Bridging from molecular simulation to biochemical networks

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 166-172

  Stein, Matthias ^a   Gabdoulline, Razif R ^a,b   Wade, Rebecca C ^a  

^a EML Research gGmbH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

BIOCHEMISTRY; CELL ORGANELLE; COMPARATIVE MOLECULAR FIELD ANALYSIS; GENOMICS; HUMAN; MACROMOLECULE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW; SIMULATION; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

BIOCHEMISTRY; CELLS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENZYMES; KINETICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; PROTEINS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 34147179524     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2007.03.014     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Baker D., and Sali A. Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 294 (2001) 93-96
2. Harrison S.C. Whither structural biology?. Nat Struct Mol Biol 11 (2004) 12-15
3. Albeck J.G., MacBeath G., White F.M., Sorger P.K., Lauffenburger D.A., and Gaudet S. Collecting and organizing systematic sets of protein data. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7 (2006) 803-812
4. Bork P., and Serrano L. Towards cellular systems in 4D. Cell 121 (2005) 507-509
5. Aloy P., and Russell R.B. Structural systems biology: modelling protein interactions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7 (2006) 188-197
6. Topf M., and Sali A. Combining electron microscopy and comparative protein structure modeling. Curr Opin Struct Biol 15 (2005) 578-585
7. Gavin A.C., Aloy P., Grandi P., Krause R., Boesche M., Marzioch M., Rau C., Jensen L.J., Bastuck S., Dumpelfeld B., et al. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 440 (2006) 631-636
8. Davis F.P., Braberg H., Shen M.Y., Pieper U., Sali A., and Madhusudhan M.S. Protein complex compositions predicted by structural similarity. Nucleic Acids Res 34 (2006) 2943-2952
9. Inbar Y., Benyamini H., Nussinov R., and Wolfson H.J. Prediction of multimolecular assemblies by multiple docking. J Mol Biol 349 (2005) 435-447
10. Devos D., Dokudovskaya S., Williams R., Alber F., Eswar N., Chait B.T., Rout M.P., and Sali A. Simple fold composition and modular architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103 (2006) 2172-2177
11. Geyer T., and Helms V. Spatial model of the chromatophore vesicles of Rhodobacter sphaeroides and the position of the cytochrome bc1 complex. Biophys J 91 (2006) 921-926
12. •] describe how a kinetic model of chromatophore vesicles is coupled to the reconstruction of a spatial model. The model gives a steady-state picture of the photosynthetic apparatus and can be used as a basis for future simulations.
13. Karplus M., and Kuriyan J. Molecular dynamics and protein function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 (2005) 6679-6685
14. Freddolino P.L., Arkhipov A.S., Larson S.B., McPherson A., and Schulten K. Molecular dynamics simulations of the complete satellite tobacco mosaic virus. Structure 14 (2006) 437-449
15. Sanbonmatsu K.Y., Joseph S., and Tung C.S. Simulating movement of tRNA into the ribosome during decoding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 (2005) 15854-15859
16. Gao M., Sotomayor M., Villa E., Lee E.H., and Schulten K. Molecular mechanisms of cellular mechanics. Phys Chem Chem Phys 8 (2006) 3692-3706
17. Tozzini V. Coarse-grained models for proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 15 (2005) 144-150
18. •,19], a mesoscopic oligonucleosome model was constructed with the flexible histone tails modelled using a two-step CG procedure. A five-residue per protein bead model was parameterized to reproduce the dynamic and configurational properties of a one-residue per protein bead chain model simulated by BD.
19. Arya G., Zhang Q., and Schlick T. Flexible histone tails in a new mesoscopic oligonucleosome model. Biophys J 91 (2006) 133-150
20. Ahmed A., and Gohlke H. Multiscale modeling of macromolecular conformational changes combining concepts from rigidity and elastic network theory. Proteins 63 (2006) 1038-1051
21. Chang C.E., Shen T., Trylska J., Tozzini V., and McCammon J.A. Gated binding of ligands to HIV-1 protease: Brownian dynamics simulations in a coarse-grained model. Biophys J 90 (2006) 3880-3885. The authors describe BD simulations of drug binding to HIV-1 protease in a CG model. The developed methodology is an efficient way to calculate the association rate constants gated by the microsecond dynamics of a protease.
22. Shih A.Y., Arkhipov A., Freddolino P.L., and Schulten K. Coarse grained protein-lipid model with application to lipoprotein particles. J Phys Chem B 110 (2006) 3674-3684
23. Chu J.W., and Voth G.A. Coarse-grained modeling of the actin filament derived from atomistic-scale simulations. Biophys J 90 (2006) 1572-1582
24. McGuffee S.R., and Elcock A.H. Atomically detailed simulations of concentrated protein solutions: the effects of salt, pH, point mutations, and protein concentration in simulations of 1000-molecule systems. J Am Chem Soc 128 (2006) 12098-12110. BD simulations of thousands of rigid protein molecules treated in atomic detail are reported. The interaction and diffusional properties of proteins in concentrated solution are derived from microsecond-long simulations as a function of both solvent conditions and amino acid substitutions.
25. Pricl S., Ferrone M., Fermeglia M., Amato F., Cosentino C., Cheng M.M.-C., Walczak R., and Ferrari M. Multiscale modeling of protein transport in silicon membrane nanochannels. Part 1. Derivation of molecular parameters from computer simulations. Biomed Microdevices 8 (2006) 277-290
26. •] describe MD simulations that were used to derive parameters for protein-silicon membrane interactions. These were then used to model protein diffusion in nanochannels and reproduce non-Fickian diffusion on a timescale of days.
27. Tomita M., Hashimoto K., Takahashi K., Matsuzaki Y., Matsishima R., Saito K., Yugi K., Miyoshi F., Nakano H., Tanida S., et al. The E-cell project: towards integrative simulation of cellular processes. New Generation Computing 18 (2000) 1-12
28. Broderick G., Ru'aini M., Chan E., and Ellison M.J. A life-like virtual cell membrane using discrete automata. In Silico Biol 5 (2004) 0016
29. Snoep J.L., Bruggeman F., Olivier B.G., and Westerhoff H.V. Towards building the silicon cell: a modular approach. Biosystems 83 (2006) 207-216
30. Orton R.J., Sturm O.E., Yvshermirsky V., Calder M., Gilbert D.R., and Kolch W. Computational modelling of receptor-tyrosine-kinase-activated MAPK pathway. Biochem J 392 (2005) 249-261
31. Teusink B., Passarge J., Reijenga C.A., Esgalhado E., van der Weijden C.C., Schepper M., Walsh M.C., Bakker B.M., van Dam K., Westerhoff H.V., et al. Can yeast glycolysis be understood in terms of in vitro kinetics of the constituent enzymes? Testing biochemistry. Eur J Biochem 267 (2000) 5313-5329
32. Albert M.A., Haanstra J.R., Hannaert V., Van Roy J., Opperdoes F.R., Bakker B.M., and Michels P.A.M. Experimental and in silico analyses of glycolytic flux control in bloodstream form Trypanosoma brucei. J Biol Chem 280 (2005) 28306-28315
33. Lemerle C., Di Ventura B., and Serrano L. Space as the final frontier in stochastic simulations of biological systems. FEBS Lett 579 (2005) 1789-1794
34. Takahashi K., Arjunan S.N.V., and Tomita M. Space in systems biology of signaling pathways - towards intracellular molecular crowding in silico. FEBS Lett 579 (2005) 1783-1788
35. Coggan J.S., Bartol T.M., Esquenazi E., Stiles J.R., Lamont S., Martone M.E., Berg D.K., Ellisman M.H., and Sejnowski T.J. Evidence for ectopic neurotransmission at a neuronal synapse. Science 309 (2005) 446-451
36. Fleire S.J., Goldman J.P., Carrasco Y.R., Weber M., Bray D., and Batista F.D. B-cell ligand discrimination through a spreading and contraction response. Science 312 (2006) 738-741
37. Means S., Smith A.J., Shepherd J., Shadid J., Fowler J., Wojcikiewicz R.J.H., Mazel T., Smith G.D., and Wilson B.S. Reaction diffusion modeling of calcium dynamics with realistic ER geometry. Biophys J 91 (2006) 537-557
38. Schomburg I., Chang A., Ebeling C., Gremse M., Heldt C., Huhn G., and Schomburg D. BRENDA, the enzyme database: updates and major new developments. Nucleic Acids Res 32 (2004) D431-D433
39. Wittig U., Golebiewski M., Kania R., Krebs O., Mir S., Weidemann A., Anstein S., Saric J., and Rojas I. SABIO-RK: integration and curation of reaction kinetics data. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4075 (2006) 94-103
40. Apweiler R., Cornish-Bowden A., Hofmeyr J-HS, Kettner C., Leyh T.S., Schomburg D., and Tipton K. The importance of uniformity in reporting protein-function data. Trends Biochem Sci 30 (2005) 11-12
41. Gabdoulline R.R., Kummer U., Olsen L.F., and Wade R.C. Concerted simulations reveal how peroxidase compound iii formation results in cellular oscillations. Biophys J 85 (2003) 1421-1428
42. Gao J., and Truhlar D.G. Quantum mechanical methods for enzyme kinetics. Annu Rev Phys Chem 53 (2002) 467-505
43. Gao J., Ma S., Major D.T., Nam K., Pu J., and Truhlar D.G. Mechanisms and free energies of enzymatic reactions. Chem Rev 106 (2006) 3188-3209
44. Friesner R.A., and Guallar V. Ab initio quantum chemical and mixed quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) methods for studying enzymatic catalysis. Annu Rev Phys Chem 56 (2005) 389-427
45. Wade R.C., Gabdoulline R.R., and Rienzo F.D. Protein interaction property similarity analysis. Int J Quant Chem 83 (2001) 122-127
46. Stein M, Gabdoulline RR, Wade RC: Integrating structural and kinetic enzymatic information in systems biology. In NIC Workshop 2006: From Computational Biophysics to Systems Biology, vol 34. Edited by Meinke J, Zimmermann O, Mohanty S, Hansmann UHE. John von Neumann Institute for Computing; 2006: 129-132.
47. Stein M, Gabdoulline RR, Besson B, Wade RC: The estimation of kinetic parameters in systems biology by comparing molecular interaction fields of enzymes. In Experimental Standard Conditions of Enzyme Characterizations. Proceedings of the 2nd International Beilstein Symposium; 19-23 March 2006. Rudedesheim, Germany. Edited by Hicks MG, Kettner C. Beilstein Institute; 2007:in press.
48. In: Cruciani G. (Ed). Molecular Interaction Fields (2006), WILEY-VCH, Weinheim
49. Wade R.C., Gabdoulline R.R., Ludemann S.K., and Lounnas V. Electrostatic steering and ionic tethering in enzyme-ligand binding: insights from simulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95 (1998) 5942-5949
50. Warshel A., Sharma P.K., Kato M., Xiang Y., Liu H., and Olsson M.H.M. Electrostatic basis for enzyme catalysis. Chem Rev 106 (2006) 3210-3235
51. Alves R., Antunes F., and Salvador A. Tools for kinetic modeling of biochemical networks. Nat Biotechnol 24 (2006) 667-672
52. Klipp E., Herwig R., Kowald A., Wierling C., and Lehrach H. Systems Biology in Practice (2005), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim