36. Seminars in roentgenology. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2001:238-249
4. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kinkel K, et al. Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:889-895
5. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kuhl CK, et al. Breast Imaging Reporting System - magnetic resonance imaging: illustrated BI-RADS-MRI. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology (in press)
6. Orel SG, Mendonca MH, Reynolds C, Schnall MD, Solin LJ, Sullivan DC. MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology 1997;202:413-420
7. Liberman L, Morris EA, Lee MJY, et al. Breast lesions detected by MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. AJR 2002;179:171-178
8. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG. Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model. Radiology 2001;219:484-494
9. Morris EA, Liberman L, Dershaw DD, et al. Preoperative MR imaging-guided needle localization of breast lesions. AJR 2002;178:1211-1220
10. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999;211:101-110
11. Orel SG. Differentiating benign from malignant enhancing lesions identified at MR imaging of the breast: are time-signal intensity curves an accurate predictor? Radiology 1999;211:5-7
12. Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ, et al. Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. AJR 2000;175:35-43
13. American College of Radiology. Illustrated Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS), 3rd ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 1998
14. Rosen PP. Invasive duct carcinoma and morphological prognostic markers. In: Rosen PP, Rosen's breast pathology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997:275-293
15. Liberman L, Abramson AF, Squires FB, Glassman J, Morris EA, Dershaw DD. The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. AJR 1998;171:35-40
16. Berg WA, Campassi C, Langenberg P, Sexton MJ. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. AJR 2000;174:1769-1777
17. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995;196:123-134
18. Morakkabati N, Schmiedel A, Leutner C, Kuhl CK. Diagnostic usefulness of ductal or segmental enhancement in dynamic breast MR imaging. (abstr) Radiology 2000;217(P):526-527
19. Liberman L, Drotman MB, Morris EA, et al. Imaging-histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy. Cancer 2000;89:2538-2546
20. Rosen PP. Ductal hyperplasia: ordinary and atypical. In: Rosen PP, Rosen's breast pathology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997:177-194
21. Stomper PC, Cholewinski SP, Penetrante RB, Harlos JP, Tsangaris TN. Atypical hyperplasia: frequency and mammographic and pathologic relationships in excisional biopsies guided with mammography and clinical examination. Radiology 1993;189:667-671
22. Rosen PP. Lobular carcinoma in situ and atypical lobular hyperplasia. In: Rosen PP, Rosen's breastpathology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997:507-544
23. Armstrong K, Eisen A, Weber B. Assessing the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2000;342:564-571
24. Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Floyd CE Jr. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description. AJR 1996;166:773-778
25. Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Soo MS, Walsh R, Mengoni P. Sonography of solid breast lesions: observer variability of lesion description and assessment. AJR 1999;172:1621-1625
26. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174