Corrigendum to "Do visual illusions probe the visual brain? Illusions in action without a dorsal visual stream" [Neuropsychologia 45 (2007) 1849-1858] (DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.12.010);Do visual illusions probe the visual brain?. Illusions in action without a dorsal visual stream

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 45, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1849-1858

  Coello, Yann ^a   Danckert, James ^b   Blangero, Annabelle ^c   Rossetti, Yves ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LILLE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^d HOSPICES CIVILS DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

Action; Dorsal ventral pathways; Optic ataxia; Perception; Vision; Visual illusion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LOCOMOTION; PARIETAL LOBE; PERCEPTION; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUAL SYSTEM; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

EID: 33947149218     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.10.013     Document Type: Erratum

References (55)

1. Aglioti S., DeSouza J.F.X., and Goodale M.A. Size-contrast illusion deceives the eye but not the hand. Current Biology 5 (1995) 679-685
2. Boussaoud D., Ungerleider L.G., and Desimone R. Pathways for motion analysis: Cortical connections of the medial superior temporal and fundus of the superior temporal visual areas in the macaque. Journal of Computational Neurology 296 (1990) 462-495
3. Brenner E., and Smeets J.B. Size illusion influences how we lift but not how we grasp an object. Experimental Brain Research 111 (1996) 473-476
4. Bridgeman B. Separate visual representations for perception and for visually guided behavior. In: Ellis S.R. (Ed). Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments (1991), Taylor & Francis, London 316-327
5. Bridgeman B. Interactions between vision for perception and vision for behavior. In: Rossetti Y., and Revuonso A. (Eds). Beyond dissociation: Interaction between dissociated implicit and explicit processing (2000), Benjamins, Amsterdam 17-40
6. Bridgeman B., Kirch M., and Sperling A. Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion. Perception and Psychophysics 29 (1981) 336-342
7. Bruno N. When does action resist visual illusions?. Trends in Cognitive Science 5 (2001) 379-382
8. Carey D.P. Do action systems resist visual illusions?. Trends in Cognitive Science 5 (2001) 109-113
9. Carey D.P., Dijkerman H.C., and Milner A.D. Perception and action in depth. Consciousness and Cognition 7 (1998) 438-453
10. Coello Y., and Iwanow O. Effect of structuring the workspace on cognitive and sensorimotor distance estimation: No dissociation between perception and action. Perception and Psychophysics 68 (2006) 278-289
11. Coello Y., Richaud S., Magne P., and Rossetti Y. Vision for spatial perception and vision for action: A dissociation between the left-right and near-far dimension. Neuropsychologia 41 (2003) 622-633
12. Danckert J., Sharif N., Haffenden A.M., Schiff K.C., and Goodale M.A. A temporal analysis of grasping in the Ebbinghaus illusion: Planning versus on-line control. Experimental Brain Research 144 (2002) 275-280
13. Deiber M.P., Ibanez V., Sadato N., and Hallett M. Cerebral structures participating in motor preparation in humans: A positron emission tomography study. Journal of Neurophysiology 75 (1996) 233-247
14. Dyde R., and Milner A.D. Two illusions of perceived orientation: One fools all of the people some of the time; the other fools all of the people all of the time. Experimental Brain Research 144 (2002) 518-527
15. Fischer M.H. How sensitive is hand transport to illusory context effects?. Experimental Brain Research 136 (2001) 224-230
16. Franz V. Action does not resist visual illusions. Trends in Cognitive Science 5 (2001) 457-459
17. Franz V.H., Gegenfurtner K.R., Bülthoff H.H., and Fahle M. Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychological Science 11 (2000) 20-25
18. Ganel T., and Goodale M. Visual control of action but not perception requires analytical processing of object shape. Nature 426 (2003) 664-667
19. Gentilucci M., Chieffi S., Deprati E., Saetti M.C., and Toni I. Visual illusion and action. Neuropsychologia 34 (1996) 369-376
20. Glover S. Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behavioural Brain Sciences 27 (2004) 3-24
21. Glover S.R., and Dixon P. Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: Evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 (2001) 560-572
22. Goodale M.A., Jakobson L.S., and Keillor J.M. Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements. Neuropsychologia 32 (1994) 1159-1178
23. Goodale M.A., and Milner A.D. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences 15 (1992) 20-35
24. Goodale M.A., Milner A.D., Jakobson L.S., and Carey D.P. A neurological dissociation between perceived objects and grasping them. Nature 349 (1991) 154-156
25. Goodale M.A., and Westwood D.A. An evolving view of duplex: Separate but interacting cortical pathways for perception and action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 14 (2004) 203-211
26. Grafton S.T., Arbib M., Fadiga L., and Rizzolatti G. Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography. II. Observation compared with imagination. Experimental Brain Research 112 (1996) 103-111
27. Gréa H., Pisella L., Rossetti Y., Desmurget M., Tilikete C., Prablanc C., et al. A lesion of the posterior parietal cortex disrupts on-line adjustments during aiming movements. Neuropsychologia 40 (2002) 2471-2480
28. Haffenden A.M., and Goodale M.A. Independent effects of pictorial displays on perception and action. Vision Research 40 (2000) 1597-1607
29. Haffenden A.M., Schiff K.C., and Goodale M.A. The dissociation between perception and action in the Ebbinghaus illusion: Nonillusory effects of pictorial cues on grasp. Current Biology 11 (2001) 177-181
30. Heath M., Rival C., and Neely K. Visual feedback schedules influence visuomotor resistance to the Müller-Lyer figures. Experimental Brain Reasearch 168 (2006) 348-356
31. Heath M., Rival C., Neely K., and Krigolson O. Müller-Lyer influence the online reorganization of visually guided grasping movements. Experimental Brain Research 169 (2006) 473-478
32. Himmelbach M., Karnath H.O., Perenin M.T., Franz V.H., and Stockmeier K. A general deficit of the "the automatic pilot" with posterior parietal cortex lesions?. Neurospychologia 44 13 (2006) 2749-2756
33. Ishihara M., Pisella L., Blangero A., Luaute J., Krolak-Salmon P., Rode G., et al. Posterior parietal contributions in motor programming for peripheral visual targets. Perception 33 (2004) 165-166
34. Jeannerod M., and Rossetti Y. Visuomotor coordination as a dissociable function: Experimental and clinical evidence. In: Kennard C. (Ed). Visual perceptual defects, Baillère's clinical neurology, international practise and research (1993), Tindall-Saunders, Baillère 439-460
35. Khan A.Z., Pisella L., Rossetti Y., Vighetto A., and Crawford J.D. Impairment of gaze-centered updating of reach targets in bilateral parietal-occipital damaged patients. Cerebral Cortex 15 (2005) 1547-1560
36. Lee J.H., and Van Donkelaar P. Dorsal and ventral visual stream contributions to perception-action interactions during pointing. Experimental Brain Research 143 (2002) 440-446
37. Magne P., and Coello Y. Retinal and extra-retinal contribution to position coding. Behavioural Brain Research 136 (2002) 277-287
38. Mattingley J.B., Husain M., Rorden C., Kennard C., and Driver J. Motor role of human inferior parietal lobule revealed in unilateral neglect patients. Nature 392 (1998) 179-182
39. Milner A.D., and Dijkerman C. Direct and indirect visual routes to action. In: de Gelder B., de Haan E.H.F., and Heywood C.A. (Eds). Out of mind: Varieties of unconscious processes (2001), Oxford University Press, Oxford 241-264
40. Milner A.D., Dijkerman H.C., McIntosh R.D., Rossetti Y., and Pisella L. Delayed reaching and grasping in patients with optic ataxia. Progress Brain Research 142 (2003) 225-242
41. Milner A.D., and Goodale M.A. The visual brain in action (1995), Oxford University Press, Oxford
42. Milner A.D., Paulignan Y., Dijkerman H.C., Michel F., and Jeannerod M. A paradoxical improvement of misreaching in optic ataxia: New evidence for two separate neural systems for visual localization. Proceedings Biological Sciences 266 (1999) 2225-2229
43. Paillard J. Cognitive versus sensori-motor encoding of spatial information. In: Ellen P., and Thinus-Blanc C. (Eds). Cognitive processes and spatial orientation in animal and man (1987), Nijhoff Publisher, Dordrecht 43-77
44. Pavani F., Boscagli I., Benvenuti F., Rabuffetti M., and Farné A. Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion?. Experimental Brain Research 127 (1999) 95-101
45. Pisella L., Binkofski F., Lasek K., Toni I., and Rossetti Y. No double-dissociation between optic ataxia and visual agnosia: Multiple sub-streams for multiple visuo-manual integrations. Neuropsychologia 44 (2006) 2734-2748
46. Pisella L., Gréa H., Tiliket C., Vighetto A., Desmurget M., Rode G., et al. An automatic pilot for the hand in the human posterior parietal cortex: Toward a reinterpretation of optic ataxia. Nature Neuroscience 7 (2000) 729-736
47. Pisella, L., Ota, H., Vighetto, A., & Rossetti, Y. (in press). Optic ataxia and the Bálint's syndrome: Neurosychological and neurophysiological prospects. In G. Goldenberg, & F. Boller (Eds.), Handbook of clinical neurology.
48. Prado J., Clavagnier S., Otzenberger H., Scheiber C., Kennedy H., and Perenin M.T. Two cortical systems for reaching in central and peripheral vision. Neuron 48 (2005) 849-858
49. Rizzolatti G., and Matelli M. Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: Anatomy and functions. Experimental Brain Research 153 (2003) 146-157
50. Rossetti Y., McIntosh R.M., Revol P., Pisella L., Rode G., Danckert J., et al. Visually guided reaching: Posterior parietal lesions cause a switch from visuomotor to cognitive control. Neuropsychologia 43 (2005) 162-177
51. Rossetti Y., and Pisella L. Tutorial: Several 'vision for action' systems: A guide to dissociating and integrating dorsal and ventral functions. In: Prinz W., and Hommel B. (Eds). Attention and performance. XIX. Common mechanisms in perception and action (2002), Oxford University Press, Oxford 62-119
52. Rossetti Y., Pisella L., and Vighetto A. Optic ataxia revisited: Visually guided action versus immediate visuomotor control. Experimental Brain Research 153 (2003) 171-179
53. Ungerleider L.G., and Mishkin M. Two cortical visual systems. In: Ingle D.J., Goodale M.A., and Mansfield R.J.W. (Eds). Analysis of visual behaviour (1982), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 549-586
54. Van Donkelaar P. Pointing movements are affected by size-contrast illusions. Experimental Brain Research 125 (1999) 517-520
55. Vishton P.M., Rea J.G., Cutting J.E., and Nunez L.N. Comparing effects of the horizontal-vertical illusion on grip scaling and judgment: Relative versus absolute, not perception versus action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 1659-1672