Müller-Lyer figures influence the online reorganization of visually guided grasping movements

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 169, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 473-481

  Heath, Matthew ^a   Rival, Christina ^b   Neely, Kristina ^a   Krigolson, Olav ^c  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Allocentric; Egocentric; Grasping; M ller Lyer illusion; Online control; Visually guided

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HAND GRIP; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; ONLINE MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; MOVEMENT; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33644631346     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0170-3     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Aglioti S, DeSouza JFX, Goodale MA (1995) Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Curr Biol 5:679-685
2. Berthier NE, Clifton RE, Gullapalli V, McCall DD, Robin DJ (1996) Visual information and object size in the control of reaching. J Mot Behav 28:187-197
3. Binkofski F, Dohle C, Possee S, Stephan KM, Hefter H, Seitz RJ, Freund HJ (1998) Human anterior intraparietal area subserves prehension: a combined lesion and functional MRI activation study. Neurology 50:1253-1259
4. Brenner E, Smeets JBJ (1996) Size illusion influences how we lift but not how we grasp an object. Neuropsychologia 111:473-476
5. Bryden MP (1977) Measuring handedness with questionnaires. Neuropsychologia 15:617-624
6. Carlton LG (1981) Visual information: the control of aiming movements. Q J Exp Psychol 33A:87-93
7. Carrozzo M, Stratta F, McIntyre J, Lacquaniti F (2002) Cognitive allocentric representations of visual space shape pointing errors. Exp Brain Res 147:426-436
8. Churchill A, Hopkins B, Rönnqvist, Vogt S (2000) Vision of the hand and environmental context in human prehension. Exp Brain Res 134:81-89
9. Coello Y, Grealy MA (1997) Effect of size and frame of visual field on the accuracy of an aiming movement. Percept 26:287-300
10. Connolly JD, Goodale MA (1999) The role of visual feedback of hand position in the control of manual prehension. Exp Brain Res 125:281-286
11. Conti P, Beaubaton D (1980) Role of structured visual field and visual reafference in accuracy of pointing movements. Percept Mot Skills 50:239-244
12. Culham JC, Danckert SL, Souza JF, Gati JS, Menon RS, Goodale MA (2003) Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas. Exp Brain Res 153:180-189
13. Danckert JA, Sharif N, Haffenden AM, Schiff KC, Goodale MA (2002) A temporal analysis of grasping in the Ebbinghaus illusion: planning versus online control. Exp Brain Res 144:275-280
14. Daprati E, Gentilucci M (1997) Grasping an illusion. Neuropsychologia 35:1577-1582
15. De Grave DD, Brenner E, Smeets JBJ (2004) Illusions as a tool to study the coding of pointing movments. Exp Brain Res 155:56-62
16. Desmurget M, Epstein CM, Turner RS, Prablanc C, Alexander GE, Grafton ST (1999) Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target. Nat Neurosci 2:563-567
17. Eliott D, Helsen WF, Chua R (2001) A century later: Woodwork's (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. Psychol Bull 127:342-357
18. Elliott D, Lee TD (1995) The role of target information on manual aiming bias. Psychol Res 58:2-9
19. Franz VH, Fahle M, Bulthoff HH, Gegenfurtner KR (2001). Effects of visual illusions on grasping. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27:1124-1144
20. Gentilucci M, Toni I, Chieffi S, Pavesi G (1994) The role of proprioception in the control of prehension movements: a kinematic study in a peripherally deafferented patient and in normal subjects. Exp Brain Res 90:483-500
21. Gentilucci M, Daprati E, Toni I, Chieffi S, Saetti MC (1995) Unconscious updating of grasp motor programs. Neuropsychologia 105:291-303
22. Gentilucci M, Chieffi S, Daprati E, Saetti MC, Toni I (1996) Visual illusion and action. Neuropsychologia 34:369-376
23. Glazebrook CM, Shillon VP, Keetch KM, Lyons J, Amazeen E, Weeks DJ, Elliott D (2005) Perception-action and the Müller-Lyer illusion: amplitude or endpoint bias? Exp Brain Res 160:71-78
24. Glover S (2004) Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behav Brain Sci 27:3-78
25. Glover S, Dixon P (2001a) Dynamic illusion effect in a reaching task: evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and the control of reaching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27:560-572
26. Glover S, Dixon P (2001b) Motor adaptation to an optical illusion. Exp Brain Res 137:254-258
27. Glover S, Dixon P (2001c) The role of vision in the on-line correction of illusion effects on action. Can J Exp Psychol 55:96-103
28. Glover S, Dixon P (2002) Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion in grasping: support for a planning/control model of action. Percept Psychophys 64:266-278
29. Goodale MA, Pelisson D, Prablanc C (1986) Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature 20:748-750
30. Goodale MA, Westwood DA (2004) An evolving view of duplex vision: separate but interacting cortical visual pathways for perception and action. Curr Opin Neurobiol 14:203-211
31. Haffenden AM, Schiff KC, Goodale MA (2001) The dissociation between perception and action in the Ebbinghaus illusion: nonillusory effects of pictorial cues on grasp. Curr Biol 11:177-181
32. Haffenden AM, Goodale MA (1998) The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. J Cogn Neurosci 10:122-136
33. Heath M, Rival C, Binsted G. (2004a) Can the motor system resolve a premovement bias in grip aperture: online analysis of grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion. Exp Brain Res 158:378-384
34. Heath M, Westwood DA, Binsted G (2004b) The control of memory-guided reaching movements in peripersonal space. Motor Control 8:76-106
35. Heath M (2005) Role of limb and target vision in the online control of memory-guided reaches. Motor Control (in press)
36. Heath M, Rival C, Neely KA (2005a) Visual feedback schedules influence visuomotor resistant to the Muller-Lyer illusion. Exp Brain Res (in press)
37. Heath M, Rival C, Westwood, DA, Neely KA (2005b) Time course analysis of closed- and open-loop grasping of the Müller-Lyer illusion. J Mot Behav (in press)
38. Heath M, Rival C (2005) Role of the visuomotor system in on-line attenuation of a premovement illusory bias in grip aperture. Brain Cogn 57:111-114
39. Heath M, Westwood DA (2003) Can a visual representation support the online control of memory-dependent reaching? Evidence from a variable spatial mapping paradigm. Motor Control 7:346-361
40. Hu Y, Eagleson R, Goodale MA (1999) The effects of delay on the kinematics of grasping. Exp Brain Res 126:109-116
41. Hu Y, Goodale MA (2000) Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics. J Cogn Neurosci 12:856-868
42. Jackson SR, Shaw A (2000) The Ponzo illusion affects grip-force but not grip-aperture scaling during prehension movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26:418-423
43. Jakobson LS, Goodale MA (1991) Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension. Exp Brain Res 86:199-208
44. James TW, Culham J, Humphrey K, Milner AD, Goodale MA (2003) Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: an fMRI study. Brain 126:2463-2475
45. Jeannerod M (1984) The timing of natural prehension movements. J Mot Behav 16:235-254
46. Keele SW (1968) Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychol Bull 70:387-403
47. Khan MA, Elliott D, Coull J, Chua R, Lyons D (2002) Optimal control strategies under different feedback schedules: kinematic evidence. J Mot Behav 32:227-240
48. Krigolson O, Heath M (2004) Background visual cues and memory-guided reaching. Hum Mov Sci 23:861-877
49. Lee J, van Donkelaar P (2002) Dorsal and ventral stream contributions to perception-action interactions during pointing. Exp Brain Res 143:440-446
50. Lemay M, Bertram CP, Stelmach GE (2004) Pointing to allocentric and egocentric remembered target. Motor Control 8:16-32
51. Meegan DV, Glazebrook CM, Dhillon VP, Tremblay L, Welsh TN, Elliott D (2004) The Muller-Lyer illusion affects the planning and control of manual aiming movements. Exp Brain Res 155:37-47
52. Merigan WH, Maunsell JH (1993) How parallel are primate visual pathways? Ann Rev Neurosci 16:369-402
53. Meulenbroek RGJ, Rosenbaum DA, Jansen C, Vaughan J, VoMT S (2001) Multijoint grasping movements: simulated and observed effects of object location, object size, and initial aperture. Exp Brain Res 138:219-234
54. Meyer DA, Abrams RA, Kornblum S, Wright CE, Smith JEK (1988) Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychol Rev 95:340-370
55. Milner AD, Goodale MA (1995) The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press, Oxford
56. Previc FH (1998) The neuropsychology of 3-D space. Psychol Bull 124:123-164
57. Rosenbaum DA, Engelbrecht SE, Bushe MM, Loukopoulos LD (1993) Knowledge model for selecting and producing movements. J Mot Behav 25:217-277
58. Saling M, Mescheriakov S, Molokanova E, Stelmach GE, Berger M (1996) Grip reorganization during wrist transport: the influence of an altered aperture. Exp Brain Res 108:493-500
59. Schluter ND, Rushworth MF, Mills KR, Passingham RE (1999) Signal-, set-, and movement-related activity in the human pre-motor cortex. Neuropsychologia 37:233-243
60. Schoumans N, Koenderink JJ, Kappers AM (2000) Change in perceived spatial directions due to context. Percept Psychpophys 62:532-539
61. Timmann D, Stelmach GE, Bloedel JR (1996) Grasping component alterations and limb transport. Exp Brain Res 108:486-492
62. Ungerleider LG, Courtney SM, Haxby JV (1998) A neural system for human visual working memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:883-890
63. Velay JL, Beaubaton D (1986) Influence of visual context on pointing movement accuracy. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive 6:447-456
64. Westwood DA (2004) Planning and control and the illusion of explanation: a reply to Glover. Behav Brain Sci 27:54-55
65. Westwood DA, Goodale MA (2003) Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action. Spat Vis 16:243-254
66. Westwood DA, Chapman CD, Roy EA (2000a) Pantomimed actions may be controlled by the ventral visual stream. Exp Brain Res 130:545-548
67. Westwood DA, Heath M, Roy EA (2000b) The effect of a pictorial illusion on closed-loop and open-loop prehension. Exp Brain Res 134:456-463
68. Westwood DA, McEachern T, Roy EA (2001) Delayed grasping of a Müller-Lyer figure. Exp Brain Res 141:166-173
69. Wing AM, Turton A, Fraser C (1986) Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. J Mot Behav 18:245-260
70. Woodworth RS (1899) The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychol Rev 3:1-114