High-spatial-resolution MR imaging of focal breast masses: Interpretation model based on kinetic and morphological parameters

Radiation Medicine - Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 43-50

  Tozaki, Mitsuhiro ^a   Igarashi, Takao ^a   Matsushima, Satoshi ^a   Fukuda, Kunihiko ^a  

^a JIKEI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms; Diagnostic aid; Dynamic study; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; KINETICS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MORPHOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TUMOR DIAGNOSIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 15744372263     PISSN: 02882043     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Radiology, 170: 681-686, 1989.
2. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology, 187: 493-501, 1993.
3. Boetes C, Barentsz JO, Mus RD, et al. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique. Radiology, 193: 777-781, 1994.
4. Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Viehweg P, Heinig A, Kuchler C. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. Eur J Radiol, 24: 94-108, 1997.
5. Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology, 220: 13-30, 2001.
6. Sherif H, Mahfouz AE, Oellinger H, et al. Peripheral washout sign on contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast. Radiology, 205: 209-213, 1997.
7. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology, 211: 101-110, 1999.
8. Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, Troupin RH. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology, 190: 485-493, 1994.
9. Liberman L, Morris EA, Lee MJ, et al. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 179: 171-178, 2002.
10. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG, et al. Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. Radiology, 202: 833-841, 1997.
11. Kim SJ, Morris EA, Liberman L, et al. Observer variability and applicability of BI-RADS terminology for breast MR imaging: invasive carcinomas as focal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 177: 551-557, 2001.
12. Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ, et al. Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 175: 35-43, 2000.
13. Wedegartner U, Bick U, Wortler K, Rummeny E, Bongartz G. Differentiation between benign and malignant findings on MR-mammography: usefulness of morphological criteria. Eur Radiol, 11: 1645-1650, 2001.
14. Szabo BK, Aspelin P, Wiberg MK, Bone B. Dynamic MR imaging of the breast. Analysis of kinetic and morphologic diagnostic criteria. Acta Radiol, 44: 379-386, 2003.
15. Rofsky NM, Lee VS, Laub G, et al. Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. Radiology, 212: 876-884, 1999.
16. Lee VS, Lavelle MT, Rofsky NM, et al. Hepatic MR imaging with a dynamic contrast-enhanced isotropic volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination: feasibility, reproducibility, and technical quality. Radiology, 215: 365-372, 2000.
17. Tozaki M, Fukuda Y, Fukuda K, Kawakami M. Diagnosis of breast cancer extent using 3D-dynamic MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated examination. Japanese Journal of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 22: 140-146, 2002. (in Jpse. with English abstract)
18. Nishikawa K, Tozaki M, Takimoto T, et al. Optimization of 3D-VIBE for MR mammography: phantom study and clinical application. Japanese Journal of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 23: 92-98, 2003. (in Jpse. with English abstract)
19. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kinkel K, et al. Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Magn Reson Imaging, 13: 889-895, 2001.
20. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG. Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model. Radiology, 219: 484-494, 2001.
21. Buadu LD, Murakami J, Murayama S, et al. Patterns of peripheral enhancement in breast masses: correlation of findings on contrast medium enhanced MRI with histologic features and tumor angiogenesis. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 21: 421-430, 1997.
22. Kawashima H. Fat suppressed dynamic MR imaging of breast cancer: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi, 56: 459-469, 1996. (in Jpse. with English abstract)
23. Kawashima M, Tamaki Y, Nonaka T, et al. MR imaging of mucinous carcinoma of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 179: 179-183, 2002.
24. Hochman MG, Orel SG, Powell CM, Schnall MD, Reynolds CA, White LN. Fibroadenomas: MR imaging appearances with radiologic-histopathologic correlation. Radiology, 204: 123-129, 1997.
25. Isomoto I, Koshiishi T, Okimoto T, et al. Evaluation of strongly hyperintense area in breast lesions on fat-suppressed T2-weighted images correlated with histopathology. Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi, 64: 99-106, 2004. (in Jpse. with English abstract)
26. Tozaki M, Hayashi N, Miyamoto Y, Fukuda Y, Fukuda K. Power Doppler US in breast masses: correlation of spectral analysis findings with pathological features. Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi, 59: 860-866, 1999. (in Jpse. with English abstract)