Adoption of GM technology in livestock production chains: an integrating framework

Trends in Food Science and Technology

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 175-188

  Novoselova, Tatiana A ^a   Meuwissen, Miranda P M ^a   Huirne, Ruud B M ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; GENES; GENETIC ENGINEERING;

FOOD CHAINS; GENETIC MODIFICATION; LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION;

FARMS;

AGRICULTURE; GENES; GENETIC ENGINEERING;

EID: 33947102076     PISSN: 09242244     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2006.12.005     Document Type: Review

References (118)

1. Abadi Ghadim A.K., and Pannell D.J. A conceptual framework of adoption of an agricultural innovation. Agricultural Economics 21 2 (1999) 145-154
2. ABE. (2003). European views on agricultural biotechnology: an overview of public opinion. Agricultural biotechnology in Europe: Promoting an open and informed discussion. Issue Paper 7, April.
3. ACGA. Corn producers survey GMO's and markets. (2001), American Corn Growers Association, Washington, DC
4. Alfnes F. Stated preferences for imported and hormone-treated beef: application of a mixed logit model. European Review of Agricultural Economics 31 1 (2004) 19-37
5. Anonymous. Economic impacts of genetically modified crops on the agri-food sector (2000-2000), European Union, Commission of the European Communities. http://europa.eu.int/comm/agriculture/publi/index_en.htm Accessed 28.04.06
6. Baker G.A., and Burnham T.A. The market for genetically modified foods: consumer characteristics and policy implications. The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 4 4 (2001) 351-360
7. Barham B.L., Foltz J.D., Moon S., and Jackson-Smith D. A comparative analysis of recombinant bovine somatotropin adoption across major U.S. dairy regions. Review of Agricultural Economics 26 1 (2004) 32-44
8. Bennett, B., D'Souza, G., Rosenberger, R., & Smith, D. (2003). Genetically modified fish and seafood: consumer attitudes, marketing strategies, and policy implications. In Seventh international conference on public goods and public policy for agricultural biotechnology, Ravello, Italy, June 29-July 3.
9. Bonneau M., and Laarveld B. Biotechnology in animal nutrition, physiology and health. Livestock Production Science 59 2-3 (1999) 223-241
10. Braun R. People's concerns about biotechnology: some problems and some solutions. Journal of Biotechnology 98 1 (2002) 3-8
11. Bredahl L. Consumers' cognitions with regard to genetically modified foods. Results of a qualitative study in four countries. Appetite 33 3 (1999) 343-360
12. Bredahl L. Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified food - results of a cross-national survey. Journal of Consumer Policy 24 1 (2001) 23-61
13. Brent P., Bittisnich D., Brooke-Taylor S., Galway N., Graf L., Healy M., et al. Regulation of genetically modified foods in Australia and New Zealand. Food Control 14 6 (2003) 409-416
14. Bruhn C.M. Consumer attitudes toward biotechnology: lessons for animal-related applications. Journal of Animal Science 81 E. Suppl. 2 (2003) E196-E200
15. Burton M., Rigby D., Young T., and James S. Consumer attitudes to genetically modified organisms in food in the UK. European Review of Agricultural Economics 28 4 (2001) 479-498
16. Cantley M., Hoban T., and Sasson A. Regulations and consumer attitudes toward biotechnology. Nature Biotechnology 19 March (1999) BV37-BV40
17. Cardello A.V. Consumer concerns and expectations about novel food processing technologies: effects on product liking. Appetite 40 3 (2003) 217-233
18. Carpenter J., and Gianessi L. Herbicide tolerant soybeans: why growers are adopting Roundup Ready varieties. AgBioForum 2 2 (1999) 65-72
19. Carpenter J.E., and Gianessi L.P. Case study in benefits and risks of agricultural biotechnology: roundup ready soybeans. In: Santaniello V., Evenson R.E., and Zilberman D. (Eds). Market development for genetically modified foods (2002), CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK 227-243
20. Carter C.A., and Gruere G.P. International approaches to the labeling of genetically modified foods. Choices 18 2 (2003) 1-4
21. Chauhan S.S., and Proth J.-M. Analysis of a supply chain partnership with revenue sharing. International Journal of Production Economics 97 1 (2005) 45-51
22. Chen, L., & Buttel, F. H. (2000). Dynamics of GMO adoption among Wisconsin farmers. PATS Staff Paper Series. University of Wisconsin-Extension.
23. Chung C., and Pettigrew J.E. Economics of soybean biotechnology in the livestock industry. The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 1 3 (1998) 373-385
24. Churchill G.A., and Iacobucci D. Marketing research: Methodological foundations. 8th ed. (2002), South-Western, Ohio
25. Cook A.J., Kerr G.N., and Moore K. Attitudes and intentions towards purchasing GM food. Journal of Economic Psychology 23 5 (2002) 557-572
26. Darr D.A., and Chern W.S. Estimating adoption of GMO soybeans and maize: a case study of Ohio, USA. In: Santaniello V., Evenson R.E., and Zilberman D. (Eds). Market development for genetically modified foods (2002), CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK 141-159
27. Den Ouden M. Economic modelling of pork production-marketing chains (1996), Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen
28. Desquilbet, M., Lemarie, S., & Levert, F. (2002). Potential adoption of genetically modified rapeseed in France, effects on revenues of farmers and upstream companies: an ex ante evaluation. In Tenth EAAE-congress: Exploring diversity in the European agri-food system, Zaragoza, Spain, August 28-31.
29. D'Souza C., and Quazi A. The dynamics of exploring future market potential of genetically modified foods. Nutrition & Food Science 35 2 (2005) 95-108
30. Enriquez J. Green biotechnology and European competitiveness. Trends in Biotechnology 19 4 (2001) 135-139
31. Eurobarometer. Social values, science and technology. Special Eurobarometer 225/Wave 63.1 - TNS opinion & Social (2005), European Comission, Brussels. http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_225_report_en.pdf Accessed 12.07.05
32. Falk M.C., Chassy B.M., Harlander S.K., Hoban T.J., McGloughlin M.N., and Akhlaghi A.R. Food biotechnology: benefits and concerns. American Society for Nutritional Sciences, Issues and Opinions (2002) 1384-1390
33. FAO. (2004). Biotechnology applications in food processing: can developing countries benefit? In Electronic forum on biotechnology in food and agriculture: Conference 11, 14 June-15 July 2004. Available from http://www.fao.org/biotech/c11doc.htm. Accessed 27.04.06.
34. Fernandez-Cornejo, J., & Caswell, M. (2006). The first decade of genetically engineered crops in the United States. Economic Information Bulletin, Number 11 (April 2006), USDA.
35. In: Fernandez-Cornejo J., McBride W.D., El-Osta H., Heimlich R., Soule M., Klotz-Ingram C., et al. (Eds). Adoption of bioengineered crops. Agricultural economic report No. 810 (2002), USDA, Washington, DC
36. Fisher D.K., Norvell J., Sonka S., and Nelson M.J. Understanding technology adoption through system dynamics modeling: implications for agribusiness management. The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 3 3 (2000) 281-296
37. Flett R., Alpass F., Humphries S., Massey C., Morriss S., and Long N. The technology acceptance model and use of technology in New Zealand dairy farming. Agricultural Systems 80 2 (2004) 199
38. Forano E., and Flint H.J. Genetically modified organisms: consequences for ruminant health and nutrition. Annales de Zootechnie 49 (2000) 255-271
39. Fortin D.R., and Renton M.S. Consumer acceptance of genetically modified foods in New Zealand. British Food Journal 105 1/2 (2003) 42-58
40. Frewer L. 10. Societal issues and public attitudes towards genetically modified foods. Trends in Food Science & Technology 14 5-8 (2003) 319-332
41. Frewer L.J., Howard C., and Aaron J.I. Consumer acceptance of transgenic crops. Pesticide Science 52 4 (1998) 388-393
42. Frewer L.J., Howard C., Hedderley D., and Shepherd R. Consumer attitudes towards different food-processing technologies used in cheese production-the influence of consumer benefit. Food Quality and Preference 8 4 (1997) 271-280
43. Galun, E. (2001). Genetically manipulated plants: ethical and religious issues. In AgBioView Newsletter: Biotech Fearmongers; Jewish Perspective on GM; Syngenta. Available from http://www.agbioworld.org/newsletter_wm/index.php?caseid=archive&;newsid=1020. Accessed 28.04.06.
44. Gaskell G., Allum N., Bauer M., Durant J., Allansdottir A., Bonfadelli H., et al. Biotechnology and the European public. Nature Biotechnology 18 9 (2000) 935-938
45. Gaskell G., Allum N., Wagner W., Kronberger N., Torgersen H., Hampel J., et al. GM foods and the misperception of risk perception. Risk Analysis 24 1 (2004) 185-194
46. Giddings G., Allison G., Brooks D., and Carter A. Transgenic plants as factories for biopharmaceuticals. Nature Biotechnology 18 (2000) 1151-1155
47. Gilissen L.J.W.J., and Nap J.-P. A contribution to the discussion how a broad choice of GMO-free food products can be guaranteed and organized for consumers (2000), Plant Research International, Wageningen 34
48. Golovan S.P., Meidinger R.G., Ajakaiye A., Cottrill M., Wiederkehr M.Z., Barney D.J., et al. Pigs expressing salivary phytase produce low-phosphorus manure. Nature Biotechnology 19 August (2001) 741-745
49. Greene W.H. Econometric analysis. 5th ed. (2003), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
50. Griffith G.R., Vere D.T., and Bootle B.W. An integrated approach to assessing the farm and market level impacts of new technology adoption in Australian lamb production and marketing systems: the case of large, lean lamb. Agricultural Systems 47 2 (1995) 175-198
51. Grunert K.G. Current issues in the understanding of consumer food choice. Trends in Food Science & Technology 13 8 (2002) 275-285
52. Grunert K.G., Bech-Larsen T., Lähteenmäki L., Ueland Ø., and Åström A. Attitudes towards the use of GMOs in food production and their impact on buying intention: the role of positive sensory experience. Agribusiness 20 1 (2004) 95-107
53. Grunert K.G., Lahteenmaki L., Asger Nielsen N., Poulsen J.B., Ueland O., and Astrom A. Consumer perceptions of food products involving genetic modification - results from a qualitative study in four Nordic countries. Food Quality and Preference 12 8 (2001) 527-542
54. Hails R. Bioethics for technology?. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 15 (2004) 250-253
55. Hair J.F. Multivariate data analysis. 6th ed. (2006), Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
56. Hamstra A.M., and Smink C. Consumers and biotechnology in the Netherlands. British Food Journal 98 4/5 (1996) 34-38
57. Hayenga, M., Buhr, B., Skold, K., Johnson, S., & Grundmeier, E. (1989). Economic repercussions of porcine somatotropin on the pork industry. In Biotechnology for control of growth and product quality in swine: Implications and acceptability, Wageningen, the Netherlands, 12-14 December.
58. Henriques I., and Butler L.J. The importance of feed management technologies in the decision to adopt bovine somatotropin: an application to California dairy producers. In: Santaniello V., Evenson R.E., and Zilberman D. (Eds). Market development for genetically modified foods (2002), CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK 91-99
59. Hillyer G. Biotechnology offers U.S. farmers promises and problems. AgBioForum 2 2 (1999) 99-102
60. Hoban T. Consumer acceptance of biotechnology in the United States and Japan. Food Technology 53 5 (1999) 50-53
61. Hobbs J.E., and Plunkett M.D. Genetically modified foods: consumer issues and the role of information asymmetry. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 47 4 (1999) 445-455
62. Hobbs J.E., and Plunkett M.D. GMOs: the economics of consumer food safety issues. Journal of Canadian Agricultural Economics Society 1 (2000) 11-22
63. Hossain F., Onyango B., Schilling B., Hallman W., and Adelaja A. Product attributes, consumer benefits and public approval of genetically modified foods. International Journal of Consumer Studies 27 5 (2003) 353-365
64. Kaye-Blake W., Bicknell K., and Saunders C. Process versus product: which determines consumer demand for genetically modified apples?. Australian Journal of Agricultural & Resource Economics 49 4 (2005) 413-427
65. Koivisto Hursti U.-K., Magnusson M.K., and Algers A. Swedish consumers' opinions about gene technology. British Food Journal 104 11 (2002) 860-872
66. Lahteenmaki L., Grunert K., Ueland O., Astrom A., Arvola A., and Bech-Larsen T. Acceptability of genetically modified cheese presented as real product alternative. Food Quality and Preference 13 7-8 (2002) 523-533
67. Laros F.J.M., and Steenkamp J.-B.E.M. Importance of fear in the case of genetically modified food. Psychology and Marketing 21 11 (2004) 889-908
68. Lockie S., Lawrence G., Lyons K., and Grice J. Factors underlying support or opposition to biotechnology among Australian food consumers and implications for retailer-led food regulation. Food Policy 30 4 (2005) 399-418
69. Loureiro M.L., and Bugbee M. Enhanced GM foods: are consumers ready to pay for the potential benefits of biotechnology?. The Journal of Consumer Affairs 39 1 (2005) 52-70
70. Macer D., and Chen Ng M.A. Changing attitudes to biotechnology in Japan. Nature Biotechnology 18 9 (2000) 945-947
71. Malarkey T. Human health concerns with GM crops. Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research 544 2-3 (2003) 217-221
72. Marra M., Pannell D.J., and Abadi Ghadim A. The economics of risk, uncertainty and learning in the adoption of new agricultural technologies: where are we on the learning curve?. Agricultural Systems 75 2-3 (2003) 215-234
73. Mclnerney, J. (1999). Economic pressure, livestock productivity and animal welfare-seeking the balance. The future developments in farm animal breeding and reproduction and their ethical, legal and consumer implications. Farm Animal Breeding and Society. Utrecht, The Netherlands, November 1999, EC-ELSA project 4th Framework Programme for RTD: 57-66.
74. Mendenhall C.A., and Evenson R.E. Estimates of willingness to pay a premium for non-GM foods: a survey. In: Santaniello V., Evenson R.E., and Zilberman D. (Eds). Market development for genetically modified foods (2002), CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK 55-61
75. Meuwissen M.P.M., and Van der Lans I.A. Trade-offs between consumer concerns: an application for pork supply chains. Acta Agriculturae Scand Section C - Food Economics 2 (2005) 27-34
76. Meuwissen M.P.M., Velthuis A.G.J., Hogeveen H., and Huirne R.B.M. Traceability and certification in meat supply chains. Journal of Agribusiness 21 2 (2003) 167-181
77. Miles S., Ueland Ø., and Frewer L.J. Public attitudes towards genetically-modified food. British Food Journal 107 4 (2005) 246-262
78. Moses V. Agricultural biotechnology and the UK public. Trends in Biotechnology 20 9 (2002) 402-404
79. Munkvold G.P., Hellmich R.L., and Rice L.G. Comparison of fumonisin concentrations in kernels of transgenic Bt maize hybrids and nontransgenic hybrids. Plant Disease 83 2 (1999) 130-138
80. Nadolnyak, D. A., & Sheldon, I. M. (2002). A model of diffusion of genetically modified crop technology in concentrated agricultural processing markets - the case of soybeans. In Tenth EAAE-congress: Exploring diversity in the European agri-food system, Zaragoza, Spain, 28-31 August.
81. Nayga Jr. R.M., Poghosyan A., and Nichols J.P. Will consumers accept irradiated food products?. International Journal of Consumer Studies 28 2 (2004) 178-185
82. Niemi J., and Virolainen M. Ex ante economic assessment of adopting genetically engineered crops in Finland. In: Santaniello V., Evenson R.E., and Zilberman D. (Eds). Market development for genetically modified foods (2002), CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK 159-166
83. Noble M.S., Rodriguez-Zas S., Cook J.B., Bleck G.T., Hurley W.L., and Wheeler M.B. Lactational performance of first-parity transgenic gilts expressing bovine á-lactalbumin in their milk. Journal of Animal Science 80 4 (2002) 1090-1096
84. Noussair C., Robin S., and Ruffieux B. Do consumers really refuse to buy genetically modified food?. The Economic Journal 114 (2004) 102-120
85. O'Connor E., Cowan C., Williams G., O'Connell J., and Boland M.P. Acceptance by Irish consumers of hypothetical GM dairy spread that reduces cholesterol. British Food Journal 107 6 (2005) 361-380
86. O'Connor E., Cowan C., Williams G., O'Connell J., and Boland M.P. Irish consumer acceptance of a hypothetical second-generation GM yogurt product. Food Quality and Preference 17 5 (2006) 400-441
87. Owusu-Asiedu A., Nyachoti C.M., and Marquardt R.R. Response of early-weaned pigs to an enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (K88) challenge when fed diets containing spray-dried porcine plasma or pea protein isolate plus egg yolk antibody, zinc oxide, fumaric acid, or antibiotic. Journal of Animal Science 81 (2003) 1790-1798
88. Paterson L., DeSousa P., Ritchie W., King T., and Wilmut I. Application of reproductive biotechnology in animals: implications and potentials. Application of reproductive cloning. Animal Reproduction Science 79 (2003) 137-143
89. Phipps R.H., and Beever D.E. New technology: issues relating to the use of genetically modified crops. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 9 (2000) 543-561
90. Pursel V.G., Coleman M.E., Wall R.J., Elsasser T.H., Haden M., DeMayo F., et al. Regulatory avian skeletal [alpha]-actin directs expression of insulin-like growth factor-I to skeletal muscle of transgenic pigs. Theriogenology 45 1 (1996) 348
91. Qaim M., and De Janvry A. Genetically modified crops, corporate pricing strategies, and farmers' adoption: the case of Bt cotton in Argentina. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85 4 November (2003) 814-828
92. Regulations (EC) on biotechnology. Available from. http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/food/biotechnology/index_en.htm Accessed 28.04.06
93. Renko N., Brcić-Stipcević V., and Renko S. Attitudes of the Croatian population toward genetically modified food. British Food Journal 105 3 (2003) 148-161
94. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of innovations (2003), Free Press, New York
95. Saek K., Matsumoto K., Kinoshita M., Suzuki I., Tasaka Y., Kano K., et al. Functional expression of a Δ12 fatty acid desaturase gene from spinach in transgenic pigs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101 (2004) 3661-6366
96. Samaranayake P. A conceptual framework for supply chain management: a structural integration. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 10 1 (2005) 47-59
97. Sang H. 6. Genetically modified livestock and poultry and their potential effects on human health and nutrition. Trends in Food Science & Technology 14 5-8 (2003) 253-263
98. Schmidt D. Outlook for consumer acceptance of agricultural biotechnology. Nutrition 16 7-8 (2000) 704-706
99. Scholderer J., and Frewer L.J. The biotechnology communication paradox: experimental evidence and the need for a new strategy. Journal of Consumer Policy 26 2 (2003) 125-157
100. Scully J. Genetic engineering and perceived levels of risk. British Food Journal 105 1/2 (2003) 59-77
101. Sondergaard H.A., Grunert K.G., and Scholderer J. Consumer attitudes to enzymes in food production. Trends in Food Science & Technology 16 10 (2005) 466-474
102. Spetsidis N.M., and Schamel G. A consumer-based approach towards new product development through biotechnology in the agro-food sector. In: Santaniello V., Evenson R.E., and Zilberman D. (Eds). Market development for genetically modified foods (2002), CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK 63-79
103. Steenkamp J.-B.E.M. Conceptual model of the quality perception process. Journal of Business Research 21 (1990) 309-333
104. Streatfield S.J. Plant-based vaccines for animal health. Scientific and Technical Review: OIE 24 1 (2005) 189-199
105. Streatfield S.J., Jilka J.M., Hood E.E., Turner D.D., Bailey M.R., Mayor J.M., et al. Plant-based vaccines: unique advantages. Vaccine 19 17-19 (2001) 2742
106. Tauer L.W. The impact of bovine somatotropin on farm profits. In: Santaniello V., Evenson R.E., and Zilberman D. (Eds). Market development for genetically modified foods (2002), CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK 81-90
107. Traxler G., and Falck-Zepeda J. The distribution of benefits from the introduction of transgenic cotton varieties. AgBioForum 2 2 (1999) 94-98
108. Townsend E., and Campbell S. Psychological determinants of willingness to taste and purchase genetically modified food. Risk Analysis 24 5 (2004) 1385-1393
109. Townsend E., Clarke D.D., and Travis B. Effects of context and feelings on perceptions of genetically modified food. Risk Analysis 24 5 (2004) 1369-1384
110. Uzogara S.G. The impact of genetic modification of human foods in the 21st century: a review. Biotechnology Advances 18 3 (2000) 179-206
111. Valeeva N.I., Meuwissen M.P.M., and Huirne R.B.M. Economic assessment of food safety in the dairy chain. Abstracts of the 1st Joint Annual Meeting of the American Society of Animal Science and the American Dairy Science Association with Mexican Association of Animal Production, Phoenix, Arizona, 22-26 June 2003. Journal of Animal Science 81 Suppl. 1 (2003) 132
112. Van der Gaag M.A., Saatkamp H.W., Backus G.B.C., van Beek P., and Huirne R.B.M. Cost-effectiveness of controlling Salmonella in the pork chain. Food Control 15 3 (2004) 173
113. Verhoog H. Naturalness and the genetic modification of animals. Trends in Biotechnology 21 7 (2003) 294-297
114. Vilella-Vila M., Costa-Font J., and Mossialos E. Consumer involvement and acceptance of biotechnology in the European Union: a specific focus on Spain and the UK. International Journal of Consumer Studies 29 2 (2005) 108-118
115. Visscher P., Pong-Wong R., Whittemore C., and Haley C. Impact of biotechnology on (cross)breeding programmes in pigs. Livestock Production Science 65 1-2 (2000) 57-70
116. Wilcock A., Pun M., Khanona J., and Aung M. Consumer attitudes, knowledge and behaviour: a review of food safety issues. Trends in Food Science & Technology 15 2 (2004) 56
117. Winston W.L. Operations research: Applications and algorithms. 4th ed. (2003), Duxbury Press, Belmont
118. Zhang Z.B., Kornegay E.T., Radcliffe J.S., Wilson J.H., and Veit H.P. Comparison of phytase from genetically engineered Aspergillus and canola in weanling pig diets. Journal of Animal Science 78 (2000) 2868-2878