The nematode-arthropod clade revisited: Phylogenomic analyses from ribosomal protein genes misled by shared evolutionary biases

Cladistics

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 130-144

  Longhorn, Stuart J ^a,b   Foster, Peter G ^a   Vogler, Alfried P ^a,b  

^a DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPOD; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME; GENOMICS; NEMATODE; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN; TOPOLOGY;

ANIMALIA; ARTHROPODA; CHORDATA; DIPTERA; ECDYSOZOA; HEXAPODA; METAZOA; NEMATODA;

EID: 34047126382     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: 10960031     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2006.00132.x     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Adoutte, A., Balavoine, G., Lartillot, N., Lespinet, O., Prud'homme, B., de Rosa, R., 2000. The new animal phylogeny: reliability and implications. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 97, 4453-4456.
2. Aguinaldo, A.M.A., Turbeville, J.M., Linford, L.S., Rivera, M.C., Garey, J.R., Raff, R.A., Lake, J.A., 1997. Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals. Nature 387, 489-493.
3. Baker, R.H., DeSalle, R., 1997. Multiple sources of molecular characteristics and the phylogeny of Hawaiian drosophilids. Syst. Biol. 46, 654-673.
4. Blair, J.E., Ikeo, K., Gojobori, T., Hedges, S.B., 2002. The evolutionary position of nematodes. BMC Evol. Biol. 2, 1-7.
5. Blair, J.E., Shah, P., Hedges, S.B., 2005. Evolutionary sequence analysis of complete eukaryotic genomes. BMC Bioinformatics 6, R53.
6. Brinkmann, H., van der Giezen, M.V., Zhou, Y., Raucourt, G.P.D., Philippe, H., 2005. An empirical assessment of long-branch attraction artefacts in deep eukaryotic phylogenomics. Syst. Biol. 54, 743-757.
7. Brochier, C., Bapteste, E., Moreira, D., Philippe, H., 2002. Eubacterial phylogeny based on translational apparatus proteins. Trends Genet. 18, 1-5.
8. Chiu, J.C., Egan, L.E.K., M.G., Sarkar, I.N., Coruzzi, G.M., DeSalle, R., 2006. OrthologID: automation of genome-scale ortholog identification within a parsimony framework. Bioinformatics 22, 699-707.
9. Ciccarelli, F.D., Doerks, T., von Mering, C., Creevey, C.J., Snel, B., Bork, P., 2006. Toward automatic reconstruction of a highly resolved tree of life. Science 311, 1283-1287.
10. Copley, R.R., Aloy, P., Russell, R.B., Telford, M.J., 2004. Systematic searches for molecular synapomorphies in model metazoan genomes give some support for Ecdysozoa after accounting for the idiosyncrasies of Caenorhabditis elegans. Evol. Dev. 6, 164-169.
11. Dopazo, H., Dopazo, J., 2005. Genome-scale evidence of the nematode-arthropod clade. Genome Biol. 6, Art. no. R41.
12. Dopazo, H., Santoyo, J., Dopazo, J., 2004. Phylogenomics and the number of characters required for obtaining an accurate phylogeny of eukaryotic model species. Bioinformatics 20, 116-121.
13. Eernisse, D.J., Albert, J.S., Anderson, F.E., 1992. Annelida and arthropoda are not sister taxa - A phylogenetic analysis of spiralian metazoan morphology. Syst. Biol. 41, 305-330.
14. Felsenstein, J., 1989. PHYLIP: Phylogeneic Inference Package, Version 3.2. Cladistics 5, 164-166.
15. Foster, P.G., 2004. Modeling compositional heterogeneity. Syst. Biol. 53, 485-495.
16. Foster, P.G., Hickey, D.A., 1999. Compositional bias may affect both DNA-based and protein-based phylogenetic reconstructions. J. Mol. Evol. 48, 284-290.
17. Friedrich, M., Tautz, D., 1997. An episodic change of rDNA nucleotide substitution rate has occurred during the emergence of the insect order Diptera. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14, 644-653.
18. Gatesy, J., O'Grady, P., Baker, R.H., 1999. Corroboration among data sets in simultaneous analysis: hidden support for phylogenetic relationships among higher level artiodactyl taxa. Cladistics 15, 271-313.
19. Giribet, G., 2002. Current advances in the phylogenetic reconstruction of metazoan evolution. A new paradigm for the Cambrian explosion? Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 24, 345-357.
20. Guindon, S., Gascuel, O., 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52, 696-704.
21. Hausdorf, B., 2000. Early evolution of the Bilateria. Syst. Biol. 49, 130-142.
22. Huelsenbeck, J.P., Ronquist, F., 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17, 754-755.
23. Hughes, J., Longhorn, S.J., Papadopoulou, A., Theodorides, K., de Riva, A., Mejia-Chang, M., Foster, P.G., Vogler, A.P., 2006. Dense taxonomic EST sampling and its applications for molecular systematics of the Coleoptera (beetles). Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 268-278.
24. Hwang, U.W., Kim, W., Tautz, D., Friedrich, M., 1998. Molecular phylogenetics at the Felsenstein zone: approaching the Strepsiptera problem using 5.8s 28S rDNA Sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9, 470-480.
25. Hyman, L.H., 1951. The Invertebrates, Vol. 2. McGraw-Hill, New York.
26. Karsi, A., Patterson, A., Feng, J., Liu, Z.Z., 2002. Translational machinery of channel catfish: I. A transcriptomic approach to the analysis of 32, 40S ribosomal protein genes and their expression. Gene 291, 177-186.
27. Landais, I., Ogliastro, M., Mita, K., Nohata, J., López-Ferber, M., Duonor-Cérutti, M., Fournier, P., Devauchelle, G., 2003. Annotation pattern of ESTs from Spodoptera frugiperda cells (Sf9) and analysis of the insect-specific features and unexpectedly low codon usage bias. Bioinformatics 19, 2343-2350.
28. Liang, F., Holt, I., Pertea, G., Karamycheva, S., Salzberg, S.L., Quackenbush, J., 2000. An optimised protocol for analysis of EST sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 3657-3665.
29. Lockhart, P.J., Steel, M.A., Hendy, M.D., Penny, D., 1994. Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11, 605-612.
30. Mallatt, J.M., Garey, J.R., Schultz, J.W., 2004. Ecdysozoan phylogeny and Bayesian inference: first use of nearly complete 28S and 18S rRNA gene sequences to classify the arthropods and their kin. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31, 178-191.
31. Manuel, M., Kruse, M., Muller, W.E.G., Parco, Y.L., 2000. The comparison of beta-thymosin homologs among Metazoa supports an arthropod-nematode clade. J. Mol. Evol. 51, 378-381.
32. Meyer, A., Zardoya, R., 2003. Recent advances in the (molecular) phylogeny of vertebrates. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 34, 311-338.
33. Mushegian, A.R., Garey, J.R., Martin, J., Liu, L.X., 1998. Large-scale taxonomic profiling of eukaryotic model organism: a comparison of orthologous proteins encoded by the human, fly, nematode and yeast genomes. Genome Res. 8, 590-598.
34. Nielsen, C., 2001. Animal Evolution: Interrelationships of the Living Phyla. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
35. Nielsen, C., Scharff, N., Eibye-Jacobsen, D., 1996. Cladistic analyses of the animal kingdom. Biol. J. Linnaean Soc. 57, 385-410.
36. Peterson, K.J., Eernisse, D.J., 2001. Animal phylogeny and the ancestry of bilaterians: inferences from morphology and 18S rDNA gene sequences. Evol. Dev. 3, 170-205.
37. Philip, G.K., Creevey, C.J., McInerney, J.O., 2005. The Opisthokonta and the Ecdysozoa may not be clades: Stronger support for the grouping of plant and animal than for animal and fungi and stronger support for the Coelomata than Ecdysozoa. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 1175-1184.
38. Philippe, H., Lartillot, N., Brinkmann, H., 2005. Multigene analyses of bilaterian animals corroborate the monophyly of Ecdysozoa, Lophotrochozoa, and Protostomia. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 1246-1253.
39. Philippe, H., Snell, E.A., Bapteste, E., Lopez, P., Holland, P.W.H., Casane, D., 2004. Phylogenomics of eukaryotes: Impact of missing data on large alignments. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1740-1752.
40. Planta, R.J., Manger, W.H., 1998. The list of cytoplasmic ribosomal proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14, 471-477.
41. Pruitt, K.D., Katz, K.S., Sicotte, H., Maglott, D.R., 2000. Introducing RefSeq and LocusLink: curated human genome resources at the NCBI. Trends Genet. 16, 44-47.
42. Quackenbush, J., Cho, J., Lee, D.D., Liang, F., Holt, I., Karamycheva, S., Parvizi, B., Pertea, G., Sultana, R., White, J., 2001. The TIGR gene indices: Analysis of gene transcript sequences in highly sampled eukaryotic species. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 159-164.
43. Rokas, A., Kruger, D., Carroll, S.B., 2005. Animal evolution and the molecular signature of radiations compressed in time. Science 310, 1933-1938.
44. Ruiz-Trillo, I., Paps, J., Loukota, M., Ribera, C., Jondelius, J., Baguna, J., Riutort, M., 2002. A phylogenetic analysis of myosin heavy chain type II sequences corroborates that Acoela and Nemertodermatida are basal bilaterians. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 99, 11246-11251.
45. Savard, J., Tautz, D., Lercher, M.J., 2006. Genome-wide acceleration of protein evolution in flies (Diptera). BMC Evol. Biol. 6, Art. no. 7.
46. Schmidt, H.A., Strimmer, K., Vingron, M., Haeseler, A.V., 2002. TREE-PUZZLE: Maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses and parallel computing. Bioinformatics, 18, 502-504.
47. Scholtz, G., 2002. The Articulata hypothesis - or what is a segment? Organisms Divers. Evol. 2, 197-215.
48. Shimodaira, H., 2002. An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Syst. Biol. 51, 492-508.
49. Shimodaira, H., Hasegawa, M., 2001. CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics, 17, 1246-1247.
50. Slater, G., 2000. Algorithms for analysis of ESTs. PhD thesis. University of Cambridge, UK. URL: http://www.ebi.ac.uk/~guy/ estate/.
51. Sorenson, M.D., 1999. Treerot, Version 2.0. Boston University, Boston, MA.
52. Swofford, D.L., 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis using Parsimony, Version 4.0b. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
53. Telford, M.J., 2004. Animal phylogeny: Back to the Coelomata? Curr. Biol. 14, 274-276.
54. Templeton, A.R., 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction site endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to humans and apes. Evolution 37, 221-244.
55. Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F., Higgins, D.G., 1997. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 4876-4882.
56. Uechi, T., Tanaka, T., Kenmochi, N., 2001. A complete map of the human ribosomal protein genes: Assignment of 80 genes to the cytogenetic map and implications for human disorders. Genomics 72, 223-230.
57. Wägele, J.W., Erikson, T., Lockhart, P., Mishof, B., 1999. The Ecdysozoa: artifact or monophylum? J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 37, 211-223.
58. Whelan, S., Goldman, N., 2001. A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum-likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18, 691-699.
59. Wolf, Y.I., Rogozin, I.B., Koonin, E.V., 2004. Coelomata and not Ecdysozoa: evidence from genome-wide phylogenetic analysis. Genome Res. 14, 29-36.
60. Zhang, Z., Harrison, P., Gerstein, M., 2002. Identification and analysis of over 2000 ribosomal protein pseudogenes in the human gene. Genome Res. 12, 1466-1482.
61. Zrzavy, J., 2001. Ecdysozoa versus Articulata: clades, artifacts, prejudices. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 39, 159-163.