Consumer attitudes to enzymes in food production

Trends in Food Science and Technology

Volumn 16, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 466-474

  Søndergaard, Helle Alsted ^a   Grunert, Klaus G ^a   Scholderer, Joachim ^a  

^a AARHUS SCHOOL OF BUSINESS   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COSTS; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FOOD PRODUCTS; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

CONSUMER ATTITUDES; ENZYME PRODUCTION; FOOD PRODUCTION; SOCIO-POLITICAL ATTITUDES;

ENZYMES;

EID: 26044452345     PISSN: 09242244     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2005.06.003     Document Type: Note

References (27)

1. S.C. Beckmann, and S. Brokmose Danske forbrugere og økologiske fødevarer 2001 Handelshøjskolens Forlag København
2. O. Borre Public opinion on gene technology in Denmark 1987-1989 Biotech Forum Europe 7 6 1990 471 477
3. L. Bredahl Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified foods: Results of a cross-national survey Journal of Consumer Policy 24 2001 23 61
4. J.R. Eiser, N.S. Coulson, and C. Eiser Adolescents' perceptions of the costs and benefits of food additives and their presence in different foods Journal of Risk research 5 2 2002 167 176
5. European Commission Eurobarometer 46.1: The Europeans and modern biotechnology 1997 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities Luxembourg
6. European Commission Eurobarometer 55.2: Europeans and modern technology 2002 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities Luxembourg
7. L.J. Frewer, C. Howard, and R. Shepherd Public concerns about general and specific applications of genetic engineering: Risk, benefit and ethics Science, Technology and Human Values 22 1997 98 124
8. L.J. Frewer, R. Shepherd, and P. Sparks Biotechnology and food production: Knowledge and perceived risk British Food Journal 96 1994 26 32
9. G. Gaskell, N. Allum, and S. Stares Eurobarometer 58.0: Europeans and biotechnology in 2002 2003 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities Luxembourg
10. P.E. Green, and V. Srinivasan Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice Journal of Marketing 1990 3 19 (October)
11. J.F. Hair, R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham, and W.C. Black Multivariate data analysis 5th ed. 1998 Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice Hall
12. A.M. Hamstra Biotechnology in foodstuffs. Towards a model of consumer acceptance 1991 The SWOKA Institute The Hague
13. A. Hamstra Consumer acceptance of model for food biotechnology - final report 1995 The Hague The SWOKA Institute
14. T. Hoban, E. Woodrum, and R. Czaja Public opposition to genetic engineering Rural Sociology 57 1992 476 493
15. K. Hursti, and M.K. Magnusson Consumer perceptions of genetically modified and organic foods. What kind of knowledge matters? Appetite 41 2003 204 209
16. J.J. Louviere Conjoint analysis R.E. Bagozzi Advanced methods of marketing research 1994 Blackwell Cambridge
17. C.P. Nielsen, and K. Andersen Golden rice and the looming GMO trade debate: Implication for the poor 2003 University of Adelaide Adelaide
18. J.P. Peter, J.C. Olson, and K.G. Grunert Consumer behaviour and marketing strategy - European edition 1999 McGraw-Hill Maidenhead
19. Poppe, C., & Kjaernes, U. (2003). Trust in Food in Europe - A Comparative Analysis. National Institute for Consumer Research, Olso. Professional report no. 5-2003.
20. J. Scholderer, L. Bredahl, and L. Frewer Ill-founded models of consumer choice in communication about food biotechnology F. van Raaij Marketing communications in the new millennium: New media and new approaches 2000 Erasmus University Rotterdam 129 152
21. J. Scholderer, and L. Frewer The biotechnology communication paradox: Experimental evidence and the need for a new strategy Journal of Consumer Policy 26 2003 125 157
22. M. Siegrist Belief in gene technology: The influence of environmental attitudes and gender Personality and Individual Differences 24 1998 861 866
23. M. Siegrist A causal model explaining the perception and acceptance of genetic engineering Journal of Applied Social Psychology 29 1999 2093 2106
24. M. Siegrist The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology Risk Analysis 20 2000 195 204
25. P. Sparks, and R. Shepherd Gene technology, food production, and public opinion: A UK study Agriculture and Human Values 11 1 1994 19 28
26. P. Sparks, R. Shepherd, and L.J. Frewer Assessing and structuring attitudes towards the use of gene technology in food production: The role of perceived ethical obligation Journal of Basic and Applied Social Psychology 16 1995 267 285
27. J.-B.E.M. Steenkamp, and H. Baumgartner Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research Journal of Consumer Research 25 1998 78 90