Independent effects of pictorial displays on perception and action

Vision Research

Volumn 40, Issue 10-12, 2000, Pages 1597-1607

  Haffenden, Angela M ^a   Goodale, Melvyn A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Attention; Illusion; Perception; Visuomotor

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; CONFERENCE PAPER; HUMAN; ILLUSION; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; VISION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

HAND; HUMANS; MOVEMENT; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0033997273     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00056-0     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Aglioti S., DeSouza J.F.X., Goodale M.A. Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology. 5:1995;679-685.
2. Brenner E., Smeets J.B.J. Size illusion influences how we lift but not how we grasp an object. Experimental Brain Research. 111:1996;473-476.
3. Colby C.L. Action-oriented spatial frames in cortex. Neuron. 20:1998;15-24.
4. Coren S. A size contrast illusion without physical size differences. American Journal of Psychology. 84:1971;565-566.
5. Coren S., Enns J. Size contrast as a function of conceptual similarity between test and inducers. Perception & Psychophysics. 54:1993;579-588.
6. Daprati E., Gentilucci M. Grasping an illusion. Neuropsychologia. 35:1997;1577-1582.
7. Franz, V. H., Gegenfurtner, K. R., Bülthoff, H. H., & Fahle, M. (2000). Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychological Science, 11, 20-25.
8. Goodale M.A., Milner A.D. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends In Neuroscience. 15:1992;20-25.
9. Graziano M.S., Gross C.G. Mapping space with neurons. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 3:1994;164-167.
10. Gregory R.L. Eye and brain: the psychology of seeing. 5th ed:1998;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
11. Haffenden A.M., Goodale M.A. The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 10:1998;122-136.
12. Haffenden, A. M., Zavitz, K. J., & Goodale, M. A. 2-D stimuli adjacent to contact points on 3-D targets for grasp are treated as obstacles by the visuomotor system. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (Abstract Book) (in press).
13. Jackson, S. R., & Shaw, A. (2000). The Ponzo illusion affects grip force but not grip aperture scaling during prehension movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1-6.
14. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. The visual brain in action. 1995;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
15. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychology. 9:1971;97-112.
16. Pavani, F., Boscagli, I., Benvenuti, F., Rabuffetti, & Farnè, A. (1999). Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion? Experimental Brain Research, 127, 95-101.
17. Rock I. Perception. 1995;Scientific American Library, New York.
18. Servos, P., Carnahan, H., & Fedwick, J. The visuomotor system resists the horizontal-vertical illusion. Journal of Motor Behavior (in press).
19. Soechting J.F., Flanders M. Moving in three-dimensional space: frames of reference, vectors, and coordinate systems. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 15:1992;167-191.