Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: Evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 560-572

  Glover, Scott R ^a   Dixon, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HAND GRIP; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RECEPTIVE FIELD; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 85047682791     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.3.560     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aglioti, S., de Souza, J., & Goodale, M. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5, 679-685.
2. Asch, S. E., & Witkin, H. (1948). Studies in space orientation: D. Perception of the upright with displaced visual fields and with body tilted. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 445-477.
3. Brenner, E., & Smeets, J. (1996). Size illusion influences how we lift but not how we grasp an object. Experimental Brain Research, 111, 473-476.
4. Bridgeman, B., Lewis, S., Heit, G., & Nagle, M. (1979). Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 692-700.
5. Bridgeman, B., Perry, S., & Anand, S. (1997). Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of space. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 456-469.
6. Carlton, L. (1992). Visual processing time and the control of movement. In L. Proteau & D. Elliot (Eds.), Vision and motor control: Advances in psychology (Vol. 85, pp. 3-31). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
7. Carver, R. P. (1978). The case against statistical significance testing. Harvard Educational Review, 48, 378-399.
8. Cohen, J. (1994). The Earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 53, 997-1003.
9. Daprati, E., & Gentilucci, M. (1997). Grasping an illusion. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1577-1582.
10. Desmurget, M., Prablanc, C., Arzi, M., Rossetti, Y., Paulignan, Y., & Urquizar, C. (1996). Integrated control of hand transport and orientation during prehension movements. Experimental Brain Research, 110, 265-278.
11. Dixon, P. (1998). Why scientists value p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 390-396.
12. Dixon, P., & O'Reilly, T. (1999). Scientific versus statistical inference. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 133-149.
13. Franz, V. H., Gegenfurtner, K., Bulthoff, H., & Fahle, M. (2000). Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychological Science, 11, 20-25.
14. Gentilucci, M., Chieffi, S., Daprati, E., Saetti, M., & Toni, I. (1996). Visual illusion and action. Neuropsychologia, 34, 369-376.
15. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
16. Glover, S., & Dixon, P. (2000). Dynamic effects of the Titchener illusion in grasping: Support for a planning-control model of action. Manuscript submitted for publication.
17. Goodale, M. A., Pelisson, D., & Prablanc, C. (1986). Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature, 320, 748-750.
18. Goodman, S. N., & Royall, R. (1988). Evidence and scientific research. American Journal of Public Health, 78, 1568-1574.
19. Gregory, R. L. (1968). Visual illusions. Scientific American, 219, 66-76.
20. Haffenden, A. M., & Goodale, M. (1998). The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 122-136.
21. Haggard, P., & Wing, A. (1990). Assessing and reporting the accuracy of position measurements made with optical tracking systems. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22, 315-321.
22. Hansen, R. M., & Skavenski, A. (1985). Accuracy of spatial localizations near the times of saccadic eye movements. Vision Research, 8, 1077-1082.
23. Jackson, S. R., & Shaw, A. (2000). The Ponzo illusion affects grip force but not grip aperture scaling during prehension movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 418-423.
24. Jakobson, L. S., & Goodale, M. (1991). Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: A kinematic analysis of human prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 86, 199-208.
25. Jeannerod, M. (1984). The timing of natural prehension movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 16, 235-254.
26. Jeannerod, M. (1988). The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
27. Kelso, J. A., Buchanan, J., & Murata, T. (1994). Multifunctionality and switching in the coordination dynamics of reaching and grasping. Human Movement Science, 13, 63-94.
28. Khan, M. A., Franks, I., & Goodman, D. (1998). The effect of practice on the control of rapid aiming movements: Evidence for an interdependency between programming and feedback processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 425-444.
29. Loftus, G. R. (1993). A picture is worth a thousand p values: On the irrelevance of hypothesis testing in the microcomputer age. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 250-256.
30. Meyer, D. E., Abrams, R., Kornblum, S., Wright, C., & Smith, K. (1988). Optimality in human motor performance: Ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychological Review, 95, 340-370.
31. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
32. Mishkin, M., Ungerleider, L., & Macko, K. (1983). Object vision and spatial vision: Two cortical pathways. Trends in Neurosciences, 6, 414-417.
33. Otto-de Haart, E. G., Carey, D., & Milne, A. (1999). More thoughts on perceiving and grasping the Muller-Lyer illusion. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1437-1444.
34. Paulignan, Y., MacKenzie, C., Marteniuk, R., & Jeannerod, M. (1991). Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements: I. The effects of changing object position. Experimental Brain Research, 83, 502-512.
35. Pavani, F., Boscagli, I., Benvenuti, F., Rabuffetti, M., & Farne, A. (1999). Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion? Experimental Brain Research, 127, 95-101.
36. Pelisson, D., Prablanc, C., Goodale, M., & Jeannerod, M. (1986). Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb: Part 2. Evidence for fast unconscious processes correcting the trajectory of the hand to the final position of a double-step stimulus. Experimental Brain Research, 62, 303-311.
37. Prablanc, C., & Martin, O. (1992). Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. Journal of Neurophysiology, 67, 455-469.
38. Rosenbaum, D. A., Loukopoulos, L., Meulenbroek, R., Vaughan, J., & Engelbrecht, S. (1995). Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures. Psychological Review, 102, 28-67.
39. Rosenbaum, D. A., Marchak, F., Barnes, J., Vaughan, J., Slotta, J., & Jorgensen. M. (1990). Constraints for action selection: Overhand versus underhand grips. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and performance XIII (pp. 321-342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Rosenbaum, D. A., Vaughan, J., Jorgensen, M., Barnes, H., & Stewart, E. (1992). Plans for object manipulation. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV (pp. 803-820). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Short, M. W., & Caraugh, J. (1997). Planning macroscopic aspects of manual control: End-state comfort and point-of-change effects. Acta Psychologica 96, 133-147.
42. Smeets, J. B., & Brenner, E. (1995). Perception and action are based on the same visual information: Distinction between position and velocity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 19-31.
43. Stark, L. (1968). Neurological control systems: Studies in bioengineering. New York: Plenum.
44. Stelmach, G. E., Castiello, U., & Jeannerod, M. (1994). Orienting the finger opposition space during prehension movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 178-186.
45. Thompson, B. (1993). The use of statistical significance tests in research: Bootstrap and other alternatives. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 361-377.
46. van Donkelaar, P. (1999). Pointing movements are affected by size-contrast illusions. Experimental Brain Research, 125, 517-520.
47. Vishton, P. M., Rea, J., & Cutting, J. (1999). Comparing effects of the horizontal-vertical illusion on grip scaling and judgment: Relative versus absolute, not perception versus action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1659-1672.
48. Westwood, D. A., Heath, M., & Roy, E. (2000). The effect of a pictorial illusion on closed-loop and open-loop prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 134, 456-463.
49. Wong, E., & Mack, A. (1981). Saccadic programming and perceived location. Acta Psychologica, 48, 123-131.
50. Woodworth, R. S. (1899). The accuracy of voluntary movements. Psychological Review Monographs, 6 (3).
51. Zelaznik, H. N., Hawkins, B., & Kisselburgh, L. (1983). Rapid visual feedback processing in single-aiming movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 217-236.
52. Zelaznik, H. N., Hawkins, B., & Kisselburgh, L. (1987). The effects of movement distance and movement time on visual feedback processing in aimed hand movements. Acta Psychologica, 65, 181-191.